PC 87-60~
r:r ;
r"~. ,
-
\
~` }i~Sf)LUTION NO. PC87-6p
A RESOLUTICN OF ~r~rs' :~tdAHFIM CT7.'Y PL~ANNING COMMISSION
THAT P~'1'I'P:ION FOtt VARTANCL, NU, 36~0 IiE GRANT~D
WIfER~AS, th~ Anaheim Cil•y Planning Co:nmission did receiv~ a verifi~d
. Petiti~n for Vari.anr.e rrom CRAIG A. Mt)C~( AN(1 RI'1'A J. MUCK, 1229 Noc~th Willek
;t~;;: Ci!'Cle~ Anaheim, CA p:!307, owners of c~rtain real property situated in th~a
~~ C;.L•y oE Anaheim, CounL-y o[ Orange, State ot California described as:
LOT 4 Uf~' `PRACT. 7417 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON ~r(:C IN BQUK 351, PAGLS
9, l0 AND 1'1 JC' h]ISCLLLANLOUS MAPS OI~ ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
~~. ~iE~LKli~Jp the Ci.ty Planning Commission did hoid a public hearing at
~,~ the Civ.ic Center in hn~ City of An~heim on March Z, 1981, at 1:30
%; p.m., notice
of said public hearinc; hav.ing been duly yiven as r.~equired by law and in
accordance with t~~e provisions c~F r_h~ Anaheim Municipal Code, C:haptEr 18.03,
lo i-~ear ~nd conr,ider evic9Ence for, and agai.nst s~id proposed var'ance and to
investigate and rnake f:indings and recamm~ndati.oz~s in connection therewit'.; and
4~1HERGAS, said Cornmission, aEter due inspection, xnvestigation and
study mad~ by it ~c~l£- and in its beha.lf, and af.ter da~ ronsideration oF a1J.
evidenee and r.e~or.L-s of.f~ce~ at saic? he~~r.ing, does fin~i and determir~e the
Eo].lowing facts:
1. 'Phat thF: petiL-ioner propnses waiver oi' thE f.ol.lo~ving L-o constr.uet
a.17Q syuare Eoot bedroa;n expansion:
SECTiON 18.27.062,020 - Maximum lot covera e.
~~ (3S$ p~~r.rnitCed; 47.~ ~roposAd)
~~
2. That I:he above-mentiuned waiver i: hereby gr.anted on th~ basis
thal• th~re are sPec.ial circu,nst:ances app.lic~ble l•.o ~he pro~ erty :au~h as size
shape, to~oqraphy, location and surr.oundzn~s which dc nor_ apP.lY
t~ ,
o~her
ic;c:ntically
' zoned pr.operL•y in the same vicinit•y; anc] t:hat strict app?.icatS
on
c~E tt~e
L~n ing Cocie de~r•ives che pro~F,rty oE ~rivilFges rnjoyed by .
oLhet
~roperti.es in the identical zc.~ri~ and claesi~ication in the vic;inity; ~ncl that
the requc~st is minimaI..
ti; ,
''' 3. Tha.C L-here ace Ax:se~tional or extraor:linary cir.cumstanr,es pr
;r; conr]itions, ap~Iica~le to the properky involved or. to hhe i.nt~nded use of the
~roperty that du not apply gener~~l.y to the p!•anertY vr r.lass of use in the
~;; same vicinity and zone.
~1. 'Phat the cequasted variance is necc~ssar~~ f:or the pr~servar_ion ac~d
~n;oyment oE a;;ubs~antial pr.opnrL•y right po~sessed by other ~roper.ty in the
sar~e vicin.it-y and zone, and denied to the pro~~err.y in que~tion.
~. 'I'ha~ the c~aqi.~esred ~~ir. ia~ice will not be mat~riall~,~ detri~r~Gntal l:o
L•he publi.c welEar~ or in~ucious Co the ~r.c~~ecty ~r improve;nF:n:s ir~ surh
viciriity and zone .in which thA pcopecty is locatEd.
