Loading...
PC 87-177,~s, , ~ RESOLtTTION N0. PC87_177 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAFiEIM CITY PL~ANNTNG COMDlISSIOt1 T:i~\~ PETITION FOR R~CI~ASSIFICATxON N0. II6-(i7-22 B~ GRANTED ~~~ _ t„ ~,~ :~;,~s' .:~ ;; , ;+ ~ ~ ~ ~,~, : :~ WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did roceive a ver.ified peti-~ion for Re~lassification from HARTMANN CORPGR~TTON, 53fi West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92805, awners, and BENCO DEV~LOPMFN'I' GROUP, 4201 ~,ONG BEACH RI,VD., Ste. 403, I,ong Beach, CA 90807, agerit, of certain real property situated an L•he City of ~.naheim, C~unty oi qrange, StaL•e of C'aliEorni.a, clescxibed as follows: PARCGLS A AND f3, AS aHOWN UN A MAP FILED IN BOOK 22r PAGE 32 OF P~RCEL M.Al'S, II~ THE OFF:LCE OE THE COUNTY RECORD~Et Or ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. YARCEL 2 AN ~AS~MBNT 8.;i4 FEET IPi TF~E W:[DTH ~OR II3GRESS AND EGRESS C1VER THAT PORTION OF LOT 5 OF T?2ACTS N0. 71 ~ AS SHOWN ON A ~` MAP R~CORDED IN BOU,C '10, PAGE 22 OF MISCELGANSOUS MAPS. IN ' THE OFF'I~C OF THE COUNTX kECORDER Q'r' SAZD COUNTY, THE; SOUTH L,INB OF SAID EASEMENT. IIGT1~G DESCR]:BL;D AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A PQI.NT ON THE CENTERLT1dE QF THE 60 FOOT ROAl) AS SI•iOFN ON THE MAF OF TRACT N0. 71 ( SATD ROAD BEINf,~ NUVi' KN04Y1~T AS STATE COLLEGE BLVI). ) SATD POINT F3F:C~IG 280.34 FEET SOU~H, (MEASURED ALONG SAID CENTERLIN~) FFJM THE NORTH~~EST COR2dER OP' SECTION 25r TOWNSIi:[P 4 SOUTH~ RAITGP; 10 WEST~ SAN BERrIARDIIQO BASE I~ATD MERIDTAN, TH~t1CG EAST, PARALLEI. WITH THE S()UTH LINE OF 5A,TD LOT 5, 2S0 kEET. EXCGFTING THEREFROM 'PHAT PURTJUN TNCL,ULFll WTTHIN SAID 60 F'OOT 220AD AS .~'i:~0ATt7 ON THE MAF' OP' SATD T&ACT N0. 71. WIiBREAS, L-he City Planning Commiss:iun diQ hold 4 publir. hearS.ng at tYie Civic Center in the City of Anah~im on August 31, 1987 at 1;30 p.m., notice of said publie hearing h~ving been duly given as reguired by .law ~nd in accordance with the proa3.sinns o;E the Anahe~m Municipal Cod~ Ctiapter 18.U3, t.o hear and consider evidence for and against ~~id proposed rPClassifir.3tion and to invastigate and mzke findings and. recommendations in connection L•herewith; and WFiEREA5, aaid Commission, aft~r flue inspection, in~~estigation an3 study made by itsolf and in its b~half, ana after due consideration of all ' ovidence and rep~rts off~z•ec3 at ssid he~ring, does finc3 and det~rmii~e ~he ? followinr~ faets: 1. That ~he ~ehitioner proposes reclassiPica~ion oL- parcel 1 (westerly 1.93 acres) af subjoct propertp from the ML (Industria.l, Limite~) r.one to CO (~am;rercial O.fEice and Professional) or a less intense zone. 00~7r PC87-177 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;'r1~ ~ ~ ' 2. That the Anah~;im General Plan clesignates subjsct property for Pusiness Office/Se.rvice/Indust.rial layid uses (e.fPect.ive March 17, 1487). 