PC 87-227~
~
1~1!
Rk.'~,S LUTI N N(~ P,~Q _22~
A RF.SOL~UT.IQN OF THE ANhHE1M CITY PLANNIrTG CO!~fMISSION
~HAT PFTITION FOR RLCTASSIFTCATION N0. 87-88-22 BE GRANTLD
WF~IEFEAS, tha Anaheim Cihy Ylanning Commission did receive ,~
~ veri~ied p~t~;i~n for ReclaRsziicatian from LtNCOLN PROPERTY, 19742 MacArchur
~ Blvd., l~290, I,rvine, CA 92715, otvner, oE csrtain real praper~y situated in
L•hc City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State oE Californi.a, d45cribed as
fol].ows:
CU~NCING AT A POINT ON THG WEST LIN~; OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF TFiL NORTHEAST QUARTER OF 5ECTTON
17, 'POWNSFIIp 9 SOUTFi, RANGE 10 Fl~ST, IN THE RANCHO
SAN JUAN CAJOrJ D~; SANTA ANA, IN TfiE CITY pF ANAHEIM,
COUNTX OF ORAATGE, STAZ'E OF CALIFORNTA, AS SFIOWN ON A
tdAP RECORDFD IN BOOK 5i., PAGE 10, MzSCELLAN~0U8 MAPS,
OF SAID ORANGE C~TJNT.Y, 425 F~GT SOUTH OF THE
NpFtTHWEST CORNER OF SAID N~f2THEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QY~ARTSR RiJNNT.tdG TAENC~ SOUTH ON SAID W~ST
LINE )68 k'E~T; TH~Nf.F EAST PARALLEL Y,II~I-T THE NORTH
r..TNE OF SAID NOFcTHEAST QUARTER OI' THE NORTHET*~:T
~UARTER 3Z5 FER:~; TFIENCE NOKTH PARALLEI, WITET THE W~uT
tINE OI' SAII~ NOftTHEAST QUARTE~2 OI' THE NORTHEAST
QUAR!'ER 693 FEET; TE3ENCE WEST OAT THE NORTH LIN'F OF
SAID 1VORTHc,AST QUA~tTER 212.50 F~ET; TH~NCE SOUTI~I
PARALLEL WITFi TFiE WES1 LINE OF THE IvQRTHEAST QliARTER
0~~ THE NORTHEAST QUART~R 425 FEET; THENCE WSST 102.50
FEET TO 1'HE pqINT OF BEGI*INING.
~XCEPTING THEREFROM i`FTE NpRTH 6G FFET THFREOF.
WHEFt~AS, the City Planning Commission did liold a~ublic he2~ring
at the Civic Cent~r 3.n the Ci.ty of A~iaheim on Novemt•,er 9, 1987 at 1:3Q p.m.,
iioLice oP said public hearing havirxg been duly given ;+s required h,y ~.aw and ;i,n
accordance with the provisions nf the Anaheim Muni.cipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
Co he3r and ~ansider evidence tor a~i~ again.sr, said pro~osec? rPClassification
a.1d to invest:igate and make .,dings ~nd x•c:comr~endat=ons in connoctioxi
L-herewiL•h; and
WHE4tEAS, said Cornmissior., atter due i.ispection, inve~tigation
and study made by it.selF anc? in zt:~ behaif, and after due cons.ideration of aIl
ecidenco and reporta offered ar. said hQaring, does f.ind and d~cerminp the
following facts:
1. Tkiat the pezitioner pr~pose~ reclzssifi~~atiUn of subject
proper.i;y irorn the RS-A-43,OOU (Residenti~l, Agri.cu~tur~l) to the CL
(Cocnmercial. J.,imite•1) zone.
2. That. the Anatieim General Plan dasignates sub~ect property
Eor Commercial, Profe.,s.i~nal lar.d uses.
3. Thac: tr,e proposed reclassitication of sub,jc~eti ~roperty is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly anci proper development of t}ie
comm•unity.
O110r
,.
;~
„~r~r, ~'
~~- '
. r + ~~n~s
:'S~t't
!I~
,,,
PC87-227
, ~, . .(~
... .if~ .M1.lY~fY~~dP
~
4. That tlio proposed reclasszEication of subject proporty does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted use~ locally ~stablxshed in
alose proximity to subject pr~perry and to the zones aiid ~heir permittcd uses
generally established through~ut the cnmmunity.
5. That ~he propo.sed reclassi.ficatzan of subject property may
require i:he impruvement of abutting strc~ets in accordance wi~h the Circulatian
Element ot ~he General Plan, due to the anticipa~ed increas~ in tra£fic vrhich
will be ganeratad by t;he intensification of l.and use.
6. That one p~rson indicated his presence at sai~ ~ublic
hc:aring in oppnsition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to subjQCt petii:ion.
