PC 87-9.
l ~ ~ . . . . . .
t
~ `r
f
, : ^~..\ ; „M'~
~ .
~ y 1
RESQLUTION N4. PC'H7-09
A RESUi,UTTON UF TtIC ANAHETM CT'1'Y PLAND:TPJG CQMMTSSI~N
•~HA?' PE`PI'PION :'OR VARSA~ICE PiO. 3625 IIF DENTEll
,
~~ WHEFt~:AS, the Anaheirn Cily Planning Commission did receive a veciti~d
fetir.ion Eor Vari.a4~ce C-r.orn EUGEN~ NOONAN, 57.0 Easr_ Gincoln Av~nue, Anaheim,
California 92805, owners, uE certain re~l proper~y si~uar_ed in r_he Cir.y of
Anaheim, Cou~ty of Oranye, St.ate of Ca:1iL•ornia ;?escribed as:
F LOT~ 12 AND 13 IN ALOCK "F" Qf "TflF. L' OREL.I E TRACT" , IN THE CITY 0~'
~; ANAHJ.IM, COUNTY UF ORANGE, STATE OI' CAL:[E'URNTA, AG SHpWN ay A MAP
~~ RECORDED IPI i3bOK ~9, PAGE 24 UG' MTSCELLAN~OUS .RECORDS qr LOS ANGEL :S
_ C'pU1~~~Y~ ~ALI['QRNIA.
WHERLAS, th~ City planning Comnissi.on c~id hold a~ublic hearing at
rhe Civic Cer~ker in r_he City of Ana-ieim ori January 5, 1987, ~at ].:3Q p.m.,
~ nor..ice oE said public hear,ing having been duly yiven us reqaired by law and i:i
_ a~corcian~e kith r.he provisians ~~E the Anaheim Municipul Code, ChapCer 18.03,
~; ~o hear and c~onsider evid~nce for and avainst sai~ proposed var.iance and to
invesFiyar~ .~c~d make findings and rec~mmendations in cannaction therewith; ~nd
'~IHGR~AS, said Co~iunission, after due ~~.pection, inveskigation and
sr_u~y mad~ by its~lt a-id in ity b~half, ~ncl due con~ideration of a1J.
evidence and report, o.Efer.ed at sa.id hearing, :~ Eind and ~et~rmine the
Eo].low.ing Facts:
1. Thar_ the pet~itioner proposes waivers of r.he F.ol.lowing t;o
consr_r~cr. a l.2-i;nit aparf:ment complex:
(a) SECT:[Ot~ 18.34.062.020 - Maximtun sike coveraqe.
~ (55~ permir.r,Q~7; 73~ ~ro~osed)
(b) SECTION 18.34.OG3.012 - Minimum sr.rucr_ural ~etback.
18.34.063.013 (14 to ~0 feer. reqixired alony n~rth,
18.34.053.022 ~a~t, sout:h and west pcoper.r_y lines;
7 to 12 f~~r_ ocoposed)
(c) ~EC'SIONS 18.06.OA0.020 - Minimum dimertsions oE parki_n~_s.paces.
AND 18.34.06G.020 ~
2. `Phar. r_hp above-menr..ioned waiver ic) is hereby dNnied on r_he
~,aais rhak ir, was deler,ecl by r,he petitic~ner atr,er ~ublic notiFicar,ion and
advert:ise~r~enr, and r,ha~ wai~crs (~) and (b) ace hereb,y cJenied an r.he bast~ t:nar..
r.here ar.e no sZ7ecial circum,sr,ances aoplicable ro the prnperr.y suah as size,
shape, r.o~agraphy, loc~tion and snrrcundings which du nor. a~p1y r.~ o~her
idenr.ically xune~i pr~~ect:y in rhe same v.iririir_y; and khat skric:r. application
of r.l~e Zoning Cac3$ 8oes ;~~t iie~rive the ~roperr.y of privileges enjoyed by
o`her properties i:~ ~:he idenr_ical, zone and classific:ar,ion in r_he v.icinir_y,
1017r PC07-09
,?i
~.aY .. .. . .
,I .. ...., ....,.~.
....,..~,.~~. ' i....,.,~.~~..
, ,{~ . . .... ~. ~ ;. . ' .
~., . .~-. , .,~
~~,~'1~ . ., .. . .~ ~ , . 1~~.•:.,. . ... ~s;-....~~ ~ r:~i.~~~.'ri.'~
': Y .-
,~^`.•,
3. That r_here are nn excepr_ional or exh_raor.dinary circumstances or
aond;tions aPP~icable to the ~,rupert~y involved ar ro the intended use of khe
properfy khat: do nok apply ger,er.a.l.ly ro the propee~y or ~1~~S of. use :in fh~
same vicinit:.y ~nd zone.
