PC 88-127~d1:M'f
,. ., , ' t tr~+'~Yw~
~` , ,,!~~,
' ~ ~ r.ii
~ , p~
RE,S LUTIQN NQt FCF36-127
A RE50LUTIi1N OF THE AN1+FT~IM C:[xY PLAI3NI21~ COMMIuSSC~N
THAT PETITIOtI FOR CdNDITIUNAL LJSE PEP.MIT N0. 3009 BF. GRANT~:D
WF~IERk;AS, the Rnahexm Ci~y Planning Commission did receive a~/erified
YetiLion ~or Conclitional [T:;e Permit from JFRFtY L. MADFEN and JUDY A. MADREN,
503 S. Vic};i Lane, Anahei.m, CA 92104, owner of certain r~a:l proper.ty situated
in the City of Anaheim, County ef Orange, State oF Cal.ifornia, describQd as:
LOT 19 OF' TRACT N0, 6735, IN THE CITY GF ANAHEIM, AS
SHOWIv ON A MAP THEREOF RECUR~ED IN }300K 255, PAGF~ 33
and 34, MT5CFL~LANEQUS MAPS, RECOR.DS 0! SAID ORANG~
C~iiNTY .
NiIiEREAS, the Ci.ty Planning Commission did hold a public h~aring at
the Civic Center in the City uf Anaheim on May ~3, 1988 at 1:30 p.m., notic.e of
said public he~ring havinq been duly given as r~qu~.red by law and in
accordanc~e with t2ie provi~ions of the Ana.heim Mtini.cip~1 Code, Chanter 18.03,
to hear and consider ~vidence f.or and aga.inst said propased caridikional us~
permit and to investigate ard mako f.indings ~nci recommenc~ations .in connectior~
therewit:h; and
WHEREAS~ 3aid Com~nissi.on, after c~ue inspectic~n, invpstigation ar~d
~t~idy made by itsel£ and in its behalf, and afL•~r ~iuo considerati.on o£ all
evidenco and reports offered at ~aid k~eariny, doc:s find and determine the
following Cacts:
1. That t,he pronosed use is pi•aperly onc~ for ~rhirh a eonc~itio:~a~
use perm.it is authorized by California ~~avernment Cade Sectiaxi 65852.1 t~~
wit: construct a 640-square foat "grariny unit".
2. That the proposed Lse will not adversoly afiect the adjoiain~
land uses and the gr~wth and developm~nt ot it~e ares in which it; is prppo~ed
to be l~cated.
3. That tho size and shape af the ~itg proposed for the use is
adeq~:al-.Q to alJ.ow the f.u11 development of the prop~secl u~e in a manner not
detrimeiital to the particular area n~r to the pQace, health~ ~af.aty anr~
general welfare eE L•he Citizens of. ttie City of Anaheim.
4. 'That the granL-i.ng af the Conditionul Use Perrnit under the
conditions imposttl, if any, will not bo detrimeut~-1 to the geace, health,
safety and qr3rieral wQlfar~ of tho Citizens ~~f ~he C3ty o£ Aiiaheim.
5. That tha traffic generat•e!1 by trie proposed use will riot impose
an undue burden Lpon the streets and high1vays designed and improvec3 to carry
the traific .in the ~rea.
Q288r
PC$EI-127
~ ~~~
,~-~,,
~
~
~; ~p~~~~
~,~ ~a
a~,
, '',~
: ?,;i
,', F~`
;,
=~~
6. That 10 people indicated thQir prssence in tavor of subject i
request and 7 p4ople inciicated their proseuGe at said public hearing in "
' ~.,i'
op~osition; and that a petition was received in opposiLion ~o the subject ,,~
peLition. ~`_~„c,
, AT~Tr RNIA ENVIRONMENTAT.,_Q~IALIT'Y~ T FTi,~llI~; The Planning ~;
Direct~r or his authorized representative has datermi.ned that the praposed ~"
, ~;
project falls within the def.inition of Categorical Examptions, Ciass 3, as !;;~
defined in the State ~,IR Gui.delines and is, therefore, categorical'ly exempt ~'~
; :f:.
from the requiremen~ to pr~p~re an EIR. ,
NQW, THFREFORE, BE IT FESOLVEA that the Anaheim City Planning '~,
Commission doe s hereby gran~ subject PetiLion fc~r Conditional Use Parrnit, upan ~`
the following conditions whicti are hex~eby found ta bo a necessary prerQquzsite '`'
to the pr~pose d use of the subject property in order t~ nreserve the safety ',~;,
an~ r~eneral we lfare of ths CiCizens of lhe Czty o.E Anaheim:
1. That prior to issuance of a buildinc~ permit, the appropriate "'~
traffic sianal assessment fee srall be paid to the Ci~y of ~~~
~ Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council.
