PC 86-132,~.rxA,,
( ,
K1:SULUTIUN NU. PC86-13'L
~_"~
A KG50I.UTION OF T(~li: ANAH[.Irl CTTY i'LANNiNG C;Or1r1ISSiUN
THAT 1'1:TZTIUN I~0(t VAKLANC~E N0. 3Sbl BG i)I:NI~ll
WHLREAS, the Anahei.m Cily I'lanning Commission di.d rece~ve a verif~ed
Pet.it:loo .Eor. Var:tance from JB[ZkY. '1'l~ML'LL:, INC. , 505 Cj.~.y Parkway lJest,
Yenthouse Suite, Orange, Ca1.i.tornia 92668, owrier, ~nd KARL SATOR QR FRALVK
SATUR, 315U Last La Pa.l.ma Avenue, Unit A, Anah~im, Ga.li..forn.ta 92$U6, agent for
:ertai.:~ rea:l property sttuated in *_he City of Anat-eim, County of Orange, StaLe
oi Ca.Lil:ornia aESCr:Lbed as:
~AktCLLS 1 ANll '?, l~5 Yr:R [~tAP .FiLEll IN IiUOK 35, PAGf; li Ol~ 1'ARC~I~
Mt1Y5 tIV 'T'H1; Ol'I'ICL' !1F '.C:'.,? CUUIdTY Rk:COhllLR OF SA:CD CUIIN:tY.
bJHi"sIZIsAS, Lhe CiLy .Yl;inning Cum~u:Cssir„~ ~ii.d I:old a publtc he:~ring aC
the (:ivic Ccnter :.n the CiC.y of Anahei.-n u-z May 'L8, 19$6, at 1:30 p.m., nctzc~~
o.C said public hearin~; having heen cluly ~;:~ven as requ.tred by law and i.n
accordacir.e w.itli Li~e provistons of khe Anaheini Municipal Code, Chap~er 1$.03,
to iiear ~nd consi.der ev2;lence lor Lir~1 a~ai.rist sa.id pri~posed vuria~~ce and L•o
itivestigace and make f~.nding~ and recom[nendatio~ts 3.n connect.ton therewith; and
Wtil.l~l'st1S, satd Cun-mission, afLer u~^ i.nspecti.on, lnvesti~;aCiou and
study made by i lseJ.f and i.n :its bet~alL, and .,rt~r due consider~~t.ton oE all
evidence and r.eports ~Ltered at sai.d he;irl.ng, does find and deterwine the
following ~acr.s:
1. 'lhar the pet:t.tf.one.r ~~ropo:;e:~ watvers ot Lhe .f.ollowJ.nt; to espand
an exi;;t.tng :Cndustri.al buil~ti.ng:
(a) S~C'tTOt1 18.61.063.011 - rli.n;tmuin structural setback and ~ard
re uirements. (50-foot w:L~le building
satbar.:k :includiTig a n~inimum 10-foot wide
~.anrl~,caped ar~~ adjacent ~o La Palma Avenue
requl.red; 15-Foot w~tde building selback with
a iu.inimum 2-foot w.i.de laudacaped are~t
adjacent to La Pa2ma Auenue proposed}
(b) SL'~'TIUNS 1ti,0~i.U5~).0212, - hlin~.munt number of ~.,arkinb ~aces.
~ 18.U6.05U.C~3~, (111 s aces re uired• 9f3 s 3ces
~___1___._ ~ , P~ propose~)
18.06.U8U AN11 "
18.6I.UGb.U5C1~
2. 'l'hat the abcve-iuentioned waiver.s a.re hereby deni.ed on the basi.s
that Gh~~r~ are no spec::[al circumst.anc~s apl~.L~c.able tu tt~e Nfuperty sucti us
size, ,~nape, lopobr~phy, locatl.on und surrouiid.i.nbs which do not apply to oCt~ier.
Ld~ntical.ly zoct~ct propecLy i.n thF s<:cue vi.cinity; and Chxc strice app7.i.catian
of the 'Loni.nb C:nde dacs 110r ciepr:tve the proC.erty of privil~ges enjoyed by
UC11Cr• prupert~.es :t.n the ider.C.tcal zone aud classi.f ic.aCton ~.n the v:tc.tni ty; and
tltat an undesirable precedent in Y.he Canyon lndu~trial Area r.oulcl be set ~if
this trere appruved,
3. 'Phat tt-ere are no exc.Npttonal. or exLraord:in;~ry circumstanc~~ ~r
condLtiRns apnlic.uble to Clie p,operty icvo7.ved or ~o r.he :lntended use of Che
prar~Nrty l•h~t do not apE~ly genera:l.ly Co khe nraperCy or class oF ur~e tn tt-e
eame vicj.n:tty and zor~e.
U87.Sr ~C86-:132
,~,<
~;~
,,i
d
,.ti.
