PC 87-253~~t,~r~
~.~.~L17T3.~N ~~: ~ 7 -s~~~
A Rk:SOLUTTON OF TI~~ ANAIiEIDt I,ITY FCANT?ING COtdMYSSxON
THAT PETITIUN FO12 V'ARIRNCE N0. 3719 PE DENIEll
WH~R~A5, tho Anahezm C.ity Planni:t,q Commission did receiv3 a
vorifiocl Petition for Vara~nce £.rom FAIRMpNT LTD., 13632 Hazol S~xeet, Garden
Grove, CA 92fi42, owner and LORREkJ A. BEI.L, 2520 S, Fairview Z~ad, 1~P, Santa
Ana, CA 92704, agent, for certain roal property situatQd in the City of
Anaheim, County oE Orange, St~te of CaZifornia, doscribad as follows:
~ PARCEY,S 1, 2, 3 AND 4, IN TIIE CITX OF ANAHEIM, COUNIY
i' OF URANGE, STATE OF CAI,IFCI:NIA, AS SHOWN ON A MA.P
fiECORDED IN BQO-C 179, PAGE .39 OF PABCEL MAPS, REC.ORDS
f
GF ORANGE COUN;Y.
FIHFREAS, the (:ity Planning Commission did holcl a public heariny
at the Civic Ce~iter in the Ci.ty of Anahaim ou November 3, 1987, ak 1:30 p.m.,
r iiotice oE said public haaring havinc~ bec~:i duly given as r~quired by law and iri
accordance with the provisio--s of t}se Anaheim Municip~l Coc?e, Chapter 18.03,
to heax• and consider ev.idence for ~nA against said proposod variance and ta
investigaEe and make findings und recommQndatior.s in aonnection tharewith;
said hearirig having beWn continued to Decamber 'l, 1987; ar.3
; WHEREAS, saicl Cpmmissinn, after due inspection, inves~igation
s and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration oE all
evidence and rQp~rts offered ar. sai~l hearinc~, does find and determine tho
; following tar.ts:
~
~ 1. Th~t the etitzoner
i p groposes waivers of th~ fo]2owing to
estai~lish a 12-unit (pr.evious.ly 17 uniL•j single-family resideritial subdivision:
(A) SE~TIQN_1~3.01.13~ •- It~guire ,_ l~t~fron~aae.
+ (All :lots requirQd to abut g~~~
streeL or alley; Lots Nos. 10,
y 'll, and 12 proposed witli
pr~va~~ str~et Erontage.}
;
(Bj SE~TI 21 lFl~_27.SIh1~_U •- Mir~im~m bu.}3ci~ng. na~~rrd,
1 (f') ~Fr~TTf1N 1R~77.Oh~,1)?.7. - t~xim~m_.~.imtL~r of _}~~~r~Ln~•
' (D) ~ T.tQN 1$~.l _5~6~~ 2~z1. - Minimum ~.~~~~~~•
; AND_ZQ~7._t(~,~~. ~~2~ (.~5_3~~.~ requirecl; ~~.~~q ~ feet
proposed).
;
~f (~:) ~~'Ti,~7-~s?7~4_S?~~~.:~0 -~ ~~nimu~~~ar._Y..~~~. ~~~~k.
0140r
r,•,µrse~ry~~
,`~;~
. `.
T, ~
... ~t F i~;i~~~ ~~~
i~!
I~~~;
w. ~ha~ the proposad variance is hereby deni.od an the basiQ that
the proposed Generaz Plnn Amendment No. 232 is approved as recommended hy tha
Planning Commi~sion to raciesignato subject property to Hillsida I~ow-Density,
[tosidential 1an~~ uses, prohibiting dovolupmant oE the proposed FtS-5000(SC)
project, and L'urtiher thaL Reclassifiaatlon No. 67-88-21, was approved to
reclas~ify subject property to FtS-HS-lU,000(SC) instead af rho RS-5Q00(SC)
zpne,
3. That 10 p~rsons indicated thezr ~~resence a~ said public hearing
in oppo~iL•ion; ~nd that no correspondence was received in opposition to
suhjoct petition.
