PC 86-252~+;.N:,
12ESi)1'~U`l'ION NU. PC86-"l52
;, RE;SOLUTIOIJ OF '1FlE ANAHEIM CI'.CY PI~A[dN:'NG COMMISSION
THAT PE'P?'PiON rGR CONDI'PTONAT~ UST; PERMI'r NC. 234~1 13E GkANTfs'D
WHGRBAS, the Anaheim City Plar-niny Commissio-7 did receive a verif :ed
Peti.tion fo~ :.onditi.onal Use Permit from CAI2XL S. F'O5'P~R, KAIBER DEVEI~OL'MENT
CUMPANY, '1121 ~aZotnar A.icport Ro~-d, Suite 201, P. 0. Box 308r Carlsbad, CA
92008, owner of c.er~ain real propert~+ si~uated in the City o£ Anaheim, County
af Or~nge, 5t:ate of ~a:LiPornia, described as:
TIiE LAND RL'EERRED 'PO IN THIS REPOR`.l' 1'S SITUATEll :IN TE:~ STATF OF
; CALIr012NIA, COUNTY OI' ORAD'GG~ C.T'iY OE ANAHEIM, AND TS DGSCR.IBCD AS
~,~ EOLLUWS:
PARCELS 1 AND 2~ AS SriQWI~ Oi? ~+ .MAP I'IL~EI) IN BOOK 210 ~ F'AGES 22 ~ 23
ANp 24, OE' PARCLI.~ M~1PS, IN '.CHE Orr'li:L ~F 'PHE CUUNTY RECO1tDGR UE'
~ O.t~ANGE COUC~T~ .
~~.
WHERL•'AS, Lhc cir,y Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civin C4'T1LP.C in the City oi Auahei.m un Septemb~r 29, 1986, at 1:3Q p•m•-
notice of said }~ublic hearing havi.ng been du].y given as required by law and in
accoec3ance with ti~e pcovisians of lhe Anar,~im Munici.pal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to he~c and consiner cvidence f_or and against sai.d proposed conditional use
p~rmit and t:~ investigate and makc [indi~igs and recommendations in connection
thF~rew,th; and
'nT'r',EFZGAa~ `~~1.~ Commi..~sio;~, aL'ter ClU(.' l.fta[JP_Ct10[l~ .L11VE'St1CJc3L10C1 dTlC3
sGudy made by ~.tse.l°. and i.n ii:s behalf, anci after. clue consideratic-a af a11
evidence anc~ repur.t:~ oEf~red at sai.d 'ne~3ring, does fi.nd and deter.mine khe
Followiny f~~cts:
1. `l:hat ttie pruposed use is properly one tor which a conditional use
permiC is authorized by A~~aheim hl~1nicipa:L Code 13.49.050.070, 18.~4.050,080,
and ;.8.03.03~.010 to wit: to per.rtiit a gas sL-ation witil a lOQO squace-f.oot
~iini-marhet and a carwash with r.r,e L-Qllowing waivec:
~' ShCTION 1~.84.OG'1.C11 - Minimum strucL•ural setback.
~, ` i100 fe~t requir~~d along Route 91 Freeway and
Weir Canyon Road; 50 feet propoaed)
F 2. Tt~ak the .31~~ve•-mentioned waivr~r is hereby yranl-ed on the basis
that there are s~ecial circumstances ap~licable to the ~roperty such as size,
s~~ape, kopography, loca~ion and ,urroundi-ig~ which c3o not apl~ly to other
identical].y zoned properh.y in the same vicinity; and that srr.icL application
' of the Loning Cod~ deprives ty,e proE~ecty of Nrivileges enjoyed by nther
pro~er.tieN in lhe identir.a:L zon~ and classification in the vicinity.
