PC 87-201~
~
RESOLUTION NQ,~PC$7-2J1
A 12~SbLU'TION OF THG l.NAHEIM CTTY PLANN711G COhII~fISSTON
TFIAT PE~'IyION FOH VAI~IA2ICE N0. 3700 BE GRANT~D
WHSREAS, the Anaheim City Plannzrig Commissian did receiv~ a
veri£ied PeL-ition for Variance fr~m ~JA1rIES T~i. F.LLIOTT AND GRAt^,E E, FLLIOTT, 324
S. EarXham, Orange, CA 92668, owner, and WALTGR K. BOWMAN, 7926 Cer.r.itos
Avenue, Si:anton, CA 906L~0, agenL-, of cert~in real property sit:uatQd in the
City of Anaheim, CounL-y of Orange, State of Cali.f-orni~, desc:ibed as Pollows:
LOT 7 OF TH~ ~STA'.Er, U~ MARY STROBGi„ RECORDET~ IN IIOOK
3, PAGES 76 F1ND 77 OL' MISCSLLANEOliS kECORL'S, ZN TH~
OT'FIt^~ OF TFI~ COUNTY RECO~UER OF I,dS ANGELES COUNTt.
EXCT'OTTNG THERLFROM :OR PUEiLIC 5IDBWALI~ PURPOSES A
STRIE' QF 6 1/2 FEET WIDE ALONG TH'E ~ASTERLY DQUNDAR~
AS CONVEYEU TO TI~E CTTY CF ANAHEIM, BY DEED FECORDED
APRTT 13, 19U6, IN I300K 13Z, FAGE 112 OF DE~D5,
RECORDS OF ORANGF; CUUNTY, CAI,IFORNIA. .
WHER~AS, the City Planning Commissi~n did h~ld a public hearing
at the Civic C~nter in the ~ity of Anaheim on September 2$, 1927, aL 1:30
p.m., notice ot said publir hearing having b~en duly given as requir.ed by ~aw
and in accozdance with ths provisions of the Ana}ieim Munici.pal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear ~nd consider evidence for anfl against said proposed variance
eind to investigate and make findings and recommendatians in connection
ther~:wilh; and
WHEREAS, 5aid Commission, aL•i:er due inspaction, investigatior:
and s~:udy m~r]e L'y itsAlE and in its b~hal.f, and aEter ciue cor.sideration of a'll
evidence and reports offered at saicl hearing, d~es fincl and determina the
Lollowing facts:
~. That ~he p~titi.oner proposes waivers oP the followix~g to
construct a 3-story, 8-unit ap~r~tment builrling:
(A) SE~TION 18_,3h.Q62,tQ17, - Mz~r.i~m,_,,~~r~ ural heic,~ht.
(? ~~qrigs permitted; 3 s~,n~i~:,
proposQd)
(~i) SE~~ION 1Q~34.O~1~20 - M~ximum si~fH, cQyFraae.
( 55~ permi.'tted; 54'b proposed)
1., Thal• rhe above-mentzoned w~iv~;rs ai•e hereby gran~ed on the
basis tk~a~: are special r.ircumsL-an~e, applicable to the praperty sucYi as size,
sYiape, topogra~hy, location or surroundinys, which do not app~y to oh~her
identically zoned progerties in the viciniky; and that skrict applica~ion ot
the Zoning Code deprives the pr.oper~y of privileges enjoyed b~• other
properti~s in i.denLical zoning classificatir~n i.n th~ vicznity; anr~ further
granting waiver (b) on the basis that the request is minimal.
~~. ;k~' ':
. ~
^.~ ~ r
.;~';_
0073r PC87-201 '1:
~ ,~:.;
NIAwY. ~ -. .. _. , ~ . ~ . .. . . . ,.. . .. ~ . ... ~ . . ., . . , .. . . . . . ..,. ~i .. .. . . . .. . .. .~~..~v
t:'~'
~ ~ ~ ~~..at~
~ ~';{
T
f}
3. That tl~ez~e are exr.eptional or ex~raordinary circumutances
or conditior~s ~pplicable to the pxoperty involved or to the in~ended use pf
the property that do not apply gensrally to t.he property or class of use in
the same vicin.ity and zone.
~
~. ihat the z•eqiiested var.iance is necQssary Por the
preserv~zkion znd enj~yment of a substantial property right possessed by o~hex•
~'_~ nroperty in the same vicinity aiid zone, and denied to the ~roperty in c~uestion.
5e Ttiat: tlie requested variance wi.ll not be materially
cletrimei~tal to ttie public wel~are or injur.ious to the property or improvements
in such vicinity and zone in which the property is :located.
6. That orie (1} pexson indic~ted their preseiice at said public
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to stiibjec~ peL-ition.
~..
