Loading...
PC 87-232~..,~ ,-,.` . , . -.o~.:~cr,rCY~ , ~ • ~ . ~ ~~}~f.~~, ~k 'tl R~SQI,~1rIJN N~L~~ ~2_ A ItESOLIITX~N pF TFIE ANAHRIM C~TX Ff,ANNTNG COhC'~ISSI4,V THAT PETITIqN kqR VA2'IANCE ~IO. 372?. E3E GgANTED f^1FfEtt~AS, the Anaheim City P1ann:~.u iyR verified Pc~~ition For Variana~ ~ C~'~;ssion c]id rQ~e3vQ a 112~ w. frcm XOLANDA MA5GTEL, AND KA1'MOND A. MASCIEL, ., Nurth Sl•:raQt, Anaheim, CA ~, 4291. AnahQirn, (;~ g~ ~. ~2~~• . owr~er, and GARY MASCIEL of Anah~:irn, County of'Or~,n~eall~tar~ 9grCalit'ornia daSCr b~d ~ u~t~a in Pho. City s. EXHIBIT A; ~'' A PQR'.CTUPI OF LOT 39, AN]~HE1M EX'PEN5ION M , Ag SHOWN UN A AP MADF. BY WII.LTI~M HANGL AND FILED TI~' THE TFiE OFFICE OF COUNTY ~{FCOnD~R OF GOS ~ ~N~;F riTY, CALII'~kNIA, MOkF p~~grI~UL~RLY DESCRIBF ~ ,n AS FOLL~OW~ BECINNJNG AT A POINT IN TIiF: NORTHF:ASTER'LY LINE; Or SA~n LUx 39 S , ATA YOINT BEiNG I.OCATED ^a0U'.CHEASTGRLY OF Tii~ t7QRTHE7~ ST 1~5 ••~ O F~~~ , CORNER OF ~ SAIll 1'.cT 39, RUNNiNG THENC~ SOUTH'RESTF RGX , , iNg ~1•16 rEET ALON(; ~ LINE PARALLE;L TO THE SOUTH I . TFi~ TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING O ^ D 9 r $CUNDAR OF THE LAND UESCRII3~D, AND RUNNIt7G THEIdCE SOUZHW~STGRLl' WITH : ~ , PARALLEL SAID SAUxHERLX LINF, 593.14 FEET, MuRE pR LESS TU THE S01J~'HWESTERLY , LIt7E OF SAT.U LUT 39; THENCG SOUTHEASTGRX, ALONG SATD SOUTHWESTERLY T LINE, 97 FEET; HENCE NOIlT~iEASTERLY, PARALLEL ~: WITH SATD SOUTIiERL'Y GINE OF LOT 39, TO THE THE SOUTHWESTERLY LAND i (;ONVEYED ~p LINE OF TIiH CHARLF.S A FUCHS ` ET UX. , $y DE;FD RECURDED JANUARY 2, 19~,~ IN BOUK ' I OFk 1510, ~AG~ 337, ICIhi, RCCORLS Ok' OANGE COL'~ NTY ' , CALIE ORtJiA, TIi~N(;~ NORTHWESTGRC,Y ALONG $~I~ S~UTFIWESTERL L' ANA (;~~~ ~~y~D ~,Q Y LINE OF SI~ID FUCH.S AND 1-LQNG SIAU ;;OUTHW ~'IN~ OF ESTERLY SAID LANU CONV~?YED TO 'IIRTHUR OSCAR WES'~F ET U};. BY D , 11LL, ~,EU ?RECUkD~D S'BpT~MpEg 3,1,gq6 IN BOOK 1~lS3, PAC,~ 7y, OEF ICIAL R(:CORDS aF ORANCF. COU!lTY, CALIFORN7A, 97 FF,ET, MORE 0~2 j,ggg„ rp Tg~ TpUE P~JINT nE }3EG'INNING. EXCEYTING THERBFROM TH~,~ p~~~TION :INCLilUED IN WEST STREET AS 5Ti0WN ON SAID MAP. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROt~f ANv pOFiTIpN 6g ,c,AIp LANA LYING WITHIN TRACT N0. 2104, !~S SHOWN ON A MAP RF.CORUED IN BOGK a0, ~J~GES 31 3 . :!, AND 33. :NCLUS'!VE 4r MISCEGLAirECUS MApS, RECORDS ' ~, OF ~1,LTFOP.NIA. ORANGE COUNTY, ; ;; i ~,, , ~ ~ ~ - O1],5r / ~r~~`.1, , . ~ ~~~ r~l f . J i~ ~,~ ^r Y 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ x f~i ;P v , ~, _,~,.. ~.. ~, . ~,r ~ .. PC8?-232 f~` ~~ si'ti ; W1iE1t~AS, the City Planning Commissiot~ clid hold a public hearing at the Civic Con~er in thA City of Anaheam on November 9, lgg7, at 1t~p p,m., r.totice oE said public huaring having be~en duly given as requirod by law and in accord~nce wz~h L•he pxovisx~ns oL tha Ariaheim Municipal Cnde, Chapter 1~.03, to hRur and cons3der evidence for and against said proposed variance and to i.nvc~st.igate and make findiny~ ancl rc~commen~lations in con~nection there~~rith; ancl + WHEREAS, said Commigsion, aEter c~ue insp~ction, investigation and study made by itself and in its be}ia.1f, and after due consideration oP a].1 evidence and rQports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the Eullowing facts: ; 1, ~hat the petitioner proposes w~ivers of the Eallowing to ~' establis}z a'L-lot ;ubdivi,^,ion and L•o c~nstruat 2 single-family residences: ~,, a ~; (A) SECTI N 18'-2~~Ci~,.l~n12 - Minir. n~ni l~t rea. (1~QQ.