3. 'rha~~ thr. ~~roposed use will nat adver~el~ affect the adjoining
land uses ~nd the growkY~ and developmenC oE the area in which il is proposed
. to be localed.
t' :
a
4. 'Pha~ the size ~n~~ :;~iape oF th~ s;il•e ~roposed for hhe use is
adequate to allow the tull develapment of the proposad use in a manner no~
dotrirnental. to thn particular area nor to the peace, ~~ealth, saE~ty ancl
gener~.t wel~ace oE the Citizen~ oF th~ City ot Anahei.m.
094'lC
Pr.66-252 ~"
r:r.~/ ir~~`
~;,;:;
;
5.
condit•i.uns That the granting
impos~~d
if o£ t.he Cond.itional Use Permit und~~r the
r
~aE~ty and ,
any,
y~neral wel~are o£ will
the not be
Citir detrirr~e~~tal
to lhe peace, heti:~l-h,
en.s o~ the City o L• Ana:~Fim.
6.
undue bi~rde That the traffic
n u~on the streets g~nerated l~y
a
d the pro~~osed usc~ wi:ll not im~,oae an
trafEic in
the area, n h:iqhways desiqne;d and im~.rovEd to r,arry the
;'~; o 0 7. `~hat no one indicated their p,r.A;~ence ak said p~~blic hearing in
"''` pp sition; and that no corres ~r-dence
~. I~ was : eceived in oF posi.ticm to ths
suuject: petition.
rNVIRONMEN~rI.L Ii9PACT F~.; T}~at ~he Anaheim City Planning
. Canmission has revieH•~d the proposal Go per.mit a gas skation with a 10U0
; sc~u~rP L-o~t r~ini-m~rket and a cac-w~sh with waiver of' min:imum structural
r;,.
i' setback on a~art (1.02 acre Parcel 4 of a~PPM 86-333) of an ir.x2gularly-
r; shaped ~arcel oE .larid can~isting of a~proximately 19.7 acres located at the
northwes'. corner oE Santa Ana Canyon Road and Weir Canyon Road; and aoes
her~by ap~,rove the NegaL•ive Declaration upon finding khat i~ has considered
; tt~e Negative Declar.atian together with any comments received during the public
.~ review process and further f.ind.ing on rhe basis of the initial study and any
,=; comments received that l:here is no substantial ~vide~~c:~~ t4~at the projecL• will
~s havc~ :~ signifir,ant effecl• on the environm?nt.
r NOW, THERLk~ORE, 13E I~1' RESOI,Vk;D thaL the Anaheim CiLy Plantting
Commi.,ssion does h~re~y qrant subjecr F~etit.iun :Eor Cnnc;if:iona~ Use Permit, upon
the ~ollowing cond;tions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisike
, to the pro~osed use of rhe subject property in ordec L-o precerve the safetv
and generaJ. r;alfare of thc~ Citizens of the City oL An~~haim:
i -
~. That in the ~vent subject p~operry is Cn be divide3 L-or the ~ur.po~p
oF sule, lease, or Einancing, ~ pat~cci map Go r~cord the a~proved
division oE subjFCt pro~erty ~hall be submitt:ed to and approved by
t.he City o~ r,nahPim and then bc recorded xn the OEficc: of the Orange
~ounty Record~r,
2. "hat prior to cornmencemeni: oC strucL-ural framiny, Eire hydr.a~ts sha.1J_
be installe~l and char.geci as rnyuir~~d and determined to be necessary
by fhe ChieP oE the Fire DeE»rtment.
NI.e'•; '
,; :'
,},-;
~} ~. t
,~..
f,.,:
k~j r
j~=1,;,~ - .
rr, ,...... .
~i,~' r
~t t
~ ~; ~
~.~ .;,~,-.,
.ry
~~~ ~ .
~ r~ „ ,
,~:~.~~% .
3. That k~ash stuiage arcas shal.l b~ pr.ovidr~d and mainta.ined ~.~
ac:cordance wit~h approved p:Lan~ nn fiie ~~iti~ the 5treet hiaintenance
and Sanitation Divi~ion.
