PC 87-210,~--~
~f~~-
RLSQf.,LTTON NQ, pC87-210
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAFIETM CTTY PLANNIIJG COMMISSTUN
THAT PETIT.TON I'OR RECLASSTFTCATTON NU. 8%._gg_07 BE GItAIdTED, AS MODIFiED
WHEREAS, tk~e Anatieim Cit
verified petit~.on for ReclassiFi.cation xoml Kqng T D~mmission did receive ~
Avenue, /~1p~, Anaheim, ~p 92~01 SCHAF~g, 2gZ Wil,t~ire
Victori.a W~ . ovrner, aiicl bfASSOUD M~NSHIZA,DEg
Y. Placentia, CA g26'Ip, agent, of certain xQal • 1524
proper~y situate8
in the C:ity of Anaheim, Cot~nty of Orange, 5rare of California, described
fol'ows;
PwRCEL A: as
THAT PU:it7'TON OF THL•' EAST HALF OF LOT 9 OF'
HELI;N 1~ND I~YNCH' S ADDITICN :EO ~1NAHETM, I2v TF;E CITy OF
ANAH~IM, A~ SHOWN ()N A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 44?, PAG~
~5~ UI' DEEDS, F2ECQ5DS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
CALTFORNIA, UESCRTBEll AS FO~,LOh'S;
BEGINNI~TI; AT THE NORTHGA.ST CORtdER OF SAID LUT 9;
TI-IRNCE SOUTH 8g~ 5g ~ qZ~~ WEST 239.06 f'EET ALONG TfiE
NORTH LTNF OF SAID LUT 9 TO THE TRiS~ POID'T OF
~iECINN~NG; TI~IEN~.E SOUIIi n~ 10 08" EAST 142.41 I'EGT
ALONG A LIN'E PARALLET, TO THE EAS'I' LZi'v'~ Or SAIU LOT' 9;
THENCE N'OItTH d'3° 5~' 42" EAST 73.63 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 0~ i0' 09" £AST. 91.61 FEET TO A POINT ON A
CURVE CONCAVE SGUTHEASTERLY HAV.ING A RADTUS pF 45.00
F~~~7': THENCE SOUTI~BAST~FZ[,y q~,~jg~ SATll CURV~ FRUM A
TAt1GENT BEARING SOUTH 70~ 10' 11" E~.ST, AN ARC
DISTANCB OI' $1.3J FEET TO A I:~VERSR CURVE, HAVING A
RA.DItJS Or 45.00 FEET, A RADIAL FROM THIS PUINT HAVTNG
A BEARING OF NORTH !ib~ 36' 42" i7~~T: TriENCE
SOUTHERL'X AN ARC DISTANCE QP' 10.27 FE~,'r ALONG SAID
1'HENCE NqK~KGH~9p CENTRA~L ANGLE OF 13~ 04' 12~~~
~Z 14 EA~:C '118.24 F~;ET TO T.HF
WF.ET LIN~ OF TfiE EAST 30.00 F~ET OF SATD LOT 9;
1'FiENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NO1t:PF: po 10' 0$" 47LST
31U.84 F'EET TO THE NORTH LYN~ OL' SAIb LOT g+ TI~iENCE
.~,LONG SAID NO[t2'H L~TN~;, SOUTH Sa~ 54 ~ 41~~ f~]FS'.~
20~.U6 FEET TO 7HE TRUE POIPiT OF BEGIN'NING.
PARC~L B: LQi' A OF TRACT 9201, IN TF~~ ~I,~,Y ~~
ANAHEIM, AS SFIOhN ON A MAP RECOR. D YN IIOOK 380,
PAG~S 23, 24, 25, anci 26, OF hiISCEL.LANE0U5 MAPS,
RECORDS pF SAID ORANGr^, COUNTI', CALIFORNIA,
WhEREAS, the Citp planning Cnmmission did hold a ,
~t the Civic Center in rhe Ci~y of Anaheim oxi Au ust 17 19ti7 at 1:30
~o~~c~ ~E said Plhlic hearing
public hearing having been du'ly gl~og ay. Y~~ 1?.m „
accordanco wx~.:h the nrovisions of the Anahe~,n Municipal Code ~ bla jaw dnd in
tn hear and consider Qvicic~nce .Eor and agaixist said proposed roc].assific~tion
and t^ investiga~e and ~'~pr ].8.03,
ther~w.ith: ~~d c:ontinued tomSeptemher17.45 e, dd~orC^tobera121U19d7~r~a cnnnection
~ n.d
OUa9r
PC87_210
;.-:, .,,
.;;;;
''~a
I,1~
:
~'
~..