3. That ~he pr~~posod reclassification of subjoct ~rogerty is necessary and/or desirable £or the orderlx and prop~r development oF the aommunity. 4. That the pr~posed reclassification of subject property does properly .r~:late tc the zo:~es and ttieir permitted uses .locally established in close proximity to suLaecti prapFrty and to the zt,nas a.nd ~heir permitted uses generally establish~d throughaiit the communi;y. 5. That the proposed reclassi£ication uf subject proy~erty requires tha dedica~ion and improvement oE abutting stxeets and alSeys in accordance with ths Circulation F.lement of the Ceneral P~an, due to the znticipaCed increase i.n traEfzc which will be generated by ~he i.ntensification o£ land use. 6. Th~~t one (1) person indicated his presence at said ~ublic heari.ng• in apnnsition; and tliat no correspondence rras receivecl in opposition to subjer.t pet.ition. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING; That tY,e Anah~im City Planning Comma.ssion has rPView~d an Aciclendum Lo Program ~nvzronrnental TmpacL- Repor.t No. 274 which was prQpared in conjunction with Lhe pzo~~osed corrmerczal office d~velopment on a site consisting af ap~roximately 2.86 acres, whicb L-shaped parcel is bordored by State College Boulevard on ~he west r~nd Katella Avanue on the north; said project to consist of a 13-,tory oftice tower totalling 238,500 ~~Zuare feet, a 5,000 squure foot r•3staurant and a parkinq structure , r.or~tain~~ia 773 parkir~g spaces; ~nd to re±classil:y Parr.el 1(the westerly 1.43 acres) from the DiL (Industrial, Li.mit:ed) Zone ta the CO (Commercial, OfLice and ~rufessi.ona]) 'Lone; and aftez• consider.iny nroyram Fnvironmental Impact Report ~do. 2%4 and ttxo Addcndum as ;:hey apply to the subject proposed $enco Deve].opment pr.•oject, and revierring evidence, both written and oral, presented to :,uppl~ment Pro~~ram EIR r(o. 274 and the Adclexid~.un, the Plannin~ Commissi~n does hereby find that EIR Na. 274 arad the Adc~endum ~re ir~ compliance with the Cali£ornia Envixonment~l Qualit~y AcL- and ~he Stat~ and City Guidelines; and th~t the Addendum £~r the proposed development indicates that the praject ?' mitigati~n measuress can reduce all ~~rojtcL- specific impacts ~o an accep+:able q 1QVel; that although the proaect wrill incremenL~.lly contribute to tlz~ signii•icant cumulative unavoidablQ adverse impacts which were identi~iecl in ' Program ETR No. 27~, the City Council previously ackno~aledged these impac~s and aclopted a Statement o.f GvorridincJ Considera~ions when ~hey eerti£ied Progzam EIR No. 274 on :~arcli 17, 1987 and, thercfore, the Plann:ing Comrnission 8~es kiereby certi.fy Pi:ogram ETR No. 274 and the Addendum for the subject ~,roposal. DTUW, ~HEREFOKF. BE IT RESOLVFD that