PC 88-140~ ~'rp~~-0~~~~~
~`~
~.z~:....:::~. , ,,,,
~e ~ ~ ~#~
, , ;~;
; ~~
;,,.,
,,~
•,~
, ;;r
~ F.
•: i~d
;~i,
>:ri J
~rsoc.~rrrorr rro. ~s~_~.no ':;.;,,
,:
~:~
A RESULUTION OF THG ANAHETM CITY PC,ANNING COtr4dISSION
TfIAT. PETTTIu!] FOR VARSANCF N0, 3790 AF DENTEI) "'
,,;
WF3~,FG yS, rhe t:naheS.m (:.ity Plannin;! Commission r,lid receive a ~;
vt~rified Peti.ti~n Lor Var.tanr.u f.rom JOSLPH M. U~IAS, :L224 E, Katella Avenue, `.:';'~;
Urange, CA. 97.6ti7, uwi~er and , ar~ent Fur certain real property situated in the ;`
City of T,naheim, Cc,i~nty of Oranc~e, Srate oF CalYfornia descri~ed as: ~';
~:f~
LOT 7 Ild F3Lf~CK 1 OF WGST BROAD;~JAY raacr, IN TIi~ '
CT'1'Y qI' ANAFiF.Itd, AS PEit D1AP RLCORDED IN BQOK 9, ''/r~
; ~,:
PAGL 0!3 OI' M]:SC:F:LLANI~OU:i MAPS, TN THE OEFICE QF TIiC
COUHTY RGCUI:U~I: GI' SA~CD CUUNTY. ~;~;=~
~ :°~t
P7F1ERrl,S, the City ~~'l~nning Commiss.ion did hold a publz~ hearing .~
at the C.ivic Cent~.r .in Che City of Anlaeim on May 9, 1988, at 1:30 p.m., '~
~ notice oE said PUb~I(: t1Nc71'll:~ tiaving been aul~~ c~iven as requ.ired by law and iri
;;
~`"~`
accor;iar~ce wit~.h tlte prov.isiozis oE the An~lieim ldtinicipal Code, Chapter 1~.03, ~•
i.o hcaar anci consicl~a• e~.~iclai:ee f:oc• and agains~ said proposed variance and to "~~'
invesl-.igaCe F111C1 mzL•~ I.'lllcli.ngs ancl r~,:commeiidaL•ions in r.nn:~ection therewi~h; and J~,~'
{
s.~id p~~bl~c•: lieuring i~rin~ cont:in~~r~1 t~ Cl7n meeL-inc7s ol` rtay 7.3, 1~80, and June <
6. 19 !3 8, a n d :;':','~
"~:'
F7Iil:F;EAS, su3d Commissior., after due in:specti.on, investigat:ion : ~,.
;7
and ,tudy m:~dc: L~v it,c:.'.: ,~ri~l .in :it•s beh~lf, anrl aEL•ec di.ie c~nsideration oL all '}
.
evidez~ce ar~c.i r.eacrr.tr, nf.ferc~cl at sa.id hear.ing, dr,~:~ find and determine the
' ;.',
rt
~o7.lowing Eacts: ` '!`~~
!,~:~
~.1~
1. 'cr;~;r the petitioner proposes waiveY•s a~ the follawin7 to '~'I
eonstruc!: a 3-story, ti-uniL ~part,menL• bi.iilding: ,~i~
'
(A) SE~T]'l?1? 18,3~~s,0,C~1 Q:1.0, - Ptinimum ht~il~?iei~r siL-e area~~r :;-
;
H~
;;
fi
l~wellina_ Lni~. ;
I
' (1200 ~g.~. f~. requ.ired; ~,
11~2 .ti-~c,~_Et. proposec~) ''',
(lij SF.f'T'T~fi_.7.Fi_,3A.(1C~2_~)11 - Maximum sh~c~Lr~l hei.qht.
__._..r _.... ._ ~.r
,'~
,
'li
2 stories permitred;
~ ~_~~_.. ..
, ;r,.
3 s~or:ics rrogoser.t)
. ;,,:'~
,,
:
r
(C) S~;C'J'7.QP1 J.9 _1~1,_(1_fi~_ d,7.Q - Maximurn ~iY..r. c;~yer~cq~. ~
~~
_
i"~5`~ perini.t~ecl; 7~~~ proposeci) ~.,
;;
i;
2. 'Clzat: h}i~re are no exr.epL•i.pnal. or ~xL•r2~rdinary ~
~;~
circiuns~anr.es or r,onditions appliaat;le Co the property i.nvolved or ~o the ~'~:*;~
:inteiidec.i iise oi' Ehe property t}iaC do nol: ~ipply generull~ ro the property or `~;s;
~
clas:; of. iise .in t•lie same v.icir-i~y and zone. :~,_,•
.,.~;,r
3. Thar the rec~u~sted variaric~ :is nol neoessary f:or the
.
