PC 88-154P'~'"~
~~
RESOLUTION N0. PC88-159
]a RESOLUTION OF T~IE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COIr4•fISSTON
THAT PETTTION rOR RECLASSIF'TCATIQN N0. 07-88-57 B~ GRAZITED
' ~ r~-~~~
;,;
;Y~
~ ;~~
;'.
WHEREASe the Anaheim City Planning Commissi~n d~.3 z~ceive ~
veri~Eied petition ~or Reclassification Prom PAUL 3. MARASCO AND FANNIE J.
MARASCO, 2~85 N. Vza Pue.rta, T,aguna Hi11s, CA 92G53, owner, and DHIRENDRA
SHAH, 131.44 Garavel Street, Cerritas, CA 90701, agpnt, of certain real.
property situated xn the City of Anaheim, County of qran~e, State of
CaJ.ifarnia, described as fallows:
BEGIIJNIDTG AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNI:i2 UF SATD SOUTH 5
ACRES; TIi~NGE NORTH 339.76 FEET ALOI3G THE EAST LINE
TH~REOF; TTiENCE TVEST 325.24 rEET TO THE WEST LINE GF
T.HE NORTHWESTS QUART~R OF SATD SECTIGN 13; Tf~ENCE
SOUTH 334.85 FE~T ALONG SAID WEST GINE TO THE
SOiT':.'F~WEST CORNER OF SAID SUUTH 5 ACRES) THENCE EAS'P
325.29 FEF.T ~0 THE FOINT UF BEGIN~IING.
THE SOU'~H 5 ACRES OF TH~ WEST 10 ACRES OF TI-~E
~IORTHWE.ST ~UARTER OF THE NbRT.FiS4EST QUAR7'BR CF SECTION
13, TOWNSHIP ~1 SOUTFi, RANGE 11 IN THE RANCHO LOS
COYOTES, AS SHflWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN AOOK 51, PAGE
11 UF ~fISCELLANE~US MAPS, RECORllS OF ORANG~ COUNTY,
CAI~IF012:IIA.
EXCEIPT THAT PORTIOH THEREOL' DESCRI~ED AS FOLLQWS:
BEGINNING AT THF. SOUTHEAST ~ORNER O F SAID SOUTH 5
ACRES; T.HENCE NORTH 334.76 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE
THEREOF; THENC~ iVEST 325.24 FE~T TO THE WEST LINE OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER UF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE
SOUTH 334,85 FEET AT,ONG SATD WEST L'NE TQ TF~E
SOLTTHWEST CORNER OF SAID ~OCTTA 5 ACF2ES) 1'H~NCE EAST
325.2A FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
,A.L50 ~XCEPT THAT PORTION TFiEREO~' CON'JEYED BY MERNA G.
C~tANDALL AND HUSHAND T.Q TH~ 5TATE OF CALIFORNIA BX'
DEE17 RECORDF~U APRIL 19, 1951 IN ~OOK 21'10, PAGE 80 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID QRANGE CQUNiY.
WHEREAS, th~: City Flanr_iny ~ommission dia holfl a public heariizg
at the Civic C~ntF.r in the City of Anakieim an May 9, 1988 a~ 1:30 p.m., n~tice
of said gublic hearing hmving been duly give n as rec~uired by 1a~w and in
accor~ance with t:he pr~visions af Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.03, to
hear and considar evidence for and against said proposed r~:classiffcation and
to investiga~e and make findings and recommendations in connsction ~,herewith;
and subjecz petition was con~inued to the meeting of June 20. 1988, and
~10339r
-1-
PCt38-154
':~
~,,
,`~~
~ ~~ _~:~
:A.
.~.
`a.
;hi
;~rr
':~s
,
~ ~,•:
Y
. ~ ~ ~ .~:~~1
.: :,,
_. . ..~•:
~f
f' •
J (1~
L11,.~.~, ' . , ~ _ .
