PC 87-191~
:...~
RES~LUTZON N0. PC87-1y7.
F , ~
A~2ESOLUT:[ON OF THE A23AHETM CITY SLANNING COMMT;,SION
THAT PETIxTON FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 87-Fit3-14 liE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Cii:y ~'lann3.ng Commission did r.eceive a
verified petition ~or Reclassi~icati~n from HANOVER REAL ESTATE A~SOCIATES,
9300 Wils:zire Blvd, Suite 500, Beverly Hi11s, CA 90212, owner, and P;3ILIP R.
SCHWA:RTZE, ].80'12 Skg Park Circle, Irviiie, CA 9~714, agen't, of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Qz ange, Staice oL
California, described as foll9ws:
THA~` POR'rION OF TFiE NOR~'HI~AST QUARTER QF SECTTON 2 6,
'.COW2~SHIP 4 SOUTfI, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANGHO SAN
JUAN CAJON SANTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP 125CGRnED IN
BOOK 51, P,~GF.( S) 10, OF N,ISC~LL,ANEOUS r4AP5, IN THE
OrETCE 0~' TFIE COTJNTY RECORDER CE' SAID COUNTY,
Dk~SCRIBED AS FOLI~OWS:
PAFCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED TDl SOQK 81, PAGE 32
OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFTC~ ~F THE C~UNTY RECOBDER
OF SAID ORkNGE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, tho City Planning Commission dicl hold a public hearing
at the Civic Cen~er in the Cii:y uf Anaheim on SEptember 1', 1987 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice o~ said publ~c he~.rxng having been du].y given as rec~~iir.ed by law and in
~ccordancs wi~h tihe provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and cansider evidence f.or and ag~ainst said propose~3 reclassification
and to investigat:e and make findzngs ~xid recommendations in connection
th~rewitk!; and
WHEREAS, said Corrunission, after due inspection, investigation
and study rondQ by itselE and in its behalt, and a..fter due considora~ion of all
evidezice and reports offered at said Y,earing, does fiiid and determine tkiQ
following facts;
1. Th~t the petitaoner proposes rec.lassi.iicaL-ion of subject
proper~y from ML (Industrial, Limit~ed) to CO (Commercial, Office and
Profess.i.onal) ZOT~P..
2. That the Anahoirn General Plan designates subject property
~oc General Tndustrial land uses.
: 3. i'hak the proposed reclassificc~tion o~ sub ;ect property is
;~'~'; r~ecessary and/or desirable for the orde.rly and proper development of 4he
'- f comrnunity.
~. Th~i: the propos~d xoclassification of subjecr, property does
properly re3ate to the zones and their permitt~d uses lacally est iblished in
close proxima.ty to subjoct property and to the zones 3nd their pex•matted uses
generally ~stahlished rhroughout the community.
';i:~~ ' ~ ~ .
;, t
i~~' S1 . ',, .
m~r~~Sf "(''~r~l1~ ,QO62Y •~ ~
f S~r~ ~y,. `iTi~ LIl:.~E, ~ '4 .
h . i s ~. ' ^y~5t+~~a 4~,t ~ ~~ ~
4 '= t~~~~g ~~}~;~ y { ~. ~, ~ '
_ . .. . . __ il}`,3Sllr~~}~''r_,'~~ ~~ ... _
PC87-191
t:~q
;~
;~
;~
y~~
ri:
L~
1
,;~;
/~
~ . :,:: ,~#~~
~~u1~'. ~ i;i , . . . . . . . ., ' ..;', r ~ ~'~ ~; ~ r `~7 17~r~f?'~ .,~ t~ tiC~d3it~`i, ~j~[~wa~{~~~~~~ ~ . ,~
'~° ... . . . _ , ~' 1+ .,i ~r~ a: ~.. ~'
~i i
.. . . ~:al~Fa% ~ . ~ , .!~~
i
`, i
~~ ~ ~:~~~'~j4
5. ThaC the proposed reclassi£ication of subject pro~erty
r~quires the d~dication and improvement of abutting streo~s and alleys in
acc~rclance with the CS.rc•alation Element of the General Plan, due t;u the
anti~ipated inc~•ease in traffic whi:ch wi11 be generated by the intensification
uf land use.
6. That no one ~.x~di.cated their. presence at said nublic hearing
zn opposition; and ~.hat no correspondence was received zzi opposition to ;
subject petition.