'~'~
.
K1YP,5EL'V~1Llqt1 and enjr~yment nt a sul.~st.anLial property right possessed b!~ okher. la;
pro~part.y .in tlie same v.3.cinity and z~nc~, and denied to t:he ro ert in
F F Y c~uesti~n. '`~
,;y~~~
~
~;
0318r :.;
~j
PC88-I~10
~ r A,~
~
~
~ i ~
t
..~.
' ~,-':~r~ . . ,~~,. ,~.~.
~. ',;
~ . . . .. . .
-- - , . ~
~ ~
,. .. .., y l~ h~.,ir.
',r. `
4, That the t•eguestec? variance wi11 be mac~rially detrimental
~:
~~;I
to the piiblic rrelE3rQ
vici
it
" or injurious ~:o the ~roperty or i.mprovements in such ;~
n
1 e
1IlC~ zone in orhi cli L-he •pra~er~y is locatPd, ;,,~~~,
.~~
5. That
hearinr, in opposiCion; 4 people indi
and th
t cated kheir pr.esence at said public r`~r
signatures was receivf:sl a
a
an opnosition to perition ccntaining approximately 18
suLject pe~ition. ;:~::;
;:';~
CAi,IC0I2NTA FNVTRONriENT71i, ~UALITX ACT rTPiDING: That ~he Anaheim
City Planning Commissioi~ has reviewe~ ~hQ praposal tin construct a 3-story,
6•-~u7il: aparL-ment complex with waivers of minimum building site area per
dwelling unit, maximum strticL•ura.l height and maximum si.te CC+V@I'd~L' on a
rectangulari.y-~haoeri parcel of land consisl-inq oE approximat&iy ).:;6 acre,
t:aving £rontage ~f 46 feet an rhe west side oP Ohio Skr~et, being iocated
approximately 220 feet nort:h of tY~e centerl.ine o~ Braadw~~y and further
descrz-~e<i as 213 South Ohio Street; and does hereby approvc~ the rtegative
D~claraliori upon findincJ that i.t has considerecl rhN, Negative Dec].araL•ion
~oc~ethar wit~ any comments received during Lhe public review process and
fur~lier Pinding ori the basis oF the initial study and any comrients received
L-hat l-here is no substantial evidence that L•hQ prnject will tiave a
s.icrnit•.icant eifec~ on the Cnvironment.
NUW, THET2ET'ORE, nE IT RESOLVED that the Anahaim Ci~y Planning
Commission doss hereby deny subject Petiti.on for Variance on the basis of tha
af.crementioned findings.
=;' TIZL I~ OPEGOil~l7 RfSULiJTTON ,i,,s s igne
; of. June, 19£tII. ~
'; e; ~
'! t _..----- /~-k1 (X-Q.iY~ .
approved by me this 6th
CIiATF?DSAN, AtdAHEIM CITl' ~~T.ANNING COtr4dISSION
ATTGST:y~ ~
.~_.~..._--~ _~~e/rv,i _. _.__ '~
SEl':RF.TARY, ~~t1AHEIM CITY i,l~t~NING COMtdISSI0D1
STATE UC CAL,IE'~P.i7IA. )
COUN'?'Y OF aKANGE ; S~,
C1TY OT' ANAHEIbt )
[, Eclitli L~, Iiarris, Secretax•1~ oE t1~e .'~naheim City P1anr.ing
Cr~mm:i:i5]pll, da }zereby cert:i.fy L•}~at the ~orer~o.in~7 resolution was passed c~nd
adop~ed at a mc~eting ot l:he An~h~im City Planning (;ammi ssion held nn June 5,
l~B~, by the foilowir,q voCe ot tt~e members thereo£;
A~'ES: COMMISSIONERS:
NUF;S : CUt~tZSSI0x1ER5:
AIISF.tJT: CfJMMIS5I0N~R5:
E30UAS, DOYDSTUrI, CARU51LL0, FFLDHAUS, i•TERBST,
MESSE, MC F3UKNEY
NUNG
PI O t~ E
~n Wl'1'NC:~S wti~REOF, T kiave hereunto set my hanct this 6~h c~ny o~
June, 19~t3. '
~ ~ i~~~~- ~ ~
~ ~
^aGCRET RX, ANAH~IM PLANNING C4DlM2SSI0-.~ '~~~"
S ~':
~~ i
;~
- _ ^Z^ --- PC89,-1~0 ._.., ,.~r''.~'