PC 87-109,r4,,
RESOLUTION N0. PC87-109
A RGSOLUTION QE~ `i'H~ ANAHEIM CITY PGANNING COMIdISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CON1)TTIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2911 B~ GRAN~rcn
, ..ai;'1j~yjv
r
~F
WEiERF.AS, the Anaheim City P.lanning Commissi.on did receive a veritied
Petii.ion Loz Conditional Use Pernit From HAROLD 13UTLER, H. S. FOOD SERVICES,
INC., 19455 Cajalco ltoad, Perris, California 9237Q, owner an~ FIAROLD F.
McGRATH, 23806 Cas;~andra Bay, Layuna Niguel, California 92677, agent for
certain real pro~~eri:y situaled in the ra.ty of. P.naheim, Count:y of Orange, StatE
of California, descrihed as:
THF EAS'PERL1' 161 FEET UP THE WES7'ERLY 214 FEE2' OI' Tf.iL SOU'PHERLY 166
FEET C~F THE NOR`PHERLY 366 FEL"T OL' `1'HE NC1RT33WEST QUARTFR OF SECTION
7, TOWNS:IIP 4 SOUTH, RANGC 10 WL'S'1', ID] 'PIiE R?+NCHO LOS COXOTES, IN
THE C'ITY OL' ANAHEZM, CUUNTY UE ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
WEiEREAS, the City Planniny Commission did hold a publi.c hEaring at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim en May 11, 1987, at :t:30 p.m., notir.e
of said public hearing having been duly given as re~uired by J.aw and in
accordance with the provisians of ti~e Anaheim t~lun:~ci~a]. Code, Chapter 16.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and ~gaiz~st. aaid ~~roposed conditional use
pern~it and to investiqate and make finding~ anc3 recommendations in c;onnection
therewitli; and
WH~.REAS, said Commission, ~~fL-er due inspection, investigaL•ion and
s~udy made by itself. ar~d in its behalf, and aFter due corisider.ation o~ a11
evidence and ref~orts ofEered at said hearing, does Find ~ncl determine the
f.ollowing facts:
1. Thai: the propo~ed u~e i^ properZy onc Pur which a conditional use
permi.t is authorized by P.naheim Municipal Codz Section 18.44.050.010 to wiL-;
to permit on-sale beer arsd wine in an er.isting drive•-thruugh restaurant
(Carmel's).
1 That.
2 the proposed use wil:l not advers~ly after.t ~he ad;oini.r,g
;
, ,
land uses and the ;r~wth and dcvelopment o~ thP area in which it is propo~~d
to be locat~d.
?, ;
'
Thdt
3
the size and shape of the
site prop
osed ~or
the use is
~
~i .
adequate to al].ow ~he Eull develo~~ment of lh e proposed use in a manner n~t
„- ;
<;
de~r. imen*a1 to th
e particu].ar arca rlor to
the peac:e,
healtr,,
safety an
,
' gener.al we].iare of thE Citizens oP 4he Ci~y of Anaheim:
A.~'
,n'.~
;
;
,,: ~
~o ;'a
~ryar the
9 granting oi i:he Conditional Use Permit un~ez the
,
cor~ditinns impased, i. f any, wil.l n4t b~ de~rime i~~ e~`e~ health,
~
5afety and g~n~r.al wel f~re cf the Citizen~ An heim
of
oP the
Tl~~~-t. the
5 tr.affic qer~eral•ed by the pro~osed us~ will not impose an
.
unc~ue bucden upon the ~treets anc~ highway.c.1 dC'~~-C11gI1CC7 and improved to carry the
traffic i.n the area.
'~hat one
6 ~erson indicated his pres~nce at said public hearing in
.
opposition; and that no corresoondence was received in op~osition to the
subject E~Eatition.
PC@7-109
?I23r
, . , ,,
....,.....~ , , ~ ~ , . ~
.~- ,
~,
,
F?NVIKONMENTAL I[~ACT E'TNDTNG: That the Anaheirn Ci~y }~lanriii~g
Commissi.on has rPViewed th~ proposal to permit on-sale beer and winE~ in ~~n
existing drive-Lhtough r~staura:~t un a rectangularly-shaped pzrcel uf laz~d
consis~ing ~,f appr~ximately 0,61 acre~ having a frontage of appro~;i.mately 166
feet on th~ cast side o~ Magnolia Av~~nu~, being Iocated approximate].y 'l00 £~~et
souCh o~ the centerline of L'a Palma Ave ue and further described as 1040 Nor;t~
MdgrlOli.a Avenue; and does hereby ap~cave thc Negative Ueclaration upon findin~~
that it has considered the Neg~tive Declaration together wi~h any camment;s
receivr~d d~tring i~tle public review orucess and further fir}ding on the basis uf
i:he ini.tial stu~~y and any comment~s rece.ived that ther.e is no subs~antia~
evi.dence that L-he project wi.ll have a yignific:arit effeck on the envi_c~7ment.
NOW, THERCFORE, BE TT RESOI,VED that trie Anah~im City Pl:~nr.ing
Cainmission does nereb,y ~7rant subject ;?eti,tion for Co~lditional Use Permit., upon
the follo~ding condit~ons whicl~ are h~~:eby found to be a necessary prerequisite
~o the proNosed usE of the supjec~ ~~roperty i!~ ord~r to preserve the safety
a.nd yeneral welfare of ttie Cii:i.LEns ~f the Ci.ty uf AnaPieim:
1. That the owner of subjPCt pr.cperky shall irrevocably offer to
dedicate to the Ci.ty ot Anaheim an additio~~al strin oi J.and ~1ong
Maynolia AvcnLe, m~asured southerly £ront the back-of--curLi ak tr-Q
corner of the intersection at Magnolia an9 La Palma, and var.ying in
width from 12 f.eet f.or the LirsL- 300 feet ;~nd L-hen transitioning fram
J.2 feet fio 0 fe~t for the nexi: 300 fPet. I~i the event that Generai
P].an Am~ndment No. 210 pertaining to Criticzl Intersections is not
adopted by the City Council, this condition ~ha?.1 bE considered null.
and void.