4~ Thar_ ~he r.~quested variance is not. necessacy for ~:h~
;~ Preservation an~ en~oym~n~ ot a subsi:ant-ia~. property right ~ossessed by oth~r
H:V
~; pro~Prty xn t:he satne vicini+:y anc] zonr-_, and denied t_u r_he
property iri quest.ion.
S• Thar_ the requesr_eG vari~nce wi.l2 be marerially detrimentai t~
r_he puk~lic welfare or in juriuus to fhe properr.y Qr impravements in sur.h
vicinihy ac~d zone in which hhe pxop~r~y i, located.
6. The~c no one indicar.ecj theic pcesencE ar. sa:id public hearir.g ir~
' oppositian; and ~har_ no corr.espondence wt~s recei.v~d in op~~osition to sub
I?Eh~-~ion.
iect
~ ENV:[RON~~1Lt7TAL IM}?ACT F:[NDING: That the Anah~im General Planr,ing
Comrnxssion has reviewer~ ~hc prop~sai t~ construct a 12•-~~nir_ apart:mepr complA~
wi~h wai.vers c,P maximum sit
e cuveragnr minimum et.tuct
, dimensxo ^ ura
n~ o . 1 set
f Par.king spaces (dele!:ed) ~n a r.eci~~n i~y~rl cback and minimum
'. jard consisr_l~g of a 9 y-„haped parcel of
~proxim~at:elY p.33 acre, having a frontage aF appraximah.p~,y
, 99 fe~k on the eash side oE Rose Street
~ Rose Sr.reet: • , and furr.h~r described as 40a 5outh
, and does hereby approve the p~~gar_ive De~~l.arar.in,~~ npon finc~ing
khat it has cUnsider.~~d the Negative Declar~r_ion r.og~r_her wikh any commanf:s
recei.v~d durin~;~ t-h~ Ptzblic r.evie~a process and iurt.her ~inc:iny on Fhe basis of
~he Initial Study and any cc~mmants received ~.r,at
evidence h.hat hhe proj~,;t w.ill have a s.i ~iEi.cant r'r,~•h~~£ 1~ n° Substantidl
y t-f ct: on the environment.
NOw, TEiL•'f2EE'ORi?, BG IT RESOL~IEU that, ti~E ~naheim City Planning
Commissinn does her.eby d~~ny sur~jcck petit.ion for Variance an r_hc: basis oE the
aEor.emeririoned findings.
THE FORGGOING RESULU~PIGN is signed an~:l a~px~~~,~ b~, m~ fhis 5th dav
of Jantiary, ~.9g7.
. , ..
-;~:+~-~~`~' /<~ ~ ~4..- ~ ~,y~ ~~
CFIA..RhfpN, eINAH hl C.I'!'Y P.LAN N' r
C, COMMTS~ION
AT~resx: . ,
, ~.~G ;~ ~ -
_ . , .~~
Sk:C,,E_'A). ~', ANAFiETM CI'PY PLAI~~NIt3(; CUMMISS:ON ~
-2•-
PC87-09
;t;;
;.'r'
;s
''::
':('~i ~
i~
,rv
hereby cerr.lfy tha~r ~.he fareyoing res~lution was ~assed and adoptsd at a
meeting of the A;-ahcim City ~lanninc~ Com,~ission hnlc~ on J~~nuc,xy 5, 1987, by
l,~r.F.
STATE UF CA1'~IFORN_TA. )
Ct~UN'CY OF URANGE ) Ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
`i~
T, Edith L. Fiarris, Sec.rer_acy of the Anaheirn City Planning Gommis:ian, do
~
~ !:he foll~~wing vate o~ r_he memh~~rs r_hereoi:
~; I
~;
~;f
AYG~ :
~OMh1iSSI0C~~RS:
E3~JUAS, FKY, HER~3ST~
MESSI:, PiC BURNLY
+~ N~FS: COMMZSSIONERS: NONE
i!
~ ABSEN'P: CUMMZSSIONERS: LA CLl#:[RL, L~~;h'ICKI
~
TN
WITNESS WHEREOF~,
I havN her~unt:o st~t
my hand t~his 5r.h day of January,
~
ti .1487.
` ~
~
y~ ..
~~
, ~
~
~ . _v
-
~:. SECRET,AFt ~ ANAHETi~1 PLRNI~ING LOMM:[SSTOP~
~~~
<'
'~
PC87-09
'' i
;
,;;;
1
' .' ~.'.~'.I'.i
~1
li:
T
~/
^,i
r~~
;.1.
'.'1
:~y
';~~
~..~
.... r..•~a:.r4~e~.2iai