PC 87-242."~~i~r .., i .~ .. t I ~ Y. ~;~.''~ .~•
. . . , . ... . ,. ~ . . .. . ';1~.
~~' ~1 .
rr"{IIj,I,~
, RESOL T~TTQN N0. PG87-242
A RFSOLUTION OF THfi ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIh'G COt~R~fISSION
~,.
THAT PFm2TI0N FOR VARIANCE N0. 3707 BE G4ANTED
,,',.' WHEREAS, tha Anaheirn Cit;y Flannix~g Commissiori did receive a
veri~i~d Peti.tion for V;~ziance Lrom ROBERT L. & GEEtALDINE; MC GINLEY, 1028 N.
MayPlower Street, Anaheim, CA ~2801, ~wner, of cert;ain rQal gro~erty s5.tuatod
in the Ci.rp of Anaheim, County of Grange, Sta~e of' California described as:
LCr '1 OF TRACT IvTO. ?.326, AS PF;R MA.P TFiEi2~OF RECOP.DED
~ IN BOOK 73, 1'AGES ~, 5, AND 6 OF MISC~i,LAIJE:0U5 MAPS,
&ECORDS OF ORANGF. CUUNT_Y, GALIFORNIA.
h'H~REAS, the City Flanniny Commission did hold a piiblic hearing
at th~ Civic Cent~r in. the City ot Anaheim ori Oc:toLer 26, 1987, at :1:30 p.m.,
not•ice of said pub].ic nearinr~ having been duly given as requzred by 1aw and in
accordance with th~ provisions oL *_he Analieim Munir.ipal Code, Chmpte~ 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and agai,ist said propos~cl variance and tio
in.vestigato and ;nake finclings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
said publ~.c Yiearing havinc~ been continued to the meeting of Navember 23, 19d7,
and
4dHEF~AS, said Commission, after clue inspection, i:ivestigati.~n
and study made by itself and in i.t~ .behal.f, anel after due consid~ration of 311
:vidence and reports of[ered at said hEarS.ng, docas fa.nd and determine the
tollowing tacts:
x. That the petiti~ner proposes c~aivers of the Lc>1';.;;w,._ng tio
retain a 6-•f~~ot, 10-i.nch high bJ.ock wa11 and patio cover;
~A) s~;rT_r.~s 3~.~04_ 0~1~~i02 - Maximum. ~_v_all height.
AND :l~ , 2~_Qg ,~~z:~ ( 6 feet permit _,~d; fee~t-, 1, _in hP
~ ~ ~__.
pr~posed)
'~~ i~~) SFCTION 18,2u,_U63.U20 - Minimum ide ~ard set~ack,
~ i (~£eot rE3quire~; 2 :Eee~ exisCing)
(C) 5~:~'CIOP7 18,_26.06~_0:30 - Minimum r~~r_y_~ru~ setb~-~k~
(1 fe t required; ~_ fg~~~~ a~1~he~
exi.stinq)
2. That the above-meiitioned waivcrs are hereby granted on the basis
that there are special circumstances applicable to t;he properCy such as size,
shape, topa7raphy, locatinn or surroundings, which do not apr,ly to other
idenCically zon~d properti~s in tt.~~ vici.nity; and that strict ap.plication of
the 'Loning Code deprives the property of privilege~ onjoyed by other
properties i~. idenkical ^oni.nq classi.£ication in L•he vic~nity.
; 3. That th~re~ are exceptional or exlraorlitiary circuui,L•ances or
•• conditions applicab:,.e to t;hQ property .invc~lved or to the inten:c~Pd usH of the
.{ property that do not ~pply generally to t}.e ~~roperty or class of use in the
~ same vicini~y~ and zone.
0126r
;
~7,} ~+'4 1~ t,~ ~ r
,~~
. :'•~'I~''
'~I
~,~
PC87-242
~
~ . . .. . ... . . .. ... . . ._^k'
~
~?~~
'~~
;~
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservati.on
and enjoyment ox a subsk.antia]. proper~y r.ight posses:ec~. by o~her property in
the s~me vicini.ty and 2orte, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requestec~ variance wzll not be materially detrimental
~o the public welfare or injurious ~o the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in wh.ich the F~ropert•y is located.
6. That no one indicated their ~resence at said ~u~ilic hearing in
upposition; and that one letter. was receivod in opposition to :;ubject petition.
