PC 87-17;~
RESOLU'.Pl'UN NO. PC87-17
A RGSOLUTIUN OC TEiE ANAHr^.IM ~~ITY PLAtJNING C0~1t•tISSION
'PH~4`.C PG'PITTON FUR CONDIT?O~~AL USF, PERMI'P N0. 28%6 I3G GRANTED
SaH~RLA5, t:he Anaheim Cit•.y Planni.ng Comtnission dicl receive a verified
petit:ion F.or CondiCional Use E~ern~.tt. Erom I~AVTB CHAVE; ANI) CAROLE CHAVEZ, 4420
E~si: i,a Palma Avenue, Anaheim, C~1if.orni.a 92f3U7, own~rs of ceri.ain real
properl:y situated in t.he City of Anaha~im, County oE Orange, State aE
California, described as:
EASThRL'~ ].8£! PLL'P OC' T[~F WESTEP.L~Y 475 FL•'ET OF LO`~ 15, BLOCK 36,
'LORBA L~INDA. 2'RACT.
WHBREAS, the Cit:y Plani~ing Commiss~.on did hold a publ~_c hearing at
the Civic Center in the Ci~y of Anahei.m on .7anuary 7.9, 19a7, at 1:3q p.m.,
notice ef saic3 put~lic he~eing having been duly yiven as required by law Gnd in
accordance with the provisions oF -:he Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.a3,
!:o hear. and e~nsi.der evider.ce for and against said proposed cont~it~iona]. use
pecmir_ and ~o invcstigat:e and make £in~iings and recommendations in connec~ion
there~ith; and
WP.t3RE~.S, said Commission, aL~er du? inspscL•i.~;n, investigation and
study mad~ by it.~,;elf. and in ;.t:s bahalf, ~~tnd af:ter due consideration of. a11
evidence ~~nd ~epor~.s of.f~;red at: said heaeing, c7oes find and determine k.he
foll~wing fact:s:
1. 'Phat: t.-,~e proposed use Ls E~roperly one for which a conditlonal use
~ern~iC is authoeized by Anaheim MutliCipa7. C~de Section ?8.02.058~t~20 i:a wik.:
t:r, per.mit s:he continuatio:~ oE an oui:dcor cerre~t:ional vehicle sL~~rage yard
wit:h a c~tre~:.a~cer's residence Eor a minimum f:ive (5 ) yeac period, retroGctive
t:o Dec:emh~r. ]., 198G.
2. ~rhar; rh~~ use ~ans previously approved by t:he Orange t;ounty
Planr~iny Cuminission in connecLi~m wii:h Ocanye Coun~y U,e P~r:mir. Na. 3Q95,
un~.il December .l, 19a6.
3. That Code Sec~:i~n 18.02.058.(J20 permLr_s the continuatior~ of
! xm~-r~~~~trict~d U30a made nr~nconEorming t,y arinexai,ion, if ap~ro~ed by rhe
A~ahc~im City ~'1.annir~g Commissic~n.
4. Thar. rhe us~ i~ hereby yrant;ed for a~eriod o!' Eive ,years, to
ex~ire on December 1, 1991.
5. That r..l:e prupos~d u~e wi1.1 nat: adversc~ly af£ec4 the ad~oi-Zi~tg
7.~nci uscs and ~:hE growr.h and c;e~r~lo~7~nen~. of r.he area i.n which it is propnsed
:t t.o b~ locat:ed.
6. Thar.. t:hp aize and shape oF t:l~e ~ite ~~roposed £or t:he use is
adeguai:e r.o a11nw ~.he tull developmr~i7r. ot i:he proposed use ln a manner :iar
~~t:r. irnental r_o +:t~e part:i.cular ar~a nor ~ o r.he peace, heal~:h, safer.y anc~
general welfare n~ c:he Cit~.ztns oE the Ci~:y af Anaheim.
7. Tl~at ~he gr.anting of LhF~ Condit:i~na1 UsP Pecmit iincler ~h~
conditic~ns imposed, if any, wi12 not be detriment~l r.o the neace, he+~lth,
safet~~ and ganeral welf~re of r.he Citizens of t:he Ci~y of A~aheim.
1025r
PC87-•17
,'Y,,
,;
:F
~ , )
,,,
~
,~ •
,..-...
8~ 'I'h~t t:he traEfic generated by r_he proposed use wil'1 not impose an
undue I~ucden upon tre st:reets and hiyhways designcd and improved t:o cdrry thE
t-.raf.fic i~i the area.
9. '~hat: no one indica~ed r.hc~ir ptesence at said public t~earing in
o~posirio-i; and that no cor.respond~nce was received in opposition to the
suhjec~. petition.
