PC 88-119.eY6~.~., ~ . . .....,:4'r~s.I~..i,:.c6. < ~..._. ,..,......_,.,. ._ . . . . . _ .
`,~~r~
° E"~
;,;;
r«,~, ~
ItE°r~~S1TZ21 N~ll~ E~CAf3_7wt7
A RESO[~UTION 0[' 7:IIE l~N]-.IiGIM C'LTY E~LA1ft1St~G C41•tMIS5I0t!
'~F{AT P~'TI1 fON FOR COtiDITIONAL USE; PGRrfIT t70. 3005 F3~ DENIED
WHER~AS, t-~c Anahei~n City Planniny Cornmission did re~.eivo :~
vur.ifi.erj Petitior~ for Conditional Use Permir_ Lrom 1•Sl.it(J~)T M. DUKLETH, 804 E.
Buchanan Courh, Hrea, CA 92621, ownc~r, an~3 CHtEN-FEtiG CHk;N, 004 F.. Duchanan
Court, IIrea, CA 925z1, agent Eor certain rea.t ~roper~y si.~uated in k.he Ci~y of
Anaheim, County of Orange, Statc~ oE Cal.iforni.a, described as:
PARCEL A:
TllOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3 1~27A 9 IN DLpCK 23 OF THE
GOLDEPi STATE TRAC'T, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN HOOK 4,
~AGES b6 1lPID o7 OF MISCELGl~NGOUS MAPS IN TF1E OFEICE
GF THE COUZ1Tt RI:CORDER AF SATD COUtITY, DESCFIB~D AS
FOLLOWS:
,+
:
~ :,
CUt~4SENCING AT Ti{r EAST1:RLt TERMii7US OF Ti{E NOR1I{ERLY
LINE OF THE I.A~~p CONVEYED TO T'liE STATE GF CALII'Oitit~A
DY DEED (STATE FARCEJ., (713; REC()RDED J~~7UAKY 13, 1967
ItI BQQK 0152, PAG~; 1, OCF'ICI1.L ttECORDS CF 5AID
COUNTY, SA?D t~ORTFiEl2LY I.i41E IIEING A CL'NV1~, rpq(;,tvE
tQORTH~RGY, ~.l11'1 }~AVItIG A RAUIUS OF 4G79.00 ['f.;£:;
T}{ENCE ALOt1G TH~ F.?.S'TGKLY CONTItIUATZUt7 OP Sl,r:~ CU:i~:;
FRODI A TA:~GEti:' WHZCfI HEARS SOUTH U3 DGG. OG' Ui"
EI~ST, THRGtJGF! Ali l~NGGE OF 10 DEG. 3A' 53", n17 AF2C
DISTI-tICE OF $69.1]. FEET TO TIIE INTEft5E(::~l011 Oc A L.LNE
~A~.'~LLEL WITlI lU•~i DISTl~tl1' 'rtE5TERT~Y, 217.5Q cEET,
bfEASURED I~T RIGIiT ht(GLES, 1~FOhS 'fitE }ii.;TERLt LI21E OF
SAID LOT 3, wTTF~ THB t30?~ ffil:F[.Y I., I t7i: OE' Ti{F. P.+P.CL•'1. OF
LJ.2~D COtNEYF.D TO 5AID S'TA11i UY U~I:U ( STATE ?AF?CE~
(711) RECORDEU JI~N1JAE2Y 31, 1967 IPl F10Uh 41G5, E'AG~
7G6 OE' UE'E'ICIAL RECORUS IN SAID OFFICE;, SA:U
INTERSECTION BCItIC THE TRUE PO''tIT 0~ Ef:G1NUIt~C;
TF{ENCE ALOt1G SAID k'ARIILLEL LI21~, NORT[i 7 UEG. 19' 33"
WF.ST, 98 . G9 FE~T TO TEdE NORT}IERL'1 LI27r OF' ,°iAiA B~~OCK
23; T'riENCf: ALO11G SAIU LAST MEiiTIOtt~t> NORTi{~RL'~ L1tIF:,
S~UTH E32 DEG. 40' 27" Fl£S~, ~02. fi3 FEE'P TO Tl{E. CURVF
HEREINAROVE DESCRIBEU I~S HAVI2tG A LBNG'fH OF P,G~l.ll
FEET; THENCE EASTEl2LY AGONG SI~IU C,AST MEFtTIC~;tED
CURVE, Tl~P.OUGH A:d At7GLE OF t1 DBG. 41' ~8", AtJ 1-RC
~lYSTAl1CE OF i 1U.20 F~ET TO SAID TRtt^, F'OIt+t OF
BEGItiNING.
