PC 88-187~ ~
xrSOLU~z~N rr~i ~PC8¢-.~?
A RESULUTION Or '.L'HE l~N.AHEIM CITY f.'LANNING COMMISSI~N
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSII'ICA7'TON 'N0. 8£f-89-03 BE GRANTED
WHERLAS, the Anaheim Ci~y P1ai~ning Cnmmission did rereivg a
veritied petition for Reclassification from LINCOLN PROPERTY, L~TD., 420U
Trabuco Foacl, Suil:e Na, 222, Irvine, CA 9272U, owner, axzd ~HRISTOPTiER PTERCG,
A.M. HOMFS, ~1060 Campus Drive, Newpor~. Beach, CA 92660, agent, af certain rf~al
prop~r'ty sit.uaLecl in the City o~F Anaheim, County ot Orange, State of
California, ~escribed as follows;
COMMENCING AT A POTNT ON THE WEST LT2~E OF THF NORTH~ASx
4UARTEE2 OF TH~ NORTFiFAST QUAR:C~1: OF SECTION 17, :C04VNSHIP
4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN TI3E R1~NCH0 SNA JUAN CAJ'ON DE
SANTA ANA, IN TH~ CITY OF 1~iAHEIM; COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATL Of C?~T~II'ORNIA, AS PER M~P R~CORuED IN BaOK 51,
PAGE 10, OF MISC~LLANEOUS MAPS, R.F,FCORiS OF SAID ORANGi.
COLINTY, 425 F~ET SOUTH OF THI: 110RTHWEST CORI~ER OF SA:[D
NORTHEAST QUTsR'SEfi OF THE NO~tTIi~AST QUARTER, RUNN?I3G
THENCE SOUTH ON SAID WL~T LINE 2G8 FEET; THENCE EAST
PARALI~FL WITH ?'HE NORTH L]:N~ OF SATD tiORTHEAST QUAR^tER
OF TiIE NORTHEAST QUARTEF. 315 F~ET: '.I'FiENCE NORTH PARALL,FL
WITH THE WEST L:CNE OF SIeID NORTFiEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTEk 2~.2.50 E'EET: THENCE SOUTH PaRAL~LEL
WITH TI?~ WEST LIidE OF THE NORTHEAST QUAFTER OF THE
NORTHEA5T QUARTER 425 I'EET: TFir,NCE SOUT?I 102.50 FEET TO
'rHE POTNT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THFREFROhi THE NORTF•! fi6 FEET TF3EREOF.
WfiEREA5, L-YiP City Flanning Commis,ian did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Canter in tne City of Anahoim on July 10, 1988 at 1:30 p.m.,
notica of said ~ublic hearing Y~avi.ng boen du1~ given as required by 'law and in
accordanre with the provisions of lhe Anaheirn Municipal Code Chapt-er 18.03, to
hear ancl consider evidence Eor ai~d againsL said proposec~ reclassificatian and
to invesL-igata and make findings and recommentlati.cns in connection th~rewikh;
and
WHEREAS, saia Commissiati, af~c~r duo inspection, investigat.ion
and study m~de by itself ana in its behalf, and after du~ ~onsideration of all
evidence and reports oftered at said hearing, does find and determ.ine the
follo~rinq facts:
'' 't~C~ ,r~.'~~',.?.;
rhrR.
{r!
~ ~ :~
s::~i
{;;
I ~~,
,,,
r ~~.
~
b
7.
,I
t
.}
r,'~
r.
,~
;';
1. That L•he petitioner proposes reclassification of subjQCt
property from CL (Commercial, Lim:i,tetl? 7.one to the RM-1200 (Resid~ntial,
ZRUltiple-Famil~) Zone.
0391r
PC88-187
~c ~
!;;
~
;`i
.~
~y
j~!;'.
;Sq
!
,
:~a
~~~
7~T{
4!1
.~ "~ ~.~~~,~~~~~~
' ~ ~: ~: ~~ .~
~. i~ ~ M~~:.i-•tC:i1 ~M IW
~
~1
lo~/
2. That tha Anaheim Goneral Plan designate~ subject property
Eor r,~neral Commsrcial land usos and thaL G~neral Plan AmendmenL- No, 245 is
currently pending to redPSignate ~he lancl usa to M9dium or ~,ow Medaum Density
Residential.
