PC 87-70.~~~
Rt3S~LUTION NU. PC87-70
A I2GSOLU'PIGN UF TEIE ANAHF?M CI7'Y PLANNTNG CONIMIuSION
'.I'HAT PETI`PLON EOK VARIANCG N0. 3626 i3R GRANTLD
WHGRCAS, l•.he Anaheim City Plann.ing Commissian did re~eiv~ a verified
Petit.ion Eor. Variance frorn F. J. HANSH?~W ENTERPRZSES, INC., E'1' AL., 10921
W~stminsL•et Avenue, Garden Grove, Cali.f~Y'nia 926A3, ownec and GREG SPONS~LLGR,
P. 0. F3ox 5G11, Canyon Lake, California 9~380, ac~ent for certairi real property
s7tuated in the City of nnaheim, County of Orange, State of Cal.i.tornia
described as:
TH~ W?:ST 317.00 rrE'P OF 'PHL•' SOUTH 'L83.00 PLE'T OC THE SOUTHWGS'~
QUART~R C1E' 'PFIE SUU'PHWEST QUAR'PFR OF SEC'r14N 5, 'POWf1SHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 FJES"P, IN 'PHC•~ RANCHO L'OS CQYO'PES IN ~'HE CITY OP ANAHEIM,
COUI~'PY OE nRANGE, S`PATF OL' CAL'IFCI2NIA, AS SHOWN 01`1 MAP RECORDFD
IN 300K 51 PAGG lU OI' MzSCGLLANCOUS MAPS, i2~CORDS QF SAZD ORANGE
COUNTY.
EXCEPT THAT ~'URTION THFRP~~F DESCRII3ED AS FOLT~OPIS:
~3EGINNING AT THE INTERSEC`.CION OF THF NOFtTFi LII~~ OF Tki~ SOU7'H
53.00 FEET W.ITH THP GAST LINL OE' TEIF WESTT:RLX 190.00 FERT OF
SAID 8EC`CIUN~ ~l'HPDiCE NORTH 0 DEGREGS :19 MiNUTES 44 uECONDS WES'P
ALOtdG SAiD EAS'P LINL '107.0~7 FEF't 2'0 A POINT 1.0.00 FEET SOUTEIELILY
OF THE NORT.HGRLY GINC UF ':[iG SOUT'rIGRLY 2OQ.00 FEr,T; THENCE NQR"'H
Q5 DEGREES :l6 MiNU`PES 1a SECONDS FIEST 56.63 FGLT TO A FOIN'P IN
7.'HE N~1R'PI~LRLY LINE OF SAiD SOUTFIFRL'1 200.00 E'F ET, SATD PUINT
AEINV 40.00 FEET N1ES'rERLY UF ;iAID GAST LINE UF SAID WGSTERLX
190~00 ['GET; TFIEP7CE SOUTfi 89 DGGRI:ES 46 MINU`PES 26 SECONDS WEST
ALONG LAST MENTIONED P~QR'SHER[~Y LI[JE 90.00 rEET 2'C) A PQ7N7.' I[1 7.'HE
LF~STF.ItLY GIN}~ CE THC WF'STEF'LY GO.OU E~.ET Of SAID SF^.'PION; ?'Fi~NCE
SOU7.'El 0 i)~GREES 19 MINU'Pf~S 4:l SCCONDS GAST ALUN~~ G7~ST MENTIONEI?
I:ASTERLY LINE 122.Q0 FEr,T TO A POIN`l' 25.00 EEE;T NORTHEkLY OI'
SAID NORTH LiNG OF ".PEiE SOU'EH 53.00 E'Lr`~ G1 SAIL' SFCTION; '1'I-IE~CE
SOUTB 46 DEGRFES 2.3 MIi~IUTES 58 srcoc~us 1'sAST 36.1U FE~'1' T.0 F~
POiNT :IN SAIi) NOR'1'E1 LINL OF SAID ~OU'PH 53.00 ['I.E'r OI' SAiD
SECTION, AID POIhT BC]:NG 2G,00 FEE'I' EASTERLY OF SAID FASTERLY
GIN~ OP 'PHE WESTLRI,Y 60.OU FEG`i' ON SAID SECTION; THENCG NQRTH ~'9
f~LGREE5 46 MINUTG ~?.6 SECONDS F'AST ~1LONG LAST MEN`PIO~ICU NORTH
LIIVG 104,00 C'EE'P 'i'0 TEiL•' YOTNT OL' BBGT_NNING.
p.r
,{
:~ ~
;
~°,' t
y~v': ~
ALSO EXCEPT THA'P POR7'ION TliEl~EOF llESCRIfl~O TN DErD 'I'0 THE STATE
OF' CAI~SG'ORNIA RFCORDGD tJ~1kCH G, 1974 IN BOOK 11U88 PAGE 1~i71,
OE~7CiAL RF.r.OR~S.
