PC 86-290r~
RESOLUTIUN Np. T'C86-290
~ RESOLUTTON Uk' THE r1NAHEIM CITY PLA,NNING COM(yISSTON
THA'1' PETITION E'OR VAF,IANCF N0. 36"ll F3E UENIED
WHER~AS, the Anahtirn City Plannitig Commi.ssi~n did receive a verified
,.'., Petition for Variance from
~<~ Anaheim, CaliFornia 9280G KGNN~DY ANn HAUSG, 2g50-A
""'•~ , owners of certain real ' East Grekta Lane,
~::.,
City of Anaheim, County of ~range, State of C~lif~rnia d sc ibealasat~d in the
P~xcEr, 1:
`!'HE EASTERLY' 10~ PEk~7' Oh THE WESTERLY 21$ FE^'1' m ,
OI' LOT 27, ~~NA~j~IM ~XTENSION ~~ ~'HA- P~R.PION
BY WIL~,TAP1 AAMEL IN r AS SHOWN ON A h1AP QF A SURVEY MADE;
RECORllEft OF LOS ANGFLES6CpUNTY, iCALIIOR.NTA~, DESCRIB DF AS EOLLU,OWTY
S.
BEGINi~ING :4T A P~INZ~ IN THE NORTHER~,X 'LINL•; OF SA:iD LOT, SATD
POINT BE.LNG IN `i'HE CF;NTGR LI[dC UF VERMONT AVENUE (FORMERLY pR.nAll
~T~~ET) AND DIS'iANT EASTFRLY MEASURGi) ALONG SAIli CENTER ~2NE,
762.09 FEF.T F'ROP1 THE INZ'E12SEC'.PZON UF' SAIU CENTER LINE OF V~RMONT
AVENUG WI'PH THE CEfdrf;R LINC
~ Ur PALP1 S'PHEET, SAID POINT OF
BEGTNNING BEING THE NOR'.PH~A;~,PEF(T,Y CORN ;R OF T[3E f~A~D DESCRIBEll
IN CGRT];FICATG ~~ rITLG N0. 7a55; ~HENCE SUUTiiERLY ALONG THG
EASTr.RLY LINE OE' THE LAND DE4CRTBLD I11 SAID CERTIL'ZCATE UF 'CTTLF
ANU AL()NG 'PHE MOS'.i' E~ISTERL~Y LIN~ OF THE 22.8p53 ACRE TRACT
llESCRIBED I[V CLRTIF7.CATE UF '~r9~I,E p~~~
SUUTH LINE OF SAID L~T 27 IN THE CENTI:R LING ~,~ A~'OI~IT IN THE
SAI~ PpIN'~ IS DISTANT EAS'P 7'75.85 EE~T ~ Or ~AL~L ROAD, LtiHICH
THE CSNTF.lZ LING , R~M rHE TNICRSF;CTIbN OF
Uf~ PALM SZREET AND gALL ROAD; THENCE EAS~P AuONG
T~tE CENTE~ L];NE OE' c3ALL RUAD TO `i'F~E SUUTT{EAST CORNER OF SF,ID LOT
~~1: THGNCL NURTY.WES'Pk;RLY AI,ONG THE CAS'.PERLY I~.i[d~ OF SATU LQT 2~
~'~ mHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SATU I,0'1' TN
VEI:MON'P AVENU6, AND THEIVCE St7U'PHWESTERI.,Y A ONG `~CiiE;~ L.T.NE OF
TO THL POTNT OL' g~GI~~ING, aAlv CENTERLiNE
~XCEPTTNG THERr'FROM TIiAT PORTIUDI THE:RF;Or' INCGUDGD WITHTN VERMONi
AV~NUB.
ALSO EY.CGYTTNG TEIr^,REC'RUM THAT PART THLRGQF LYTNG SOUTHERL' X OP' A
L' TNE DRAWN EA$TER[,y ACH~c~;s SAID LF.ND PI~RALLEL WIT;: THr NORTH~RLY
I,JNE ~P SAID LGT 27 FROM A POZN'1' NOt;TH 15° 24' WES'P 1436 F~ET
~ ROM TEfE SOUTHWEST C.a12NER 'PElEREO~ ,
WHERI;AS, the City Planning ~ommis~ion did hold a
punlic hearz.jig 3t
Ehe rl~Jic Canter in t~he City of Anaheim on November 24, 1986
noticc oi sa~.d public hearing havin~ been r3u1 ~ ~ at ~~30
ar~cordance ~aith the Y given aa requir~d b ~~m~'
provisions ~f the Anaheim Municipa]. (;~r~e~ ~ha r~W and ^q
to hPar and consid~r evid~~nce for and ayainst said
proposed variance and ~~
invesFigate and inake findings and racommendati~~ns in connection ther~~,`r 18~0~,
iLh; an~3
0964r
PC$6-290
..,.
,
,. .„,
,, , . ,
, „ <: ,,. „ ,
~ ... ... ...
~. _
,.,,.,. , . ., . . . ; .,. . . . :~,;s
; ~F
; ~ ~
~
WHEREAS, said Commission, aFter due inspection, invGStigation and
study mad~ by itselE and in its behalt, ana after due consideration of a11
evidence and reports ol`fered at said hearing, does find and determine the
L-ollowing facts:
1. That the petitioner pr.opo~es waivec af the followi.ng to cetain a
~ mar.ager's unit in an exisking 15-unit apartmenk complex:
(a) SECTIQN 18.34.061.010 - Mini:num site area per dwellincLunit.
