PC 88-175',~~ :~~:, ..i,,.~ ,~ - ~ ~. ~ ~.~
. , „ r .{ ....• ;.':. . ,.~.,. ...... . . ,., ....
~.'~~f~r?~~'~'~.:'1!~y1~t~~~ ~~;;ti: ,s,~.,;;. ': ~, ,~~., R~yY~.v;N~~tit~t~~.t~a .. ~~)~,r , rr. ~ , . . , ., .... - .. . . . ~t.
~... „ . . .. , . , . ,;~:~~r
. .. ~ }i !
. . . . , . -~., ~~
d
~1~lRVlv~ ..~ . ~ ~ ~'~~$
1M
91^
RE~QLUTI.SLN ~~?~?~B _~~
A RFSOLliTI0r1 OF THE ANAHEIM CITY FLl~D1NING Ct~MMISSxON
THAT ?ETITION FOR VAR7ANCF N0. 3809 BE DENI~D
WHEREAS, tha Anxheim City Plani~.:ng Commission did receive a ver.ified
PetiLi~n Eor 'Variance Erom CI~ARLF.S J. BOL,ERJ'ACK anct DORQTHY A. BOLEftJACK, 3625
Savanna ~treet, Anahoim, CA 92E304, properL-y ownars, an~3 MICHAEL K. FRAZIER,
10200 Yorba Lincia F3ou:lovard, No. 20'1, Yorba L.inda, CA 926A6, agent, for
car~ain raal propArty situatc~cl in the City of A:iahnim, County of Orange, StatQ
oE California described aa:
THE WEST ONE-HALF, MEASURED ALONG T~fE SOUTH LINE Ok'
LpT 21, ~JF TRACT 743, IN THG C]:TY OF ANI~IGIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE;, STATE UF CALIFOF.N,'.A, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 22 PAGE 1(1 OE` MISC~LLA2'EOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGF COUNTY, CAi,IFORNIA,
FXCEPTING THEREFR~M THAT PORTIL`N LYtNG tTORTHWGSTE;i2LY
OF THE SOUTHE:AST~;RLY LIN~ OI' THE LAND DESCRiBEll IN A
DBED TO ORANGE COUNTY FLl70D CONTRUL DISTRICT,
RECORDED MAY 05, 79G0 IN BOOK 5227 PAGE 182 OE
OEFICIAL RECORDS.
WFiEREA5, tlle Citj Ylanning Commissi~n did hold a Lublic hearing at
the Civic Centc+r in the City ot Anaheim on Ju1y fi, 1980, at 1:3Q p.m., notice
of said public hearing haviny been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisi~ns of t.he Ananeim Muni.cfpal Co~e, Cha~r,C.er 18.03,
to hear and consider ovidence L-or and against said propo3ed variance a~nd to
inv!~stigato and make fiadings and recommenda.tions in conn~s~t.ion therewith; and
WHF.REAS, 5ai.d Commission, lfter c~~ie inspection, investigati0n anr~.
study madr, by i.tself and in its behalf, and aftQr due considerati.on of all
evidenc:e anci reports oE£ered at said hearing, does find ancl detarmine the
~ foll~~wing fact:;:
~
~ l. That the petitioner propo~~s waivers of the LollowiKg tio
~ conztruct a 3•-~tory, 16-un.iL-, "afforciable" ~partmerit complox undor auL•hority
of California Governmeiit CoaP Section 65915:
(A) ';~EC'C~N 18,~~t.9~1_L9?~4. -~inimum Rui.l~3xnc,~~~.~o Area ner DL~well_ r~ic
e ~~~
(12Q.Q~~q,fty, rQ~uii'ed: 92~~ck~3.
~~roposed)
-; (F~) ~E.GTI_~.___1~~:~4_~9~?~5~1~ - t~ta_xi1~~m...~~.ru~~L~r~l~~.~,.E.~•
(~ s~Q~.y within 150 feet rf a sinylcs-
s.~: family resi~?enrial zonQ permittod;
, ,~~t~p~i~_~ proposec at 5 and 135 feet)
; G374r
PCRB-175
r~
~ ~.
.:o
.~
Y t~i4
.°~,,
~
~~„~~~
,,ti 4
:ri`
.~s.; i~~
. V t^i
~ C ) E ' I..~.~.~$ • ;! 4 . 24 ~ _2~ (? - Ms?.~~ Lll~.m_~~Q_.~Y_~~'.~Jg •
(~5~ permi~teci; 77~, proposad)
(D) SF T70lI ~.~~62. 032 - Dlin'~,2um F,1~o: Arg,~Q. Dw 1] i}~g Un~.
