PC 86-185~"",,~,- ,
RESQL~UTION N0. PCt36-lgg
A RESOLU:IUN OF' '.PHE ANAHEIM CI`CY YLAP7NItJU COMMISSION
THA'!' PI:TITION POK VARIANCE t~70. 3576 BE CRANTCU
WEICRI;AS, L•l~e Anali~i_m Cit.y Pltinnin~ Colnmission did .recei,ve a v~riEied
I~.Fitian .£~r Vartanr.e from MARY E. fiORSELY, 2103 West Orange Aven~ae~ Anahe.im,
Cali~ornia 92804, owr,er and PHILL7P ~• CAMARATn, 54A2 Yale Avenue,
Weskrn.ins~er, Cal.ifornia 92b83, lgent Eor rerhain reai pr.operky sikuak~d in l:he
Ci,ty of Rnahei.m, County ~f Ocan7e, St.ate o£ Cal.if.ornia c]escribed as:
LOT 27 OF ~RAC`P NO. 2369, AS PER MAP 12ECORUED IN E300K 74, PA.GES 1 TU
6 INCLUSlVE OF MTSCELf,ANEOUS MAPS, Z~ THE OFFICE UF TEIE CGUNTY
ltLCORDGR OF SAIll COUy'l'X.
WHLRLAS, the Cii:y Plarining Commissio,~ did t~oJ.d a public heari~ig ak
khe Civi:: Cenr_er. in the City ~f. Ar-ahpim on Ju1y '7, 1986, al. 1;30 p.m., nokice
oE' sa.'td oub7.ic t~earinq having been duly yiven as required by law and in
accordanc~ wi~h the provisior.s oF fhe A~laheim Municipal Code, Chapker. 18.03,
Y.c heat and consider ~vidence Eor and ~ yain~~: ;;aid ~ropo~ed var. iance and to
int~?stigake and make findings and recornmenciakiens in connec~ior~ therewikhJ and
SVEiE;RrA5, said Commission, a[l-.er. due inspection, invesk:;ation and
skudy made t~y itself and in its uehalf., ~nd aF~er due consideration of all
evidence and r~~ports ofFered a~ said hea:ing, does Einci and derermine khe
Eollowiny Facts:
1. That t:he pe~irioner ~raposes waivecs oE kha followiny t:o retain
an e;cisti.ny addition ko a si.nglc-family cesi~e~~ce:
f a) 18.26.OG2_020 - M~aximum ].ok cave:aq~~
~ (408 ~ermil•ked; 42~b proposeci)
(b) 18.26.U52~0?' Minimum reac yar.d se~back anc? area.
18.26.UG3.(! 0-toot szGpack with 35~ coverage of. rear. ard
.~rea perrr~ir.~ed; 5•-fook setbacr with ~~$
covera~e og cear___ya;a area pr~posed}
2. 'Phat khe ~bove-nenG.ioned wai.vers are hereby grantEd on the basis
khat L•here are ~pecial circums~ances ~1pp1iCC~b1e t~~ the ~roperty suc13 as a~.ze,
shape, topagraphy, locarion ~~~lu surrour-dinys which do not ~~~pll ko oGher
iJenfically zoned property in ~he same vicin.it:y; and thak skricu appli~a~ion
of the 'Loning Code deptives the pro~,erty oF privi.leyes enjoyed by okher
proE~ex~ies in khe iden~ica.l zone and classi~icakion .in t.he vlcini.~y.
9. That th~re are E?XC@pt:lOtlcil or exkr.aor.dinaLy rircurnstances or
r,ondirions applic~ble ro the ~coperty involved or to kh~ intended use <~E the
pruNeri:y kha~ dc not app:ly gener.ally ro r.he propPtty or. c1.as~ o.f use :,n khe
same vicinity ana rone.
4. That ~he cequest:ed ~ariance is necessary foc rhe pr~:,ervation anc]
enjcymPnt oE a sub~t:antial ~cuperty righr. pog~e~sed by uther propecky in t.hP
sa~ne vicinity and a.one, and c3enied Y.o khe pr~~pcrkl in question.
0~73r E+C96-185
~~_
: ;~
~ , ,.,M ,,,»..,, ~ ~
5. Thai: t:he reques~ed v~riance wi11 nok be mat.Prial'ly darrimen~al to
~he ~u~lic welfart or injuriou~ i:o t:he properky or im~rovemwnks in such
vicir~it~![ and zone in which the properky is :.oc:aked.
6. T.hat•. nc one indicared Fheir presence ak said pu~'lic heariny in
opposikion; and tha~ n~ correspondence was received in opposikion to subjeck
petition.
