PC 87-135~
,{
r, ; _ _ . . + '~~„ a~~c~t~f~
~~
~,~4N
xr~su~o~r~ :~oN ~row~c~~~~
A RGSrJLUTTptd OF' THL ANAHEIfd C:[TX PLANNING COP1MISSIUN
:CfiA'P PE'~TTIQN b`OR COT:DIT:[0[1AL US~ PFRMI'.C N0. 29p7 13F: DENIEU
WHk;RL1,S, the Anaheim City Pl~nn.iny Commission ciid receive a
ver if i,~:d pnE it ion For Cond itional Use ~r
r DOkTHLAL ~. STAi~LFY ? ~`~ mA~ ~~pm `j1;RAL D. STANLEY ~Nti
, 36 South A,h Street, Anahe.im CA g? C
_ cerF.~in real pro~~_ety ~itu~t:ed in the Cit~.y nF Anaheim ~ ~U', aW~1tC ot
of- Calitc~rnya, d~scribed ~zs; , County o.f Orange, State
LOT 8G OE TRACT DJO. 1565 AS P~tZ MAP 5[iUWN tiI BQOK 49 p
2U TO 24 I~ICLUSIV~ pE' M.iSC ~'LLANi,OUS MAPS ~ AGES
THG RLCORllER GF SAID COUVT'~, r ~V T[•1G OE'P,CE OF
the Civic Cenlterr~in~ ~f~t C~~ aL~~~naheim"onlsJU~,n ~id t~old a
publ ic hear ing al:
oF ~~ id pub:~ 1r, licax ~~~ ~ ~~ 1987 at 1: 30 p. m. , not ic:e
9.~avinc~ been ~~ul.y ~~iven as rcqu ~ ~:l b
accordance with the provision~ oi the ~naheim [~un.icipal _ude, Ct~„~pter 18 03n
L-u hear and con;~i.der eviden.:e Por and ~gainst said pro~~osed conditional ~.tse
~errni.t and L-o investigat.e an~ mal;a [indings and recommnnd~ations in connection
tr~erewith; anc]
inHBRGAS, sa.id Commi.ss:i~ii, ~F.te,- c]ue .ins•
study made by it>E1~ and in i!:.^, AecL-ion~ invesriga~a.on and
evi:]ence an~? repoz:l•s oL-fere~l at sail~~lhearing aEdoes(~ Eindo and edehE~mine tt P
following EacL-s;
i.
.l. TtiaL- Lfic proposcd ~.~s~ is ,
corzr~~.t.ianal use p~rmit, is autnorized h ~:CO~~~r~'1 °ne For which a
18.41.05U..13U to wit~ t~ y A~~~~~~~.lrn Plunicipal Code Sectiori
wli.ver oL- the tol.lowing undexm~~hhorilyYutUCod~ 5,,,,residenl:i~1 st:r~;ctur.e with a
~ion .1F3.06.080:
SC~CTIONS ].8.06.05p,p_ 212 - Mi_'n~irnun number oE~~rk.ii~s ace~s
AND .18~!~1.06~b.p,p (1.3 rc:cluired; 3 ~
..- .~, NroP~- ed )
2. 'I'hat ~he r.equest~~d waivex i,
Eht~l: L•h~ parkicig waiver Lor the ,, h~reby c+~ni.pc7 on the basis '
~roposE.,3 ~:c~mmerci~l use wil ~ v^d113@ an .incrPase I
in ~raf.Eic con~es~.ior, .in th~.~ im;nediate vi~:iniL-y and adverscl '
~idjoini.ny ~ingle-Earnily re>ic3enti:~1 land u~~s ~~nc3 Y a~Fec~ any ~
waicer will ;~e detrimental. to the peace, heal.th, saEe y~~ ~ n`' oC ~he parking
fhc ~J.tizf~ns of the rl~y oF Ar~ah~~im. 9eneral welf.are of ~
r
3, Thai: L-he propos~d use ia he. c.by ~en .e;.3 or. ., ~•„ r.
Re~lacs it• ication ~10. 87--£38_02 to rerone r~ j `hE bU.~z„ that ~
(Re:.ident.ia.l, Single-r~mily) to ~~ n ~ub~ec.t PropertY ~'Cprn RS--'T200 ~
denied. (Coi~rn:rctal, 0[Llce and ProL•a~^t ~
,U~ona1) was
y an 7 t}~~ Tf~at L•1,~ proposed use wi.l.l adver;;ely affeat ~}ln
Lc3tld USf:r ' !