ENVIR0:IMENTAt~ IMPACT ~'INDi~1C: That the i~lanning Director or his
au~hor.lzed representat:;.ve has determ.ined ~hat: rhe proposed projecr f.a11s
w.ii~hi.n i:he definit.ion oE Careyori.cal E~;empt:ions, rlass i, as dePin~d in L•he
Stat:e GIF Guidelines and is, thPtefore, cal.~gorically exempt ftom the
requirement t:o prepare an E7R,
NOW, 'P[~FREFORE, RE I'P RESO'LVED t:hat: the Anaheim Citiy Plannin~
CommisUion dor.s liereby gr.ant: subject Pei:ition for C~ndil•ional Use Permit, upon
i~he Eollowinc condii:ion~ which are hereby founc] t:o be a necessary pr.erequisxr_e
L-o the proposad use of the subject proper~y in order to pra_serve the safel•y
and yeneral vr~lfare oE t:he Cit:izens of t:he Cit:y of Anah~im:
'l. That 1-.he owr.er o° subject: Propett:y shall irrevocably of~er to
dedic~re to t!~e Cit:y oE Anaheim an additicnal sl:rip oF land along La
PaLr,ia Avc~nu~, m~asured westerly :trom the pcopPr. Cy ].i ne at ~he corr,er
af r.he intersection ot La Paima Avenue and Gakeview Avenue, ~xnd
va~:ying ~n widl:h frum 12 feer. ~or the Eirsi: 300 feet and ~her
tr<.~~isitioriinq from 12 f~e~ t.o 0 f~er. fcr ChF, nexr_ 300 feet. In t:t,e
ev~=rzt i.ha{: General Pl~in No. 210 pertaini.ng ~.o Critical Intersections
is not: adopi:er] by lhr~ City Cour.cil, this conditiori sha11 be
cnnsi~]e~:ed null and void.
2. Thar.. street: light.ing facilities along L~, Palma Avenue sh~a11 be
i.nsta:Lled as ,:equireci by t:he Ut.ilitiES Gc~nerai Manager iit accordance
with specificar.ions ~n file in r..he OLFice oE U~iliti.es General
Manaqer, and c:hat. sr~c~~rit:y in t.he form of a bond~ certificaL-e o£
d~pesit, let:ter of credit, or cashY i.n an amount and fo[:n
satisEac~c~ry t:o rhe ri~y of Anahc:im, sha.tl be postNd wir.h the City t.o
gu~~cantee r.he satisfact:ory complet:ion a~ the above-men~ioned
improvernenr..^,. Said sec~:ri~y shall be posted with tYie Cit,y of Anayeim
prior within rt~irt.y (30) days ~rom t-he date of this approval t~
gu~~ranCee .insta.llar.ion wfi:hin one hi~~idred eic~ht~~ (180} days from Lhis
ci~t~.
3. That suY~jecr pro~erty shal.l be dcvelopc~~9 subs~.ant.ially in accordance
wi~:h plans and :;pecif_i.cat:ions un Ei.le wir.h t:he c:i~y of 1lnaheim niarkEd
Ext~ibit No. 1.
~. That within a period of one t1) year Lrom the dat~ of L-!~i.s
re~o.l~ztii~n, Condition N~. 1, above-mentioned, shall be comPlied with.
5. Th~L- ~.ni.s us~ pel:miL- sha.ll eapire on Aecember 1, 1991.
-2-
t`
~C87-17
~'; i
/'"~°••,
i
~+~ v~~~
i;
~ ~~i;
BE IT EUR`PHL12 RESOLVED ~ha~ the Anaheim C11:y Planning C~~mmi~si~n does
hereby ffnd and determine t:hafi adopt:ion of this Resolation i.s expressly
prec3lcat~ed upon aPplicant:~: compliance wi.t:h eacl~ and all of the condirions
hereinabove ser. fortY,. Shoulu any such conditions, or any part~ i:hereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by t:he final judgment oE any court of
ccmpe~ent jurisc~iction, then i:his Resolution, arid any appcovals herein
c~ntained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE c^OR~GOING RGSOLU'PION ~s siqned and ap~roved by me rhis 19rh ~ay
nL- ,lanuary, 1987. -
~~~ ~~ ~, G~ ,., . %' . ,/ `
,;., ~.- . ,~J•~ ~~ ~~,~y~. i.;- : ~ ~
CNAIR ?,"~~~A~EIM CITY ANNING COMMIuSION
i
ATTEST: ~
--~~~~C-~i~.,'
SECRI~TARY, ,~NAHEIM CiTY ~I~AN TNG COMMI:SSIOP7
STATE ~F CnLTNORNIA )
COUNTY Of' ORANGE ) ss.
CI'PY OF ANAHEZ.M )
I, Edi~h i~. Harris, Secrei:ar.y of tne Anaheim Ci.~y Planning
Commissian, do hereby certif.y thal: th~ f.oregoing resalution was passed ~r.d
adopt:ed ai~ a rneatiny of ~he Anaf~cim Cit.y l~lanning Comm~ssion held on Janua~y
19, 1987, t~y the Eollowirig vore of the me:mbers ther=of:
AXES: CQMMISSIUN!3R~: BOUAS, ERX, HERL•sST, I,A CLATRE, LAWICKT, MC BURNEY,
Mc.°SE
NOES: COMMTSSIONERS: N~D;E
ABSENT: C~MMISSIONI~RS: NGNL
TN wz~rr~t;SS 'rTIiU42E0I'~ I have hereunt.o ser. my h~nd t.his 19ch day of
.7anuary, 1987.
~~ ~~~.~I~L~_.._~~_.L~~~.~.t
S'3CRETAI2 , AIVAE?~TM i.1'~`Y. t~LANN:[NG CUMMISSION
~~,
;I
,~,,
~
,
~'.
-?- PC$7-17
;~
~ .;.