ALTI'~.RNIA EcNIRONMENTAt, OUALI'r;Y ACT FINDItJG: That Lhe Analieim
Cit.y Planning Commission has xeviewed the proposal to recl.assify subject
proparty trom tlie RS-A.-43,000 (Residential, Agricwltural) zone to the CL,
(C:ommercial, Limited) zone to per~nit an automobile service anrl commercial
cent°r in conjunetion with an existinq oE~ice structure with waivers of
miminum nwnber oL parking spaces, maximum buildin~ height, and minimum
sL-ructural ?~eight on a irregularly-shaped parce.l of laiid consisting uf
approx:imately 3.6 acres, having a frontag~ of appruximately 212 feet on the
south side of Lincol~z Avenue, having a maximum depth of appro~imatelp 627
fr~et and bei:ig located aQp~'oximatelx 1005 feet west of the c;enterlii~e of
Euclid StL•eet, and furt;k~er described as 1780-17l1ti West, Lincoln Avenue; and
does hereby approve the Negativc~ Declaration upon fi.nding that it has
considar~d the Negal•.ive Declaratian toq~:ther with any cammen~s receiv~~d
during the public roview process and further fi.nding on th~ basis of thQ
initial study and any cumments xoc~ived that there is no subs~antial evidence
tha~ Lhe projecL• will have a significant effect on Che environment.
NOW, THEREI'ORE, BC IT RESOL4ED tlaat the I~naheim City Planninq
Cnmmission does hereby grant subject Petition for RQClassificataqn and, by ~o
doi.ng, that Title 18-~oniii? of tha Anaheim Munici~a? Code be r~mended t~~
exe'luc~e the above-described property from ttie RS-A-93,000 (Residentia~,
Agricultural) xone an~. to incorpor.ai:e said described properL•y inta L•he CL
(Commercial, Limi~Pd) 'Lonc upon the following condit:ions which are horeby
iounii to be a nocessary prerequisite i:o ~hn proposed use ot subject property
in order r,o preserve tho ~afety and general welfare af the Citizens of the
City of Anah~im:
1. fihat th~ ownez of subject pro~Qrty shall pay to the City of Ana~^eim
a Pef: fur street lightiriy along L.incoln A.ven~xe in an amounL as
determined by the City Council.
2. Tha~ ~he owner nf siibj~ct property :hali ~ubmit a letter requesting
t~rminaL•ion of Variance rTo. 1729 and Cor.ditional U~e Per_mi~ Nos.
2gg, 526 ana 86x to ~he Zoning Division.
~.
,.
.
3
°;~
3. Tt~at in the event rhe Cit~y Traf•fic Eng:ineer 6etermines that the
existing rais~s~1 mediari ~n Lihcoln Avenue shoulcl bQ ex*..erideci in frant
of subject pr.operty, Y.ho owner/3evvlo~er of subj~ct prop3 ty shsll
provide sZid extoi~sion at no cost to t~e City.
-2-
PC87-227
,~F1
r
.~-,
~
!';'"""•7'
. . .• . 'J ; 4vN•`~M
~ ~~ ~'~~
, ~ '`~~
`~
4. That prior. to the inL•roduction of an ordinance rez~ning subaect
property, (:ondi~.iun tlos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, Shall be
completed. The provisicns or rights granted. by this resolution
shall became null and voi~ by action of the Planning Commission
unless said conditi.ons are compli~d with within one year ~r~m tYie
date of ti7is r.esolution, or sucYx further time as the Planni~g
Commis~ion may grant.
BF IT ~URTHER RESQL'JED that the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission
does azereby find and determine that ado~tion of this Resolution is expr.essly
predi.cated upon ~p~licant's compliance wi~'.i ~ach and all o.c tlle co~di~.ions
hereinabove sat forth. Stiould any such eonditi~ns~ or any parL• therQOf, be
declared inva].id u= unenForceable by the £inal jucic~nent oF any court o[
competent jurxsdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals lierein
rontained, sha.ll be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESO~,UTION is sig.-eei c-nd approved by n~ie ~hi.s 9th day
of November, 1987. .;; ~ ~~
`, .... /:~ ,
~ C"~~G•'. l / ~ ~~'- ;~~, ~-.--~------.~
- - --T- _-
CFIAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CrTX PLANNING CON4~II5S:[ON
!
I
4TT~ST: ~
` r // / ~ 'VL-G..r/ _^.~
,~,,~,~~.
SECRETAkY, ~1AHEIM CITX PLANNING COt~A~fISSION
~'TATF OF CAL7.FOR)lIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY' OF ANAHEIM )
T, Edith L.. Harris, 5ecret2-ry o£ t2ie Anaheim City Plan.ning ~ommission, do
hereby cQrtify that tho for~goixig resolution was passed and ac~opted at a
meet.inq of the Anahsim City Planning Commis~ion held on November y, 1987, bx
the ~~'llo~ving vo~e of the rnombers thereof :
AYES: COMt~(I5SIONER5: HOUAS, BOYD~TUN, CAP.USILLO, FEI,DHAUS, FiERF3ST,
MC Bi7RNEY, DSh:SSE
NOES: COhSMISSIONERS: .T~.1N~
?~BSENT: CAMMISS'tONER~: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hava hereun~:o set my hand f.his 9th day p~
Novembex, 1g$7.
'~ ~ •~ , -
_-._ __.__-~.-~~~ ~"~ Z~ ~~
SFCRETARY, I~lAH:EIM CITY PLANIr'I2TC~ CQMMISS~qN
~:: .
;,;
~`',> ~
_3_
p~:d7~•2'L7
~ ;.~,
~
,,,a
''k'
, . ... . , ;
~.;t~~
~; , . ~ >
..~a: _ ~ • tc ..,,..~:r.