PC 87-203~: ,
~
~
- ,~~~
,,'~
~~~
I2ESQT~SjT._IOt_',_PIC~._ P~f3%203
A RESOLUTION pF THL a1~AHEIM (:ITY F'L'ANNING COMMTSSTOLI
THAT PGTITION FOR VARTANCF N0. 3'!O1 HE DENIED
WFTGRFAS, the An~heim Ci.ty Plani~inc~ Comm.i ,sion did re~e.ive a
vc~rif, ied Pec:it.ion l:oc Variancc f.rom HLT.EN M. ~AhIE ROtt, 917 E. North Street,
Anaht:im, CA 92805, uwner and N~:WPOFT Pt~C2FTC COPiST.RUC7.'ION CURP„ 4000
MzcArthur Bi~a. , N t~80, Newport Iieac;h, CA 92660, ATTN: MAGbY HANNA, agant,
Eor certai~ real prop~rL•y situateci i~i the City oE P.naheim, County of Oranga,
StaL•t~ of Calitorn.ia, ~7cscxibed as f~llaws:
THAT PORTYON OF 1:,OT 45, ANAHEIM CX'iF,NTION, DESCRIfiEA
AS F'OLLOSVS :
CiEGIrrNING AT A FOINT IN TF[L•' SOUIHF.RI,Y LI2lE OF SA7D
L01 45, AND IN T~iE r10RTHGRLY LINE OF E1,~T NORT~~i
STRFGT, SAID POIDTT. ~1::I~1G DISTANT SOt'THWESTERLY ALONG
SAID SOiJTHI~;KI.Y LINF P11.53 FEET FRUM THE CENTF,R I.INE
OF NORTIi EAS'r STRE~T; '~'HENC~; FRUM SAID POINT OF
BEGIN'NING AND ENTERING SAIL) LQT 45, A'~ RIGHT ANGLES
TO SAID FiOUNDARY AND IPi A NOi2THWESTEI2LY DIRBCT70N,
150 . QO E'EI':T; :iHENCE N0~<THEASTERLY At;D PARALL~EL WIT.H
SATD SOUTFIEE2LY LINE, 95.00 I'EE:T; TiIENCE 50UTHEAS:C~:.RLY
I~ND 'AT RTGH'I' ANCLES TO SALD SOUTliERLY LINE 95.40 FEET
TO THE POItdT OF LiEGINNIPIG.
N;}TE: SAID LI!ND IS SFIOP7tl Oti A LICEtTSED SURV~;YUR'S
MAP P'ILEI) IN I300K 19, AT PAGE; 32, 0~' RE~UkD OF
S(7RVEYS, TN TFIE OFF'TCF. OF THE C.OUNTY CF SAID URANGE
C0IJNTY .
WFIFREAS, L•tie City 't'laiini~-g Commission did holcl a public he~riny
at the Cit~ir. CanL•er in ttie ~ity of At:aheim on Sept~_mbor 28, 1987, 1987, at
1:30 p.m. , notice of said public hearir.q havir.g b~eri uuly qiv~n as rc~quired by
law and in accordance witli the pr~visfoiis of rhe Anaheim Municip.3l Code,
Chap~er 18.03, to ti~ar ~nd cansider evi.dence t'or and a<r,ainst said prorose~
variance arid to i-rvestigate and make L•zndxngs and recomm~r.dat.ions in
connect.ion ~}icrewith; and
Wf1EE2~:AS, said Commission, a~t.er due inspec~_.ion, investigation
and study made by itself ~tnd in its beY.alk, and after due con,idEration of a21
evi.den~e anci rr.ports oLfered a~: saiel heuring, tloes tii~cl and detQrmir.~t the
rollawir.g fa~ts:
1. T'hat th~~ petir,~.oner propuses wa.i•~nrs ot ttie f~llowirg to
construcL• a 2-•stor.y, 11-ur~iC aparhment 2~uildinv::
(A) ~Ff~T.~2l~_lU_T3h_f_.4.5~.~_4.~.= - h1¢xirn~m_gt.~l~c~u=~1..1~~'~9~~•
(.~____~.~.0.3'Y parmittQd withi.n ~~5~-~~~ oF
single-famfly residQn~?al xonfng; ~.
~Y91~,.~i proposed at ~i~Q~f~_.feet)
( B ) ~•St~14N_. 1_$.. 3!~ ..g ~? . 9_2~
° M?;c~tmUtrl..~~~C_GS2.~1=r19~•
(z~'! ~~rrr,ittedi `~ Pr~~osed)
0075r
PC87-203
0
~°a`'~u1
2. That tho abave-mQntioned wa.ivers are hereby d~nied on the basis
th~L th~rc~ ar~ no special circumstancos app.lic~k,le Lo the properh,x s~ich as
size, shapo, topography, .lcr,at•i.on and surroundings which does not apply to
other iden~ic ~11y zonod propor~y in the samQ vicinity; and thaL strict
applir.atioi~ of the 'Loning Code doe~s not dHpri.ve h.he proporty oL• privil~y~5
enj~.~~~{ }~y other prr~per~ies in the id~ntical zone and classif3.cation in the
vicinity; ancl that the requested rE~class.ification was a.lso ~ienieci.
