PC 88-181f~~~,~3'rydM~°.(l•'~"#r ~'4~~Y~y -~' `'+~nk(W}~,~;; rr, N;y;.IV~~, ~~:~r~yiyb,~ :~::
~ .. ~~
~
~OLu~x4t? __N~2~PG..$Q~8 ~
~
A RESO[~TJTTON OF THE AlIAHExM CITX PLANNTNG COMI~I:iSION
TEIAT PETITION FAR (:ONUIT20NAL USE PERMIT N0. 3027 BE GRANTCD
WHEREAS, the Anaheim CiL•y Planning Comm3ssion did r~cefve a veri.fiad
Pe~tition for Conditional U4e Permit from tiOB~RTO I. NOGALES and ALEJANARA G.
NOGALES, 817 W. North Street, Anaheim, CA 92805, proP~rty owner~, for cerr,~in
real property satuated in thr: City af Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
CaliP~rn.ia, described as:
THAT PORTI023 OF LOT 3d ~:~1' ANAHEIM EXTEtdSION, 7:I TFiE CITY
QF ANA'EIFYM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATF OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER
MAP OF S:TRVEY OF WILLIAM HAMEL, llATEll DECEMBER 'l1, 1968
AND FII,EA IN THF. OFFICG OF THC COUNTY kECORDER OE' LUS
A-JGE~.ES COUNTY, CALIEORNIA, nESCRIf3ED AS FULLOWS:
BEGZNN"iNG AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHERGY LINE OF SA'tU LOT 38,
DISThNT TH~REON $94.542 FEET EASTER.GY PROM THE
SOiJTi~WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 38, AND RUNNING THF.NCE
NORIHERLX PARAGLEL WITH TFiE WESTF.RLY LIN6 OF' SAIU LOT,
201.25 FEET; THENCE ~;ASTERL•Y, PARALLEL WITH THE SGUTHERLY
LITIE OF SAID LOT; 60 FEEx; THENCB SOUTFi~RLY PARALLRL WITH
TFiE~ WE5TERLY L,INE OF SAID LOT 20J..25 FEET 'TO TH~ SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT; THF.NC~ WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERL~Y
LINE, 60 F~G'l' TO THE PUINT Or BEGjtINING.
~
WHEREAS, the City Ylanning Commission did hold a publie nearing at
th~ Civic Centar in the City of Anaheim on July G, .1988, at 1:30 p.m., notice
of sa:il ~ublic hearing havinq been duly given as roguir~d by law and in
accordance with the provisiuns of ~he Anaheim Mur-icipa'_ Cc .e, Chapter 18.03,
Cu hear and considor evidence for and again~t 3aid PY0~056Cx condi.tional u~e
permit and tc~ investigate :~nd makc finc3inc~~ an~ recomrr~endations in connection
ther~w3th; and
WF?EREA~, said ~ommission, af.ter du~ inspection, fi-vostir~ation and
study made by i~self. ancl in its behalf, ancl afr.er due eonsideration of all
evidence and roporr_~ off~red at said hearing, does f:nd and detQrrnine thQ
foll~wing facts:
1. Thut the proposed use is properiy one for which a condiCional
use permit is ~uthorizad by Californ;a Goverr~ment Codo Section 65852.1 L•o
wit: to construc:r, a 511 squar~-fo~t "~ranny unit" w.itta waiver o£ the
followin~:
~E~T.~Qt~ 1,$_t2~4~_~_t~3U - Mi1-is,mum ~.g€-r-.Y~~ ~9~.~?~~k.
(2~..~.~LP_~ r«qtiirecl; 17 ~,~~.~ pxoposetl)
0376r
'1 ,
YC88-1l31 _ ._
`i
. ,' ~
,~
,:
~
`-
~
r'
.,.., , . . ..J~a?~
~?.k~
.~
_ . fl~~
_ -- _ ~: ~ ~~'1
' • ;';t
~, ~~' ~~
2. That the cequestecl waiver i~ horoby granteci on 4hc~ basi~ that
ther.o are special cir!:ums~ances app:Licab).o to the property such ~s size,
shapP, ~opc~raphy, loc~tion and surroundinqs which do not apply to ~~her
identica].l~r zonecl property in thc~ same viciniL•yt that stric~ ap}~lication of
r_hc~ 2oning Codo deprives the pr.operty of: privileges enjoyed by other
propertiey in tlie i~3enL•ical zone aiid classificat.ion in rhe vicinity.
3. That ~he height of the wall along the QastQrJ.y proper~y ].ine
st-~11 be raisad to a minimum of• six (6) fpet, as mQasured from the hic~hest
grade.
4. That the proposea use is hei•c~by grantQd ~ubjecC to the entrance
to tlic~ structure facing southerly (towarcls ttr~rth St.rQC~C).
5. That khe proposad usQ wi11 not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the gr.owth and d~velopment of the az~a in which it: is proposed
~o be ] ocate;i.