~~.':
, .:' ~
~,{
~~~
::^
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspention, ir.vestigation
and study mac'e by itse:Lf and in its behalf, and after dua consideration of ~1~.
eviclenr.e ancl repcrts oifered at ~a.id hearing, does f.inc] ancl deLermine ~he
folJ.owing faci:5:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of Porti~n A
uf subject property from the RS-5,000 (Resia~ntial, Single-Famil,y) and
Portia~i B from the RS-T>-43,UU0 (Residaritial, Agricultur~l) z~nes to the
RM-3,OU0 (Rosiden*ial, Multiple-Fam~ily) zono.
2. ThaL the Anaheim General ~lan designatQS subject property
For Medium bensity ltesidentia'1 land usus.
3. That the nroposed recl~ssificaLion of subject propArty to
RM-3,000 zs not necessary and/or desirable Pcr the or.derly and proper
develo~ment of tha community ~nd ~voo.lcl be "spot zoning" with ~djacent
pruperties t~ tPia soizth aiid we~t being zoned single-Pamily resic]ential.
4. Th~it reclassificaY.iori oE Port:ion S of subject property to
~~ ~S-5000 (Resident:ial, 5ingle-Fami.ly) Uoes prope~rly r.ela~e to ~he zones and
their permittQd use:: loca.ll.y established in close prnximity to stxbject
property and tc fhe aunes aiid tlzeir perrnztt~d usPs generally establishec.t
thraugliout ~he community.
5. That 8, 25, and 47 persons indicated their presence at the
Septr:mber 14, ~eptc:mber 28, and October lZ, 19a7, public hcarings in
opposition; and that letters arid peti.tior.s cont:zining approximately Z36
sigr,atures were received i.xi opposition; and that approx3.mately 10 persons
ind:icated their presence in favor ~t those public liearings.
~AL~IF~_P.NII..,_r:NVIRONM1irITAL QUALI'rX_ACT FINDIriG: T.hat L-he AnaYzeim
~ity Plaiining Commission has reviewed L•kie prop~sal c.u rec.lassify, subjeat
pro~erty (partions n and Et) from the RS-5,000 (Re:~.ide::L-iaZ, Sing;.e--Family)
and the R5-A-43,000 (Resideritial, Agricultural) zorles to the RM-3,~J00
(P.esidenL•ial, I~u].~,iple-~Family) zoize to corlstruct a 15-un~t cond~minium
project with waivers of mir.imum n~unt~er of pt~rking spaces (d~leted.), minimum
strur.tural and par~:ing setback adj~~cent to an arter5.a1 hi.ghway, rnzmimum
structuraZ and pa~k~.ng setback adjacent to a local street, minimum structural
setback, r~inimum st.ruct~:ra7. and parking setback ~djacent to si.nglo-family
residences, arid minimum recroational -].eisure area on ayi irregularly-shaped
parcel of ].and con:cisting of approximatelg 1 ticre locat:Ed between Broadway
anG the :~ortherly ter•minus of G~lbuck Urive, havinq a~rontagp of
approximately 192 fee* on t2ie northeast side cf Gilbuck DY•i.ve and ~09 feet on
thQ soutti si~.e oL• Aroadway and being located appruximat~ly 25U feet east of
the c:enterlr.ne of. Gilm~r Street anfl f~.irt;ier descril~ed as 1500 West Broadway;
and does hereby apprvve the Negative Dec'laration up~n .finding th~k it h~xs
considereci the Negat.ive Declaration together wit,h any cumments receiveci
c1ur5.ng the publia raview process and further fznding c~n tha basis ~P the
initial study and a~iy comments recei~~ed that there is nn substnntial evidence
that tho project wi11 have a sigYiifican~ efEect on the environment.
