PC 86-195, .r~
RESOi,UTION N0. PCf36-195
A RESOLUTION OE THE AHAHETDI CITY PLANNING COMMISfiION
TkIAT PE'PITIUN FOR VARIANCE N0. 3~83 DE GRANTED
WtiEK~AS, the Anaheim CiL-y Planning C~n~.miss;ion did receive a verifzed
~ Petition fc~r Variance [rom MICfIAEL POLING Ahll CECELE l~OLII~G~ 1827 Bud.lony
r~,; Circ.le, Anaheim, C~li`cznia 92$07, owners and CASEY JURADO - CALIFURNIA
R~MODEGI:I~, 2021 White Stac, #C, Anat~eim, California 92806, ager.t Eor certain
real property situated in th~~ City of Anaheim, County of Oz~,nge, State o£
California described as:
C,0`P 32 UF TRAC7' Nn. G68f3, AS PGR !\ MP.P RECORU~U IN BOOK ?.6~3, PAGES 28
AtdD 29 UF MISCEI,LA[dFOUS ~lAPS, 7I3 T(•IL•; OEFIC:E 0~ TFIE: COUNTY RE;CORDGR OE
SF~ID COUIJ'PX.
WNERLAS, the City Pla;ining Canmission did hold a public hearing at
l•h~ Civic: Center in khe Citx of An~heim on ,7uly ~~, 1986, at 1:30 p.m., notice
oE said pub?ic hcaring having been duly yiven as required by law and in
accordance with ~he pr~t~isi~n.~ oE che Anaheim Municipal Cod~, Chapter 18.03,
L•o hear and consider evidence £or and against said proposed variance ~nd to
inve~tigate and make findings and rQcommendul•ions i[- conn~ckion tP-ecewitn; ana
WHBRCAS, said Com~nis~ion, lfter due ins~ection, investigation and
st~.tdy made by itselF and in its bel~alf•, anci ~.f:ter due considetation o£ all
evidence and reports ofLered at sai,d l~~aring, does Eind anrS cletermin~ the
f:ollowxng facts:
].. That rhe petitinner pr~~pos~s waiver uf the Fo?.l.owing to
construct a room addir.iun to a single-•family residenc~~:
SE;CTTON 1t3.27.062.020 -• Maximum lo~ coveca e.
~ (35~, ~~e~:rnitted; 398 pr~~pos~d)
2. That the aboae-meritioned waivers aYe hereby granted on the
basis that there are s~oec:ial circumstances «pplica~le to the pro~erty SUCh as
~ize, shape, topography, location and surrnundings which do not ~tp~ly to othec
identi.ca).ly zoned ~ropex::y in the same vicini.ty; and that strict applicatiun
o~ the 'Loning Cocie deprives the pr~p~rty of pr~vilege~ enjoyed by other
properties .in the i.dentical zo-i~ and clzssiEicati~n in the vir.inity.
3. `PE~at l:h~re are exce~~ional ur extraordi.nary circumstancas or
conditions applicable to the prop~rL.y in~:ol.ved or k~ the ~~ntended use of the
properl•y that do not apply ye;ierally to the ~ro~er.hy or class of i.~se in the
~ame vi.cinity an~l zone.
4. That the reguested variance is n~cesa~~cy tor the preser.vation
and en~oy~ii~r.t uF a substar~tial propert;y right possessed by ot~zer pr.opert.y i~~
~h~ same vici.ni:ty and zone, and denied to rhe proparty in que:~lion.
5. Thak tY:~ requestec] varzance wi]..1 not be materially detrimanta.l
t~ the public welEare or ir~jurious t~ the ~rr~ptc;ty or im~~r~vements in sucn
vicinity and 2one in which tne property is locGLed.
, 0883r Q~86-.195
t
,~
s,',
F,~ ;
' 6. That no one indicated their presence at said puhlic heariny in
o~+pa~it~i.on~ an~ that no corres~ondence was r.ece:ived i.n oppo~it.ion to subject
petit~on.
FNVIRONMGNTAL IMPAC`P FINllING: The ~lanning Director or his
authorized representative has determined that ~he pcoposed projec~ falZs
within the definition ~f G~tegorical Exemptions, Class 5, as defined in the
,,,, State GIR Guidelines and is, ~herefore, categori~ally ex~mpt from the
~'_ requirement ~.a prepare an EIR.
NCW, 'PE1FR~:FOR~, BE IT RF'SOLVFO tt~at thc Anahei-n CiLy Planr.ing
Commission c]o~s hereby grarit subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
condi'.:ions which are hereby [ourid to be a necesaary prerequisit,e to ~he
~ropased us~ of. the subject proper~y ir~ order to preservE the saEety and
general we].Pare u~ l•he Ci~ize.ns oE the City ot Anahein~:
1. .~hat subject p~operty sl:all be developed subs':antially in accordance
w:.t-~ plans and specifications on file with the .^ity af Ariaheim
marked Exhibii: No. 1.
r:
BE IT FUR`1'HEk RGSOLV~D ~hat the Anaheim City P.lanninc~ Commission
does hereby find and dst~rmine ~i~at acloption of this Resolu,tion is expressly
predicated upon appliranL-=s compJ.iance witk~ each and a].1 oE the cunditians
herEinabove ~e~ forth. Should any suc:~ cond:;tion~ or any part ~hereaP, be
declared invalid or unenfor.ceable by t:~c final judyment oE any court of
cr~mpetent jurisdictior:, then this R~solutian~ and any approvals herein
contained, si~all t;e deemNd null and void.
THI; I'OR~'GUT~ = RESOL,U'TION is siy~~ed and apprcvad by ~rte tnis 21th day
uf ~1uly, ].986.
1--=~~~ _, ~%' ~~ vi ~
,_.,,G,~Yf~-~.~,_ '''~ !~ ~ .r,. ~.-
CH,'1:~RMAN, ANAHF. M CITY PLA I~MMISStON
~
AT`.~EST:
c.p. . ~ „
- ,~`~,~_~-~ ~ :~~~,..~.,~... ..
SE~CRETAf~X, ANAHEIt4 C.I'rY PLAIJN:[NG COMMISSION
STATG 0~ CALT['URNIA )
COUN'PY OF ORANGE ) ss.
':ITY UF ANAHEIM )
~` I, Cdith L. Eiarris, Secret~cy Q~ the Anaheim Ci.ty Planning
~or„missi on, do h~reby cer.tify tha~ thc foregaing resolutio~i was passed and
~ a~iopted at a meeting of th~ Fnaheim City L~lanning Commissian nel.d ~n .Tuly 21,
1986, by the fol~low'.ng vote of t!-~e members thereof:
~ AYES: GUMMTSSION~;RS: DOU,~S~ FRY, HERBST~ LA L'GAI12E, LAWICK:[~ MC BURNEY,
~ ~ h1ESSE
NUES: CUMMISST()N~;kS: NON~
~. :
ABSENT.:
COMMISSI~N~ftS:
N~N13
;,; IN bVI'I~N~;SS WHEREOr, I have her.eunt~ seL- my tiarid t:his 21th day o~
',~ July, 19 86. /
~_ ~. ~ f,
, .~'
,~~ ~Le._4 ~~ ~~: ~~E~z,t~~.~
:',~ SECRJ:TAk , ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNING COMM'iSSION
;'; ~2° FC86-195
0
:;,,a;
:;~;
'~;:
:~^
;;;,