~ u rF _feet required: 7,057 ~, ?~~~5~~_ f~~ proPosed) (B) SI; TI rT 18,1.~Of3~OlU _ Mina.mum fr2nt vard set}Za~, (2~~ f_ eet rQquirea; ~ ~g~.~ proPo3ed) (C) ~F~TI(~ 1$~2~.~c.CZ3~2r% - Reauired q, rs,~9~~~~1c. ArrD. 1~.~~~3~111. (6 „~~~~~~~.~r 25 ~ 20 feet proposed) ~~ ~equired; ~A) aF~CTi~1 ]8~?$.Q~i3.Qi4 - Minim,~m~i~.Y_arcl s~~~~k. t~ f~.gr roq,xired; . fe ~ proposecl) (E) SECTION_1r~s25..+Q¢3 r,~~~ _ M~nir~u~ rg.~r~~~@~back. (.1,~.,_~rl i~2q~~~ .required; 1Qt-,~_2~ f~t an~~.~q._12 f~g~ nroPosed) 2. That, the above-mentioned waivers are horeby grantQd on the basis that thQre are spec3.al circumstances aPpTicable to the ~r~perty such as size, shape, tcpography, locution or surroundings, which do not apply to ot.her iden;ically zor.ed proparties in the vi.cinity; and ~hat str.ict application of the Zoninq Code dsprives tihe property ci privileqe, ez-joyed hy other ~srnporties in idc~ntical zoning classit•icatiun in thP vicinity. ~. That; there are except.ional nr exL•raoxdinary circumstances or condit_ions applicable to the property inv~lved ar to the xntendec3 use oF tho propFrty that ao not apply qenerally to the propertx or class of use in the same viairiity and zone. 4. That the reque~ted variance is necessary for the preservation anQ enjoyment of a substanCial proparty righC possessed by other propsrty in . ihQ sam~ vfci.ni.ty and zone, and denied to the pronerty in quosrion. J ~' 5. ThHt the requostg~ variance will not b~ mntorfally detrirnental K to the pixblic welFarc~ ot i.njurious to the proper~y or improvamer~ts in sucr °: vicinity and zone in which tha pr~perty is locr~ted, i~'; r~ „~, „ : , , '~~~:~'st 1 -~ ~_~._~ _2.. PC87-232 ~~~~, ; ,~1 ~ 6. That no ~ne indicatecl their presence at, said public hearing 3i~ opposit;ion; and that no corrospondonca was xeceived in opposition to ~ubject petition. ~ALI ~ NIA~ ENVIF.QN~l~ITAI_~j~~ITY A T F7N171N(' • ;'• C.ity Planning Commzssinn has reviewed the proposal t~. Qs~ b],ishe a~~tllot ;~~ subdivision and to c~n~truct 2 sing1P~-farni1y residencas with waive~rs of minimum 1ot area, mini~num iront yard setback, required qarago se~back, minimum side yard setblck and mini.mum zear ~ard sQtback on an irregulaz•ly-ghaped parcel of lanc~ consisting oP appr~xamately Q.32 ~cre lucated at th~ northeast; cornez• of WQSt S~reet and Autumn Drive, having approximate frontages of 8?. feet on the east side of West Street azxd ].92 feet on tha north sid~ of Autumn Drive and furrY~er described as 1010 N~rth West ~~~ Stree{:; and does her~b a ~ y ppL•ove the Negative Dc~c;Iaration upon tinding thaC it ~ has c~nsidered th~ Negative