3. That there are no except~on~l or e~:traordinary circumstances or
conditioi~s appli.cable ho rhe property involv~d or tr the intended uso of tne
propert~.• ~kia~ do no~ apply g~t~Pral.ty to the property or c:lass oi use in Che
:,;:tme vicinity and z~rie.
~., !~•
~ preservation
' That
and enj tho recruested vnriaace is
~ymc-~nt' of not necessary for the
property in a substantial property
the same vir_inity an~l Lon righ~ ~ossessed by other
e, artd denied to the pr~per~Y xn q~+esh.ion.
' S.
thP r,ublic 7'hat
wr_lf~re the reqtiesteci variar-r.e will be matariallp detr.imentaZ ~o
or injurious t
vici.nit~ and
zc~ne in a the ~roparty
which t•he or irnpro~•ements in such
~ p~operty is located.
6. That six~een (1.6) persons indic~tFd their prPSence at sai.d
piibli.c hearinq in op~ositiuii; and that a petih.ion ~ontaining approximately h;
signatures was received in apposit.io3z to subje~t petition.
ENV7ROiJ?IENTAL IMPTCT __ ~'IP7DxN:G: Tha~ the Anaheim Cihy
Commission has reviewed thc~ propusal to reclassify stibjec.t ro E. Planning
RM-7200 (RQSidential, Sinc~le-Famil p P xty £rom the
Diultiple-Famil Y~ zOnQ r° th~ pM-~2U~ (Resi.dential,
y) •r.onQ ho construct• a 2-•story, 11-unit apartment bui.lding with
waiver.^, of maximum building height ar,d r~ax:;mum 'lok
roctanr,u:lak•Zy•-sl~aped parcol of. lancl consistin Q~ a coveraqe on a
te~t, havinc~ a frnntage o:: approxi-n.stely g5 LPQ~ o,p ~h~ ~ north Sid~ 5~f SNflrth
St.reet, haviny a m~ximiim depth ot ~,pf>,•,~x.ima~ely 150-Leet and being located
approximate.ly 715 feot west nf t_}ie cunt:erlinQ of East StreeL• an~l furhhor
clescribad as 91'i Easr llorth Streel; and does hereby approve L•he Nega~ive
llecl.aration upon. finding that it h,as c~nsidered the N~~at:ive Der.larati~n
togeth~r wi.th ang CGir101r?ntS re~~eive~t during the public review pror_e:;s and
further f.inding on the basis ni tne initia~ studx anra any Gomments .rec~ived
th,1t: l•.here is r-o subst:~7nrial eviderice r.t~ae the projoct w.ilZ have a
s.ignificant etfeet on ~h~ ~nvironr.er,L,
NOW, TEIE&:;FpRL••, pr 1'p RF.SO[.VEp t}iat Lhe ilnaheim City Planninc~
Commissi.on c~,oes here"~y deny subj~~cL• Yetition tor Variance c,n tha basis of ~he
aforemP»ticned fiiiaings.
THF. FOREGAIPIG RESCLUTICr;~is 3a~ d and approvod by me h.his zar.r.
of Sepkembpr, ~9A7,
___._____.._ _;1~~~,~~~ _ " _ ~~'r
CHAIRMA ~ •.~~ ~_..______..~-_----.~_._
1,N~ FiEIM CIT YLAt•li7ING COMMISSIOPJ
ATTES'T : --
_._.-------•-='~'-~~__.~~. ` ~'
S~CRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY P A[Ji2~ ~~S5I0~" ^
-Z PC87-203
. ~
M wr..vx+rxr...,~. .. .. _ ... ._. .
~:~:~ {
;; ~
~';. .
~~' -,~'
F~
~
<< in~~t~
s~
;~_~•.
,r„g~
: v.
:~
; y,, ,
ri~ ;
~,~ t.
I,~,
j'~ ;i
;1,
STATE OF' CALIFORNIA ) '`~
: i;a
` ~'.,y~
COUNTY OF (~RANGL ) $S,
CI ^
TY OF AN~IHEIM )
L', Ed.ith L. Harri,~, SPcre~ary oE the Anaheim City Planning
,
' Commission, d~ harob~• cer~i.fy tkiat the foregozng resolution was ~assod ~nd
~;:
~'"' adopted a~ a meQl:ing of ~he ~naheim City Planning Commission held on
September 2A, 198%, by the f.ol3.owing vote of the members thereoE:
AY~S: (:OI~fISSIONLRS: BOU'AS, ~3pXDSTUN, CARUSILLU, FELDHAUS, FIERBST, ME5SE
N4ES: COMMISSIONERS: NOtrE
ABSLNT: COMt~fTSSTON^nRS: DIC BURNEY
IN WITNGSS WHEI2EOF, I havo }ierount:o set my hand this 28th day of
~ei Y_~;mbe~•. J.987.
-- ~~' '-=~'-- '~ .
~ .~~~~~.- _..
5~CI2F:TAFY, ANAHEIM Pr~AN~II~IG CO!+u'dIaS1UN
,.c,,.y ,
~3- PC~7-203