0260r
PCaB-119.
`',
:t;i
;~I
r:.~e2
~r~~;~~
! i~~~:. ~:~A~
7 y'~
„. ~
~ ~
~~ ~~I
WHEREAS, the CiCy P lanning Com mission dirl hold a publir. hearing x
I
at the Civic Canter in the City oE Ax~aheim nn May 9, 198a at 1:30 .m., notice
P ~':~
; o~ said public heariug haviny k~een
duly given
as requiced by law and in ,, ~,
~
~ accordance with h,he pruvisions cf the Anaheim Munici~al Code, Chapter 18.03, ° ~~
,
ta hear and cansicler evicience for and a ai:isk
q' said
proposed conditlona,l use ~~
,:
permiC and ~o invesCigate and make findinqs and xecomrnendations in cennection -`~s
therewi th; ancl
WHEREAS, said Corunission, after due znspecliQn, irivestiqation
and stucly mado by itself and in its behalf, and a~Cer diie considerati~n oC a:l
evide»ce and seports oPfared at said heaxir~g, does find anci determine tha
Eollowing facts:
1. Tnat the proposed use is properly one for whicl~ a
condikional us~ permit is aul•horized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sectioci
r 18.51,05q.610 to wit: to permit a 66-unit motel with waiver of the Eullow.itigs
s,,
~
SECTION 1,~fL1, 2 11 - td~imum S~,r c ur
'~ r ~~9~?~.
(Q fee permitL-ed at nort:h
property line; 2 f e propc,se;i) ,
: 7.. Th~t th~ requested waiver is hereby denied on the basis
w tha~ there are no special circumstances applic:able ~o ~he property such ~is
} sizc, shape, ~opography, locati~n or surraundings which do not apgly to oth~:z•
ident•ically zoned proper,tie~ in t}~e v.icinity; and that strict a~plicar.i~~i o°
the Zoning Code d~es not deprive the ~roporty oE privileges enjoyed b~ ~rre:
~ properties in identical Loninq classificat.ion in the v::cir.iky.
,
' :~. 7hat the proposed use is 2iereby denic~d ~n ~hP basis I:hat
s: access to the siL•e would ba d.i[f.icult ~nd guests would 2iave to travel through
: ~he zndustirial area anu furrher, t2ie proposed use would be dE2t2-1rtl~itk31 to th~s
~ inCegrity of the Canyon Industri~l Area.
~
4. Tha~ r.he propasHd use will adversely affacC the adj~ining
lanc~ uses and the growtY- and developmen~ of the area in which it is pro~osed
to be located.
5. Tl:at, the size and shape~ oE Lhe sit.e proposed for tlie ~ise is
not adequate to a11aw t•he Ful1 dc~veloprnen~ oE Lhe propose~3 use in a mann~~r not
datrimental to the parkicular area nor r_o r,;.,_~ ~,e~~-c~~, healEh, saPety and
general we~far~ oE the Citizens ot 1:he Ci~;• o[ Anaheim.
6. That the granting oE ~hc Conditional Use Psrmi~ wi11 be
dQtrimental to thct peace, health, ,a.Eoty and creneral wE~lf:,re oE L•hc Cit.i::ens
of khe City oE Anahc~im.
7. Th~~t the traEf.ir, generated by r1:Q p:•nposed use wil.l irnpos~
an undue bt-rden upon the streets and hig}~ways designed and impruved to c~rry
th~ traffi~ in t}~e area.