Declaration together with any commc~nts rece.iv~d ~''' during the public roview process ancl further findi.ng on the basis of the '' initial stuciy and ariy comments receivad that thore is no subs~ant.ial evidc~nce I'' thst the projecL- will have a significant offock on the enviro~m ent. NOW, THEI2EFORE, HE IT RESOLVED tha~ the Anaheim CiY.y Planninq ~ Comm.ission does hereb ~ following conditiozis wh cti arel herebX, ~pun~{~~c1bP~ a z~ cessarp prerequis te ~to the proposed uso of t2:e subject property in or~ler to preserve khe safe~y and general weltare of ~he Citizens oE th~ City uf Ar,at~eim: 1. That the owner oE sub7z~~ property sh~.ll. pay to the City of Anaheim a fee for stree~ lighting along Wes~ Street and Autumn Drive in an amoun~ as det~r-nined by the CzCy Council. i 2. That thQ owner uf subjQCt prp trti ~ a£oe L•or tre~+ lantin P, y~'h`~1~' p~y to the City oE Anaheim ? P g}~urposas along West Straet and Autumn Drive in ~n amount as determined by ~he Ci~y Council, 3• Th3t prior to is~ua~.ic;e o:f a building pQrmit, the appropriate traEfic signal assessment fee 3hall be paid to the City of Anaheim .in an amount as dc~termined by the City Council. 4• Tzlat prior to final parcel ma~~ approvt,l, a~~~,ropriate park and recreation .in-lieu fEes shall be p~id to L•he City of Anahs3m in an amount as detei•minod by the City Council. 5„ rh3t roll up garaye cioors shall tse provided for those front-on garages w3th less L•han 25-foot setbacks from Qi•tller streeL. 6. That drainaqe of subject praperty sha11 be ciisposed of in a manner satiefacto~y to the City Enqineer. 7. Thar_ subject progerty s~ia].1 bo served by andergruund utilities. 8. That prior to commencement of strucr.ural framing, fire hydrants slzall be inatalleci and cherg~d a:~ rac~uired and determine~ to be no~essary by tho ChieF of Che Fire Departm~n~. -3~ PC87-232 , ";r;^~; ',.~'; ~~'.'.';-~ ~ ~~ ~ : ~~;~s .~,~. -~ %~ '.'.:u~~ .., , ....... . _ . . . _ . ... .. ...., ~ . ~ ~ , +~r~. ipK ~ ' yG i ; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ,~ ~r ~'F !,1 1 9. That al.l air conditionix~g facilit.ies and other roo~' and ground iJ m•~un~ed equipment shall be praperly shielded from view, and t:ae sound buffered from adjacent residential prcpPrta.es. 10. '1.'t~at prior to i~suance oE a building pzrmi~, the app].icant shall prQSent evidence satisfact~ory to the Huilding nivi~ion thaL- tk-R proposed project is in conformaalce wiL•h Council Policy Number 542 ~ "5ound Atter~uation in Resadential Pi~ojects" ancl with Noi3a Insulatiori SYandards speciEied in the California Actministrative Cod~, Title 25. L1. That. subject praperty sha11 be develored sui~~tantially in accardance '' ' ;: w,ith plans and specifications on file with the City of A~nahEim ` ~ marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 9, i ' 12. That prior to the issuance of a building nermzt, or within a perioa v of one year £rom t.ie date a.f this resolution~ whichever occurs ~' first, Condition Nos. ~, 2, 3, ~nd 10, abov~•-menti.oned, shall be ~~ complied