PC 86-216x"^*
r~cso~,u~r~o~ PCF3(i-2].6
~ RESOLL"1'ION OF Z'HL ANAliEIM CI`PY PLANNING COPiMISSIUN
`PtiA`i` PETIT]'ON FOR VARIANC:E N0. 35$4 L~E dEN'iED
, WHEREAS, the Anaheim City planriing Commission did r.eceive a ver.iEied
: PeEili~n f.or Var~~.anr,e frcni SHJH-Y~,N CHIANG (ST.LVE) AND JUT-;dA (JULIL) CHIANG~
t:,: P. 0. F3ox 3428, ~!'ust;in, Califor.~ia 92b81, owners of: certain real proper.ty
~~.;
situated in the City oF. Anaheim, CounL•y of pranq~, gta~a of Ca].ifornia
descr.ib~d as:
LOT 1~1 Q~~ SOU~'H STREET TRACT, AS ~ER MAP RECORDEU IN BOOK 8 PaGE
$9 U~' MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN 'PHE Ur^k ICE Or i'HE CUUAI'PY R1 COi2UER
Ql SAID OF2AIVGE COUNTY.
WfiEREAS, i.hA Ci ty Plarinina Commission di ci hold a pub] ic hearinq at
the Civic Ct~nter. in thH City oE ;~nah~im an ,Tu.iy '1,1., 19~l6, at 1:3U p.tn., notiice
oE sa.i.d pubZi~ h~arinq havinq b~?n du3y qivQn as r~equired by xaw and i.n
acr.ur.dance with rh~ pr.ovisions oE the Anat~eim hlunicipal Cu4e, (;hapter. 18,p3~
~~ h~ar and consider eviclence for anca aqai.nst said ~~roposed vari~nr.e and to
investigat~~ and mahe f.inqzngs and recomme~dations in conrection therAwith;
said ~ublic hearing h,~viny b~~~n conkirw?d +:o the planninq Com~ni.ssi.on mee~inq
of. A~~guUk ].8, ).~i~G; ancl
~n'H~R1.I~S, said Co~nmission, 4~ter dup :~nspecti.on, invcstigation and
study made by it.self. anc] in its behaif., and af.ter due ~~n~zdeca"ion o£ aJ..l
evidence and re~,ort.s of.f.Pred ah sai.d heari.nq, doPs f.ind and datermine i.he
t'aliowing r.acLs;
~. That -.-ha ppti.tion~~r prop~sps waiv?r.s of thA f.oll.o~•inq ~.o
constr.ucF ~ three-uniL- apart;m~~nt compl~~;;
(d) SECTIOfJ ].8.39.U6~:.0~.2 - Maximum bui].dinq h~=iqht.
(1 stocy within 150 fe,~t of a ~inG1F>
tamily resi;tential zonP ;~tar.m:.ttc~d; 2_stories
at ti2 F.ePt proposed) -
(~) S~CTIUN 18.34.U63.Uli - Mi.nim~;m str.uckura.l. sekback.
ANll 18~34.063.OJ.2 (?.0--f.ooh. 3varaqo 1and~^a ud ~~
--- p_ ~ tbark adjacent
to ~outh S:reek and l5-f:out landscap~~d set-
Uxck ad ja~en~~ to C).audin~ str~pr_ requi r~d;
].8 and J.4-r:oot .etbacks prc,pos~~d
(~) 9E;:'rIaN5 1L'.34,Uii4.C70 - Marim...~~ F~nce heigt,~.
ANU 1ts.04.043.10 (36 inch "r-.~ ~ i_n requ~rPd f.ront setback
area p-ar.~inittec;; G_foot ~Nnce pcoposed
2. Thak the ahov~~-m~n~i.on~d wazvars ~rp hernby d~•iied ~~n tne basis tha-.
there are nq speci~l cir.cum.stances app~.icable to the proper.ty such as szze,
shape, topoqraphy, locaki.on and surroundinqs wt, ch do nok app~.~r to ot.hwr.
identically zonEd property in the same vicinity; a-id that str.ict ap~J;ir~tic,n of.
ttie Zoning Cvd~ duPs nq*_ deprive thp proper~y of. pri.vileyes enjoyed b;~ other.
properties in thp idpntical zone anq c.lassiEication i.n the vicinity.
G9U3~
'~
PC86-21ti
. ,~,,,,
~. ~l'hat ther.~a ar~a no exceptional. ar exi:raordinary circumstances or.