~o b~~ L~r.~Ef~G. 9rowth and ~eveloPment aF. the ar~a in which i.t is aNrnPOSeg ;
1.
f~
i
,
1153t~ ~'`
,
nC87-135 s
~~C~ ~ ~ ,
,f.
.~'~
~
a..,~
'
~I
va~
A~*~
~.
not ade~~uate lo 'Phat -~he sxze and
allow the f
l~ shap~ o.E r.he ~~ite ~;raposed for the use is
detrim~ntal ro •u
develonment o~ L-he proposed use
the ~~ar~i
cular in a ma-lrier not
ycneral w~lEare .
ar
u£ khe Cltizens oE ea rior to the pe~~ce, hea1L-h, sa.Eer.y
the Cit:
oL• A
t and
y
na
i~~im.
6.
detrinental
to That the granting
the aC th~ ccndirional uae per.mit will be
_
.
peace, hea'.th,
aL rhe Cit_~ oi' Anahei.m.
~;r-; saEety and general weltare ot the Cikiz ens
7. Thal, the tr.a.EEic gen~rated by the propase~7 use wi11 impose an
undue burden upon the streeEs and highways designc~d ~nd improved L•o carry ~he
L-raEf-ic in the area,
E. 'rhat 4 p~rsons indicated their presence at sa.id ~utlic hearing
in o~:pcsition; and hhat• a petition conta.ining approximately 10 s.ignatures w~s
recEived in opposition to subj~ct ~etition.
ENVTRONh1ENTAL I,~1pACT EINllT~IG:
`Ptiat the Anaheim C.ity Pla.nning Commi,~ion has review~d Ehc proposal i:o permit
oEf ice usa of a residential structure with a wai~~er ;;L minimum number oE
parkiny spac~s on an irregu.lar.l~l-shaped parcHl oE land consisting of.
appcoximatel;~ 8,~1E1 sc~uarn [eet, located at t:he northeasL- corner, of Sraaaway
and Ash Strec~ts, and L-urr.her ~escribe~: as 23G South i~sl~ Stree~; and does
nereby ap~rove th~ P7egative ~eclaratian apon C-inding tha~ it has cnns:Ider.ed
the NeyaL-ive UeclaraL-ion to~~atl~er wit-.h any comment~ recei.ved during the public
review process anc~ further Eindiny on the bas.is oP th~ }.nitial study anci any
commcnts received tk~a~ Lherz i~ no subsL-antial evi.dence tlzat the project w;ll
have a sigr~if i.cant eEE~~ct on the envirnnment.
NOW, THGI~GFORr, -]~, C~c RESOLVGU that tt~e tlnaheim Gicy Planning
'"s, Commis::,i:~n does hereb cjem ; ~„
I~; Y t ~ub_ c.~t Pet i.ti.r~r. Ear Cond~ tional U~e Permit, on
, the basis oc the afor2m~ntion~d L•inc~ings.
'r
`TiiG POItt;GCING RESC~i,tI~~,OV is siyned ar~d ~p~ccved by me this 6Lh day
oE ~t11.y, 19II7. ~
,
; -~_t..~ ~ ~ t~.e_
~ CHAIRMT-tJ, ANAHE'I.M C TY PLANNING COMMISSION
' a,r.~r~,s2~:
t
~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~
F S~.CR~TARY, ANAHEIPI CI~'Y P[~APJ[31'Nr~~p~t~Sr,CUtJ
?
~.R
r~
-2~ PC87-135
STATC OF CAI,IFORNIA
COUN.C'~ Or OR.?~N~E
CI`~Y 0[' ANAHEIM
I, Gdith I.~. ?iarr.is, SHCretary of tne Anaheim City Planning
Commission, c~o her~by cer~if}~ thaL• the foregoing r.ey~lut~on was passed and
ad~j:ted al-. a me~ti~,~ of. the Anaheim City Planning Commission he.ld on July 6, ~;
1987, hy the t'cllowing voEE of the members thereof:
AYFS: C~Jt~1MtSSI0NCR5: BOUA~, HLRBS'.P, MC F3UI2NEY, M~SSL
NOES: COMiKISSIOLdERS: iQONE ''°
ASSENT: CO^1MI~SIO[~ERS: NON~
VACANT: COMMISSZONERS: TIiRFB
IN WT`TNESS WfI~,RroF, :t have hereunto c,e~ my hand ~his 5th day
c~t Ju1y, 1987,
~ir~dl~x=x-~---~--~~~tsi.~c-L~
SEC[2E7'ARY, ANAH~.IM CTTY PLANNING COMMISSrON
~,:'i
i.
;:, I
-3-
FCf37--135
.,, . ,,. '.~r.;:~ ;f~~