ENVIRpNMENTAL IhfPACT__FINDIT7G: That the Anahei.m City Pl~nnznq
Co-nmission has reviewe~9 the pruposal t~ reclassiEy subject property from the
;~Y CG (Commercial, Genaral) zorie tc thP RM-1200 (ResideriLial, Multiple-Family)
~• zone to construct a 3-story, 8-uni.t apartment buil;~ing with waivers ~f
maximum structural heic~ht and mar.imum sito coverage ori a rectanc~ularly-s'.aped
` parrPl of land consisting of approximateiy 11,431 square :~eet; havinc~ a
fron.tage oL- approximatgly 72 FeeC on Lhe west side of Lemon Street, having a
maximum C1P~t~1 of approximately 15L feet and k~eing located approximately 175
~ect narL•h of the centerline of Santa Ana StrNat and further described as 415
South Lemon Street; aiicl does hereby approve L-he Negative Dec:larati~n upon
f.inding that it has consicler.ed the NegaLive Decl.aration togetzer wi.th any
comments received durin~ the publia review pr.ocess and Euri;her findir~g on the
basis af the initial sl:ucZy and anp comments r~ceived that ther~ is no
sixbstantial evidence tha~ t.he project wi11 have a significan~ eEfect on the
, environment„
NOW, THF:~EFOFtE, BE iT F2ESOLVED tt-at the lanaheim Ci.ty Planning
Commi~sion d
h
oes
ereby granl: subject Petitiun for Variarice, up~n ~he
Fnllowing conditions which ar
e hereb
fo
d ~
b
;.; .
y
un
o
e r~ necessary prerequis3.te to
Che proposed use of the sub~ect
ro
ert
i
d
;
i~+
'
i p
p
y
n ar
er to preser~~e the safeLy and
gen~xal we.lfare of +;he Citizens of the City of I~~iaheim:
,
`'
~ 1. 'i'riat the owner of subject nropertX sha11 pay to the City of
Anaheim a fee for trNe planking purposes a7ang Lemoci Stxeet in
an amount as determined by the City C~uncil.
b-
2. That prior L•o issuance of a building permit, appropri.ate park
and rocreatiori in-lieu tees shall be paid tn the City of
~,
;., ~n~heim in an amount as determinQd by the City Counci,l.
.
~:;~
'
' 3. That prior to issnance of a building permit, the appropriate
:r
~ ~raffic si.gnal assessment f.ee shall b~: paid to the City of
~;
' Anaheim in an amount as deL•erminPd by khe (:ity Council.
~
.
4~ '2- PC87-201
'.;;. ;
, ~ ~~
~;~;:r. ~~~;.: ~ ..
.~,~.~~~'~~" ~~~' ._ . .
~ fi~
f . ~:rl~i'~r~or.~ i ~ i r' ~ -
~ ~l..~t c,..J~,:l ;
r ~ ~, :i
r~ ~r~ia , r ~;
r E~' ~~r( '~~` l ~; . .
~ v'~;bir'~!~ ~k~ ~' .
s'Mbr~'~',~,
."~!~
r'
~~`~t
. ~ . . . i ~ .~~,_ .,1 ,
~k. That gates shall not be i.nstalled lcruss the c?riveway in a
manner whiah may advers~Yy aEfFCt vahicular ~raffic in the
adjacent pub:lic sl:reets. IYistallation of any gate~ sha11
confarm to Engineering Standard nlan Zto. 402 snd shall be
;
~ subjecL- to the review~ ~~:ci approval of the Cii:y Tr.aEfic Enqineer.
;
~~
' 5. That drainage of subject property sha11 be uispused aE in a
1 manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6, Th~L• ~+uhjer.t property shal]. be served by under.giound utilities.
. 7. That pri~r to commencement o£ sL-ructural iraming, fire hydrants
;~ sha11 be insta.lled and charged as r~qu3.red and determiiied to be
~ necessary by the Chief of. the Fire Department.
!
;
8.
'rhat if required by the E'ir.E or Police Department, aJ.l lockable
~; pedestrian and vehicular access gates sha7.1 be equipred with 3
; "knox box" device to the satisfactior. oE the Chief of Police
?
f and tf:e City Fire Marshz.ll.
} 9. That trash st~rago ar.eas shall be providcd and maintained in
; accordanr.e wi.th approved plans on fi'le with tkie Street
MainF:onw:.ue and Sanitation Division.
v,
f:; .
;; .
14:; ` ''
.,,.r.
~;~~~ _
±'
+Y'ry,.~ ~ ~ .
~ ''
~~`
u~j,r,
~ ,
rJ ~ r
t,, ~ " `.
{j~~`~
~
~~, s ~
'" t; `; ': ~~
. y ~r[S~.ti't'r, r , .
10. That a11 air eondikioning Eacilities and other roof and grounr~
mountecl equipment skiall be proparly shieldo~ fxom ~riew, and the
sound bu£fered Lrom adjacent res~dent;ial properties.