6. Thttt the size and shupe of the slrr~ proposed for the use is
adequate to allow thQ £ull development o.E the proposed use in a mAnner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to t;he peaca, health, safety and
genaral o~eZt:are of the CitizQns ~f L•he City of• Anahe.im.
7. That the grantinq of tlie Conditional UsP Permit uiider the
conclition~ impased, if: any, wi11 nat be de~rimental to the peace, haalth,
saf.ety anc~. general welfare o~ the Citize:~s ot• the Cir.y of A.r.~heim.
8. That the traEfic: ,eneraLed by i:he proposed use will not impose
zn unciue burden upon the streQts and highways designed and improved to r.a.rry
the tra:`fia in the area.
9. That onr, persox~ indicated rheir prQSence at said public '~earinq
in o~position; and that a per.ition ~:as recoived in oppositian to the subjact
petiti~n.
~L~~~Q~tPIIA ENVIR N R~NTI~,~. QUALITT~_A~ F'I~IQ_IP.~: The Plsnn;.ng
DirQCtor or ~iis authorized rQpres~ntative has de~erminPd that the ~roposed
projact falls wit•h:n the definiti.on of Categorical Exenptions, Claus 3, as
ciQfinad in the Stata ~nvir.onment~l Impact Roport Guidelines and is,
L•herefore, categorically ex~mpt from tha r~quirr~. ~t t~ prepare aix EIR.
NOW, THEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED ~hal: the Anaheirt~ Gity P1ann.tr.g
Co:nmission doe~ hergby gr~snt subjoct Petition for Condi~ional Use PermiL-,
upoa tbe iollowinq conditions which are herPhy found to be a nacQStsary
prerequisii:e to the p:•opoaed use of tho suhjHCt p:opertx in ord~r t~ preserve
the sa~ety and general w~lfaro af the Citizens of the City of Annheim:
1. That prior L•o issuance of r~ buil~3.ng permit, the appropriato
traffir, s3gnal asseasment fge sha11 bo paicl to the City of Anaheim
in ~n 3mount as dgtorminod by City Councll resolution.
-2- PC8$--101
~:
~
'~: ~.
~. c~
~
t~ r~.~
'i?ci ,~, t ~ • .
'~rw I
k~
~
' .. , .. ,... ~.,ir,,., ., r . . , . J.a, t .. ~:,r,l , ~' ~'';' Y,C~}~~ ~~~;~ r it i, j rr., ~ r 'tt~,4, tt IY +w
,,'i _.. f~r 4~. ~~ a~ ~. i,i~ kl~t~l~!~ik~
1` ~~ 1 5'.; tf
~~,~ ~, , ia
~ j . ~ ~ ~ i . , Y o ,~:, i
2
~~~ Y~ ~
~.'SV
;;,,j
`• TY~a~ e ~ao $hall be ` ~
paid tu the Ci~ ~ `
ttlony North Street in Y of Anahpam for ~roe p '
resoltttion, ~n arnount as determined lariCinq ~°~;
~~' ~a~Y C4uncil ~
3. Th~t priar to issuanc~ o,~ h ~~
buildin ~~
recrea~ioi~ in_lieu feos ~hall be g Permit, ~
amaunt as determined b kl?ropric~te pa.k and ~~`:';S
paid Go the City n#~ Anah~im in ~n
y tk~e City Council. ;:h
4. That the new construction a~ul:horizad b ,;;~
Served b ;'r
y undergrauncl util.ities. X~hx~ xesalu~ion sha11 be •"~
5 . ;y
That all air ,;j
conditioning facilit:ies and '•~'
mounted eqtiiPment ~hal1 be o~her rooi•' 3nd rlxound ~
s~und buffered from ad'ac~n~ residenti.al ~ roaed f.rom view , ~''~
~ , a, ~d the
fi. P pQrties.
That the lega~ owner
occupancY og ~hP °~ subje~r,t propert
sixk 9ranny unit ko one or two adultsha].1 restrict ths ,~
Y(6U) ped~5 of a Q both of whom are
covenant against the go oi• ~lder, and .EurthermorQ ~~
unit. p p~rty so rc~trictir~ • sha11 record a '~`
Sai~ covenant sha11 be submittecl ta ~ heh ZOn~rupancy oF said
transmiCtal ~o the ~itY Attorne
priar to recoxdatinn, Y's OfFice for r.e~ri~w a~aision for
to the 2oning Division.
Prool ~~ recordation shall then be ~ubmitked
~' That ;,ub ec~
aevordancP with p~operty shall
plans and s er.if cations~~np~d Subst-antially ~n
Anaheim rnar.ked F,xhibit Na, ~ file with Che
faot higt~ block 1% providQd, however, thar a Ciry of
~all st~all be constructed a,~ari Eix (6)
~n~P~~C~ .l.ine as~~ measurad from t
ho highest g the easter.lY `'!