2, That the driv~ways sha.ll be reconstructzcl ~o ac:cammod~te ten (l0i
foot rac7ius curb returr?s a~ requirc~d by the City 'PrafFic Engineer..
3. ThaL trash stor-~ge areas stiall be provide~ and m~intained in
accordance with approved plans on fi.le wiL•h thP ;;treet Maintena;~ce
and sanitat~ian Divi.sion.
4. That a.l.l air conditioning facil~~ties and other ruof ar,d ground
mountzd equipir,pnt sha.ll be prc~p~cly ~hielded from view, and the sound
:~uf.ferPCi rrom adja<:enL• residentia7. ~rop~rties.
5. 'Phat the proposal shall comFly with all signing requ.irement~s of th~
CL Zone, unless a variance alZowinq sign waivers is z~~prove~~ by i;he
Planiiing Commission or Ci~y Councii.
6. That a sir. (G)-foo~ hiqh masunry block wall sha].1 be m1~.nraineo' along
the woui:h and east pru~~erry 1in~s.
7. That nn ~lcohol.ic beverag~s, except beer and wine shall b~ sold or
consurned on tt-e premises o~ the subjec~ rest~urant.
a. That beer and wine sha11 not be sold •ria L•he driva~-through ~~l.t1dOW.
"Z- PC87-1C19
,;: ~` ~ ;,~
,';+;':-
r!:!:ir
.~
;.
~ ri'
;': ;
.'','~
,:~
„i;
,;,.
'~~;
',,,
~~'~s~
~:'~
;~,~
`;":
~ ,~
. ~,~,
, i
..'o.,
°. ~Phat tt~e o~aner oF subject F~roperty ~hall submii:. ~i letter r.equesri.ng
lerminatJ.on oE Cnn~itiuna.i Ur;e Per.mit No. 598 to th~ P1Anning
ne~artmenE.
lU. ~i'hat subj~ct ~ropecty sha11 b~ develo~eci :~ubstantiall.y in ~ccor~ance
wi.th ~.lan~ and sptc.ifica~ion~ ou fil.c with the City ot Anaheim mArKed
Gxhibit N~s. l. thr.ougi~ 4.
j{ 11. That nrior to the commencemer,t oE the activity authocized undec thie
K r.e~nlutiou, or within a peciod of one year. Er.om the datie oE khis
resolution, whichever ocr.urs first, Cor-dition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 and
10, above•-mentioned, shall be complied with. :;xtenc~ionR fcr Eurther
time to comnlere said conditiai~s may bE grantea in accordance with
Section lE~ .03 .U90 of the An~,heim htur~icip~~? Code.
DG IT ['URTH~R RESOL'JE~ t:hat the Anah~im City Plzinning Commi.s~ion doea
nerzby Eind and deter.mine that ada~tion of t:his kesnlution is exptess'ly
C~redicated upon applican~'a cum~lianca with Pach and a~l of the canditiona
nexe.inabove set :ort.h. Shuuld any such condirions, or. any parr thereof, be
declared invalid or nn~n~~~ceable by ~he final judgment of any court of
COttlnn~cnL jur.isdiction, then this Resolution, ancl anr approval~ herein
conhained, sr~all. be deemed null and voi.d.
THc. F02CG0_TNG R[;SOLUTIO~i is ~igned and ar~proved by me thi:; 1. ~ t,i day
of. Ma j, ! 9i~? . I
~f ''
:
~ .~ ~ ~~ ~~'~/ ~y~~` /•j~ ~~~~~ /
r.-~y~..~.rr..,~.{ ~~~. / ' ' '. A. ,
C'1~~,:r:tanN, AN-AHtiTM CITY PLA ~IP~G COMMIS~TON
AT'PEST:
~~-~521..
SF:CRET.AftY., ANAHE*M CI'CY PLA N:NG CUM~4I5STOt7
STATE OF CALINUCtNIA )
C•J:1N'"Y 0~ ~RAN~~ ) ~s .
CI'.I'Y ~1N AtVAHCI(4 )
`i:4W
. ~ ', -~,_-~~
I, ~ditn L. Harri:3, Sacretar.y of the A.,ahei.m City Planniny
Commis:sion, iio here~y cecCiEy that the foregofng resol~~tion was passed and
adopted at a meetinq of the nnanPim City Planninc~ Co~nmi~siun held on May ll., .~
19~7, by the follohinq vote oE tF~~ ;ne~nbers thereof: y
AYFS: l'OMMISSLONF,RS: B~UAS, FR't, EiI:~.~ST, LAWICKI, MC 13URNEY, "r
MESSF. '
4~OE:S: ChMM,ISSiOWF.RS: N~:~E ~
ABSENT: COMMZS~I~N~KS: L,A CLATRF
LN wITNESS WHEREOP, T h3VE' hnreunto snr ny t~an~3 tnis .tlth day oC Ma~,
19d7.
~~ .
.~
v i
SRritP.T11 . ~ ANAH[;iM ~~rmv vr.nr~Nit~G COMMYSSZON
'3- PC87-109