the Anaheim Cicy Flanning Commission does h.ereby grant :;u~je..t Pet.ition for Reclassific:ation and, by so , doing, that Tirle 10-zoning of tiie Anaheim Municipa]. Code be amended to exclude the above-c~escribed propecty from the MI~ (Indusr,rial, Limited) :one r`. ~ and Co inc.urporate 3aid de~aribed property into the CO (Commercial ~fEa.ce ar.d '' ProPessaonal) Zone upon the following conc~itions which are hereby found to be ~'',; ~ necQSSary prer.equisihe to tihe pruposed use o£ subjec~ pruperty in order ~o ~ ,~_.:; . ~;,.;i ~ .~~'~~~ .~;i St ; ^2_ P~B~-1~~ ?' 1~" :. ~ ~~~~+°r~~r"~ ~,K 4 ,.~;. ,,, . , . , ly. ~ ~' ~4is'~"li ,%e`: . .s,',;.' ~ - r!r . .. . . _ .. .. . .. .- . . . • . .. . . ;r ;.`? ::~ ,~,, . . _ ~~;.'r~~ . J ~ preserve the saEety and general welf.are oF th~ Citizens o[ the Ci~y oE ~ Anahei.m: E~ 1. 'rhar ~he owner oL- SUb]c~CC properL-y shall irrevocak,ly offer to ~ ~ dedic~t~ to the Cil-y of Anat~eim a sL-rip of la,~d 60 f~et in wiclth Frarn the centerline of rhe street along Sl.ate Coilege ~ Boulevard i.or streeL ~vi.de;~i~'~g purposes. ~ ~ Y 2. That the owner. of sunjec~ property yhall. ir_evocably oE~er to dedicate to ttie C~ty oE Analt~im an additional stri~~ of land along State College Bou].evard, mcasurf.d sautherly from the I~acl:-oF-curb al: the corner oC th~ intersection of State Co1'l~ge Boul~var~ and Y.aL•ella Avenue, and varying in widrh Erom ].2 teet For the fir.st 3U0 Eeet and t:hen l-.ransiti.onir,g frum 12 feer l:o Q feet f:or t~tie next 30~ feei;, ?. Ti~at• th~ owner ot subjecl•. property sha11 irrevocably of.Fer to dedicate to the City oL• 'Anaheim an additional strip oi land a.long Yatella Avenue, measureci easterly f rorn the k~ack-oL--curb at tt~e corner o[ the intersection of Kai:e7.l:.a avenue and State Collegc~ Hc~ulevard, and varyin~r in width ~rom 1~ feet Eor the £ir.st 300 feet. and then transitiunir,~ from 12 Eeet to 0 f ect Eor r.he next :iUO ~eet. 4. Thai: all engineeriny r~quirements of the City vf Ar~aheitt~ alon~ Shate Collcge ~3aulev~rd and Ka~ella Avenu~, including pr~~E~arur_i.~n ~L im}~rovement ~lans and installaL•ion of all improvc ~ents such as curbs and yutters, aidewalks, wa~er f3ciliti.~~, sLeeet grading and n~vement, sewer. ar.d drainage L-ac:iLities, or oth<~r app~:rrenant wor.k shall be complied wi.tl~ as rr_quired by the Cir,~Y Engineer and in accor~ance with speci~ir~~tions un file in th~ Oftice c~E the Ci'cy Engineer; and that security in L-he Eorrn o[ a bond, cer~iEicate of deposit, .l~tter o~ credit, or c~sh, in ar- ~muunt and Eorm ~atis~actory ' to L-he Ci.ty of :~naheim, ~hall be po:ste~3 with the City L•o ' guar.anr.ee ~he ^atisfactury complt~tior~ of said i.mprovements. S~id sccuri~y shall be postE=d with tne City priar to ~- 9 J Properfiy, to inL-roduction aE un ordinance rezonin sub'ect !'