Street), °P thR granny~, unat shall fnce Qrade and tha~ the '
the sauth (Cow~r~y porth
8' That rior
P to issuance of a buildin
pn~ ycar fr~m the date o~ ~ g parmit, or within a ner.iod of
Condi~ion Ncs, ~his resolution, whichever
with. Extensions~ fer furkher6~timeQV~_m~ntionecl, .^,hall~ccurs Eirst,
be grantod in to co,npxete said b~ ~omplxed ~
accordance with Section ~g, condiL•ions mdY
Munic.ip~1 Code. p~,pgp of ~;
~h~ Anaheim '`
9• Tliat prior. ta fin~1 ~ I'
bufldin ~'
g and zoning inspe,,tions, C:ondi~xon Nos. `I'r
~ 5 and %, $bpve_mQntioned, sha11 L+~ `"`
~om~l.ied witkl, ~ ~`
10 . ,1,,
That approva.l o~ this applicati~n ""`
Proposed r.equest onl consti~t~~es a ~~.
Anal~Qim Munici al y to the extent ~har it ^ Pproval of the `~~+y
N Zoning Code an~ °m~l~~s kith the
r~gulaCions. Approv3l does ~nv otlze~
Co compliance or a riO~ includ~ en. ~PPlicabae City
pprovAl of the ~ acti~n or ffndings a& '
applic~ble ortiinance, r.egulation ~r rere~~uest zeg~rding an "'''
qu:.remont. X other ~'`,
i __,;
, ,'~
G. ; `'±
_3_ a ~
PC88-181 ~ ;'i'~;
•`7
~;,:,.;
;J
, , , . ~ . .~~~~i
~ _.1
,;: ;
;v.:*a c wP, c;;3rt~ti,:,~L~i!'N . y'~ra s 1~! vf: '.
.,t- . ,., I ~'~f_~...1~~~~~jU~~Y~i~~~' K~)I f lb~.~r~'..•~rt,~ (~4~:10~
s~ . - . ....
~ - f r ne~ y~ e„rt•r yH r t~ t t .
~.ti,
~k~
.
,. 1 ~a`,~;15 1
~i~
#~~ ~
~
" 2~ ~'`
.. ..
.
~
_
,
~i
V
,
,
~ ~~ ~ a r~~;~n i P
. . , r,r
,'~f~
,
~ ar~
~ 4~
1
,
,t
'`~1
~
":i~"r'.
.
BE IT FURTH~R RESOLVED that the Anahelm CxCy P1~iining Commission ~''
cloes he:eby find and determine tliat adogtion of this Reso:lution ig expresaly ~
predicated upon appJ.lcant's complianco wikh eacb. and all ~f the conditxons
~;
harelnabove set Corth. Shnuld any such conditions, ur an '~
declared invalid or unanL•orceablo by the final ud x part thereof, be i,~
competent jurisdiction, ~hen this RQSO~ution, nd ~ n t af ~nx court oE ,,~
contained, sha'l1 ba deemed null and vu:id. y PNrovals herein '`y
:`:
~;~;
THE FOREGUING P.ESOLUTIpN is siyned and approved by rne this 6th day ~~~~
of July. 1988. `;`~
, ~~l,~~~;._c!~~. ./~"J. ~~..rl~r;~'.~'~i.,,_. . ;Y
CHAIRMAN. At~f HEA IM CITX PL•ANp7I23G COM2•SISSTON ~~~.`
~ ~/ ~
ATTEST: ' -
c ~; %~ )
~~ ~~.t'.,-~~-=~-_-__ ~` C~-z~.., -,
SECRETAFiY, AI~AHEIM CITY' PLANNING CONIMISSIQN ~.`.~
STATE OF CAI,IFOR:ZIA )
CUUNTX OF ORANGE ) 5,;,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith T.. Fiarra3, Secretary ~F Che Anaheiro City Planning
Cammi~sion, do herE~by certify that th~ for.eqoing r~ssolut,ion ~.~as pessed and
ad4ptad at a meeting of the Analie~m City P.lanning Commission held on Ju1y 6,
1988, by the followir.g vote of the membars thereof;
AYES: CdMMiSSION~'RS: BOUAS, E~OYDSTliN, FELDHAUS, HERHST, MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES: COMM7SyI0NERS: NONE
~$~~N~~ COMMISSTONEi2S: CARUSILLO
IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, I hav;+ heieunto set my hana tY~is 6th clay of
Ju.ly~ 1908.
t_ - ~'(= " ~ ~ )
~,~,/~~G ~(., : ' / /
~ ., .t._C~. _._f~. ~~~/ ~ • . 1.--- `: - ~ _
~ECF~.P.'~RY, AN1,FiETM CITY PLAI~NIN~ C02~4fISSIQN
f~ ~
~A,
f ~ ';
~~x s-ie'
••4-
PC88-1l31
'1J
T !•
f
,' ~~
r Y~y3
~ ... :'<t"'