PC 88-177~'
~ . ' ~ . . .. l.,5} tl ( f~~~p
. . } ,~: ~.~,
~.~~
~ ~~~,
~ . ..,.~7P[~'~
r~Q~
RE~QL TION N0. YC88•~177
A RE50~UTIOTI OF TH~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANN?N'G COMMI55IQN
THAT PFTTTION FOF VARTANCE N0. 3f310 BE GRANT.~D, IN PA.RT.
WHEREAS, Lhe Anaheim CiCy ~lann3.ug Comm.ission di.d r~ce:ive a
verified Petit•ion for V~r.iance fzom Cl~.nton H. P'lynn and Ruth R. Flynn,
6Q3-607 West Broadway, Anaheim, CA 92805, property owners, and S& M
Development C.ompany, Attn: Mohammad Mehdi ~brahimzade:~, P.O. liox 3868, Mission
Viejo, CA 92690, agent, of. certain. real proper.ty situated in the City nF
Aizaheim, County of Orange, Sta*.o of California described as:
Lot 12 in Block 2 of the "Enterprise Tract", a
~ubdivis ion ot a part of Vineyard Lot "E6",
~naheim, as shown on a Map r~corded in Book 4,
page 39 Miscellanen•xs Maps, records of ~range
County, Caiifornia.
Lot 1'3 in Hlor.k 2 oi "Ftnkerprise Tract", a
subdivis ion of a part of Vineyar~ Lat "E6"
Anaheim, 3s shown c,n a map racarded in Book 4,
page 89 of Miscellaneous Mapa, Reaords of Ur~nge
County, California.
WFiEREAS, the CiYy Plann3ng Commission did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Center in the City of Ar-aheian on uuly 6, 1988, at 1:30 p~m.,
notice of said public hearing having been dul,~ given as re~uired by law and in
a~cordance with the provisions uf t;he Anaheim Municipal Code, ChapL-or 18.03,
to hear and consider evidenre £or and aqainst said proposod variance and to
investigate and make Findi.ng~ and recommezidations in connection thQrewith; ~nd
WHEREAS, said Commission, a£t~r due ins~~ection, inv~e~tic~ation
azxd study made by itself and in its behalf, and aL•ter due consid~rati~n of all
evidence and reports offerQd at sai~ liearing, dnes ::ind and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes ~raivers of the Eollowir~q to
c~nstruct a 1Q-unit apar~ment complex:
(A) SE TION_1~~34.OE~2,0~0 - Maximum Site Coveraqe.
{.~5~ permiCted; 7t~ pronosod)
{s) s~rTZOrr ie ~tc.~a.,,~2 -~ti.nimum Floor z~r~a or nweiYin~ Uni~~,
(C) SEC'PIQN 18~4,Ob:i.•032 - iinimixm R~r~aY.ional~~i~rg Ar_~?.
Q3B9r
!'C88-1?7
1 :;
. _ . ~ . . . ;~' ~ ,p' ~ ?tr ~rtyt~i-S'
.. , . . . ~ ~ . . . ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . . . . ~ , . , . . ~ :1 ^ .~ (, i~t!~~
':.~., . . . . . . . ~. t,.,
• • ~ +"°ti!~ ' ~y
. . ~ ~'~ ~ YF',
1
2. That the above-mentioned waiver (A) is ho~eby granted on the
basis that there are sp~rial circumstances applicable to the propert,y such as
size, sha~e, topography, J.ocation and su~roundxngs which da not apply ~o otk~er
identically zonsd property in tYiQ same vicinity; and that strict app].icatio~n
o.f thQ Zoniuy Code deprive5 the property of pr.ivilegPS enjoyed by other
proLerl;ies in the identic~~. zone and classiFication in the vicin:it.y.
3, That the above-mentioned wai.vers (I~) ~nd (C) arQ hereby denie8
on thQ basis tY:at L'he riepd for said waivezs was elimina~e~ after the public
advertisoment.
4. '~hat there are exceptiondl or extraordinary circumstance5 or
conditions applicable to the property Ynvolved or to the inter.ded uso of the
p:op~rty that d~ not apply genec~lly tn the proper.t~~ or class of use in khe
same vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance, as granted, is necessary for the
preservatiun and enjoyment of a substantial property righr possessod by othar
property in the same ~~i~:inity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
6. That the requested vari.ance, as grant~d, will not be materially
detrimental to Che publ.ic welfare or injurioas to the prokerty or improvPments
in such vicinity and zone in w}iich the property is loaated.
7. Tha~ five people indicated their presence aL said public
hearirig in opposition; and that no correspondence was rerQived a.n opposition
to subje:.•t petition.