~~ giiaranr,ee t:he insL-a.llation ol: the ab~~v~-requ~ ced improvemenL•s :;,`;c~ pr.ior to occupancy; or within a period of twa year.s, whichever ,;~ occu,:s Eir~:t, 5. 'i'hat the owner oi suk:jc~c~ properf:y shaJ.l b~ xeq~aieed tn imnrove the e.ntir~~ sou.:heas~ c:~rner of KatF~.lla Av~~n~c and St:aLe Co~.lc~ge ~oulev~~rd to cri~iczl i~:~Prsectior s~andar:::;. 6. That pric.r. to L•h~ int;oduc'-ion o~ an o~dir.ance rt~zon.~.ng sub'ject property~ rondition Noa. 1, Z, 3~ 4, and 5, ahc;ve-m~nt~iot:ecl, _ shall be cumpleted, The provisions or r:..ghts ~cai;ted by this ~'' ~~'' reyolueion :;ha11 becorne nu1]. a~:d v~~Ld F~y ac;:ian of L•1!e Plann9.r~~~ ;~;;, Commission unleys ~ai~] conditto~:s ar~ comnli~~l witl~ wil:hin t:wo , ~;~, y~wars fcorn the .~ate of this resol.~t-ion, or suc7 .EurL•her kime a:~ '•. ~--~ - - the Plauning Cornmission in~y yrant. ~~ ' ~, , ;;~ ~ ; :.; ,',, ; ~ ,:;~ ~ { . -3- PC87-1'17 '~~ 4 i cy~~~ ~ ~ ' r ,~~ r , r ,~, ~~ , ,~, , ~ ~ y.~ ~ r ~ ~ ia ; ~ ~,~ ~ ~ . . ti : ~ ie.~~wiP.~i ~'1.+~7c .. .. . ~. . . . _ ~ .. .. . ~ ~^~~ ~> ~,~, , i ,. ; ;: . :,:. . ~„ .,.x ,.~ ,.. . .. . .: ......... ... ,. . . ;~t , ~~ ~; >> , f, ,~;~'~,. ~ r1~ ,~ Hh1R RESOL"J~D thar the Anaheira Ci~y P1ar,nxng Commission FUKT BE I'P ~E f ,~i . . does hereby find an-9 determine that ac]option o~ this Resolutlon is expressly d itions p~:edicated upori applicant's compliance with e~ch and all of the cun hereinabove seL- for+~:~. Should any such cc~ndition~~ or an,y vart thereof, be ~eclare~3 i.nvalid or unenEorc~able by the fina:L ~uclq~~enL 4f any court of in h ere competen~ jur.isdi~tion, then this Resolution, and any approvals cocitained, sha11 be deemed nu11 and void. TEir FOFGGUING RG50LUTTON is sig~-~d and approv~d by mc this 31~t clay of August, 1987. /~~ ~ ~; ~~ J ~y~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ` . -~ ~ ei`" ` _ PLANNING CO~SSION T . CliAIRMAN, ANr~HG7h1 CT .:; A`rTEST: ~r ~ r i~J ~ ~ GL~t~~[ A ` _ . SECRE'PA Y, ANAF'iE;TM GI'PY PLIiNNTNG COMMISSION ir~ STA'rE UF~' GALIb'ORNI A 1 ti ~;. COUNTY CF 012ANGE J 9s . .~`;',~ CI`PY UE ANAhIEIM ) ='f^ T, Edith L. Harris, Secratary oE the Anaheim City Planning ~;.~i Commission, d~ hereby c~rtiCy tnat kt~e Earegoiny res~~lution was passed and ;:; aclopL•ed ~t a meeting of ~h~ Anaheim ~ity Planning Commissi4n t~elci on August 31, 1987, by the folluwing vote oL th~ members thereoE : ~y~~; rqMMISSl'ONC~;R6: 30URS, BOYDS'PUN, CARUSILGO, FELDIIAUS, HE.F.I3ST~ ``+ ,,if P9C BUR[4EYi MLSSE ;iyF td0E5: COPIMISSZONC;RS: NUNE: ;;s;. "} AF3SENT: COMMISSIONGItSt NONEi `~ ',;;a ]:N WI`t'[~IES5 WHLRi~~F~, T have hereuni:o sel: tny hand thi.s 31s~. day oE ,~ ~ ' ~ ~~~~ ~ Aag~zst, i987. ~ ~ C ~ ' ( - 4'C~ r ~ .i , SF~CItE. ARY~ ANAHL'IM CITY P.I,ANNZNG COMMIS5i0RJ 'ti~ --4 - er ,; PC37-177 _ ,r* , r„ . f't~ ~ ~ ~ ;'.~'~tk __.__ ...,.. ., . .r.~..n.lx+»*.UJJI'v~?~