PC 87-71J'~t
RESOLUTION r~0,~ PCf37-71
~~
A}2E;i0LUTI0N OF THE ANAH~IM C'ITY PLA~IN.ING COMMISSION
'.PHAT PG'i'TTION FOR VARIANCE N0. 3650 BE GRA~ITEU
WHEREAS, khe nnahein~ Cit-y Planniriy Commi~sion did receive a vFrified
PetiEi~n for Variance from WALTCR W, TIM0,3HUK AND :,HRISTTNE M. TIMGSHU. , 7077
East Sho[ecrest Urive, ~naheim, Califorr.i::~ 92807, owners and SHULDA-McCLOSKEX
ARCHZTEG'I'S, 34113 Coast Eiighv~ay, Dana Point, California 92629, ATTN: JOHN P. `~'
McCLOSKEY, aner.t for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
~ounty af Orange, State nf C~liEornia described as:
LGT 8 OF TRAr,~P 10998, AS SHCWN ON ~ MAP R[,~CORDED IN 6U01( 532 ~
PAG~S 20 TO 25 IDICLUSIVE OI' MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, REC~RUS OF ,:.`.:'~
ORANCF~ CQUN2'Y, CALIFnRtQIA. ,,
WNET:C,:!S, the Ci.ty Planning Comre' ~sion did Yio1d a public hearinq at t;
the Civic Center in the City nt Anaheir,i ~n tiaz~ch 30, 19£~7, Gt J.:30 p.m.
j
,; notice of. sai~:, public heari~g having b~e~~ duly ,
given as re~uir~d by law and in ;:~'
;J ~ccordance with the provi:~;iuns of tne Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03t
; to hear and :.onsider evi.dencc: for and against said proposed v~riar.ce and to
`~~:
i invsstigate and makp finding~ and recommendations in connection therewi.th; and `;'~
~ WHERFASr sazd Cormnission, aft~r due inspection, investiga.tion and '~
~
~ study made by itself and in iL•s behalf, and afher du~ consideration oE a11
evidence and re~orts oEPFred ut said hear.ing , does find and determine the ;
{
~'ollowing tacts: ;
_
1. That the petitioner proposes waivec uF the foll.owing to consL-ruct
a two-story, 29-toot hiyh, single-fami.ly residence: ~%:.;;
' :1s;
SEC`PiON 1g,g4,042,U1.1 - Maxirnum s~:ructuzal heiqht.
~_ ~~''~.
::
(25 teat in Scenic Corridor r~ermi.tked; ,.
;~;
29 f.eet proposed) `»~
. ~,;:
?. That the above-m~ntioned waiver is hereby qranted on tk:e basis ;
that there are special cir.cums~ances applicable t~~ th~ Proper~y such as ,~ize, .~~-
shape, to~oyra~hy, Iocation and surrou,~dings which do not ap~ly Co other ``'~•'
>,; identically zon~d properGy in the sam~ vici.nity; an~] Ehak Utric~ application r~
:i; of the Zoning Coc]e deprives the proper~y oP privileges enjoy~d by othex ~a
y~
., prop~rties in th~ identical zane a~d classiEication in i:he vicinity. ~r
;
'~.
3. That there are ex~eptional or extraardinary circumstanr.es or i(
;
'~;
conditions applicable to the pro~erty involv~d or to the int.ended use oP thP ;,
,,~
.r pr.opr_rty tt-at: do not apply ~enera].7.y to th~ property or cla,s o~ uc~~ in the ~
'r
Sd(il@ V1C1fl1C~ dt1Cj 'LOCle, ,
y
~s,
'j ~;v
'~ 4, That the r~quested varianr:e is necessary for the ~r.eser.vation and
,Y
~ enjoyment of a substanti._~.l ~roper.L-y right possessed bX othcr property in the
' sarne vicinity and z~ne, ~na denied to th~ property in questi.on. ';,4~
5. That the requcsted varianc~ will not be materially detrimental Cc ~r~
"-' tne ~ublic welfnre ~r injurious to the property or i.mprove-r~r.ts in such
`~.~ viciniry and zone in which the property is lacated.