~ALIFORNIA ~NVIRONMGNTAL~iLF.LITY ACT FTN~IN•: That the Anaheim
City Planni.siq Commissioxi has reviswed the prol~osa:l to reclassi:y the prop~rty
from the RM-2~QU (Residential, Mu'ltiple-Family) to the 12M-1200 (Residential,
Multi~le-Family) Zone ar.c3 Lo cor~struct a 1Q-unit apartment complex with
vraivers oi maximum s.ite coverage, minimtt~n Cloor area of il.welling unii:s
(deloted) and miniMrzm recreataon/~.e'~surc area (deleted) on a
rectangular].y-shaped paxce? of land cunsisting of approximat~:ly 0.3 acre,
having a f.rant~+ge of approximat~ly 88 fieet on Lhe north side oE Broadway, and
being locatsd approximately 760 feet west aE tlze centerline of FIarbor
Boule~~ard ~nd £urther doscribed as 503 thxough 607 West Broadvray; an~ does
hereby approve the Neg~:.ive Declaration uporx findir:g that it has consiclered
the N'egative Declaration together with any commenL-s receivod during the public
review process and further finding on r_ho k:asis ot the initial sL•udy and an,y
comments rocpived that there is no substa~~~ial e•~idence ths~t the prc~ject wil~
have a sigr.ificant effect on L•he environment.
'.y NOW, THEREFORR, EiE IT. RESOLVL'D th~.t_ rhe Anahoim City Planning ',;i
'' Commission @oes hereby grant subject Pelition for Variance, in paa:t, upon the ?
followiiig con.c~itions which are hereby fouiid to bo a necessary prerequisite to ~'i
tha propused use af the surject property in ~rder to preserve the s~iety and
general welfure oP the CiLizens of the City of Anaheim:
i.
~
"°;
,~. ;
i
~ ~~
` ~j
}
~Y'f' nJ.
,~; _x_ FCAB-177 ;~~:
~'~ -1,
~
,
i ;~
~:,
~7~
~
I :'.ir ~
~~~~
~~
' . . . ~
-' ': r '
~ " r
~r t~t ra^~- ~
~ ~
.
N~.. _
~ . . ~ . , . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . ~ ' . ,
. . , :~. ~
. 1 fie:,l'1:F'~,F
~
c
a~~,
Z'hat tliis Variance is yrantc~d subject to thA adoption o~ the Zoninq
Ordinanre in cor.iiection with Reclassitication No. 8$-F39-02, now
pEnding.
T?iat prior to ic>cua:~r.e of a buil~ing permit, ths appropriate L•raffie
signal assessment fee sh111 he paic~ to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by Gity Council resa.lution.
3. That tha existi:ig drivpway on Broadwa,y shall bP removod and replacel
with a standara curb, sidewalk and landscaping.
h. That the drivewa.y shall be constructed with ten (10) foot radius
curb re~urns as required by the City Engineer. Existing braken or
cracked driveways sha7.1 be removed %~nd replaced as required by ~he
City Engineer~
5. That in the event a parcel ma~ is not rac~•rded ccmbining the tw~ (2)
pxisting .lots, tha 1ec;~;1 property orrr~er shall £urnisti the zoning
Division with a copy of a recorded covenant and agreement iix a form
approved by th~ City Attorney agreeing to hold subject property as
one parcel.
6. That gatgs shall not be installe8 across the driveway 9.ii a m~nner
~rhich may adversely affect vehi.cular traffic in the aajacent publia
street. Installarinn of any c~ates sha.ll conform to i:he Engineering
Divisi.on's Standard Y.lan No. 40i and stiall be subject ta the review
and app_oval of the Cily Traffic Fngineer.
7. That a parking plan indic~ting compliance with Citv parking lot
design standards s2ia11 be submitt,d ta and approv~d by the City
1raEfic ~:ngineer.
8. 'rtiar, prioz• to is~uance o£ a b~zilding permit~ ~ppropriate park and
recreatioa in-lieu f.ees shall be paid to the City of .~naheim 9.n. an
amoun~ as determined by tk~e Ci.ty Caunci:L,.
9. Tk~at drainage c~: subject property shall be a~~~oSea of in a manner
satisfactory fio ~he City Engineez.
10. That subject proper~y shall be servecl by underqround Litilities.
7.1. Tb.at prior to commencement cf structural framiny, f3.re liydr3x~ts
shall bp insL-a11ed and chargQd as requ3.rer1 and approved by the City
Fire DPpartment.
12. Ttiat if r~quired by rhe Fire and/or Police nepartmenY.~ a11 lockable
pedes~rian and vehicul~r access gates shall be eqixipped with a"knox
box" device to the satisfaction uf t:he City Fi~e UPpartmei~t and the
CiCy Pol~ce Departn~ent.
-3-• PC88-177
;: .1
~
,,.~
~'..
'„ ~
j', j
(
;I
Y~
,'•,
~~~~'i
:~
,,~ ~
~~ .~
,,~
~ ~j~~
.. ~ . . .,~:i'_t;~
~
~
13. That trash a~o.rage ~reas shall be provided and
location acceptable to the Street Maintenance
Di~~ision and in accorclance with approved plan;; on
Division.
i,~,.., ~ .n~:~ ~r ;,e.y~r,l r~~iw, ~s:li hept.~lk+F`~W,
t
. ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~~ i
i
~
~:i
G~(d
~ . ... ' .';(~
~1
maintained in a
an~ SaniL-atiori
file with said
~.4. That a17. air conditioning facilitit~s and othe;r rao~ and ground
mounted equipment sha11 be prop~rly s:~ielded f..rom view, ar~d the
sound buffered from adjacent residen~ial properties.