G~ `Phat no ~ne indi;:ate,:i their r~::esence at Yaid nubli~ he.~ring in
;;
;~ oppositian; a~i~i thar no curr ~s~on~iene~ wa~ r~ceiv~d in oupr~sitipn o.,ubject
,,~ petition.
l0~lr -
PC87-60 ..
,>...r , : _ . . . ,
i ,..~~ . - , .
.. . '"'~. . . .
: ~,
ENVIRONMrN''i'AI. IMPACT E'INDIN~: The Planninq Director nr nis auh.horizPd
re~reser.tative has determined that the pro~osc~d projecL• Ea11s within the
deFinition oE Categ~rica~. ~xempl:i.ons, Class 5, as d~fined in the Sta~e h]IR
Cuidelines and is, L-herefore, cahegorical.ly exe;n~t Erom the requirement to
preparE an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORL, BG ~[T RESULVLU t-hat the Anah~im C.ity Planninc~
,.; ~ommicsion does hereby grant subjcct Petition for Variance, upon the followin.g ~
"" conditions whi.ch ar~ hereby found to be a necessar ~!
y prerequisite 'tu the
proposed us~ oP the subject propPrty in order to preserve the safety and
g~~neral welfare of tne c:itizens of. rhe Ci.ty of. Anahc~irn: `~'
, 1. That subject property shall be developed a~ibstantiall;~ in acr.prdance ~
with plans anri specificat:iuns on [i.le with th~ City of Anat-,eim marked
Gxhibit Nns. ]. Fhrough 3.
,,:
~;,; 2. That prior tn final buildi.ny and zoni.ng inspections, Condition No. .l, '•~`
above-mentionnd, shall Ue c:omplied wLth.
B~ IT ['UR`.t'HGR RES~LVED that the Anaheim C.ity Planning ~ommission does
hereby find and deterntine that ~doption r,f this Resolut:ion is expressly
predic~~ted upon a~plicant's complian~:e ~vith each and all of tt~e conditions
heceinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or an;~ part thereof, be
declar~d invalid or unenforceable ~y L-he [inal ~udgment af any court of
competent jucisdiction, L•hen this Re•soliii~.ion, and any appr,~va].s herein
conl:ained, sha~.l be fl~emed null and vuid.
THE E'~~RL~~TNG R~SOLUT[ON is s~gned anr. a>>pcoved by me '.:his ir.d day of
March, 1987.
.~~ ~~'' ~%/ f
' ' % :~_ .~
C[-IAI MAN, ANA EIM C:C'PY Pl~,nt~NTI~JG COMfdISSION
A'P"!'EST: !
~
~
SBCRrTARa , ANAFlC7M CI'P1' PLANNING COMt4TSSION
STATE OE CALIrORNIA 1
1, COUNTX UF URANGE ) ss.
CITY 0[~ ANAHCItR }
+
I, Edith L'. Harcis, Secre~a.ry of thr Anaheim City Pianning
Commis~ion, do hcreby c~ctiL,y that the foregoin~ resolution was passEd and
~', ado~t~d at a m~eL•ing of th~ Anaheiin City P].~nninr, Commis,ion helc~ on March 2,
` 1987, by the Fo1l~wina vot~ of L•he me;nbers therenf:
! AYES : CQMMI,~,STO[JL•'RS: B~UAS, ERY, HEkBS'r, (aA CL/1IRE~ MC BURi~LY., MGSSE
~~ NOES: COMMISSlUNERS: NQNG
~ ABSCNT: CUMMISSIOPIiiRS: LA WICK;[
~~
~ TN W.IT~d!~;5c WFfERGUE', i have h@rt?LLIlrO set my hand th~s 2nd day ~t
~. td,~rch, 19p7.
r ~ -
, J ~J .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIhI CI1'Y ~L [dNING COMf4ISSI0N
~ ~'~ - '~~ PC87-~i0
~' ~~
s,'$; !:
;••,
.. --- ~ - ~ . ~ .~.:',;-i~`~xi