PC 88-167. - _ (ryr~.~
, ~ ~ . . . . ~ . ... ~ I kt t ~Y~~II .- .
~~.
~~ . ~ ~ ' ' t~.
I` +~
:~1r
~ ~~ l~
`~
'
t' R~5QLUTIpN N0. PC88~167
y A RESO~.UTT.ON OF THE ANAH.EIM CITY PtANNING CO!~fMT.SSION
F bFNYING GEN~:RAL ~L'~N hM~NDN.LNT N0. 229
'. LAND USE ELFMENT
WHERFAS, the City Counc3.1 of tha City Uf Anaheim did aclopt the
Anaheim Goneral Plan by ResoluLion No. ~9R-644, ~h~wing tlle goneral
description and ~xtont o[ possibl~ ~ut:ure dovo7.opment within tlio Citys and
WHF,F2EAS, pursuant to a request Erom ~he proQerty owner f.ar a
GEneral Flan Amendment Study, City staEf pre~,ared a GPneral P1an Arnendmant for
an art~a consisting of appraximate~.y 2.5 acrc~s having a irontaqe ot
approximately 133 feet un tho easL side of Dalo Avenue, having a maximum depth
of approxim~tely 1019 feet, baing ?.ocated approximately 6~,0 Foet south of the
conterline of Lincaln Avenue and incl~icling a porti~n of th~ Carbon Cret~k F1ood
Control Channe~.; and
WHERBAS, th~ City Plarininq Commission did hold a public hearing
nt the Civic Center. in ttie City of: Anahnim on A~rz]. 25, 1988, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having bQen duly givQn as required by law and in
accordance with the nrovisions oE tl~e Anaheim Municipal Coc'te, Chapter I8.03,
to h~ar and cons.id~r evidence for and against said proposed varianc~ and ta
invesl•igato and make findings and rQCOmrnendations i:~ cannec~ion i:herewitti; and
whereas subjcict b.earing ~vas conrinued to the meetings of May 21 and June 20,
1988;
WFIEREAS, said Commission, after riue in3pection, investigation
and ~tudy made by itself• and iu its beha7.f~ and after clue consiclc~:r~tiaii of• all
evidenco and reports offered at said hearing, doea finti and determine tt-e
Eollowing fact3i
;, 1. That aufficient avidence -~as 2eoL• preser.te<: to substanti.atQ
; t:~Q need for an ame~drnenY. to the AnahQim General Plan at th:.:~ time to ;;hangt~
the 1anCl use dos.ignarion from Gen~rat Commercial with a Flood Control Channel
to Mecl.ium Den,ity Resiftontial.
2. That tho closost ac]jacent land u:;e deslgnation to *he north,
east and south are genernl commer.ci~l and 1ow density r.osiden~ial.
3. That t~Ernty-five (25) per3ons inQicate~ ti-eir presence in
opposition ko subjece rer,u~st nnc~ that no corresponder~ce was submztted i.n
uppos~.tion.
CALI~t~II~ ~_~ tLQK~E~T~L OUALITY ACT Ft~il~: Thal: t:~a Anaheim
City Planninq Commission haz re~~iewed the proposal to amend the land use
c~~signation of kho Anahaim ~gneral Plan from Genar:al, C,ommercial with a~lood
Control Channel, to reclassify subject properzy from the 12S-A-43,000
(RQSidanLial, Agriculkural) Zr~r.e to t2-.g RM-1200 (RQSidentl~l, Multiplo-Famfly)
Z~ne and Co construct a 1-stocy, 48-unit (formerly 2-story, 84-unit) apartment
complox on a rQCt~ngularly-shapecl ggrrQl of land cansisting of approsfmate7.y
-~~ PC86-167
;:
, ~.
s~
!,r5t'.
,q..
. '~~9~t~'~.1{i
'r ~ih~llt
~`:
~y ~
t
1,
2.5 acres, having a frontaga of approximatelp 133 Eeot on the east sido of
Dale Avenue, having a maximum <lepth o: ~pproximatoly 1019 feeti a~id being
locaked approximately 550 feet south of the center~ino of Lincoln Avenue and
furtl~er dQSCribed as 150 Dale Avenu~ and including a portion of the Carbnn
Creek P'lnod Control Channelj and does hereby approve th~ N~gativa Declarati.on
upon finda.nc~ thaL 3t has considered the Negative Doclt~ration together with any
commQnts roaeived c~uring the public review ~rocess and further ffnding an tlie
basas oE thc~ initial study and any comments received that there is no
substan~:ial eviderice that the preject will have ta significant effect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to amenr~ the General Plan and redesignate
:' subject property from Genoral, Commerc3al land uses with a Flood Con~ro2
~ Channel to Residential Modium Density lar~d itse3 and rhat pursuant to Che above
findings, tho Anahaim City Planning Commission does hereby deny General Plan
~ AmBndment No. 229.
THE i'OREGUItTG RESOLUTiON i~ signed and agproved by me rhis 20th
day of June, 1988.
-~~~
-----~`L•%c"~~ ~~ _~,'-")`"~ .t~~ ~_~ ~
CHr\IR2~1AN~'~ A1tAHEIM ClTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_ ~~L~.~~~. __~___
SGCRE ARY, ANAHEIM CITX PGANt7ING C02~4~iIS5I0N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN:Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHGTM )
I, Edith i,. Harris, SecreL•ary of the Ana2~eim City P].anninq Commi~sion,
do hereby carti€y that the forc~goinq rosolution was passod and a~~~pted at a
meetxng of the Ari~,heim Ci.cy Planning Cemmission he13 on Jun~ 20, 198f1, Ly the
fullowing vote of thR momb~rs thereof:
AYES: COt~SISSiONEFS: BOUA5, BOYD5T.UN, r.,~KU5ILL0, FELDH,~U~, EiBRBST
MfC B~RNBX, MESSE
NUES: COMMISSTON~RS: NONG
ABSENT: COt~1ISSI0NERS: NONE
IN bJITNESS WHCREOF, I huve hvrQUnto se~ my hand this 20th day of
,7une, 1988.
..._.-._. __ '^ /~~--w~
SECRETA Y, ANAFIEItd CITY PLANNING C02~1ISSION
-3 - PC88-lti?
'~~
::t
, ;~
; ^~
i
;;
•~~:~
~c, ~
~4~.'. . ~.. , .~. , .. . . ..., .