~ ~~~; - , ~ . i'
~~ ~... . . ~' ~ .. ..,, . . , ' . . . ~ ' ~ . , . ... .. . . ~ . . ~ ~ . . ,~ . , . ~ - . .. ~ , . ~' , . . _ . . ,ii..~.2'!~
, ,
, :, . .; , ~ . ,.
,~ r .. . . ~.ti . ... _:. .::, , „ ,,..,., _. . . ,~. , ~ ~ _ , _ . s ~ '~~~, t ~ ~~~~:,;;~
"'i
~
;
;
':. ~
.~' (~ ,
liir 3. That the proposed reclas;:ification of subje~t property is
} necessary and/or desirarrle for the orderly and pr~per devel~pment of t2ie
;•:, community.
'` 4. That the proposed r~classificata.on of aub'ect
''' ] property does
,~ properly relate to the z4nes and their permi~ted uses lacally established in
~'.~ close proximity to subje~t property ar.d to the zones and their permit~tpd uses
~; g~nerally ~stablishPd thro~ighout the communitv.
~y 5• That the proposed reclassifzcation of subject property
;~ requires the amprovemen~ of abutting streets in accordance yrith ~h~
Circulataon E].ement af the General Plan, due to iche anticipated increase in
traffic whicY. will be generated by the in*_ensification of land use.
:~a
s• ~hat no ane indicated. their presenc~ at said public: hearing
~a in opposition; and tha~ no c.orrespandenee was received iu uppositior~ ~,n
'x!: subject petiL-ion.
Yv
LTFQFNT ENVIQNMENTAL QUALITY A'r FINDINC; That the Anah~im
~ity Planning Commissio:~ has rovfe~re~ the proposal to reclassify subject
proparty fram the RS-A--43~Q00 (Residential/Agricultural) Zoz~o to the CL
(Commercial,. Limited) ZonP and to construct a 3~-story, 196-xaom motel and
accessorl uses with waiver of a m.i.nimum number of parking spaces on a
rectangular2y-shapec~ parcel of lancl consisting of approximately 1,9 acres,
having a frontage o~ approximately 334 ~eet on the east side o:E Beach
Boult~vard, haviyg a maximum depth o~ approximately 2G0 feet anc3 being Iocated
approximately 900 feet sou~h of the centerline oF Lincolxi Aven~ie, and further
described as 212 S. Beach f3ou:leuard; and does hereby approve the N~gative
Declaration upon findir~g that it Iids considered the Negative Declaration
together wath •any comments r~ceivea during the public review process and
furLher finding on the basis of. tha initial study an~ any comments received
tk~at there is no substantial evidence ~hat tha projer.t wi11 have a
siqnificant effect on the environmeut.
AIOW, THERE~ORE, AE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Corti~ission does hQreby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doinq, that Title 18•-Zoning oE the A.naheim Municipal Code be tunended ta
exclude the above-described nroperty fr.om the RS~A-43,000 Zone and to
;'
~~ ~,;.;
, 5; ;r>
~"n
~
,
f~~^~ .
~,
i~ ~ ~
~ 41 ~C
,/~1
~ ~i~~i~,~g~ i 4:'~i
PCBB-154
~C
WHEREF~S, said Co:~unission, after due inspection, investigatian '
and study made by i~self and in its behalf, and after due cor~siderati.on oL• all ``,'
evidence and reports offered at s~id hearing, does find and determine the ~
,;:;,
follawing lEacts:
l. That the etitioner y~l
P proposes reclassificati~n of subj~ct
property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agrict.ltura]) Zone to the CL ~'
(Gommercial~ Limited) 'Lone. ~ '`'1~j
i
Z. That the Anahe~m General t~lan deszgnates subject pxoperty 'Y'
for general commercial land uses. ;r,',;
-: ~
-z-
..,. ,.tMR,,.,,v
jF
~' '.~=
;d
;rt7
lt2
F.}
~ .. . ~ .;.,,.i'
„
::~;
~ :r
ri'~
~'.-,. r
.,'~
;+:;ti!,I
E .,
,
?'~
'~
;,,.