TNVIRONMFNTAL IMPA~7 FINDING: That t..~ Anaheim Ci~y Flanning ~j
Commission after. reviewing Drafr Environm~+nta1 Impact Report No. 271 an8 the ~~
Ad~endum for the propased. p.roject to permit a 1, 235, 375-square foot
corrirr~ercia.i/offi.ce complex, including 56,000 squar~ feet of aceAssory rstail
uses, to be included within 5 buildings ranging in hei~ht from 110 to 223
feet and t;.~ee multi-level parking sCructures to be constructecl ovar ~ ;~%
10- eai~, 5- hzse ~eriod on an irze ularl '~
Y P 1 g y-shaped parcel of land consisting of ;l
a~proxim~tely 17.1 acres, having apZ~roximate frontages of 1022 feet on the
soutlz s.i.de of K.atelZa AvenuF. and 3U2 .feet on the north si3e o£ Paci~icp j'
Avenue, and being loc~ltecl approximately 66Y feet caesL- of the intersectian of ~i
Katella Avenu~ and State 1:o11ege Boulevard ar.d Eurther described as 1284 East
Ka~ella Avenue (Hanover Gol~enwest Business Park) snd 1301-1395 East Par.ifico
Aveiius (Hanover Anaheim Central Business Pt;rk); and aft~or reviewing evidence, I
botYi writteri and oral, presented to supplemQnt Uraft EIR No. 271, th~
Pl~.r,ning Co:nmission c~oes hereby find that EIR tio. 271 is in compliance with ;;;;~I
the Califnrrzia Env.ironmental Qu~ility Act and the State and City Guidelin~s; ~
that ETR No. 2'll identifies tYie following impacts which are cons.idered to be
both unavoidahle and adverse in nature and not fu11y mitigaLed to a le~el of _ ;f
in~ 5.gnif icance: ~
«
1'hat the proje~t will increment~lly inteiisify th~; urban character "~
of the area znd will result in increas~d t•raff3.c and air pollu~ant ~
emissions wi'thin tho inunediare viciriity.
The project wi11 result in ap~roximat~.ly 5,042 permanent
~mployees. While z~ ran be assumed tha~ a ma~or ~orti4n of new
employ~:es will bQ provided t}irough tha 1oca1 labor market, a
cerl:ain portion wxll be drawn from out-si.de ar~d will thus increase `~~
'~~~
demand for housi:ng, partially within the "a£tordable" ranc7e. ,!
;i
T_he p.rojeat is anticipated to gonerate 17.,260 naw daily vehicle '3
trips ot which ].,(i60 w3.11 uccur in the PM peak houx, Tsmporary
ccngestion may occur in the imrn~diate arQa. -~
Projec~ implementation w=11 incremantally add to demand toL~ major
r..ew i.nirasi:ructure improvements .iri Che area including riraulation
improvQments, ar,d sewar, ;horm drain, wa~er system, and electric~l
~.:aailities.
Project implementation will add to tYle cumulaL-ivQ demand for finite
resources such as energy and water.
T.ha prnposed project wi11 contribute to c~umz'lative demaiids upc,n
public services such as police and fire pro~ection.
~ ,~ ~~ ~;;~~
,,
-2-- YC87-1y1 ;'::~~
;
~;
~ `~
._ . . ~.;~ ,~~~
~ -
~~:~ ~
w~' 1 , , ~ ~ : L,,~,t
~ i
71~
~j
~'ab,: ~
~
1
. ~
~
~~h~
i
~ 'i.N
Thoraf.ore, the k~1t-nn3.ng ~o~i: sion dor~s t~oreby determine l•hat Cho
brn~fits of tlie projact hnve baari r~taighod against the unavoidabie adverse
environmen~al impacts arid, pursuant to Sect~•~n 15093 of th~ State CEQA
Guidelinos, the occurrence of the signi:'ic2nt envirunmental ~fgQ~~3
idontified an 1~Tk No. 271 as sot forth abovca, may be pormitted without
f.tu~ther mitigation duo to ~2io following ovorridinc~ considerati.ons:
(1) Tlie project wi11 bring substantial benefits to the citizons o~
A~ial~eim by providing acidir.ional employmen~ and busiz~c~3s
act.ivities to kho area.