;
r? i ,
:
`{
'
; 1084r PC87-71 ,:~
s ,
~,r
i.
i ,,;
~
1 y ~r
_
''~SM1..l,Irl.. ~, .~~ ,. ., . . . _ . _ .. , ..,. . . ._
_ . ...... . . ... .
_ .. ,. .. . ,, :,.
. .. ...' . . ... .~:. . :. ' .. ~.... ... ~. . . .. ~ . ' . ' ~ .. ~ ~ '.,: . ..~.. .. ~r.b~
~r ~~,~F
~."~~4 T.tf11MM1~,:~.~4~}.~
~r.;.r. ,.,,.. .
~ a , i _ , .~~ t a'~~~:', ,',.
i
b. 'I'hat no one indi~t~ted their f~rn,^y(?I~C~C at ~aid publir, heaK.tng ln
~~PF~asiti,~n; and t.hat no corr.eapundc•~nce wa:~ re.^.eive~] in ~~p~osition t.o ~ubject
petition.
f~NV1RONMENTAL TM~~Ar~l t~~tNL~ING: ~Chat t-he Anahetm City Planning
~~rr~ni ~sinn has ruviewed th~~ uror,r~s~~1 t.o co,-~~c•uc~ a twc~-story, 29-~foot high,
t~ingle-Famliy xesidence with wa.iv~r of m~xi.mum struct:ura.l he:ight on ,in
ir.regulurly-shaped E,arcc~l af l~nd consisting of appr.oximately 1.64 ac~e~
tocated at th~ soucl;w~.:st corn~~r. of. Overl~ok 'I`Grr~sce c,nc~ Tuckaway Circle and
f.ur~`ier descr.i:~ecl <~s G925 L?ast. Overlo~~k T ~
Negative lleclarac.ion upon Eiridiny that~tit,~Ph~~ar~~C n~ id red`k~~he~~PNegattva
D~cl.ar~~tion together with any comments received dur.tng the ~ublic xeview
pr~~ces:~ an~~ fur~her. Ein:3ing on t:he ba„i, oE the init:al study and any comments
-'~ce'~ved thaz thc~ee .i~ no subst~ntial evidence !.haC the pr.o~e:,L will have a
~i.gniEicanL efEect. o~~ the ~,nvironment .
NOW, ~:H1;RFEURE, E31•: iT RESULVf:D L•hat the Anaheim City Plann.tnr~
Commis:sion doc~s nereb~~ g~~~nt subject Peti.tion for Variance, unon the fol.lowing
~~nraition:; wi~ich are h.~rc~•~y ~~u,~~ t.c> t~c~ a nec~~:•-
pr.opose~' ~,,~ oE ~hr subjecF p•uE~e,:~ ':'ary prerer,uis.ite to the
~ yenecal. w~~l far. e of khe Ci t i.ze~,s of c~„Y in ~rc3er to prescrve thA ~~fAty ~n~j
_ ~:ity oE Anahei~r,:
~ l. Thak suk~jer,t ~~r.ol~ercy shail be c•l~velo;~F~-3 sur~stant.ially i.n acc.o~da;ic~
wit'~ plans and specificaCion:; on file with Ch~ City oE Anaheim marked
Gxhit;it i~os. ]. throagh ).
2. 'Phat ~riur to i,;suanr.e oP ~~ builoi.n~J P~rmiC~ t;;e ~~
thoroughfazc~ and briclge fe~~ ;h~all be o PPcopriate major
an amount. as ;.~ p~''~ CO Lf'~ C~ty n~ nnaheim in
:~pe. if ied in the Major 'PhnrouyhEare and Bridge Fee
Proyram for ~he Foor;~il.l/r;astern Trar.:,portation C~r4idor, a~ ~3~'i~COVP.d
by Ci'.y rauncil Re.^olution t3o. ~5R-423.
