PC 86-57i/
~ , , . ;.,~
; ,~r~'s., ',
";.
, ~;;
~~ ~ ~~;~
R~SO]~U'PTUtd N0. PCo6-57
A RESOLU'i'T~P! ~1F 'i'flE ANAHEIPI CITY PI,ANNlhG COMMTSSION
R~COMML•'NllTNG 'PO THE CITX COUNCIL 'PHAT REVTSION N0. 7 OF Tt1E SANTA ANA
CANYON RUAD ACCGSS PUINT STUDY ~.RrA APPROVED IIX CITY COUNCIL
RL•'SULU4'IUN N0. 661:-27 BE REVT~Ell TG INCLUDC pN ACCESS PQINT
DGSICNATLD AS 12A, BY.;IIIII'S` B
WEILRL'A5, the Nroperty o~aner has request~ed the Planning Comm;ssion to
consiuer access onto Santa Ana Canyon Road as a part• of a cir.culatior~ plan foc
a proposed rommercial p.rofessional of.fic~ facility on a 3~acre parcel with a
tr~ntagF~ oi~ approximaCely 856 teeL- on the nurth side of Santa Ana Canyon Road~
r~ppr.oxirnately 3yU feet eas~ oi' r_he cFnter.linc~ of Ei~calyptus Drive; and
WH~RLAS, l:he Anah~im City P'larining Commissiun did 'nold a public
heariny at the Civic Center, i^ the City af Anaheim on t4arch 3, 19~6, at 1:3R
p. m., notice of ~aid public h~aring having been duly given as required by law
and in accocdanc;e with tt~e prov.isi~i~s of the Anaheirn rlunicipal Code, Chapter
1N.U3, to hear and cunsider evidenc~ f.ur and against said pro~osed revi sion of
access poi~ii:s on Santa Aria Car:yon Road, iri conncctian therewith; an.l
WHERcAS, said Comm.i~sion, after due inspection, investigation ~nd
stacly made by i.tself and in its behalt, arid aEter due consid~ration of all
evidence ~~nc~ reports off-ered aL• said hearing, daes iinc7 and determine th~
Pollowing tact~:
1. 7'hat it is deEmc~d appcuy~ri4it-e and ne~e:,sary L•o irnprove access ar,~i
circulation in the study area ~~nd, mor~ specif:~.cal].y, immediately
opposite the access point ideiitified as tJo. 1'l, aPproved by i:hE City
Council in 1982, ar-d which has nol• yet been developed, because af
future pol•enL-i~al arcess pr.ob.l~ms ,~s addi.tiona.l devclopment occu[s :In
L•he subject arFla.
2. `l~hat the Sa~1t.a ~,ne; Canyun ~toau Acr.ess Point Study, as adopFed by the
City, Count•y and StaL•e, desiynates eleven (11) limit~d approved
acces:~ points alony 5ailta Ana Canyun )~oa~~, and sai~.] access poinLs
were adopreci as a lo~ical method o[' providiny access to those
proj~erti.ev f ro~L• iny on Santa l,na Canyon Itoad at such tirne as said
propertiE:; were tc be developed Ear us~~s mor~ inS.~nse than preseni:ly
~onedo Subse~uent to rhat appcoval, seven revisions, G~zr 9a, 5a,
lUa, 9b, 12 and 4a have occurred.
3. Th~t r.hL Santa Ana Cany~n Itoad Access ~oint Sr_~~iy founc] that at such
time as oro~erty owners choose to ~evelop their.~ pr.op~rties, ~hey
wc,uld havP tt~e cespnnsibilit:y o1 joint.ly salvir-g t.heir rnutual
cirr.ulati.on pcobl.c>ms so <~s to coniorm to the propo~ed access point L-o
5anta Ana Canyon )~oad.
+~
4. ~Ptyat ~he Circulr~tion L•'1e-nenl o.~ hl:e Anaheim General Pl.an desiynates
Santa ?1na Canyon Road a:~ ~n "Sceni.c Er.pr.Lssway" w.itt~ accc.;s limi.tEd
tc thoye eleven poir.ts zind suUsequer-t r.ev~sien~ as clefined by t.he
Access Point Study L•o limit direct vehicular accfisa bPCause £requent
or uncontr~l.led ar.cess would not nnly i~r~E~ede traffic flow, but would
be unsafP a ~ wc11.