(2) The projert i~ consistenl: with the intgnt ~f ~ha City's General
Plaii for the site ~~r.d will be e~modtible with the pr+;jecCed
uses of the ;;urraunding lanci uses.
(3) Mitigation measurc±s have been iiicorpor~~~d into the proj~c:t to
roduce ths majority of environmenCal .Lmpn~~$ to axi ~-cc,e~,tabl~
).evel.
i- ThereforQ, the Planning Commission herebx certifies EIR No. 271 and
tlie Addendut~~ for the propose~l project azir] adopts this Starement of Over: idin
y Considerations, g
NGW, THEREFORL•', BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby qrant subjeat PQtiY.ion for Reclass.ification and, by ~o
doing, that Title 1£t-?.onin~ ~g
Qxciude the above-closcribed pro~,ertye fromh thQ MLni~J.pal Code be amended to
and to i.ncox•purate said dQSCribed propcrty inko he aCOt(Commer~ia]~d Office
and F~rofnssional) Zone upon tho followix~y condi~ions which are her~by found
to be a necessarl prer~qui,ite to L•h~, pz•opc,sod use of subject pro Krt in
order t;o presorve the ~afety ai~d gen~ral wPlfare of ~he Citi•r,ens qf. tne City
of A;~aheim:
1. That this Reclassification is granted su~ject to the recordation of
Developm~r.t Agreement No. 87-l;1 with trQ Office ot the Oranqo
Cnunl•y Recorder. A copy of sa.id rR~:orried agreomQr~t shall be
furnis}ied to thQ Plai_I~ing p~partment.
Z. Thrat Devc~lonment AgrQQment No. a7-O1 shall bP in full
effect until khe Qntire subjoct properky is ror.onc~d.
8evelopment agre~ement S,s canca::!ed, in accordance
provisions Qf 5eckion 18 "Cancellation" tharofn, no
parcels shall be rec]assiEaed to t.he CO "Commorr.ial.
Profes~ionnl" ?.one.
force and
If uaici
kith the
remaininq
)~Fice and
3. That prior to fnL-raduction ot an ordinanco r~zonin~ any portian of
sabject propert•y or with3.n t~ pariod oE nfnety (90y d~-ys from the
Qate of this rQSOlution, w...ichevar occurs firat, the ownar(s) p~
s~tb;acr. pzoper. ty sha12 execur.~ dnd recc~rd ~~ cc-vena~it i~n a f~rm
Approved by *_he City Attorna~•~F OEfic«~ w}sorain scch ownctr(s; aqreo
not to contese the tormati.ton of any ~srtossment distriat(~c) ~,t~i~h
ma~+ hereafter bo fc~rmc~u nur~uantr to the provisi~ns uf Dc~vHl~pment
Agr~Rmon*. No. 03-•pl ba:..+een r.ho City of An~3hoim and An~hs?im Stadium
An3ociatea, ahich distrSc:.(s) coulci inc.lude sur,h owner'a proporty,
-3- PCB%_191 1
: ~ ~;. 3f
~ ~
~ `:~
~~~~ ~ ,
4. That prior to inL•rodu~Cian uf an orQinance rezoning any port.ion of
subject pcopert~,• cr within a period of ninety (9~) days from the
datQ o~ this resa7.ution, whichevQr o~cur~ Eirst, the ownar(5) of
subjoct pcoperty sha]] ~x~ctite and recorfl a covenant in a~orm
appro~ved by tha City Attorney's Off.ice wherein such owner(s) agree
not to ca:~tQSi: che Earmati.on o.~ any ~pocial asse~smen~ district,
communit,y facilitias distract, redovelopment ar~a or oCher
financing machanism which may har.~t~£Ler he Eormecl to pt~y tor the~
construction and/ar mainte~~ance oE public im~rovements nacessitate~i
by said project, wh.ich district(s) wcu.ld include subjQCt property.
Said aovenan~ wi11 talso indicate that ownec(s) wilt consenG to the ~
J.evying of any special tax or ch~rge which mt+y be nocsssary '.i
~urtherance a£ ~he intent and purF~c~e oF Developr~ent Agreemen~ tlo.
8'I-07..