2. That ~he own~r(s) of subjQCt property shall restrict tha `:;~
occupancy of the "granny unit" ro Ane or two adulLs, both oE ~;
whom are sa.xty (6U) years of ae~e or o~der, and furthermore, `~
sh~11 record a covenant aqainst tho proparty so restricting tho ~~`~
occupancy of said unit. 5aid covenant shall. be submitted to ;;r
thQ Zoning Division tor t:ansm:itta]. to the Ci~y Attorney's ~
"'
;;^
Office for review and approval prior to record~kion. Proof of ;~~
rec.ordatiion shall then be submitter~ Lo tYze ~oning Uivisi~n. ;'.;
3.
That subject prop~rty ~hall be devaloped substantially :in `,~i,
°k
accordanco wirh plans and spQCific~tions on file with i:he Ci.ty
of Anah~im mar.ked Fxhibit Nos. 1 and 'L.
4. That prior to L-he commencQmant of the activity authorized by
this resolu~ion, or prior Co issuance of a btxilcli!,g permit, or
wit,hin a pc~riod of one year from the dar~ of thi~ resolution,
whichever oceurs first, Condition Nns. 1 and. 2, ~i'
above-mentioned, sh~17. be complied ~iLh, Ex~ensions for
Euxther time to ~omplAte said cox~dit;ions max be granted in ~J~
accordar.ce with Sectiozi 18.03.090 of the Anareim Muniaipal Code. ;: ,Z
~
;;,1
5. That prior to final building and zoni.ng inspoctions, CondfCion '~
No. 3, ~bove-mentioned, shall be complied w5.t2:. `~(
6. That approval of this applicatioii cons~i~:.tes approval oP the `i~t
proposed requesL- only to the extent that it Gomplies with thQ
Anaheim Municipal Zon.iiig Code znd any other applicable City t'
regulations. Approva7. does not include any action or finc3in~e
as to compliance cr approval af Che request regardinq any ottio:
applicablo ord.inance, regulatian or r3quirement. „
~.:~~
-2" PC88-127
. , . . . .._..... ...~.i.Y
~M~'N1. 14V:~V1.:1JF(C(n7~f~ 1'1:~~~.:,Yaai~/?:1t4.f2',lfiK4'~VIYI:~f.r.)MK . i~::.l.~~~~~~. ::'l1Y~.M'(:~Y~~ .w:~~.vw ~n~' ~ -.i~. .. ,...r~ .-....~..... . .. .
. . . . . . . . ._ .. . . . ... ., ~ ~, . . I~fV~ f~~, Y,if 7
. .. .. . . . , . . . . ( :i ~
E ~ ~ •, r ~N, ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ _ t 1~
'~ 4
7~.~
~ . ~ - .. _ .;~
~ BE IT FURTHER k2ESOLVED that the Ax.~aheim C3.ty Planning Commission
' does hereby fand and detormine that adoption of th~.s ~esolution 3s expressly ~"`~
predicated upon applica~nt's comhliance with Etach and a11 ~f t,he conditions ~
hereinabove .:et forth. Should any such canditions, or an~r part thereof, be ?,'
daclared inva3.id or, unenforceable~ by the fina.l judgment o~ any couzt of ~;.
c~mpetent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any appravals harein ':;
~ contair.ed, shall be deemed nu11 and void. , ~
;~ TH~ FOP,EGOING R~SOLUTIO~T is siqned and approved by me thi~ 9th d.ly ~
R of May, X988. ;-~ ~"~ ;
f. ~ / ~~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~i ~-~.t~.~ J ` ~~-'I--~:_
~ CHATR2dA.;V', ANAHFIDt CITY PL'ANNING CONIIrtTSSION
ATTEST:
. ~
SECR~,TA12X, ADT~.HEIM CTTY PI.ANNING CQMMISSION
STATE QF' CALxFURNIA )
COUNT'Y OF ORANGE } ss.
Cl'TY fJF ANAF3EIM )
I, Edith L. Harzi,^„ SE~cretary of the Anaheim City Planning '' ~;
Commission, du hereby certify that the foregoinq r.QSUlut.ion was passod and ';r
adopted at a me~ting of tlie AnahE~im Ci',y Plarining ~:ommission held ~.~n May 9, ?',:?'
I9g8, by the following vote at the msmbers thereof; ":''4
AXES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSIL;LO, FFL~DHAUS, EiEF2BST,
MC BURNEY, 14ESSE
NOES: COMMISSTONGRS: NONE
ABS~NT; COMIriISSIONBRS: NONE
1988.
:i?
;j`;4
; ;,',
II3 WITNESS WFIERLOF, Z have herr~unto :,et my harid this 4th day of May,
~..~, , ` / -
~
SECRETARY, A17AHEIM CIT'~' FLANNI2~G COt~AMISSION
;~~
<<-~„
~:~
~~;
;: 'r'
; i,
~+,
;°~
~ : ,~,
~I'µ}
(n
,r
%Y i
, , w: . .
-3-
PC88-12?
, ,Cr:
. ,,.:. -l,jh
~
~~
' '~
~' ,,:r~
, . . , ,.~ br~9