4. That un.tess waived by the City rire Marsha:ll, the following minimum
standards sha11 a~ply;
~. That dis~e~sing d~v:i.ces shal'1
f~~et Frum a be lor,atec3 a minimum distance oE lp
ny pra~erty lir~e ar~d
vehicle beiny serviced wi
L1 b sp located rhat a ll parts o1° a
.
e on private pr~perty.
b• That dispensing devices sha1.1 be located nat less tl•
an lU
from any bui:lciiny T,~hich is not
devi ,
FE:et
fice reszstivP consLr~action. Such
ces shall al:;r~ be locaked so that L•he nr~zzle, wlien huse i
Eu11y extended, sha~.l not rcach
opening.
wit;hin 5£eet uP s
any building
~2-
::?: ?~ ::
~'C86-2!i2
:: ~.
,,?
~
I~~
,-.
~y;,
.,. 'Phat dispensing devAc~s shal.l ue protec:L•ed agai.nst ~hysical
~amage fr.om vehicles by mounting on Z concrete island a min.imum
of 6 in~hes :.n heigli'c. Alternat~ methods of- providing equivalent
~>rotection may be permiL•ted wh~n approved by tt~e Chief~
~~. That dispensing of gasoline into the fuel Lar-ic or inho a
cuntainEr sha11 at a.1.1 times be under Lhe supervision of a
qualiLi~d attendar~t.
c;. 'Phat the att:end~nt's primacy ~une~ion sr~ali be t~ superv;.se, ;:;,
observe and con~rol the dispensing of ~~soline.
_.,;;
1:. That the c3ispensing of yasoline shall nni: be into portable ~:
con~ainers un.less sach containers are of approve~ material and
const•ruction, having a tighi: closure wiL•h screwed or spri.ng
c;over, so designed thGt the contents can be dispensed without
soilling. _,_
c~, i'hat it shall be tha attendant's rESponsibility to contro.l ,._;;i
sources of ignir_ion and immediately haudle accidental spilis and _'~
Eite c.xL•i.nguishets if necessary.
h. That nmerger~cy contro.ls shall be ir-stalled at a location
acceplable to the rire llepzrtmenl•, bitt controls shall not be m~re
L-han 100 ~P.P.~ from dispensc~rs.
i. 'P.hat insLrucL•i.ons for the operai:ion of dispensers shall 5e
conspicuously i~osted.
j. That r.emote preset-ty~e c~@V1CP_S are L-o be in thc "nff" positioal
whi~e not in u:~e so the dispens~r cannot be activated wi~hout the
knawledge oE ';.t~e atLendant.
5. That in the event a~arcel map is recordad on subject ~roperty, G
r.ecipr.or~~l ~r_~c~ss an~3 parkirig agi:eemenL•, in a form satisfactory tn
tt:e Ci.ty Attorne:y, shall r~e recarde~l witf~ tY:e UEEice of: tl:e Orange
Coun~y Recorder. A copy ~~ the rec~rd4~9 aqreement shall then be
subm.itted to thE~ Planni.ny De~ar.Lment. ,
6. 'Phat ~rior ~o .is~uancr•_ oE a build.inq permit for any business ~•rith one
~r more drive-throuyh lane:, the owner si1a11 submit specific ~isns
For revi~w and app:~ova1 by the P'lannin~ Commission.
7. That subject propE:rty sY~a11 be develo~ec3 su~,tantially in ac~~ordance
wit'r~ plan~ and spr~cifications an :ile witi~ the City of Anaheir; markecl
Exhibit Na ~. 1. Z and 3.
S. Th~t _~rinr. to issuance ~E a building per.rnit, or within ~ peri~~d o~
one .yeuc ~~m t;~e date of this resalution, whichevEr occurs fir~t,
Coridil•ion I~~:.~, l., S ar.<3 11, shal.l. be cprnplied with. Extensions for
Purther timP to ~.omplete :~aid condit.iun:, may be granteci in 3CCOCdd11CE
wiL•h Section 1£3.0.3.090 of the An~heim t4ianici~a.l Coc~e.