;
0734r FC85-57 ,;
~vY ,,,~ .-, ., , , r~ ~... t,_ ,. _ ... „ ~~;{ 11 ~,y~4..Lfa~T.~.'~{hriv ~ ~~
~~ ~
~
,~ `t
~,, _ , • '°ti
; ,''~~
NUW, TH~REI~ORE, BE I7.' RLSOLVI;A that. the
Commi~sa.on has reviewcd L•he ~ Anaheim City P.lannin
propo
al
-
g
.,
l
.o ch~ange the current General P.1an
designation f:rom L•h~: i~illside 1ow-~~n~
comme
z
l~
rc
al ~rotessional and to r
y residential designa~ion to
evise ~xhibit
Ruad Access p~~
No. 7 of th
zn e
t s
St:ud ant
a
Ar. An
Y ea to permit an
a Canyon '';~'
i
access
rreguiarly-shaped parce~ of land p~int in ~he Study Area on an ~t
consisting
bound
d
f
'
w:;.
•
• :: e
o
on the
a rox
~~~
narth and ea~t; by the kiv~rsid~ (91) rpeewamate1y 3.0 a~.res ;;~
Ana c;anyon Road and w
~
Y. ~~uth b ;,..
est by a sing.le-fan;ily trar.t; and does hereb a y Santa
NegaEive i~cclaration upon i'i
Y Pprov
q
~
n
e the ;:~
i~lg that it
Declaration koyether wiL•h an h"s G~nsidered Ehe Negativ
'I
e
y comme.uts received duriny the
procPSS and further tinding on t'r~e nasi
'
P~p~'zC review
s of the initial stud~
received L•hat thzre is no substantiai evidenc
~ and ar~y catnments
5i
i
; 41~
e that the
ficant extec~ ot~ L-he envircnmeni:, ~'COj'-'Gt Will have a ''~;'
~
~'
i.' -
~,
, ~;'~
~L I'1' PURTH~R 12E;;Or,VEll tk~~at the Anatieim Cit Plannin Co .
hereby recominend to Lhe Cit
5 mmiayion do
C
'
~~ y
es
uunczl oi
proposed revision tc f3ahibit No, 7
l:he City of Anahei.m adoption of the
aa
Canyon Itoad Acce,s 1~oinc ;;~u~, '
opted i.n cunn~ction wikh hhe Santa p
n~
]
shown
.
,
as Access Point fl~. 12A on EXhibi.t g~
~, 2~y~% ri~7:L;GOING ftr~sOLU7.~IqN is siyn~d and approv~d i~y mz th
Mc1L'Ctl~ 19£36.
k
y o~
is 3rd da
~ ~
, ~ ~ /~
L'E1:1IRW()[~fAN,~LIb1 CT`l''a*~ A ~ , -
II~G CO~iMISSlON
AT'i'EST ;
L..~~ ,
~ -
~ ~- .
` ,Q_, ~--~ . 7
i.~:~~.L _ c~.,c-~
SECNLTAityi ANAH1~I61 CIi'Y PLANNING CUMD]TSSIUN
S~i"~iTL•' UG' CALIFOI:tJIF~ )
CUUN'i'Y UP ORADIG~ ) ~S.
~.I~rY ~~r ANAfiL•'TFt )
1. Ed.ith L. Ilarris, Se~rel•~ry of thc Anahe.i.m City Pl.ann.ing
c:omm.ission, ~o hereb5~ certii`y that the L-'oregoi7g resolution was
adoptEyd at a meetiny ot th~ Anah~~irn City Plannina comm.i~si.on held anaMarcha3a
1y86~ bY the fo.llowing vot~ oL the members t.hereot:
~YES~ COI~1(~1.1'SSIGNL•'22S: 13UUAS, T'FtY, HLRBST, LA CLAiRE, MC F3URNr'Y
N~~~: CJMMTSSIONL•'~2u: plOIVE:
,
~~~~N`j': C:UMPITS,~I~NERS: L,AWICKI, hIESSr'
I~~ WI'1'NL•'SS Wh~:H1:pI', ~ have hereunt_o s~r n~
March, 19gti. Y han~] Lhis 3r:1 day of
~~ _
__..:~__.__,~-(~~'~ ` .
S1:~RF;TARY, ANAfIfilhl C:ITy PLANNING LGMMISSION
-2-
PC86-57
,-
~e~~s-- - ~ . .
- Slr~~ ~ . . ~ . . . . . . . . .. ~,+~c;ic