~IFORN_IA ENVIRQNMENTAL _Q~jALITY )LC`~ FINDiNC~: That the Anaheim
City Planning Commission has roviewed tihe proposa:~ to establi.sh o 12-uniti
(previc~us.ly 17 i~niL) KS-5000(~C) single••Ear~aly rosiden~ial subdivision with
waivors of r.aqui.red lot fruntage, minirnum building pad area (deletc~d),
maximum ~~xmber ut bedrooms (deletRd), mini~ri:m garage setback ~nd minimum resr
yarcl setback (deleted) on an irreqularly-shmped parcel of land consistiny af
approx3.mately 2.97 acre3, having a f.rontag~ of r~pproxS.mateiy 843 feet on t.he
iiorthQaS~ si3e of Fairmont Boulevard, havinq a maximum depth cf approximately
2].0 feet an~ bein~ loc~ted appr.oxima~ely 1080 feet snuth of tha conterlxne of
Snnta Ana Canxon Roacl ~nd further described as 22G-225 South Fairmont
Boulevard; and does hereby approv~ the Negativa Ueclaration upon finding that
iL• has contii~ore~ tti~ Negati~~e Declaration t,ogether w3th any commenta
recei•~ed duz•i.ng the public review process and furl:hex findiilg on the basis oE
tho iz~itial study and any commAnts rece.xved that there is no substantial
evidence that the projoct will YiavQ a significant Pffect nn the environmen~.
NOV1, 'PHER~FOFE, BE IT RBSO: ?D that the I~naheim Ciky Planning
Commission does hereby deny subjecL• PetiY.ion for Variance on tYle basis of the
aforementi~ned f•incl~.ngs.
TF1F. FOREGCING RBSOLUTIUN is sic~r.ed and apprnv~d by me this 7th
,~ + i/~
ot Aecemb~r, 1987.
,(YYy,-~1.~•` ~~~~~~.~ ~'.
T_.__~ _ ..-_.-/-._.__~~.~_ -
CHAIRMAN, E+2IAI~EIi~i CI~Y PLANNITIG COt~SISSION
ATTES'T :
_.__ _ . _~ ~ - ^ "
S~CF.STARY, ~.2JAH~;IM CITY PI~ANNING COMMI~SION
O.140r
_Z_
Pf:87 •-253
r
;,
~ r ~' s~
~_r'~rrs ~ ',;:: r ` --- - ~ ~ ~ ~~~i
;,, j
.' 1
i
~~:;
~
~~
-,ir aYhv}~-
'~ +1~
r F~ i
~
_ `;~,~~r~,
ri;;Er,,
Y~
>; ~~J
~;_
~y'•
STATE OF CALTFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ,;'s
CITY O1F ANAHEIM )
~;:
,,
T, Edith L. H~rris, S~cretary of th~ Anaheim City Planning ~;
CommisSion, do hexeby cartify Chat the foregoing resolution was passed and `
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim r,iC~• planning Commissiun tield on Dsc:ember "``~}
7, 1987, by thQ Eollowinc~ vote of th~ members thereo£:
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BUUAS, BO,~DSTUN, FELDHALS, HERBST, MESSE, MC BURNEY ~~f
NOES: COMMIaSIONERS: NON~ '~~
A13SENT: COMhSISS1QPtEKS: CARUSILLO
,~;
EN ~lI'fNES5 WFfFREOF, I have herpunta aeL• my hand this 7th day of ''
D.~cQmber. 1987. `t
,~
~P.c~1.~_ v ~ Y. .`~ • -- ~ ;
SECRE ARY, A?tAHEIM PLI'.NNING CUMMISSION
:;, ,.
tE~ `
l-
ri
~, 0190r -3- PC8?-253
, ~;
`.'ti
. ;,
r,~~~~`; !~
~ ; j. ~ ~~
~ ~.~ - '~;.`~s