11. Th~t pxior to issuance of a building per,nit, the applicant
sha11 preserit evi~ence satisfacf:ory ~o the Auild.ing Division
t•hat~, the p:oposed projecL- is in conformance with Council Yolic.y
Number 5~2 "Souncl Attenu~ti~n in Residen.tial Pr~jects" and with
Noise Tnsulation S~andards specitied in the Californ~a
AdminisL-raY.ive Ccde, Tit1e 25,
lz, That a six (6)-foot Y~igh masonry block w~ll shall b~
constructed and mainlairiod alqnq Lhe nortYi, soutb ancl west
properl•,y lines.
13. That pz•.ior t:o issuar.cc of a building pQrmit, the property ~wner
shal]. prepare and rer.ord an unsubordinated covenant limiting
ocr.upancy of each apartment unit to no mora ~han two (2)
persons (ot}~sr than ch~.ldren under the ag~ of twa (2) years)
p~r beiiroom. Said limitation shali bc~ incluclQd in each
lease/rental agro~:ment. A copy of the covernant shall be
~ubmitted to anri approved b~• th~ City Attorney prior to
recorc~ati~n. A copy of Lhe recorder~ covenant sha11 be
furnished. to the Zoniny Division.
14. That this Vari~nce ~.s granted subject to th~; adoption of the
Zoning OrllinancR in coiinection with 12eclassification No.
87-8R-15, now pondinq.
•-3 -
PC87-201
~I }~Y
. . ~ ;',,~~1iti
~.l;
~
,~
il
,l
~~
~. ..
. ~ . . . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . ~. ~ . - ' ' . . .. ,~i:~ ~ ;t Y'~~r~,+~+~
yy I
y'y'QQ ~I `'~~
,~ ~a~~~ . . . '!~
~i ~''~~
~
:~ , ~:~I't~~
15. Tl1at subject property shall be devel~ped substantially ii1 '`;~
accordarice wiL-h plans and specifications on file wirh the Czty
oL- Anaheim marked Exhibit Noa. 1 through 5.
16. That prior to issuance of a building pFrmit, or within a period
of one year f.rom tY:e dat;e of this resolution, whichever occurs
;,, first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 11, 13, and 1~, ak~ove-m~ntioned,
~~i shall bE ~omp'lied with. Exte.nsions for further time to
?" complete said cvnditions may bo grantecl in ar.cordance o~itYl ;~'
Secfiion 18.03.0~.0 of. th~ Anaheim tdunicipal Code. y
1%. T1iat prior t•o final. building and zoning inspections, Condition
Nos. 5, 6, f3, 9, ].Q, 12, dT1C~ 15, above-ment9.onecl, shall be
complied with.
BE IT FURtH~R RESOLV~D that the ?~naheim Citx Planning Commission
cioes hereby find ar.d detexmine tha~ adoption of this Resolution is expressly
pre~iicated upon applicant's compliance with each a:~d all af the condi~5.ons
2iereinabovP snt furkh. Should an~• such conditians, or any •part ther~:of, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the L•xnal judgment of. any court of
compeL-~nt juri~diction, then this Reso].ution, and an.y approvals h~rein
contained, sha~l be deemecl nu'l1 and vo?3.
THE FOREGOING 12ESOLU'TION is/~sigr:ed and approved by me this 28th day
of September, 1987. j ,~ ~
~.~~ ~~< <
~HATRMAN, ADTP.HEItd C Y PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:~ ~
, -.
~~ .~..
- .-.~-~-~~~=--~.°---~~ -- ~~~
S~CFtL;TARY, ~1QAFI~IM CITY PLA1v2~ING COt~htISSTOP+ .
STATE OF CALIFOFrIA )
CUUNTY <)F ORANGF ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHBTM )
~, Ec]ith L. Harris, S~cr~stary of the Anaheim City Planning
Comm.ission, do hereby certifX that the foregoing resAlution was passed ancl
adopL-ed ~~t a meetir~g of the Anaheim City Planning Commission lield on
Septenber 28, 1987, by tl~e following vote of t.he members zhereof:
AYES: COMMISSION~RS: BOUAS, BGYDSTliN, CARUSILLO, I'EL,DHAUS, HERBST, MuSSE
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NONE ;-;~'
ABuENT: COi/.i~fISSI~NEi~S: MC DTJRNEY ,. ;,;
';~*,
~`
, ' IN W7TNr~SS WHE[2N;OF', I havQ hereunto set my hand this Z8th day o.f iYfir
'
'
< Septembe: , 1987 . 'y<
'
; ~~~
;
,~~ ~
~.,_ _
; -
~ '~~~ )
~ " ,
'~ ~~.C~1i
°" ' - ~~~~r,
':'
~ _ _
___ !
,~
'° ~ECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY YLANNTNG COMMTSSION -
':`~,
:K~~ ~ -4- PC87-201
' ::;.
~
' :';
i:i:~
"'
,,
~ :
.. .:. ; ,_,,,
~~l"~'P~".+~d$~"4.t'b~i' ~7.r.,
_ _
. _ ..
. , . . .. . , . . . .
..., _
. .; ~ ~
. . . . . . . . . .i . . .. .f.. 5..~./ ~~, i y ~i
[
....lt GM~he