PC 87-98~p . , . , . , . ~ , , ~ ~+,,: r rw
~ 7 '^j
, . ~ - ~ ~-~~~f~
' ~ ~~n~
RESOLUTION t~0. PC07-38 '~
A RESOLU'.rION OF I'EiC AtdAHEIM CTTY i?LANNING C()P1MIu3I0N
THAT PETTI'ION POR CONDI'~IONAL U5E PFRMIT N0. 2906 SE UBNIED
WHEREAS, khe Anaheim Ciky Planning Commis~ion did receiv~ a verif.'ted
Petition for Conditional Use Fermit fr.om hILDR~LI B, YELLIS A(3D T. E. YELLIS,
13G80 Cloverdale, Corona, Ca.liEornia 91720p owners an~] W. F. F;.EYNOLDS, 7.4758
La Grirr,a, Mission Viejo, California 92692, agent for certain re~l proper.ty
situated in the c`ity of Anaheim, County of Oranye, State ~L- Calif.orrtia,
described as:
PARCEI, 4, IN THF CITY Or ANAHEIM~ AS SHOWN ON A MAP REC.ORQ~D IN
y BOOK F35, PAGE(S) 4 ~1ND 5, pF PARCEL MP,PS, JN THE OFE'ZC3:' OE' THE
~i COUN'PY RECURDER OI' SAID COUN2'X. ~~
~;
. WHERGAS, the Ctty Plannirig C~mmiss:ion did hald a publir_ hearing at
the Civic Center, in the City of Anaheim on April 27, 1987 at 1;30 p.m., notice
;;, oF said public hear.ing having been clul
Y given as required b,y law and in
~,s accoraance wikh L-he provisions of L-he Anaheim Municipai Code, Chapter 18.U3,
.r, L-o h~ar and consider evidance for and agajnst said pro~osed conditional use
~ Permit and to investigate and make [indinys and recor~mendations in connecti~n
'r'
'~ therewi.th; and
~:` WHEREAS, saS.d Commission, after clue insp~ctic,n, invesi:igation atyd
,;. study made by itself and in its behalf, and aPL•er due considera~ion eF all
~:, evidenr,e and reports of.fered at said heariny, does find aad determine th~
r folJ.ow.ing facts:
O
` 1. That the proposed use i.:; properiy one for which a conditi~nal
;'.~ use permit is authorized by Anaheirn Municipal Code Snctions 18.44.050.070 and
'` 18.a7.02~.02f to wit.: to permit a convenience market with gasolir~e sal~s ~nd
; off.-sale beer and wine.
~ ~. That the pruposed use .is tiereby denied on the basis that the
t retaii sales wuuld i,~iclude oEf-sa.le beer and winE ~n a convenience market with
~
~ gasoline sales, that the accessibility o~ beer in conjunctian with the sale of
' gasoline to ;:ueJ. vehicles driven on Cit;y stre~ts cauld crcate a dangerous
~ situatia~ by making it l:no convenient for persons to drink and drive; and that
~ subjert property is across ~he street [rom Brookhurst ,7unior. High School. ~,
~ 3. That thn propas~d use will adversely af~ect the adjoining land
~ ~s~., and the growth and developm~nt oF the arc3 i.n ;,,,ich it is proposed to be
~ lacated.
' 4. ^hat ~he size and shape of the site pco~osed for the usr ia not
~ ad-r_quate ~o a11ow the full development of the proposec] use in a manner not
detri.men~al c~ the particuiar area nor to t.he peracP, health, safety and
gPnerai welfare of the Citizcns of the City of A~;aheim.
5. 'Phat ~he granl-.ing of the ~onc~itioriai Use Permit undcr the
cond.itions i.mpoced, if. any, will be detrimental to the peace, he~lth, saFety
anc3 general welfare ot the ritizens oE the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generahed by the propo~ed use will impose an
undue burden upon tt~e streets and hignways designed and improved ko carry the
tra.Efic in the area.
1108r
PC87-98
,,~
~ ,,•~ ~r
:,. j '~
~ ~ •~.. ' ~.,
~'! ~ Y~ ~ ~ ~~
/
7. That no one indi.cated their {
presence at said public hearing in ~~'
opposition; and that nu r.orres~ondence was r.ecei~~F:a in oppasit;.on `~ th~ ~:?I
SUbjert pe~ikion.
ENVIRO[~MGN'PAL TM~AC~r F'INDTNG: Tt~at the Anaheim Cit r
Commi~sion has reviewed the ~ Y Plann~,ng "
propo..aJ. to permit a convenience macket with
gasoline sales and wit-h oft-sale beer and wine on a rectangul.arly-shaped ''
parcel of 1«nd consisting of aparoximately 0.51 acre located at the southeast ~'~'
corner of Cr?scent Avenue and iirookhurst S~reet, ac~d furkher described as 530
North Brookhurst Street (Arco Ser.vica Station); ~nd does her~by appro~re the `,!''D
N~gative Declaration upon finding that it has considerad the Negative 1
Dec.laration kogeth~r with any aomments receiv~d durin the 1~.~
pr~~cess and Eurther finding on the basis of the initial st~dy and anyccomrnents '~
received thak there is no subst~nti~l evidence that r_t~e '?
significan~ effecL- on the er.vironnent. Project will have a
NUW, THEREFORr, BE IT RI;SOL'VED ;.hat the Anaheim City Plann.ing
C~mmi.ssion dops hereby deny subject Yetitiun for Conditianal Use Pertnit, an
; the basis of the aforementi.oned [indings.
~
'~ THE ~'ORCGOING RESOLUTION is signed and aPProved by me ~hi.s 27Lh da
~" April, 1987. y of ,
~ 'J .`~ f ?C.'~ /l ,'`
~? ~ y /i ,"' ~-v
CHAII2MAN, ANAfiE M G TY PLANN G COMh17SSI0N
ATTEST:
l -
4 /
t SECR~'.i'Ah'Y, ANA[?EIM CIi PLANNiNG COMMISSION
S'rATE OI' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OE ORAPIGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, gecret~ry oE l-.he Anaheim City Planning Commission,
do he.reay cer~ify that ~he foregoing ti~solutiun was passed and ada~ted at a
maeting c~E the Anahe9.m Cit,y planning C~mmissi.or- h~td on Apr.il ~'1, 1987, by the
following vote of the mernbers thereaE:
AYES: COMMISSTONERS: BUUA~, Ff?Y, HEF2BS'r, LAWTCKI, MG BiJRNEY, ~fESSE
NOES: COMM,ISSIONERS: NONE
A13SENT: CQMMISSIONERS: GA CLAIRE
IN WI'rNESS wx~RCOr, r have hereunto set rny hand this 2'Ith day oP
Apr.il, 1987.
~
SECi2E7'ARY ~~~~ ~+ - ~ --
~ ANAHGTI~I CITY PLANI+IIL;v^ C,OMI4ISSION