."•;,
-;"a:
;;~F;
;~y'
:
~ ~~;~
.y
~ r~,
. ,. ,. ..i .... .... .~..~.i. ~:1~:. ~l.~i
.---~.
r,~'M°j
incorporata said descril.ed property into the ~L (Commercial, Limited} Zone
upon the followirig conditions which a.re hereby found to bo necessary
prerequisite ~~o the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the Cit:y of Anaheim:
1. That a rHlief sewer sha11 be constructed in D~le Avenue Na•rth of Lincoln
Avenue; and that socurity in the form of ~. bond, certificatQ of deposit,
letter uf credit, or cash, in an amount and foxm satisfactory to the
City of IanaYieim, sha3.1 be posted wzth the City to guarantee the
satisfactory completion of said improvemenl:. Said security shall be
posted with the City prior to introduction of an orc3i~ance rer,oning
subject property, to guarantoe the instal~ation of ~he above-required
impravements priox• ta occupancy. A sewer raimbursement agreement may be
made available to the developer of said propQrty upan their request.
~.~id reliAf sewer may be canstructed in two phases Qacl1 of which will
intercept suffi~iont units to permi~ connection into the existing sewer
system.
2. That street lightirzg faclJ.it3es along fleach Houlevard ok~all bQ insta~l~d
as required by~ the Utilities General Manager in accordanre wi~h
specifications on fil~,~ ir~ I;he Office of 'Utilities General Dianager; and
that security in the for;n of a bond, r.ertiEicate of deposit, le~ter. of
credit, or cash, in an amcunt and £orm satisfactoxx to thr. City of
Anaheim, sha11 be posteci ~with thQ City to gua•rantee the satisEdc~ory
comp'letion of. the abova-mentiuned imprnvements. Said security sha~l be
posted with the Ci~ty t~f. Anaheirn prior t:o introrluction oi an ordinance
rezoxting sub ject prc+perty. T2~e above-req~iirec3 improvemex~ts shall be
insta].led pr3or to occupancy.
3. That the owner oi• subjecL• Property shall pay to the Cii:y of. Anaheim a
fee for *ree planting purposes along Beach Boulevard in an amount as
determined by the City Council.
~. Than grior to intr~duction of an ordinance rezoning subaect prpperty,
the applicant sha11 participate in reducing the 1eve1 of service from
level "F" tq level of "E" at the i.ntersection oF aieach IIoulevard and
Linco].n Aven~ze bp pnyment of a£ee quivalent; to the cos~ ~f construcL-ion
of ~•urbs, guttor~ and sidawalks (estimated to be $11,0OO.OQ). NQ
right-of-way aquisition wil~ be requirec~ wa.th this condition.
5. That prior to the .introduction of an. or~inance sezoning subject
propesty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above-ment•ioned, st~a11 be
camplet~d. The provxsions or rights granted by this r~sol.ution sha11
become nu11 and v~oid by actfou of the Qlann3ng Comm~.srion unless said
cond3.~ions are complied with wit•hin cne lear from t2ie r~ate of tris
resAlution, or such further L-ima as the Plann.~ng Cornmission may graut.
`~~ ; 6. That approval of this applic.atian cpnstzt.tes approval of the proposed
f{Ht,';. r~+quest only to the extent that it complies wi~h the Anaheim Municipal
~,~ ; ~Loning Code antl any other app~ieablp City regulations. Appravs~l does
~~~;
: n~t 5.nalude arty ackion or findings as to compliaace or appz~oval of the
_
ar~-~ reguest reyardin~ any other appliaable orninanc~, regulakion or
~~
qti~(~
i
reCZt11.I'@1Tlf.llt •
,` 1+` ,
i f;,i ~ ~ .
