PC 87-108,,,.~
Kf'SOLUTIGN N0. PC87-1(1$
H RESOGUTION OF THE ANAHElM CITY PLINNING COM6ITSSION
T.HA'1' PE'PI~PION FUR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ. 28E32 BE GRANTED
~
WHEREAS, the Anaheim CiL-y Y].anning Comttiission did receive a vcrified
PeL-ition For Conditional Use l~ermit from DAFtLE FIP.LE ~'. ROBFR?' R. ALL~N, 3910
East Cor~nad~ - Unit B, Anah~im, Cali~ornia 928U7, owners and JAMBS KINDGRMAN,
3910 Gast Coronado, Anah~im, Ca.liL•ornia 92807, agent for. certain real properEy
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of- Utange, State oL Ca?iLornia,
descr.ibed ~s:
THAT PORTION Or THE NURTHWLST QUAR'PE:ii OF uEC'~ION 4, I'OWI~]SHIQ 4
SOUTEi, RANG~ 9 4TGS'P, SHOW@i AS PARGELS ~~, S AND 6, ON A MAP FILED IN
i BOOK 131, F'?~GE 26 OF PARCGL MAPS, IN THE OFFICG OF 'i'HE COUNTY
, RCCGRll~'R Of~' ORANGE CGUNTY ~ CALTFQRNIr'1.
i WHEREAS, the C~ty Flanning Commission did hold 'a public hearing at
L•tiP Civic Cnnter in i:r~e City a~ ~nah~im on May ?'l, 1987, a~ i:JO p.m., notice
" o~ said p~blic hearing having bP~n duly ~iven as required by law and in
ti accordance with rhe pr.ov.isions of the Anat~eim Municipal Code, Ghapter 18.03,
;y to hear and consider evidence [or and against said pr~posed conditional use
ptrmit anci to investigate anc3 make fi.ndir~gs and recommendations in cnnnection
' therewith; and
WHL'REAS, said Cor.~mission, ~~ter due inspection~ in~tps~.igation and
stu9y made l~y itself. and i.n its bei~alt, and afL-ec due cansideration c~f a11
evid~nc~: and r.e~orts oEfered at ~aid hearing, does Eind and determine the
followi!ig Facts:
1. That the pcoposed u.^e is prop~r.ly one for which a coriditional use
pecmit is authorized by Anaheim ~•,:nicipai Code Section 18.61.050.070 to wit:
L-o permit a limousinc manufacturing bus.iness wii:h waiver of the foli.owin~:
SEC~PTONS 18.06.050.0222, - Minimum number of parking spaces.
~
'18.~6.U50.031, (85 spaces requi.red; '5 spaces existina)
~ ~
18 .OG .08Q AND
18.61.066.050
i; . _
2. Tha~ khe proposed use will nut advers~].y r]~f~Ct khe adjoining
`~~ .land U5P.S and the growth anci dev~l.nprr.ent uf the ar.ea in which it is pr~pospd
to be lor.aL-ecl.
~,
3. That the size and snape of. L•ne site pro~:.sed fur -:.",e u~e is
~'~ adequate to a11ow the full cievelopment o£ the ~roposed u~e ~~, a manner not
:.~„ detrimental to the par.ticular area nor to the peace, hea].th, :;afety and
~~
'
~ general we'1£are ~P the Ci~izens of the Cit,y of Anah~im.
,
';
`~~~;, h. That. the granting of the Conditional Use Permit undee the
~'` conditions imposed, if any, will nut b~ detr.imental lo the peace, he~1~h,
fs;i sa.Eety and general we1L-are of the Citizens o£ the Cit•y oE Anaheim.
~,~ 5. That the traffic yenecated by th~ proposed use wi11 not impose an
~~~, undue burden upor~ thE streets and highways designed and zmpr~ved to carry the
~;,~ traE£ic in the area.
'~+: •.
1122r
',,,.
,~~ '
i ~:c~~: ~ ''_ . .
PC87 -108
~`~
'`;;
;'ri
",;:
~.~;
,;. :a
:ti*~~i l . , , . ~. . . . .
i:y,~ . . . . . . . . . ~ . - ~ . ' '. . ' . . . . , : . . . . ~ ..
a:~i .. .. ... . . . . . . ~ . . ~ .. . .
'.-! . ~ . . .. . . ~ ~ ~ ~.
~. , . . . . . . . . . . '';,,~ ~ ; {~1
1
6. ;hat no one indicated their presence at said public heacit~g ~,n
opposition; and tr,at no correspondence was received ~n opposi.Lion to the
subjec~ petition.