(Z2~."~.~,n.~ t~- _ required fnr 1 bedroom
units; ,~,,'ty'Z,g~ ft:. proposQd)
( E) ^UirTIQNS_ ] 8. 4 04 _Q_~2- Permi~.~~ncr~~.k.~?~nen~ in~c~Fr~r~~
and 1a •'t~l..L064 tQ~O y_~r~•
( ~=in~~i enr.roac:unaT~t f~r unenclose~
sta.irway permitted; 7 fg~t proposed)
2. ~hat the ab4ve-mentionad waivers are hQrQb~ denied oii the basis
~hat R~classific.~tion No. 8i~•-89-1, proposing RM-120U (Residentia].,
Multi~le-F'amily) zoni.-~q and submitted in cor-nQCtion with subject varia.nco, was
denied; Lhat thore are no special circumstnnaes applicable to the property
such as size, shapP, topograpliy, locar.ion or surroundin~s, which c~o not zpply
to other 3.dentically zoned properties in the vicin.,v; and tha~ strict
apg].ication of the 'l.oning Code cioes not depxi.ve the pr.operty of privileges
enjoyed by aE:lier groperties in iden~ical zunzng classification in tho vicinity.
3. That there are xio excepti~nal or extraordinary circ:unstances or
condition:; applicable ho i:he property involved or .:o the intended use of the
property that do no*_ apply generally to the property ar class ~f us~ in tho
same vici~iity and zone.
4. That the requsstad variance is not nucessary for the
preserva~.ion an~ enjoyment oi a suk;stantia.l property right possessed by other
property in the same vacinzty anri zonu, and denied to the propartiy in question.
5. That the requesrod variance wili bo malerially det.^imantal to
~he publtc we1L•are or injurious to the propQrty o.r improv4ments in such
vicinity and xone in which L•he propQrty i3 locaL•ed.
6. TY,at tw~nty people indicat•ed th~ir presQnce at sai.d public
hearing In opposition; and that no correspondezicc~ wzs rQCeived in opposition
to subject• petition.
_ ALIFORNIA_E:DI~IIr p~ENTAL~UI~LTTY A~T _F~ND~N~; That the Aaaheim City
Planning Commission has r~viewQd the proposal to rQClassify subjtct property
from the R5-A•-43,OOQ (Res~.dQntial, Agricultural) Zone to t.ie RM-1200
(Rssidential, Multiple-F~mily) Zone and to cons~rurL a 3-s~ory, 16-uni.t
"affordablc~" apartmenL complex with waivers of min.imum building si~e are~ per
dwe111ng unit, maximum structural height, maximum site cover~ge, minfmum floor
a~~ca oE dwc~llzng units an9, permitted encroachment inCo fronC yard on an
irregularly-shaped parc~l uf land consisting uf ~pproxirn~~-~e),,- 0.35 acro ha~~ing
a fronlag~ o~ approxim:~L•ely ti5 foet on tho north sid~ of ::AVan~a Street and
being loc:mted approximat•ely 115 feet wc~~L• oP the r.enterline of Marian W~y and
further ci~sr.ribeQ as 3425 West Savanna Stroet; anc9 does hereby deny the
N~qaf ive D~clarat.ion upon finding L•hat it 2zfls considered the Negat{ve
Declardtfon togethNr aith any commonts rgce.ived during the public reviaw
process and further findfng on r,he basis of ~h~ initi~l etudy aad any conuner.t~
receivo~l thet ~her~ i.s subsrantial evidence that the proSect wi.il have a
significant efLer.t on the onyironment.
~~
~~; .
f ,t ,
~'~I~.~ h~ ~' ~,M1
-2' PC88-175
~ ~~
~~aw~
F
~
fi..
~,':~~
ATTEST:, i ~ ' / . - ~
~ ~y;' ? . / ,~ i ~ ' .
_ e-„C"~~...-_~,~. ~ ~ 2.-~ _ __
• ~ L
CHAIRM~TL ANAH~IM CITX PLANNING COb4rlISSION
~ ,,
~
~ ~ ~~ `::~~~~~LC~(~~Fl~f4~~~
t x,
~'
~ . ~ ~ . . _ti °r~
/; ~~
':hi
.:,:1:, a°.
.,i.:`
N4W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV'FD that the Ant-heim City Planning ~'`>~
Commission does herek~y ~eny subject Porition for Varianca on the basi~ of the st
aforementaoned E3ndings. '~`."~~;+
TFIE FOREGOItYG RESOLUTIO~T
is signed
and approved by me this 6th af `;i
.,+~t
July. 1980. ;a
, ~,'!-°~'- ,..' y,r~G^~'-'~~~....~ ! ~~i
SECRETARY, ANAFIEZM CITY Y'LANN:i11G COtr4rSISST~N
STATG OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTX ~~F' ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AN.AHEZM )
I, r.ditn L. Harris, S~cretary of the Anahaim City Planniny
Co:nmission, do herQby cQrtifj L-hal. the foregoing rosolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting oF the Anaheim City Planning Commissi.an held on July 6,
1988, by t.he fo7.lowing vote of the member~ thereof:
AY~S: CO~SISSIpIJERS: BUUAS, B~~DSxUN, F~;LUIiAUS, HERBST, MC HUFtNEX, MESSE
1NOES: COtrW,ISSI0NEK5: PTGN~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CAktJSZLLO
7N WITN~SS WHERFOF, 'I have hereunto set my hanti this th t3ay r~f
July. 1988 . ~ i ' ~? '
~ ~ ./ ., .
----~-~-~-~,,~-~~ ~~ ~
SECRFTARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING CO2YIIytISSION
-3- PC88-J,75
t~ ~~
r~„? r .,.~ _ , ~