~ :~:
~~
- ._ . ~ . . . . .. . . . . . ~. . '::4
I ~ . ~ .. . . ' . . ~ . . . .
. .~ . - ..
+ . . ~ . ' ~.ii ~ 11 y'%t`~..~
h~
~
3
~
.
~~~.
~ ~^•~ ,~~+g~~},7~ .
1 "~ . '#
S . ~~~
~ t~
~
ai
`
`;'r `~
'"!
~ ' 8. That two ( 2) persoris indicated th~ir presence ak sa.id
public hearSng in opposition; and that `
,;r
'~ no correspondence was received in
opposition to Ghe subject petition. '"~~
~;>
~ALIFO_RNIA E*NIRONMENT~L O1JAI.XrY A~T FINDI1tG: Thak the Anahrirn
Ci~,y Planning Commission has r
i
d ; ,•,:
~~`
ev
ewe
the proposal to reclasszEy subject
properCy from t;he R8-A-43,000 (Residential, Agriculturttl) Z .;y;,
one to tk-e ML
(Indu-trial, LimiCed) 2ane and tn cor.struct a 3-story (28-foot h,igh) 66-unit i,'
`s~'`
mr,tc~l with waiver of ineximum structural heighk on an irregularly-shaped
~
~
' parcel oE land consisting of approximately 0.9 acre located on the norCh si
de ;
;
,
,
„
' ,
o~ '~he Riverside (Rout~ 91) Freeway ancl veing locatec.3 west oP ths cen~erlir~e
;:, oE the southern terminus of WhiCe Star Auenun; and ~aes hsreby approve k:~e ~;
21egn~.ive Declaratidn upon Ei:,dinc~ that it has considered the Negative '~~f
Declaration together with any comments received during L•hQ publ~.c revi~~~• I
, process and further finding on tlie basis of the ini.tia~ study aa~ ~n~~ `~''
comments received that there is no substantial evidenc~ that the project wil:
:,~
'~
~~, .
:iave ~a ~ignif,ican~ efPect on th~ enviro:lment.
NO~r', THEREFQaE, BE IT RESOLVED tl~a~ the Ar-aheim Citf Plann.inu
Commissian does here'r,~~ deny subject Petitioii for Cor.dikional Use Permxt~ on
the basis of the aforementioned findin~s.
THE FOfi~GOIl~G R'cSOLUTIOH is ;,ignec'. and app;oved by me this 9th
da~.• oL May, 1988. ,~
,
, , ; ,t ,
~,~~ -~ ~- ~.-~-~.--_
CIIAIRrtA27. A:IAFiE":M ~~Ii:i PL `1:•?TZ~G CqF~SISSIOtI
ATT~ST : i,~
L ., ~ l~t~i
~ /
SECRETA Y, At7AH~IM C;iT, pLANNI2;G rOhiMI;iSION
STA~E OF CIu~ZFqRt7IA )
COUNTY OF ~JF2AItGE ) , ~ s .
~ITY OF Al~A.I;EIM )
I. Bdith L. F{arris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that C2ie fc~regoi~g reso~ution vas passed and
adopted ak a meetii~g of the Anaheim (.ity t'lanning Cortunission held an May 9,
1988, by the follawing vote of the members t~ereof:
AYES: COhII~iISSYOldER5: BOUAS, BUXDSTUtJ, Ci,FJ5ILf.U, iEI,LHAUS, Fi£R~ST,
MC BURN£Y, t•SESSC
NOES: CO'tdMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEiJT: COMMISSIUNER5: NON~
Iti WITNESS W:iERE~F, I have 2:ereunto sek my hand Ctiis 9th da}~ of
N,ay. 1.988.
- ~~ l.~l.c.~
SECSETAFt , ANAH:.':M CIT,Y PLANNING COt~ISSION
'- t'CLd-lln
Ji
• , ~'i
k.;'~ E . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . „ . . . . . . .. „ ' ,~~ /~ ~`~
~~,i}. .1 ~ . . . .... . . . .. . .. . . .. . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . ... . , . ._.. , ~ .., ::i.'{;tµ~lyKi'Cd