CNVIRONMLNTAL 7MPACT ~'.iNDIP7G; The Planning Uirer..kor or his
aui.l~urized r.eoresentative ha~ dekermined khat h.he proposed ptoject Ealls
wif.hin ttie definikion o.f Categorical F.xemph.ions, Class 5, as defi.ried in khe
Stal:e EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, cake~orically eMempk f.rom khe
requiremenk ro pre~are an LIR.
DIUW, `~EILRGE'URE, BE I`t~ RESOU'v'I,D ~hak l.he Anat~eim CiGy Planning
Cornmis~ion does hereby grant subject pekition For Variance, upon khe f411owiag
conditions which are hereby f.ound ~o be a nec:pssary orerequisire to khe
proposed use of khe subject proPerty in ocder to preserve the safeky and
qeneral welfare ot: the Cikizens ~E the Ciky oE Ariaheim:
l. ~rhat suk:jec~ pro~ert.,y shal.l be develaped subskankially in accozdance
with ~lans and specifir,akions on file wi~h hhe City of Anahei,m mark~d
Exh.ibit No:;. 'l, 2 and 3.
2. That a hui.ldiny perrnzt shu:Ll be obt:ained showin~ complian~e with al'1
ap~l.icabJ.e bui.ld.ing, eleckrical and plumbinc~ codes.
3. 'Chac priox to Eina.l t~uilding and zoning inspeckions, Condition No. 1,
above-inenGioned, shall be cotnpl.ie~9 with.
DL :[T FURTHER REeiQL~'ED rhat the 1lnaheim Ciky Planning Commission does
hereby £ind and determine i:Yi~~k adoptian of Ghis Resolut3.on .is expresslY
predica~ed upon applicank's com~liance w±~h each and a11 of khe condirions
hereinabove set L•or.th. ShoULd any such condikion, or any paxr t.hereoE, be
declar.ed inva7id or unenf.o::ceable by khe Eina1 `•sgment o£ any cour.t Q~
compekenk. jurisdiction, then this Reso.lut;fon, and any ap~rov~als her.ein
cantainzd~ shall be deemed nUl.l and void.
THE I'OREGOING ~2ESOLU'PLUN is signea an~~ approvtd by me this 7th day pr
Ju1y, 7.986.
..~.~vL~ C ~° ~, '
CHAIRMAN, ANAfik~ CITY PLANf~ G CO:dMISSIQN
AT'PEST:
~~~ ~ .
SECR~TANY, ANAHCI61 CIT ~ pl,ANN ING COMMISSION
-~-~
r
-2- ~C36-18: ~~
E
.~r.nµf,~,,,...,,....~, .. ., , . . .. . ., . , . , . . . . . . .. . . . ,. ..~ ........ _!'1'
~,~{:'}'~ ; ..
A ~~
F~.~,. ~ ' ~ .. .. ...: ... ...r.~.i~ . ,. . ~
v:~~~ w}Yr'''^~c"~ n n ~ . . ~ . , . . . , ~ . ._, ~. ; .
.~(~111~~' if~,y.l ~ rnr.~ ta,hrr,lii~~ j~I
. ~ . . . ~ ~ ~
,i.', , -
r~ ~ .
{
,r.; ..y M~
' ~ S'PATE Or CALIFORNIA )
CUUN~Y QF ORANGE ) SS~
j CI7.'Y OF ApIAHEIM )
Commissi.
ac~
~
d I, Edikh L.
on, do hereby Harris, Secrel:ar
cerkif ~ y°E Nhe pnaheim Cit
ar rhe F
x Plannin
~,; op
e
19~6, by al•, a~neeking o
}:he fo?l g
~regoing rhsolu~ion was
F i:hp nahe
d
planning Ca
i
a
S
^'~ owing mm
~
ssion he,ld ~1
vote oF the members
JUly
L-here~~ ;
F-y AYES;
N~~~: CpMM7SSI0[~EftS;
COMNISSIUNERS:
BOUAS, LA CLA:iRE, LA6VICKI, MC F3URNEY, ~`9ESS~
P1Q~E
ABSEN~': COMMISSIUNEKS; FKy~ HERI3S7.~
,~ 198G. TN WITtdLSS WFIF REOFy I have hereuntc~ se~ my hand khi
~
~ s 7kh da
Y oF July,
~
~ ~ ~
.
5ECRl;~~i~y~ ANAHLIM CI'
~Y p -
A.~~IING Cn~~IMISSI~N
~
PC86--185
r ~~I
~ , '~~.. . . ~`~i ~,~ _~.~,, ....