WHE:3~nS, ttle City Planning Co:nmission did hold a puhlic heari.r~g at
the Civic Center in th~ C~ty of An~heim on March 3U, 1387, at 1:30 ~.m.,
notice af sai.d public ticaring having b~en duly given as rec~uired by law and in
accordance witfi th~~ provisions oL the Anaheim Munici~al Code, Chapter i8.03,
to hear. and c~nsider. evidf~nce for and against said proposed vaciance and to
invesl:igate and make findinos and recommenda~ions in conn~ction ~herewith; and
10~33r
PC97-70
^
?~
.,~
d
':<'~.~
'i;':
.~~;:,.:,~utr
r'"""1.
WEII~RuAS, sai.d Comrni~sion, after due .inspectiUn, .investigation and study
made by i.tself ar,d in its behal£, and after due consi.derat~~n o~ all evidence
and repori~s oc~ered al• said henri.ny, does f.ind and det.ermine ~he fol.lowiny ~acts:
1. That che petitioner propo~;es waivers of the fo.ll.owin~ to construc~
a 3?50 :;quare £•oal addition to an zY.1St111~J commercial shopping r.enter:
SECTIUNS 18.06.05U.G~'_' - Minimum number of parlcing snaces.
1f3.06.U50oU231 (73 spac~s required; 60 spacss proposed)
18.06.050,0233 ~
18.06.080 AND
1a,44.066.050
7.. 'r17at. the abov~-mentioned waiver is herc~by granted on the basis t:hat
the parking waiver. will not cause an increase in traffic co~gestion in the
immediate vicini.ty nor adver.:;e1y aEEect an~ adjoining .land uses and gran~ing of
the ~~3rking i~~aiver under. the conditions imposed, if any, wii.l nok be detrimen~al
to ~hc peace, health, safer.y and general wFlEarz of E.he citizens of the City of
1lnaheim; anci on tt~e basis that ttie request is minimal.
3. 2't~at there are ex<;ep~.ional or extraord:inary circumstances or
conditions applicable ta the propecty invol.ved cr to ~f~e intended use oE the
pruperl-y L•hat da noG a~ply qenera.lly to the property or class of use in the same
vicinity and zon~r.
1. That the requester3 v~riance is necessary For ~he presecv~tion and
enjoyment oL- a suhs~antial ~r.opPrLy right ~~ossess~d i~y other property in the
same vicinity and zone, and dFnied t~ L-he nropert:y in question.
5~ That the requested variance will. not. b~ n~aterially detrimental to
the ~ublic welfare or injurious to lhF ~~roperky or improvEments in such vicinity
~nd zone in which the nroper+_y i, locatnd.
6. That no one indiratc~ thei.r presence at ~aid public iieari.ny in
oppositian; ari:~ that nu c~rr.nspunc9ence was received in opposition to subjecL-
petition.
EI~VIRONML•'I~tTAI~ IMPAC:T rINUING: 'L't~at. the ~:naheim City Planning
Commission has revie;~~d ~hF prepoaal to con:;truc:t a 3,750-square Eoot addition
to an exisCing coinmerci~.l shopping center witY~ w~.iver of minimum nu;nber of
parking spaces ar an irrcgulacly-yi~aped parcel uf ].anQ ronsisting af
a~praximat~ly 0.93 acr.e 1~cated nocth and ~ast of ths nr~rtheast r_orner oE
L~a Pa1ma Avenue and Brookhurst StrePt, and Eurther described as 1112 N~cth
erookt~ur~t Str.eet; and does hc~r.~by approve the Negati.ve Declaration upen fincling
tha~. iC has con~idEred th~ Negative Declaration to~e~her wil:h any comments
received dur.ing the public review pr.ocess and Purther tinding c~n the basis of
th2 init.ial study anr~ any comments received that there is no subskantial
evi.dence that tk~e projecl r~ill have a sigr.ificant eEf'ect on the envi.r.onment.
NOW, ~'~iERFCORG, DF, t'[' RGSOLVB~ that kne Anaheirn City Planning
~.ommission d~~s her2t~y gc~nt subject Petition for Variance, up~n the following
~~~n~~itions which are hereby ~und to be a necessary prerec~uisit~~ tu the proposed
use of the si:bject ~ro~er~y in or~er to pcesnrv~ the safety and genera], we~Eare
o~ the Citizens of. the City of Anaheirn:
-2- Pr87-70
~~
,
2.
~
That the owner of subjeck peoperty shall pay ta the C,ity of Anaheitn a
L-ee Foe tree planting ~urposes ~along T~a Pa.lma Avenue and ~r.ookhurst
SLreet iri an amount ~s determined by the CiL•y Council.
That; prior to issuance oF a building permil~ the appropriate traf£i.c
signal assessment fEe sl~all be ~~aid to L•he City o.f An~heim in an amount
as detecmi.ned by the City Council.
3. ThaL all drive~vays sha11 be constructec~ or r?constructed !•o accommodate
ten (10) foot radius cur.b returns as raguired by the City Traffic
Engi.n~er.