NOW, THF~REFORE, BE IT R~SOL~ED thaL the Anaheim City k'lanning
T Ccmmi~sion doc~s hereby a:aiit, a~ modi.fied, subject Petit3.on for
_ Reclac~siEication and, by So doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim
Muriicipa.l Code bo amended to exclude Portion B of the above-desc.ribe3
-2-• PC8?-210
~,z~ ~~~
propert-.y from the RS~A-43,000 (P,c~sidential, A~7ricu].tural) zonc~ and to
incor~+orate said d.escribed property into the RS-5,000 (Residential,
Single-F~m~.:iy) zone u»on the :Eollowi:~g condi~ions which arQ hereby found to
be a necessary prerequisite to the proposea use of subject propert,y in nrder
to preserve th~ safety and general welfare of the Citizer.s oi• the City c,f
Anaheim:
1. That s.iclewa"lks shall be installed along Broadwa;~ as required k,y the
Cit~ Engineer and in accordance with standax•d plans a~zd
specifica~ians on Lile in the OtficQ of the City Engineer and tha~
security i.n the form of a bund, certiEicate of deposi~, letter of
credit, or cash, in an amount and forrr~ satisfacti~ry to tne Ci.ty ef
Anaheim, sh~ll be posted with the City to quarantee the
satis£actury completion of said improvements. Saic1 ,~ocuriY.y sha17.
be posteci with the City prior to introdur.tion uf an ordinan~•e
rezuning subjFCt property, to guarantee the installatiorz of the
~bove-rQquired improvements prior -:a r~cc~xpanc~~.
2. That tkze owner uf subj~ct pro~erty shall submiL- a letter rEquest.i:xg
termination of Conditional Usc~ Permit No. 18%2 to the Zoning
Divzsian.
3. That the vehicular access rights to Draadwap, except at approv~d
acc:ess paints shall be dedic:ai:ed to the City of Anaheim.
~. 'Chat prior to the iritroduction of an ~rdinance rezoning subject
property, Conditior. Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shall be
c:omplated. The t~rovisions or ric~hts gr~nt•ed by ~his :esolutioi~
sha11 become null a~:d vaict L•y action cf the Planning Coi7unission
unlas~ said conditions are c+omplied with wi.thi~:i one year Erom the
daL-e of tlxi~ i•esoluti.on, or s~.ich fur. th~r time ~s the Planning
Comrnission mzy grant,.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLV~ll that tne wnaheim City P1ac~.nS.ng Corunissi.nn
does hereby find aud determine that adoption of hhis Roso].ution is expx•essly
predical•ed upon applicant's compliar..:e witti each and a11 ot the condit~ienc:
hereinabovo set farth, Should ~ny fiuch conclitions, or any part; ther~ot, bQ
declar.oci invalid ar unenforceable by the f:ixial jucigmeiit oF any court ot
comperent jurisdicti.on, l•hen tYlis P.esclution, aiid any approvals herein
contained, sh~ll be deemed null and void.
THB FORFGO;Cr;G RESOLU'70N is s'gned and a~provod by me this 12th day
of October., 1987. ~ ~
~~ ~G~~
CHAIRMAN, ANI~HEIM CIT PLANNTNG COMMISSIOII
A'~T~ST :
, ;,.,;,,
,;,;
,-, ,
t../' ' ' ;J / '
~ , ~,y~_ ~~ L.~- _
5ECR6TAkY, ANAHEIM CITY 1'LANNING COMhSISSION
.~
L' il':..
-3-
PC87-210
i'~
R~
. ~~, ry~y°~ F1r~'~~'P6
~ . . '': t ~ . ~ ~'
i~'
!C~
~r ~~1.;
~~
~;1
STATE Of CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF' ORANG~ ) ss . ~ t:
CT.TY Of ANAF~EIM ) ~;`
; ~4
I, Edith L, Harris, Secretary of ttie Ailaheim City Planning Commission, ~
dn riereby certify i:hat L-he foregoing reso].ution was passed and adopt,ed at a
meeting oi the Anaheim Cit~ Planning Comm. ssion held on October 12, lgg7, by ~
the iollowinq cote oP tihe members thereof: -.,;;
., :,
AYES: COMMISSIOI~?ERS: iOYDSTUN, CAR1JSILL~O, FELDHAiJS, HF'kBST, MC FSURNEX, ~
MEuSE
NQE S : COt~II.SSIONEFiS : NONG ~
ABS~NT; COMMTSSIOPTERSs BOUAS
IN WIThEBS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hatid this 12rh day at
October, 1g87.
~,^ ,'`;
~~v '
~ ~ ~ '~d~-- -- ; 7~ .-~~-'l~__l~-~,
SLCRE'rARY, laNAHETM CITY' nLAI~iNING COi+~A2ISSI0PT ~r
'~
, ~';%.
~;3';
i;.n
f;