~~ ~ ~t' ;
-3- PC$8-J.S+~
rMi~4 ~ t }1 .~1
: ,
, . . ` r
~~
. 7 1
~. . ....~~...... ~.. ~. ~. :~~.,,~. ., . ~ ~`
. i(h1,i .. .. .. ,, ~ {{J ~~
1
. . .a. . . ~ .. ~ . . ~..}.. .\ ~ .. ~ u .~_ ~~'.. It 1.! ~ y ~. 'r'~~
~{ ' ~' . ~ ~ ~~~'~ ~~ ~ ~1
~' , -. ~ . . ~. . . . . . . ~..~ .~ 1~.Sr. . ~l
~ ~y
~ ' " ` +~11j,,SI
r ~H~
~. . . . r.~>y ~ ~ . . $.~.~~
1
1~ f4~
x~
. ~ . ~~.~~~,;
•°t
1
i
? $F r'r F'URTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plt~nning Cammission ~
; ~
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resoltit3on is ex ressl • NS
. predi^atec~ upon applicant's compliax~ce with each and a11 of the canc~itions ~
~ herei~:abuve set forth> Shoixld any sucli canditions, or any p~rt thereof, be '~~
~ d~clared inv~lid or unenforceable by the fi.nal. judrrnent of an.y court of. N
~'~ competer.C jurisdiation, then this Resolution~ and anr ''
~' 1 approval s hereiz~ ~;
contained, shall be deemEd null and veid.
r'
, f
' ';HE FOREGOI?J'~ RESOLUTIOLT is signeci an~. a,proved by me this 20th day af ,,;N~
' June, 1988. y,
.~
~ ! ~~~~J ~~ ~x
~ ~ /r ~,.. .
!~ : , F
' CHATI2MAN~ A,NAHEI~S C:tTY •LANIIING COI~II•fISSION r
~~ #;
~ ATTLST: ~ r ;~
.~ + ir;
~Q~ ,
~ v"[,~ .
;~
A
SECRETARY. AITAH~IM CITY PLANNING CaMMISSI02~f ~~`w
~ ~
N
" STATE OF CALTFORNIA ) ~"
€` C~UNTY OF ORANGE ) &s,
+ CITY OF AN,~HEIM )
; Z, Edith L, Harxis, Secrota~y of th~ Ana~xeim Cxty Plt~nning Commissiors, .
~ ~
~ da hereby certi.~y that L•h~ foregaing resolutior~ was pz-ssed and adapted at a ;;';'r;
; meeting of the Anahei.m City Planning Commissior. held on June 20, ].986, by the
.~:
~ follawing vote of tha members thereof; ~;
~,
~ AYES: CO?~StS.~',IONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, HER3ST, ~
; MC AURNEY, MESSE ~!
NOES: CQNIIyfISSIONE~tS: NOt1~ 1:''`z
~ ABSENTs COIrII~1IS.~,TONERS: NONE :` ~
~ ';;
rN WIT2v"ESS WHEREOF, I liave hereunto set my hand this 20th day ~r ~Tune,
~
1988. •
r
/ k~
1'!
r ~o
`-~ L % }'~
S~CRETARY, I~NAHF'IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON ~
, `;,,u
'i'~
~,~
''~ ~
~ ~~;,
;r~~
{~,i' . _;n~,
?'r` ~,-. :,I
r~ ~
J} ~ ~~.
N .; ~..
. .. ... t' ~ : ~
l ..'u..' . .... . ... . . . . . . . ~ .. . '~,
~:;~`
t _A~ ~
t ,
' s PC8 fi -~154 ~r;
~~, ~;', ,
~~~ ~ ~
~ ~_ ', ;-i
~ `~~•,;it:~-,,, ~
~~,~ : ~
~;
~~ 1 ,; ~ ~~~
ti~ r'~~ ~
i~ +~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~~9.
y, ~fii 1 . . . ~i'~"
t i yn
F ~E~Y~~l~ ~ ,f: ~~:~ , " . . . Y 1 J ~1
~., . .. h~} A .p,YY~
_ ' ~ ~~ . . . .. ... ._.. , ... , ~ ' ~. . . . , .. . ..:7~,.)-rt14~(