15. That subject pro;~erty shall bQ cteveloped substantially in accordanae
with p3ans and s~•ecificatinns on tile with the City of Anaheim
marked ~xhibit Nos, 1. and 2.
1h. Tnat prior to issu~nce of ~ buildirg pe.rmit, or within a period of
one year from the dat.e of this resolution~ whachever occurs first,
Condation Nos. l, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8, above-mentioned, sh~ll b~
comp].ied with. Extensions for further time to completQ sa~d
conditions mak be gzanted in accordance with Section Z8.03.d90 o.f
the Anaheim Municipal Code.
17. That prior to fi.na.l building and zor.ing ins~ecticns, Condition Nos.
3, 4, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14 and 15, ai~ov~-mentioned, shall be complied
with.
18• That approval of this 3p~Yication canstxt-utes approval of the
L~ropos~d request only to the c~xi:ent that it complies with the
Anaheim Municip3l Zoning Cotle and any othez applicable Gity
regul~tians. Appro~val does iiot include aity action ~r findings as to
com~liance or approva]. of thQ request re~ardin~~ an1 other applicable
orclinance, regulation or rec~u5.rement.
BE TT FURTHER RF.SOLVED that the Ailaiz~+zm City Planning
Commission does horeby iind and dot.ermine that ac~option oE l:his Resolution is
expr~ssly pradicated upon applir,az~t's comFliance with earh and all of the
conditions hereinauove set forth. Stiould 3ny such conditions, nr any part
thereot•, be declared invalid or unenfor~~;al:~le by thg ~'in~xl judgment of any
couxt. o~ c~mpets~nt jurisdiction, then thi~ Resotution, az~d any approvals
ha~rein contained, shaJ.l be deeme~3 iiull and void.
THE FOREGUIN~ RESOLUTTON is sig~ned and ~pprovnd by me this 6th
day of July, 1908.
,i'r'/,~.t:- i,~ j ~i~r=.i_..~~-
'°--,~---- -
CHAIRidAN,~ AfiETM (.ITY PLANNING COMMISSIUN
ATTES~: ~ ! ~ ~
, ~~j.~
, ~~ ~~,~-J~ ? , - ~
; ~ , - ~ .i.~ _ ~ '^ ~ ~-' ____.
SECRETARY, A.rI1~HFIM CIfiY' PLAN2 ~ COMblISSI~N
-4- PCf38-1?7
n ( -_ ' ' ~ , . . . . ~ . . . . .. . ~ .
,:i
'i
;~;
,.,
_ . :,
i
;
i
`~
~
~ ~ ~'~~`i
~i
~i
,' ~
i
E
,1
~';
;.;
,;,'~ ~Q . ~
~,~,~'
~ ~ ~ . . . ,. -,. t i x ie,at ~1.t'y`+'p~~
~ ~
. ~ ~ ~1, xi ~
~ ~ ~,~i~~~
,'Sk~
1, ~~ n
i
STATE CP' CALIFORNtA )
COUNTX OF ORANGE ) sS.
CITY OF ANAH~T.~f )
I, ~dith L~. Harria, Secrotary of the Anaheim f:ity Planning
Commiss.ion, do haroby c.r~rrify thtt!: tho forogoing r~rso:lution was passod ancl
adoptod a~ a meeti ng af t1~a .Ar,aheim Ci.ty Pl~nning Commissi~:i helcl on July 6,
19N8, by ~ho following voto of Che merobers theroof:
AYES: COMMISSIpNERS: f30UAi, FELDHAUS, ~IERSST, MC BURN~Y, MESSE
rIOES: COMMISSIOItERS: NONE
ABSENT: COhIIdISSIONERSe BOYDST(1!3, CARUSIL,LO
IN WTTNESS WHEREOP, T hava l~ereunto ~et my hand this fith day of
July, 198E. 1
(,, , ~ ~
. ~ , ~~, , r-' Y~ r
.__.~ ~-c.; ~~___ ti~~; _
SE~.RETARY, ANN~iEItd CIT'I PL IcIING CQhRr1ISSI01.1
i
: ~+;i
:_.
~
!
4
~
,; f
,
i
_ _ . . ;+
. . . . . . ...... ~.,~ F I
~ `~
~~~i
C
~~ '
PC88-i~~ `~';
~w~
~
;;~~
,
~,,r , ~, ,
~, ,
` ~`
~
,
'
+
-
~ .
~,{
.`
. w.Y.l-:e.,.. . .. ~ . .. . . , . ~ , . ,r
, z
~.
,~
. . .~ . . .. , .: ~ . • ~ a.W,;.,~,T,~. ~'J~~,.