PC 87-225~
'~! R~.4LV'~'T N NQ.e~$y.= 22i
~,
~~
A RESOLUT.SON OF TfiE ANAHCIM CITX P:,ANNING ~OMMISSION
THAT PETITTOI~ FOR RFCLASStFICATTON N0. 87-f18-20 FiE b~NIEU
WI~IEREAS, ~he AnahQim City Planning Commission did i,nitiate a
request for Reclass.ifi.cation for certain roal property situated in the Ci~y of
Anaheim~ County of Orango, StatQ oi California, described as f•olAowsi
YARCEL A
1~uL THAT CERTAIN I,AND S'ITUATED IN TIi~ STATE OF
CALIF'ORNIA, ~QUNT1' OF ORANGE, CITY OF ANAHEIM,
~~
a DESCRIBED AS FOLL~5J3:
'
• 'PNAT P012TION OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTETt
OF TFiE
` NQRTEIWEST ~UART.rR C~r 5ECTIpN 23, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN `rHE F A,NCHn SAN JUl-N CAJON DE SANmA
ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN AOUK 51, ~AGG 10
OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS ][N TFIC OFFICB ~F TFIE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, bESCkIB~D AS FOLLOWS :
w!
s~:
~,
+;
,~
-.~
~
.;
?
O:LUS c
}3EGINN:[P7~ AT THE INTERSEC~ION OF THE CENTGR LSNE OF
CERRI'POS STRErT hND TTiE CENTER LINE OF U.S. HIGHWA'Y
101 (LOS ANGELES STREET}, Ag SAID INTI4RSECTION IS
SFIOWIZ ON A MAP FILED IN kipQK 35, PAGE 34 ~P RECORD 01c
SfJRVF.YS TN THE OFFICE Oc TEIE COUNTX RECORDER OF SAID
l".OUNTY, THENCE t30RTH 6 DEGREES 55' 00" WEST 221,61
FCET; ~FiENCE EAST 300.37 F~E.".', PARALLEL WITH TI~E
CEN7'ER LINE OF CER:tZTOS S`PR~ETf 7'H~iJCE SCUTH 220.00
FEET TO THE CENTER LItiE OF CGRRTTOS STREETj TI~ENCE
WEST 273.68 FEFT A.LOVG SAID L'ENT£R LINE TO TFIE POIZTTF
OF UEGINNING.
EXCGPT THAT PURTI4N TIIFRFOF LYII~IG WESTERLY OF. THE
FOGLOWING DESCRI9ED LINE:
BEGitdNING AT TFIF TNTERSLCTInN OF THE PTORTHEASTERI.Y
LING ~F THAT CEKT.AIN ST12IF OI' LAND 6G.00 F~ET Iil
WIDTH, DESCRIBED I!J THE DEe,D TO TIiE STATI. OF
CAL'iFORNIA, FtECOP.D~U JULY 10, 19~4 Iti BOOR 258, PAG~
F6 OF DECDS, WITH THE CENTER LYNB OF SAID CERRITOS
AVEtn"', SAID INTERSF;CTION BEIlIG ON A CURVE CONCA''E
WESTERLY, HAVtNr, A RADLUS OF 630.00 FCET; THEN~G
NORTHEI2LY AL(3NG SAID CUItVE TO A LIN£ PARRI'~LEL WITH
)-ND NURTHERGY 20.00 FEET FROM ~HE CENTER LI2iE OF SALD
CERRi'rOS AVENUE~ A FADIAL LINE THRr,t~GH THF CENTFR
LINE OF SAZD CE~:RIT05 AVcPtUE, A BAllIA[. LIt3ti THROU~H
SAID POINT AEA~tS NORTH Fi~ C~GF.~,~S 54' 41" CAST;
:fHrN~'B GONTINUIN~ 11LONG SAID ~LJRVk, 50.81 FEET
TFiROUGH A Cc`~TERAL I~NGLE QF' 4 pEGR~ES AL02(G SAZD
PC:$7-225
,~•~
W1iEREAS, :he City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing
at tho Civic Center in the City o£ Anaheim on November 9, 1987, at 1:30 p.m.,
~iot3.~:e ~t said public hearing having baon ~uly given s~ required by law anci in
accox•da ~ with the provisions of Ch~~ Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
lu hear and coiisiclcr evid~nco for and agai.nst said proposed roclass.ific1tion
and to itz~vestigate aiid rnake tindings and recommandat3.ons in cor~nec~ion.
therewith;. and
CURVE, 50.01 F'EET THROUGH A CBNLRAL ANGI,G OF 4
DnGRGES 37' 1~~" T~~ THE SOUTFlERLY C~RNrIt OF LAND
AFSCR?IIED TN TIiC AEEU TO THE STATE OE CALTFORNIA,
RECURDGI7 ~PRIL 13, 192g IN t300K 257, PAG~: 4ti2 OF
OFFICIAL RECOktD5; :CHENCE Ir'~?RTFI 6 13EGfiF k~S 5~a' 00" WEST
A1:ONG TH~ EASTERLY LINE OF SA.xD LAIZD OF' THE STA'TE OF
CALIFORNIA, 1'0 THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND ABQVE
DF.SCFtIFiEll.