~
~ ~y;~
1
~
i
,~~ ~
~
,
4. That the requeste;d variunr.e is not ner_ess~-r,y .cor the prese.rvati.c,n
and en~oyment oF a subsl-~intLal ~,roper~y ri.ght possessed by aL-her pruperey in
the same v:tc~.nity and zone, and denied to the property ~n que~tiun.
5, Tliat ~tie requestc:d v;~r:Lance will be materiaily detrimental to Che
public welFare or :i.ri iuri ous t.o Che proper. ty ar lmprovemeat~ ln such ~~ic.iniCy
,~
~nd zone i.n which the property is 1oca~ed.
~i
6. That ~ne peraon indi.caced h~s pr~:sence at said public hearing in
oppus.ttion; and that nq corresuo~ldence wa~ r~ceivec~ iti op~~os~LCi.on t~ sub~ect
pet:trion.
LNVIRONhlBid'LAL tMPe1CL' FIhUING: That the Anaheim Ci.ty Planntng
;; Commtsslon h~~s rev.Lewed l-.he pruposal lo exP~ind an existin~; industrlal build:Cng
;^ ,~:tCh wai.vers of a-inimum structural setback and yarcl requiremantr~ and ~nini.mum
?' number of. parking rpaces on an :Lrregu:Larly-shaped parr.c~l of :Land consisti.ng ~~
~; approYi.mztely 2.4 ar..res locaeed wesLerly of the 6011thWr?5L' carner of La Palma
Avenue and VHn Buren S~reet, and tiurther descr~.bE.d as 3947. -• 3969 ~;ast 1.3
Pa!_ma Avenu~:; and does h4reby ~pprove ~he Negative U~~clr~rati.on upon the
i: fir.da.ng Lhat i.t has coiisidered tl~e Ne~ative Decla~ation together wi.th 3ny
comments received dur~ng the publ~.c revi.ew process and EurLhe. finding on the
~i basis of the initial study ancl clil`J comrnents recei.ved thak there is no
! su'~stanl~.tal evi.dence LhaC the pr.oject wi.ll have a si~nifirant efxect on tlze
~•uv~.ronment.
NUW, THi;ltt:i'UKE, l3E I.'r Lt~3SUL~l;ll Lh~~t th~~ An~ihe:im Ctly Planning
~,ommiss.i.on doc~r, her~by deny ~ub ier.L l~eC:i.tt .n for ~ar.i.ancP on rhe basis oF r.he
aloreGnent.toncd fi.nd9.ngs.
'i'HL: FURliGU:CN~ itESOLU'i.lUN is r.,i.gn~:d and approved by me tt,:i.s 'LBtti d~ty
ot rl~y, .198G.
~ ~ ~_
;~~ ~' ~ .~ ~~d~.L..~_
CIIAI kWUMAN , ANAki)S I P G T ''LAIVN L u C4MMIS:i It)N ~
ATT~ ST :
` ..r/~ '
~ • ,1
~Y ~~ - •h~! L~~ ~'~,.a~-tz..
' ' 5L:CI~;l~AI~e~t1LL:1 CI';'Y Z'LAiVN.[~!(~ C()MI~lI..5SIC~N
r, :'
' 5TF~P1~ OF CALIk'Ul2NIr1 '} '
~
F" CUUN'.CY U1 OCi~~NG~ ) s:,. ,,
` ? CTT1 OF ANtiHL'IM ) '.'~,
;
~
'` t, 1'.dith I.. Harris, Secre~ar.y ot the AR1Ilk;~lI1 City Plannini;
•~
Comm.tss:tun, do her~by cert:tiy rhat ttie Por•egoin~ re;sulutioci was pasoe.d ari~l '~
~
adopted at ~ meeti.n}; of ttie Ar.~iheim City F.lannir~~; Comniission he:l.d on Ttay 'L3, '~
~
~' ~ by thc ~olJ.owing vote uf the nit;mbers ther~~f:
~)8G
1 `~
.,,
,
.
AYES: COMM75STONl:KS: IiUUAS, F[tY, HH:FtIl5'f, LA CLAilti:, Le1WTCKI, MC BURN~,Y, r`;
MESSG
NOES : ~U`iMISStONl~:tS : NUNE
-,- AKSEN'J:: C~Mr"..CSSIO~IL1tS: NOL~~;
`~
~ IN WITNL:SS W!1BRk.UF, I tiave h~: ~ unto s~t my hand this ZStti ciuy of May,
,
,
;d I986. ~ ~ -
~ ~ ~
~:.
SF'Clt~.'lA Y, ANAkiLIM CITY PLNNNiNG CGMMIS:iIUN ,~~
; -Z- PC86-"132 ~';'
t' ' ~
~a
~ 'r
;r
s~~i ~:t