,~,.~;
, ~ ;.
T
tt1,i ~t~ r_.
~~'~~r~'~r7~t~ ,:~ +
~~^'t'~'~yG~r; :r ~ ~...~r _.r . _ ..
-3-
PC86-25;
ri.~
`:'t. i
~''Rr.i'i:if1~A:~qZ
~',V
~; ~
'i;A
,7
i
~~
i
9. That prior to iinal building ~nd zoning inspecti+,is, Cui~uition No~.
3, 4, and 7, :~hal:l be complied wi.lh.
1.Q. That lhe proposal shall comp].y w.ith ~11 signing requirement5 of ~he
CL zone, unless a varianc~ allowing sign waivers is approved by che
Planning Commission or City Council.
'l1. That prior te issuar.ce of ~ building permit, the appropr.iaY.e major
thorouyhfare and bridge Pee shall bc ,pai~ to the City of Anaheim in
an amaunt as specif-ied in L•he MajoL ThorougY~Fai:e an:~ Bridge Fee
Program Eor i:he I'oothill/~astern TranspoCtdtiion Corridor, as approved
by City ~ouncil Rtsolution No. 85R-423.
BE IT FUN.'PHGR RESQLVLD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby Pind anc9 detecmine that adoptian ~f this Resolutior~ is expressly
predicated upun applicanr_'s compliance wiL•h each a~d ~111 nf ~he conditions
herei;~abov~ set fotth, Should any such cunditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid cr unenl'orc~abl~ by the L•~nal judgment ot• any r,ourt o:E
coinpetent jurisdiction, then ~his Resolution, and any approva.ls herein
contai:~ed, sha.ll L~e deEmed nul.l anil voi.d.
THF EUREGOING ItGSOf~UTIOtd is siyned and aE rovAd by me this Z9th c7ay
of. Seprc~mber., 1986.
~ ~ ~
~~"•'/,r~i;%
~= ;.~ 2~^ L, .%~ r , ..,: - ;r
CHAI~2MAN, A~1 "CITY ~ ~ NNING (:OMMTSSION
A'rTE S'C :
~CX.C.,t~1.. ~ /~ _~^_.C~o_,/ -
SE :'RGTARX, ANAHF.IM CITY PLAN[dING COMPIISSION
STA7.'E OF CAL'IFORNIA 1
COUI3TY OF OFt~~NGE } ss.
CITY OF A[~AHEIrI )
't, Editti L. Ei~xr.r:is, Secretary o£ th~ ~~ttaheim Ci~y Planning
C~~mmission, do h~rc~by cer.tify ~;:at the fore~~~~ing resolution was passed and
adopted at u me~L• ing of the Anaheim :, i~y P i~nn ~..^.~ ~+~mm.ission held ~n Se~tem~ier
29, 1986~ by the following v~te oE the members theceoi:
AYES: COMMIS~IONERS: BOUAS, ['RY, HL•'RDS'~, LAWICKI:, rtrss~
D'O~a: COMMISSIONERS: NONG
ABSENT: COMIQIS:3ICNERS: LA CLAIRE, MC DURNF3Y
Iid WITN~SS YJHEREOF,
5e~tember, i.986.
~;~,.'~~, ~ _ .~ .
~,~ t :~ ..~.~ - . .
~~t~t)~ '~~ ~ .~:.' ~
~1AH~ U{~'"~lYlhnu ~d~M~.r.t. ! ,... L ~., r. .,.. ..
T have her_eunto set my hand this 'l9th day o£
~ ~
~~"-~s.: ~~~.111.c._~Z.
SECE?E'PAkY, ANAE'.ETM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4-
PC86-252 <~,''
.
., l~f,