with. Extensians for further time ta complete said ; conditiAns may be gr~nted in accordance with SecL-ion 18.03.090 oi '~ ttie qnaheim Municipal Code. ' 13. That priar to fina7. building and zoning inspectxons, Condirion Nos. 5~ 6, 7, 9 and 11, abovH••m~ntioned, sh~11 be compl.ied •,vith. ~' 14. Thal: approc~al of this application constiL-utes approval af the ~ ~ proposed roqusst ~nly to t2ie extent Chat xt c.r~mplies with the Anaheam Municipal Zoninq Cod~ and any ather applicable Cit_y ? ' rPgul~tions. Approval dues not include any acti.on or findings as to compliance or appraval ok the reques~ r.egarUing any other applieak~le ordinance, rQqul.at.ion or requ'.rem~ n~. B~ IT FURTHER P,ESOLVL•'~ that the Anaheim City Planning Corrunission cioes herQby find fln~ determine that adol txon of t:his Resolution is gxpressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should an~• such condztions, or any part thereof, be ~ cleclared invalid or unenforceable by the Einal judgment of any court uf competent jurisdiction, then th.is ResoluL•ion, and any approvals herein } ~ contained, shall b~ dQem~d nul'~ and voido ,~ TIiE FOREGOING .RESOLU'TIOV is signed an~l apgrc,vod by me L-his 9th dny ~,"j oL• Novsmber, 1987. /~ , -~ ,;, ___ %C~=,~~~~ ;/~1 J ~ ~~~~__ . ~` CfIAIRMAN, ANAFiETM CJ1TY PLANNTiv' i CO2+IIrfIS~ ; ~ !'; ATT~ST: '; r` ~..u,~.~ ..--, f / y~~, '°. ~--~ J~ *~ SECRETAR , I A.NIUIEIM CITY PLANNING COhA~iISST02v ~ ,~ ,C '~ f , ,,:, ,ti , ;;~ "4' PC87-232 :~ ; s:a; y ~ d: k"~~: ~h. 1 ~' k~'~Y`~ ~r ~{G;ti f, ~ : ~1~ ~~:'r~ ,, ,,~ «~~ f~i'~ti! ~~ ,,,.r,- - ~tr: , ' ~ . ~ti ~~~t ~ M s~ r !i rrMa r~. r ~,~ . , , , `,. ,'.V / l •~k' 1 I Y'~ t4~~ ~ n ~~,i ~ - -~ „ ., ~ ~ o~ ~ :,. ~ ; ,~~f ~NS,~~,~l~r~~f~~~•~'~~~~, x> , ~ , ~ ; ;!J . . ' . . . . i~; t i y yl.,.r;.y+ ~~~i;~ !?'~ . . ~ ~, ~.. , 1 ~~'~'~ . . . , . .. i ' .~ ST.ATE OF CALTFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss, CITY OF ANAHFIM ) ~r.~, '~'~"; I, Edith L. Harris, hereby certif th ^oecretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do ;'" y at the f.oregoing resolu~ion w,~s pas~ed and adopted at a mQeting of the Anaheim Cit Pl i the f'ollowing vote of the y ann ng Commiss3on held on November 9, 1987, hy memhers there~f; ;' AXES: COMMZSSIONERS: IiOUAS, ~OYUSTUN, CARUSJL'L0, FELDHAUS, HERBST, i•; MC BURNEY, MFSSE ~ G' f.n: ' NOES; COMMISSICNr:T2S; ~TODiE a ; ;; ABSENT: C02~II+~IIS~IONERS: NONE ,.~ IN WITNF~SS WHGREOF, I have hereunto set my hanc3 this 9th day af Novernber, 1987. , ,; ~ `~ • ~ ~~ ~sl 1~~~~~ ~ ;i - _ ~I.C.,~1___~-- SECRy'tAP.Y, ANAHEIM GITY PLA23NINC COMMISSTQN „~~ :'11 ,~ ,~ :J ~ ~d ~~ ` ~I ~ r~~ 1 ~j, 1. 4 t~ 1 Ji _.... . . .. . ... . ....... ri ~ . . . -'- PC87-232 iY~~,~,. 4' ~ . - . . C ~ f i~ r n, ~ ~ ~~, r :~ '~ I ~t va ~ v~ ~~. ~ ~ - ' ~avA f~t;f~1 r~; , ._. ~ K ~~ ~, r~~j:f~~t h v ~ . , . ~, ~ ~ ~, -'~ r~~ ~~,(~ . ~f t ~/j.7 ~FY'_K ~ I / .~`.1 , ~.1'~ ~r~ J+ , i; , . ~ tr,vf~4..,,~ ~y~_'_ _ ' Y .! . ' 1 ; . - . . . . . . . . ~. ~ ~~~~ ., , , .,, ., .. . . . , . _ . , . . ~ ~ . . . ,.._. .._ ,~.~•Qi,dull