4. 2'hat drainage oP subjeci, property shall be disposed of i.n a manner
sati.sFactory ~o the Citl Engine?r.
5. That the o~aner of subject ~roperty shall. irrevocably offer to de~icate
to ~he City of Anaheim, an addi~•~.onal strip oE land 12 L•eet in width
along La P~1ma Avenue and IIroolchurst 5treet. In Lhe event that General
Plan Amendment t~o. 210 perta~ning to Critzcai Tntersecti~ns i5 nUt
ado~ted by the City Councilr tt~is c~ndition st~a11 be consi.dezed null
and vcid.
6. ~Phat ~rir,r to commencem~nt of structural framing, fire h,yc~ranks shall
be i.nstalled a~id charger3 as required and det~r.mined to be n~cessary by
the Chiet• o[ the Fire De~,artment.
7. 'Phat trash storac~E ~reas sha11 be provided and m~inta~ned in accordai~ce
wiL-h ~p~roved p.lans on file with Che Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Division.
3. That tl~e ex.isting mosl- ~asterl,y dcivewav on La Pa1ma Avenue sha.ll be
removed and re~~L~~ced wiL•h a standar.d curb, gutter, ~idewalk and
landscaping.
9. Thar_ th~ proposa.l sha11 comply with all sign~ ng requi.rements nf the CL
Zon~, unless a vari•~nce allowing si.gn waivers is ap~roved by the
Flann=.ng Camrnis.sion or Cit,y Council.
].0. '.Phat subj~ct ~ro~ert~l shall b~~ developed sttbstantial.ly in accordance
with pla~s and speciEicati.ons on file with thc~ f;it,y oE Anaheim marl;ed
Exhibit No. I.
11. That r~rior to issuance of a build:ing pecmit, ~r within a pnriod of one
y~ar Prom the date oF this resolutiar,, whichever occur~ Pirst,
Condition ~los. 1, ~ and 5, abo~/e-mentioneci, sFia11 be complied with.
E•r.tens~.on~ Eor Eurther tirne tn cam~lete said co~iditions may be grai~ted
in accordance wit.h S~ction 18.03.030 of the Anahe~.m Mutiicipal Code.
12. That ~+rior to final bi~ilding and zoninq ins~ections, Conditian :~os. 3,
4, 7, 8 and 10, above-mentic~ned, shall b~ complied ~~ith.
~~3~ PC67-70
i
~
'r~
~
,,
,
„i
',:i
'~I
~+`r,'
. . , , .. . ... . .. .,. ,i. , . .. .... . 1ae~•'v . `J"M]5~~r1`4~G4~~d.
4~; ~
. ~~r , . ~'~r
i:~
. . ,~r',)~~
';.
~ . ':~.:~fi
BE IT rURThER RESOLV~D that the Anahpirn City P.l,anning Commissiun :~oes li~
hereby Find and determine that a~option of thi.s Ftesolution is exprPSSly
predicated upon ap~licant's com},l.iance with each and a11 nf the r.onditions
hereinabove set forth~ Shauld ~ny suc}.i condition, or any parL• thereof, be
declared inval.i.d ~c unenforceable by the fir~al judg~ent of any court pt
competant juris3icti.on, t.hen this Resolution, and any approvals h~rein -
contained, s(,all be deemed null and v~:~d.
TH~ POREG02~)G RESOLUTIO~T is sigr~ed and approved by me this 30th day q~ '',
M~,rch, 1987.
. ~%;.' ,
' ;7 ~ .
_~~'~~ ~ ~ ~' . ;
CHATRMAN, ANAH~ M CT PL NN 1G COMMISSION ~r
A`t".C' E S`P : •
~ ~ ' J
SECRETARX, ANAEiL'!.M CT2'X P APJNING COMMTSSTGN
STA'PE OF CALIFO 2 ~
RNIA ,
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Sy~
CITY OE AP7AHGIM )
T, Edith L, Harris, Secre;:ary oP the Anahei;~n C.,ty Planning Commiss~,on,
do hereby certify that the i°oreg~~ing resalution was passed and adopted at a
meetiny af the Anaheim City Planning Commi~sion held on March 30, I987, by thP
f.ollowing vote oE the mambers tE~er~oL:
~YEti: COMMISSIONLHS: BOUAS, ~'RX, EIERAST, LAWICKT., MC BURN'sY~ ~IESSE
~~~5: CUMh1ISSI0NERS: NO:VE
ABSEPi"P: COMMI$StONERS: LA CLATRE
TN WITNI~SS WHEREUP, T have }~ereunto set my hand this 3flkh day of MaCCh,
.19ft7.
~~ ~ - ~
Sr CRE;TARY, ANAHGIM CI`PY PI, ~~J
ANNING c.OM~1ISSIQN
-4-
PCE~7-70
: ,'•'
r ~ ; }. , ~r