?. Tha~ ~ri~.~r t<~ issiianc~ ,~f a buildiny per.mit, or within a period of
~"E` Y"~r Crori thr r.~ate uE this resol~.tion, wnichever r,;;C;~rs L-irst,
Condikzcn 1tc~. 'l, ~i(~pyn-~~ntxqilp~~ <;~7~,1 hP comnli~d with. ExZenstons
for f~r.tl:er time t.r~ comE~ler.r. ;;~i~3 c~ondition~: ~
acc~ordar~c~~~ with S~~ct.io~ 1~.~~~.O~i~ of t.hP Anriheim Murr ici~al Cadetca •n
~• `:'ha~ Z~rior co [in~l bail~linq anri ronin,
~~:~ove-menti~n~ci, :,hal.l be rnmE,l i,,rj N~`h in ;F~nrtjp~~~~ Conditicn No. 1,
}lE: I~i 'r'l1RiH:R RESOLVE:U that th~~ Ana~h,~im Cf.~y Pla~ning c:~mmission c:oes
hereby tind anrJ ;ieterminF -h.~[ a~lo~~ i.nn ot thi~
~C.r.d~C~3t:^d u on a ~ ~;• ~~,s~.2ut.c~r. is cxpr•a~az~y
P ~p-ic~~n: ~ complian,:.~ with r_ari~ ~~nr~ ~ill. vE ~)~c, c~nditions
hcreirtabnve sPL CurCh. 5'~ould any >ur,h ,.on~3t~i~~~, or .an
~E?Cl~Cf?~) :nvali.ri or 11~1nf1tOCr4~dhln ~~, Y parL thc:reof., be
com~~c~t~~nt f ~h" fin~~.l jurlgmeni. oE any court o£ `
~urisdiction, th~,n tni:z Itc::aolution, and an; ~p~rovals herein
cont~~i7e~i, sha.i i t~-~ r)~~.m.,rl r.;il l~nd void.
- 2-
Pc87-71
~.
,. .. .,.;; ~,~~ir;.r,
,...~.,
, 'l'HF L~UIt~GO'tNG ItESbLUrc~ara is slyri~:.~d an~,-3 z~~,E~roved by tne f:his 3Qth day
of Mt~rch, ].9F37 ,
~~~~,,?~ ,~ "/~ r '> ,o'
-1:-.:~:.~.._. ~' .~ ` ..,
CHAIRMAN, ANA h M~CITY PL NIN~; COMMTSSZQN
" /
~,'; AT'i' F~ S'C :
`~G~1.e~. ~ .
SEC:.FtETA12Y, AN11Ht:It~~ly PI,ANNING C:OMMISSIUN
STATr OP C11I,IEORNIA )
CUUNTY (.)F QRANGN: 1 ;;s .
CI1'Y UF ANAHE7M )
I, E:dith t.. f~iacr~ 5, Secretary of. the Anaheim ~.ity Plan:~ing
~ommis~ion, du l~ereby cer~ify ~ha~. l•he ;oregring r~solution w~s passe~i and
adopfeu at a rneeting c[ the rlnarieim City E~?.~~nn~ng Cnmmi,si.~n held on Marcti 30~
1987, by tha Eollowing vote o[ t.hr-_ inembers thpre~~E:
AYES: COMt4ISST0~lls'RS: 7UU~S, ['T.t~', HERBS:t', LA6vTL'KI, MC E3JRNEY, MCSSE
NUES: CnhiMISSIONERS: NONE
AF3SENT: C~Mh1TSSi0NL•'f23: [,A CLAIRG
zN WITNESa t-7FIF.EtE;OF, t hav~ i~~reuntG s?k my han~ t:his 30th day o~f
t4arch, 1987.
~
"n,c~"~ ~j~~~
SECl2E`.CAR , ANAEfEiM CI~~~~~'~!~~.."-'
iY PLA.INING COMMISo1~JN
s - 3 ~-
:; PC87-71
,.~{;;.
,: j
,~~
, ;::;:~