:; ~;NVIRONMENTAL SMPACT FTLVI~ING: That the Anaheim City Plarani,ng
a Commission has ceviewed the pro~,osa1 to permit a limousine manufacturing
bus.iness with waivr-:r ef miraxmwn number ~f parkir~g spaces on a
rectangularl•,_shaped p~arcel. of. land consi~ting of abproximately 1.63 acees,
ha~ing a frontage ot approximately 207 fcet on the south sic]e of Coronado
Street and being 7ucat~d approximately 702 fe~t~ wesr of the centerline of Van
, Buren Slreet and further descr.ibed as 39J.~J East Coronado Street (Units F, H~ r
~~ and J); and does hereby a~pro~e the Negati.ve lleclaration upon £inding that it
! has cor~sidered khe N~gative Declaration ~ogel•her wi.th any comments rec~iveu
' durin the ~ ~,
9 t~ublic revieta ror;es~ and further finding on the basis o£ the
initial study ~nci ar~y comments received that there is no substantial evidence
that. the project will have a significank efEect on th~ environment.
~3~~i, THGREEOItE, t3J3 TT P.ESQLV~D Chat thc Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hcreby grant s!~bject Petit_ion for Condi~ional Use Perrnit
the followiny cenditions which ate hereby ;oun~i ro be a necessac ~ up~n
to rhe proposed u~e ~~ the sub'ect :-~ Y Arerequisite
and general welfare of the Citizens ofrthP ~ity of Anaheim:preserve th~ saf.ety
1. That a traFfic signal assessment fe~ e~~ualing t!~e difEerence between
the industrial and commercial assessment tees shall be paic~ co thc~
City of Anaheim in an amounr as de~ermined by the City Counci.l.
2. ~hat trash starage areas shall b~ Provid~d anc~ maintazned in
accordanc~ with approved pluns on file wit-h the Street Maint~nance
and Sanit.atior~ uivision.
3. ~t:at ali ~air condicioninq facilit.i~s sha11 bc properly shzelded ~rom
vi~w.
4. ~rhat L•h~ ~ropr~sal sl~all cornply with all signi.ng requiremer-ts o~ iche
ML zone~ unle~s a variancP allowing c;ign waivers is approved by the
P.lanning ~ornmission or C.ity ~oun~il.
5. That n~ outcioar wurk on vehic7.~s or vehicular parts nar ou-~doot
stor.age oF vehicle ~arts sh~~ll be permi.L-ked.
6. That the owner oF subject propert.y stiall ~ubmit. a leL•r_er reque ~tiny
termination o:E' Conditi~nal Use 1~ermit No. 2076 to the Planning
Ue~artment.
7. That subject l~roperty sha~.l be deve:loped substan~ially in accordance
with pJ.ans and ~peri~~.c~tions on file with thQ C.ity of l~r;aheim r~arked
Exhibit No. 1.
g. That C;onc3itian Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6 and %, above-mentioned, sha.l.l be
~n~Pl?~~~ :~ithin a p~ciod oE ninety (y0} c]aYs ~:om the c3ate of this
resr~lution.
r; e
'.;~
'~. ..~.. _c.,.~_ ..... . .. . .. . ...... ... .. _ .. .. . . . . . . ~ . . . , , . .. . 1 ~..
t
~ww, ~
\
~.i
BE IT rURTHLR RESOLVED that '.:he Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine tha~ ado1~tion of this Resolution is expresslv
~ predicated upon apnlicant's cam~liance with each and al.l of the canditions
herei.ri~bove set P~rtti. 3houl.d any sucn condi.ti.uns, or any part thereof, b~
de~lar.Pd invalid oc unenEc;:ceable h~~ the final judgment oF any court of
~om~etent juris(iiction, thsn this Resoluti.on, and any appruvals herein
contained, shall be deerned null and void.
TEiF FORGGOING RESOLUTTON is signed and approved by me this 11th d<iy
of t4ay, 1987.
l'~~ ~ ~'" . ,
.
/ i ~,. , ~.• . ~,
._L.~;r+.a_..~.:~. % ~,..
CHAIRMAPd, A'AHE.T.M CTTY 'P~AA]NI[~IG CCMMISSTON
A7.'TLS`~ :
` ~~_,~~~~'~~'~.~'
SECR~TIRY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION
STAT~ Or^ CALTFORNIA )
COUNTY UF ORANGE ) ss,
CI`PX OF ANACi~TM }
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary c£ tr~e Anaheim C:ity Planning
Cummission, do herebl certify that the fnregoing resolut:lon was passed and
adopl:ed at a m~eti.n~ of the ?~naheim City P1<<nni.ng Gommission hel,~ on Mal 11,
1987, by ttie followinq vote of the member~ thereoE:
AYE;S: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, rRY, HERB5T, L~ANTICKI,
DtC BURNcY , MESSE
NOGS: COMMrSSIONF'RS: NONE
ABSENT: COMM.LSSIONERS: LA CL'AIRB
:tv WITNLSS w~ic~co~, I have herE:tnto set my h~nd this llth r7ay u£ May,
1987 .
. /~ y
SrCFtE2'ARY, ANAHCTM CITY PLA[3NING COMMI5SION
-3- • PC87-I08