CALTFORNIA ENVTF'?NMENTAL,~t~UAL~TX ACT rINDING: That the Anaheim
City Planning Co-nmissien 2ias reviewed the proposal to retain a 6-taot,
10-inch hi.gh block wa11 and a patio cover with waivt~ts of maximum wa11
t~eighi:, minimutri sic.le ysrd setback and minimum rear yard setback ~n a
rectangu:-arly-sha,~ed parcel of land consisting of agproxi.mately 7,795 square
feel•, locat.ed at rhe southPast corner of La Palma Av-~;ae and Mayflower
StreeC, having approx.imate frontages of 100 feet on the sauth side of Ia
Pa1ma Avenue and iti feet or_ the EasL side of Mayflowor Street anrl Eurther
described as 1U28 North May~lower Street; and doES hereby ~pprovQ the
Neg~tive Declaration upon finding tha~ it has consi3ered the Negative
Aeclaration together with any commenLs received during the public revi.ew
prucess and :urther finding on the basis of tha in3.ti31 study and any
comments received that ther~ is no substantial rv:~dence tbat th~ project wi11
have a signiPicant ePfect an the erivironment.
NQW, TFIERFrORE, BF•. Ix RESOLVr:D that the Ar~aheim C~.t.y Planning Commission
dor_s hereby grant subject YEtition £or Vaz•i~nce, upon the Following
coriditi.ozis which are hereby .Eound to ba~ a necessary prerequisite Lo the
proposed use o~ the subject- property in order to preserve the safety and
g~neral welfaz~e oP the Cztizens uE th+. City af Anaheim:
1. That ~lans shall b~ submitt~d tu Lhc Building Uivi:sion showing
complianc~a with tl:i~ mininiur.i sL-andards of the City oE Anahe~im,
including thc: Uniform Builcliny, Plumbing, r lecCrical, Hous~.::g,
bfechanical arid Fire C~des as adopted b~j• the City o~ Anaheim. The
appropriate permits shall be obtained for any necessary work.
2, That subject property shall be dEVeloped substint5.a11y in
acr.ordance with plans and s~eca.~ications on file with the City of
Az~aheim marked Fxhil~it No. 10
3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-menCinned, sh~7.1 b~ completed
within a period of sixtiy {60) days from tk~e date of t:zis resolution.
0126r
'~4~
PC87-242
ti; ;.
t~"
..,,
'. ;
, :,
R!~f
i
~
~~1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ '€:~
~ ~'f~1t":1
~ `4M
~ . .~:`R
'~'
I!8'~
~~
: ~4
c.:C'i
FiE I.T FURTT3ER 12ESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission '~
uoes hereby fi:~d and de~ermine L•hat adoption of this Resolutian is ex~ressly 1' ~,,
predicated upon app~icant's compliance with each and all of the conditions" "I
hereinabove set ForL•h, Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be `°`J~I
declared invalid or u f -
nen or~edble by the ~ina1 judgmont of any caurt of`
cornpet:en~ jurisdiction, then this :~~~solutiar,, and any approvaas herein
~:ontained, shal l be d~ ~amed nu11 and void.
TEIE FOREGOING RESOLUT.ION ' s signed and apprc~ved ~y me this 23.rd day ,
o£ November, 1gg7,
/~~~/~
y"~'`''~-,~---..
CHAIRMAN, ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI~ SBIpN
T.TTEST : ~
-- ~"~ --,~ 1~~-~
SECRETARY, ANT,HEIM f,ITY E'LANNING COMMISSTON
STATE OF CALIFOkNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss .
CITY OF ANAI~;EIM }
I. E:dith I~. Harris, Secrete,r.y of rhe Anaheim City Plannin~
Commission, do hereby certi.gy that the foregoi.ng resoluL-ion was passed and
adopted at a meeting of t2ie Anaheim City Planning Cornmission held on November
'l3, 19II7, by the followir,g vote of the members thereof :
AY~S: COMM];SaIOH~RS; BOL'AS, BOYDS:I'UN, CAR[JSILLO, FELDIiAiiS,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES: CO2~fTSSI0NER5: N~~NE
A~iSEt7T: COMMISSZONFR~: HLI2IIST
IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, i have hereunt:o seL• m~r h~rid i:hi~ 23rd day of
'tlavPmber, ~,gf~ ) ,
~_~.___~~'~~~-~%k~ _ ~~ .
~., ~~ ___._~_~,~In~~_
oLCnFTAkY, ANAHEIM C;xTY PLANNI:IG CUMAlISSION
0126r
-3 -
~. , . ,, .
,
PC87-242
~ , ;;,~
;,fi,l
'S`Y
( ~;~:5
i
-.;
`y.
,
~ ;t
~'.~
; ;;
<`i
.~.k.
?s