WHEP.EAS, saic9 Comr,iission, after due inspoctioi~, investigation
- and stu.dy made by itsel[ and in its behalt, a.nd aI°tar. due consideration of all
evidenco and roports ofEcr~d at said tiearing, dca~s firid ~-zxd dekermino the
, foll~wing facCs:
I. Thal Che City of Anaheim proposQS rec~assification of
subject pr.operty from the DtG (Industrial, Limi~ed) tp CL (Ccmmerc.ittl, Li.mited)
lone to bring subject properties in~o conformance wit:h the General ~lan.
~. ThaL t,he Anaheim General Plan designat~s subjc~ct property
Lor GeneXal Commercial land uses.
3. That th~: prop~seci reclassif.ication of subject property~ is
nat necessary nor daeir~ble for t1iQ or.doriy and praper development of the
commun~.ty at this time.
4. That Che propased recla~sification of suL~ject ~iroperl:y does
not properl.y relate to th~ zones and their permitted uses locally astablished
in c1osH pruximity tc, suLject proporty and L•o t.ho zonQS and thoir permitted
uses genoi•ally establishad t_h:•uuqhouh the community,
5. That thQ pro~osed reclassif.ication i~ denied on the basis
~ that reclassification at this time~ would bo prom~ture and w~uld result ~n
"spot ~oning", and thar. the Qntir.e aroa should b~ revi.ewe] for
reclassificatio~i ir. connoction wiL•h futuro development of this area.
6. That no one indicatecl the.ir pc•esencQ at sai~l publir_ heariny
in opp,~sition; and that no cerxeqpondence was received in n~position to
subject potiti.on.
~AI~.I_C~i_.~~~__~NV7. tt~,1M~I;iT~L QUAL~~'_Y__ ~'_ .~ua~4: That th~~ Anaheim
City Plan.~ing Comrsiission h~s revi~wcd Ch~ pro~osul L•o xQClaszify i~ubjec!
properCy Prom ML (Industriul, 1.imite~) k~ CL (C.ammeraial, Lir~iked) or s l~ss
i intQnse zon~, on an irreqularly-Shc~erl parcel of land consiating oi
~ approximately I4.8 acres; located at tho norkheast corner of Cez•rftos Avenue
i and Anahoim Boulevard, havinq a~proximate frontages of 660 feet on lha et+st
~ sido ~f Anaheim Boulevard an~t 950 fegt on the north side of Cerritos Avenue
and turthex (iascribei! as 1490 South Anaheim ~~ulevard and 33~ East Cerritos
.;,~. ~
-2-
~
~
. ~;
P:87••225
;, n ~i ~~~ r! ~, O+t~ )~
f 5~~~~i
~ . . ,,A4 - . +~i~
h 1 RR~ .. ' F y
~ . . .. ~ ~~1'
~
1
~
f
Avenues and does hereby approve the Nogative De.la.ration upon finding thar it
has cont~idered tihe Negative Declaration toge~her wi~h any commenta seceived
during tho public review process and furL•hdr Finding on the basi~s of the
initial st~~dy and any comments rec;eivQd that f:hore is no aubatantial evi3dnce
th.at the pr~~joct wi11 havo a significanL effect an the en~ironmQ~nt.
NUW, 'rHERGI'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Citx Pl~nning
Commi~sion does hereby deny Petition for Reclassi~ication ~n the basis of the
a.forementioned Einftings.
THF: FOREG~iNG R~SOLUTION is signed and approveii by me this 9th
clay of November, 1487. ,~"~
~ . ~~
/C~;~-,~i~~-~ % :~,~%.~:~
CHAIRDU~T, ]~TI~HFIM CT'I' PLX~NNING COb1MIS~ION
ATTESTs ~~ ~
- ~' ~~ -~~=~~t%~.~.~_ -
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY FLI~Ni1IPiG COP4SISS70N
STATE OF CALIFQRNIA )
COUNI~C OF ORIWGE ) ss.
CITY dF A2dAHEIM )
I, Edith L. ~Iarris, Secret~;ry of the Ar.ahaim City Planning
Commi.ssion, do hQreby certi£y that th.~ [oz~egoii-g re~olution was passed and
adopted at a moe~iny o.f ChQ Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission hold on Nove~mber
9, 1987 by the fol:lowing vot:e oY the members thereo~:
ItYE5: COMMISSIQNERS: BOUAS, BOYDST[TN, CARUSILL•L0, F'ELDHAUS, FIERBST,
M~SSIE~ MC HURNEX
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: P(G!'~'
ABSk:NTt COt•L-dISSI0NER5: NOi1E
IN WTTrIESS WHERF.OF, I havo hQ.eunto set my hand this 9th day of
November, 19a%.
'7
~~"~.~~''~~~._
SECRETARY, }~,~EIM CITY PLANNYN~ COA4fISSION
!-
': ~ ~
-3-
P~8'!-2?.5
.Y
•
~{;}~I'~ r..,..:. .. . , . . , ~ . . '. . y '~'~?ii
--_. ~ . , . , . ~ J~.,..