(1200 square £eet requir~d; 1,153 `"•
s~uare feet proposed? ''1''
(b; SECTIONS 18.34.~166.010 - Minimuta number of narking spaces.
AND 18.U6.050.0121 (36~arking ,~aces rEquirec7; 35
~ spaces existing) ~
2. That. the abo~~~-mc~nkionec9 wai~~er (a) is hereb~~ deni~d on the basis
that tr,ere ac'e no special circiim~+~ances applicahle to the property such as
Uixe, shapa~ topography, locatien and surroundings which do not apply to other
identically zoned proper.ty in the same v::cinity; and that strict applicati~n
of the Zoning Code doc~s no~ deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by
c~ther propert.ies in the i.dentical zone and elas~ification in the vicinity.
3. That ~he above-rt~entioned waiver tb) is hereb;~ deriied on the basis
tha~ th~ parki.ng waivee will cause an increase in trzfEic caige:~tian i.n the
i~nmediate vic:9iiity and adversely aifeet any ac7joining lund u~es and granting
oE the parking waiver under th~ condir.ions imposed, if any, will b~:
dEtrimeni:al to tl~e peace~ heall•.h, szfet.y and general welfare o£ the citizen~
of the City c~f An ahei.m.
4. T.hat kl;ere are no er.cEr~tional or exi;raordina.ry circumsLanr.es or.
conc:iti.ons ap~~licable L•o the proper.ty invcived or to the intended use of the
prope:i:y that d~ not apply qAn,~rally L-o t:he praper.ky or ~1ass of use in the
same ~>;.c.inity and zone.
';. ~PYiat the requested variance is not nece:;sa:y .Eor L•he preservation
and en;lo~~ment of. a substantial pro~erLy~ righ!: possessed by ol;her properl:y irt
the sarne vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question..
~. 'Phat the r.equested vari~nce will be mater~.ally c~ehriment«1 to ~h~
public ;~elfare or inj~irious to the pro~~rL-.~r or impravements in such vicinity
and zone in wl•.ich the property i~ locatNd.
7. That no c~ne indicated their presencP at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corxespc~idence was rece~ved in oppos.ttian ~o sub~ecL
petition.
ENVIkONt4ENTAL IMPACT FINbING: That l:h~ Anaheim City Plannir.g "x;
Commission has reviewed the proposal t4 reta`.n a manager's unit in ~n axisting ::;;
15-unit apartment complex with waivers of minimum site area per dwelling unit
and minimum numbnr of p~arking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parcel ot land _ "''~
consistina of ap~r.oximat~l.y 0.4 acre, having a£r~ntage c~f approx~.mately 108 ~;";c
f.eet on the sou;.h ~ide ot Vermont Street, being located approximately 210 Wes1:
u£ L•he cen4erline ~f l~emon St.reet a~d ~urther deGCCibed as 210 West Vermor~t t;°;:a;
Stree~; and does hereby a~pr~vE the Negative Declaratian uZ~on Fi.rid=ng that
,;;
_2_ PC86-290
,~:~~
~~~~
~'~
s r '~{}~
. . . ~ ~ , , ~ , , . . . ; ~ r , , ij' ~ ~ ~r~~.4};
~~ , F~
~ ,
it has considered th~ Negative Beclaratic~n tagether with any comments received
durirg the publi.c. r.eview proces~ and further finding ori the basis of the
ini.L•ial study and any rommenL•s received that rhere is no sub~tantial evidence
that thc project wi11 have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, TH~RE~OR°, Bk; IT HESOL~IED thah the AnahHirn City Planning
Commission d~es hereby deny subjecL• PeL-i.kion for Variaiice on the basis of the
afurementioned findinys.
THE F~7REGC~:CNG Ri,SOLUTION is signed and approved by me this ?.4th day
of November~ 198E~.
~=~ ~ .~~ , ' ~
i:.-i:r..;.r:.. ' .. •,i ~_s_i_,r;i, .•
Cli.AIItMAN~ kNA. ~IMJ.C.TTY PL NING COMMISSION
AT'PES ~ ;
~~' ,~~4.~~~...__.__
SECRETARY, A~iAHEiM CT`.Y 1?I~ANN:CNG COMM7:SSTGN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNT.Y '~f' ORAN;E ) s~.
CITY UF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith li. Harris, Secrc~tary o+'. the Anaheim City Flanninc~
Commission, do hereby certify that tha l:oregoiny reso:luti~n was passed and
adopted al a meeting ot the Anaheim City Pl.anning Commi~sion held on November
24, 1986, by the ~ollowi.ng voE~ of the mei~l.~~rs theceot:
AYLS: COI~IMISSIONGE2S: BOUAS, ~RY, HERBS7.', LAWICKL, t~GSSE
NpES: CUMMTSSIONERS: N'iG BURNEY
AASENT: C~~MMISSI4NGRS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS ~~1~L"I:E~F, I' have }ier~ur.to set rny hand this 24th ~ay oE
Navember, ].9A6. ,
`~~'~~ J, ' ~C'~_
SCCRE'PARY, AAlAHEIc1 CITY PLANNING CUMMISSIO~)
;~
:<~
;r
ar
,~,
~ ~ ~;n'~
;:;
r',',,,~
:> v.
~~;
;;~
':_s
;, ,
;,~~
;~
~ ~;~~,
~
4
~3-
PC86-290
~ ;'::;
;~;;;
"i
',~;.
~,.Y„
i':?r
. .. . ..::1~~~
. : ;'SSr~