, aonditions app].icabl? ~o thP propFrty irrao:i.ved or ro th~a intanded U$? of. l-he
pr.uperty hhat do not a~p..y genet:ally to the pr.oper~y or class of use in the
same vicznity at~d zoue,
4. That the rev„u~~sted varianr.n is not necessary fo~~ th~ pr~,serva+~ion and
enjoyment of a substa.ntial property r.ight possessed by other pro~PrLy i.re thc~
same vicini~y and zor~~, and deniecl ~o the prop?rty in questi~n.
5. Th~~ the requestPd aar.iance wiJ~]. be rnater.ia.lJ.y detrimental to thP
publxc welf.arP or znjurious tu th? property or improv~tr~nts in such vicinily
and zone in which the ~roper.ty is ].ocated.
6. That no onp indic~t~d !-h~ir pres?~tc.n at s«id pUb] ic h~~.rinq in
opposition; and that no currespandence was r.ecezved in opposition to su:~ject
netition.
ENVrRUNMENTAL IMPACT I':[NI)ING: Tha~ L-.he Anaheirr~ City pJ.anninq
Com~nissi.on has r.?viewed the pro1~usaJ. to constr.uct a three-unit a~art~ment
cotnp.lex with waiv~rs oP maximur bui.ldi~q height., minimum s~rur.tur.a.l. s~tbacw
.3nd maximum Eenc? height on a r.pct.ungular7.y-shap?d parrE~~. oF land consistzng
cf. approxima+~Pa.y 6,956 square ~?At lor.,akPd ai: the southeast corn~r of. South
Street and Cl.audina StreeF, and £ur.ther described as 2UU East Sou~h Srr.eet;
and does herPby approvP `he Nec~ative p~~].aration upon th~? f.].11d'itlq Fhat it has
COIlS1~~PC.'P_d the Negati_ve lleclaration toy~ther with any cotmnents r.ecei.vec! durinq
l-he pub]_ic revi~~+~ r:z•ocpss an~ FurthF~r f.indi.nq or th~ basi.s of. tt~A ina.tiaJ.
study and any cc~mm~nts CP.C:?1V~?C~ t!~at ther.e is no subst,~i~tial evidence that thF~
projecl-, wil]. have a signif.i.c~n~ ef.Fect an MnP Pnvir~nm~~n~~.
NOW, TFIF;REFURG, BE I~ RESuLVED h.hat the Anaheim City [~lanninq
Commi.ssion do~s h- rQb,y d~ny suF~j~cr petitian ~~r Vari~nce on t~he basis oE the
aEore;nention~d finciings.
' TIiE FUI2EGUING RESOLUTTON is ~iqnad arn~ ~~pprov~d by m~ this ].8~h day
nL' Auy~tst, ).9F3G. /~
; ~" /r iC `-!,~`,~,,f.
y ~~'-s'°~C (. , r ..~, ~%~
CNAIRMAN, ANAHLI'N; TTY PLANN G(;~~MMISSION
!
~ r~~r~rLS~r:
; `'. -~~... ~ ~,-.,~
; ~i~CRETAR_, ANP.HEIM CI'PY PI.ANI~ING COhIMISST('ti
~..
;r,'
+; ':
; -z- P~~E6--z1~
r
~~i~
tt~
. .... , . ,.
_ i' r ~'t1 +.r,;
r.,,u~
S'.PATE UF CALTTQl2NIA )
COUNTX OF ORANGE ) ss.
CIxY OF ANAE.EIM )
I~ Edith L. f~arris, S~cretary of. the
g g Y P.lanninq
', Commisszon, do hereby cer.ti[y that the fQre oin resolutipn was
;j ado~ted at. a maetinq pf thP AnahPim Cit ~ passed and
~3~ ~986. by the followi.ng vote oE the membe Sa rhe g fommission held on Huqust
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: r.RY~ HERE3ST~ LA GLAIRE, MC BURNEY~ h1ESSE
IJOES: CU~9MISSIGNERS: BpUAS, LAWICKt
, AIiS~[~i2'; ,;(iMMiSSIUNEk25: NONE
~
IN W]''PNESS W.NEREON~, ]' have herei.tn~o spt i~x hanc3 this ].8th day pf
Augus~, 1986.
~ ~~ ~~ .
SECRc~ RY, ANAHEIM CITy !?LAp1NING CONIMTSSION
r~; , `
~~..,
r~!fz.;
-3-
PC85-215
~
~~~~ ~ ~
, ~~~'~ s,~:, ~
R~.F.~t'~4~la~+w ~ r ~ , ~