5. That prior to introduction of an ordinancQ rezoniaig any portion of
subject praperty or within a periud of one ('~.) year frnm ths date
of rhis zeso'luL•ion, wh.ichever occurs first, the pinperty owner
shz'_1 make irrevocable o.E.fars of ciedication to the Cit} of Anaheim
for the following as sY~ow71 on Exhibit No. 2 of Development
Agreement No. 87-01:
(a) A ten (~0) foot wide strip of land alor.g thi~ sout>> side oE
Katolla Avei-ue.
(b) An e~ghL• (4) foot wic3o strip of land alonq the nort~ti ~ide u£
Pacifico Avenue, .
6. That ,prior to ii-troduction of an ordinance rezoning any gorticin of
subject p:operty, Che e:ci~tinq uutomotivo tletai~iing facility
loaat~d at 1381 East Pacific~ J~venue 3ha11 either he ~ercr:inated or
a conditional usF perrnit shall bc~ obtained.
7. That priar to intr.oduction oE an ordinance rezoning any portion of
subject property, the propQrt~~ o~~ner shall subcnit a letter
r~quesCing thQ term.in~tion of Conclitional Uscs Pormit t1os. '1842 anf4
1F379 ~
8, 7hat ordinances r~classifyi~~g subject property shall be adoptc~d as
each ~arcel is ready to c.omplj with conditi~ns pertaining Co such
parcol; provic~Q~3, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean
existing parcels of recorc~.
9. That p:ior to intxod~xc:tion of ord.inances r.e~oning eact- portiAn of
subjc+ck properky, a pre.liminar,y title report shall be furnishe~ to
the .'.aning Uivision showiiig the lee~al vesting of L•itla, a legal
descripr_ion antl containinq a map of tho prop~sty.
iiE IT FURTIlER RESOLVr~b L•2iat th4 Anahcsim City P1.nnniaq Commission
d~as her~by fiud and detQrmi.ne that sdopti~n of tihis P,esoluti~n is expresaly
-- predicat;g~ upon applicant's comnl.ihr.-:e r-ith aach and a11 of the conditions
~ horoinabove set forth. Stioulct a:-y such conditiun;~, or any paxt thereoL, LQ
~ 8ocl~ce~d invalid or unonforcoable by ~he final ju~lgmeet of any r.ourt ~f
~ compotent ~juristliction, then ~his itersodution, anli any approvAls 1:Rrein
'" conr.alned, shAll b4 deomod na11 nnd void.
,
~ , ~ _9_ PCti?-191 ;
't `~ `
,.
., '"r,
, ,
~.! ~
. . ~ ~ ~ .. ~ _ , ,.. , „ i.! f; d .1J.
~ ., l<~~
, ._.._:., . ,. . . a . . . . . .~,..
^'
),-~
,..
~
~
' ; '~'d 't ~ P '~+~`iS.~
~~ EP~k
I~~:~~
'~
. . ~. '!,~.`;
~
THE FOI2EGOING RFSOLLITTON i:s signe6 and agprovad by me L•hls 14th day
of ~optember. ~.987.
o~'~,-~' 1 ~!-1~..~_
~ ~
CHT.IRMAN, Iit1AHETM +ITY PLI~NNING COM~fISSION
AT'PEST: ~ .. '
/ ~~Slll1./~.d~__- --
SECRETf+R , ANAHEIM ClTY PLI~NNZNG COMMISSIUN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTX OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY Ot ATIAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, SQCretary of ~i:e Ar,al:2it~ City Planr~ing Commission,
do hareby certify tllat tt-a _'oreqa~.:.<j reso7.ution was pa~secl and adopted at a
meeting of r.hP Anaheim Citv :.~ar.ning Commission helct on SeptQmber ].4, 1987,
hy th~ following votia or i:he m::rnbers thereoF~
AY.w'.S: l;Ot~tJ°~IONERS: Lit1UA5, BOYDSTLTN, CAl2USIGLU, FELDHA'US, H~RIIST,
MESSE:
pIUF;~: c:OMMTSSTOiiERS: NONE
AI3SF~`i: C0~~IISSIONEFS: MC IIURNEY
II3 WITPIESS WH~REOF, I havo hereunCo sQt my haz~d this 14th d~sy of
S~Pteraber, ].987.
~
_ _~'~_.•/ J ~4~= \ ~ _ r
SECRErARY, I~NAI3EIM CITY PLANNIIiG COMMISSION
-5-
PC87-191
: :i
~.;r~:~ t,':~1~