~
3. That; th~ propossd reclas~iiiaation of subject proporty is
necessary an~/or desirable for the ordorly aiid proper cievelopment of the
community.
9. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally Qstablish.ed i.n
close pruximity i:o subject proporty and to tYie zones and thQZ: permzttQd uses
generally estahliahed throughout the community.
5. That the pro}~osed reclassification oE subject property
re~uires thQ improvemen~ of abutting streets in accordance with the
Circulation ~lemenL• of tY,e General Plan, dua to t~ie a~ticipated increase in
tr.affic which ~~ri11 be gene:ated by the intensitication oE land use.
6. That two (2) persons inclicated their presence at saic]
public hoaring in opposition; and th~t no c~rresponclen~e was recaivec~ in
op~~ositian to subjec~ peL•iCion.
A~ LIFQRNTA FNV'IRONh1EPtTAL OUALTTY. A( T FINUING: That the Ane`~eim
City Planning C~mmissiori has rsviewed tho proposal ta amend the Land Use
Element o£ the Anaheim Gerieral Plan to redesignate subject property Erom the
existing Gen~ral Comme~cial design~tion to the Medium Density Residential or
*,ow ,~Sedium DPnsity Residexitial 13nd use clesignation and to reclassify subject
property Fr~m the CL (Commercial, Limitedj Zune to the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple Family) Zone L•o construct a 3-s~ory, 106-unit apartment aamplex with
waiver of maximum s~ructural height ei: an irregularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approxima_tely 4 acres, having a frontaye af anproxima.*_el~ 213
Eeet on the sauth s.ic.e of Lincoln Avenue, being locatec3 approximately 1,030
£eet we~t of hhe centerline cf Euclid Street anQ i•urther described as 1780
WPst Lincoln Avenue; and doa~ hc~reby approve the Nogative L~oclarati~n upon
Finding that it has considored the Negative Declaral:iuYi together with any
comments received durir.g the ~ublic reviaw process and further fi.nainq on the
baszs of the initial srudy and any comments received that there is no
substantial evidence that the proj~ct wi11 have a significani: effect on the
envi.ronment.
NOj9, TFiLREFORE, E~; IT RESOT.~VEU that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission doP? heraby gran~ subject Petitzon ior Reclassificati~n and, by s~
doing, that I'itle 18-Zoning oi• the Anahe~m M~:nic.ipal Cocie be amended to
excluda ~he above-r~QSCribed property from the CI~ (Cornmercial, l~imited) 7.one
and Lo incorpcrate saici dHSCribed property into tlie Rt~t-1?.00 (Resicien+-~.al,
Multiple-Family) Zone upan the following cunditions which are hereby £ound to
be a necQSSary prerequisite to thE ~roposQd use of subject property in order
to p.resarve the sat•e~y ar.d gene.ral welfare of the Ci~izens of the City of
Anah~im:
`~- PC88-187
'i.
~
~.;. ~
~;,;~
:,;:;~~
~
,:~ .
..,I 1 r '.~.,.i~i~]7~~rY,
1. T2iat street lightinq facilities a.lonq Lincoln Av~nue and Embassy Avenue
shall be installed as requireci by the Utilztias General Manager in
accordanr.e wi~h spec.~.fications on file izi the C~Eficc~ o£ UtiliriEs
General Manager; or that security :.n the form of a bond, certi£icate of.
deposit. :letter of credi.t, or cash, .in an amount and form sati~•Pactory
to the City oL• Anaheim, sha11 be postecl with ~.he City to guarantee the
satisfactory compl~tion of the above--m~uti.oned improvQments. Said
security sha11 be posted with the City of Anaheim priur to the
introduci:io•ri of an ordinance rezaning subject property. Z'he
above-require~d imrrovements shall be installed prior to occupaney.
r
~ -,
r+'';
:;~,::
~;,r i
~~ i
~::,
~t~,i
~'+ r".
~~ i. y
i~'/
[''~
S'1ip
2. That the vehicular. ~.ccess righL-s to Embassy Avenue an3 Hiawa~h~ Avenue
shaJ.l be dedicated to th~ City oL• Anaheim.
3. That prior to introducti.on of ari ordinance rezoning subject property,
the legal property owner shall prepare and record an unsuborda.nafied
covenant limiti.r.g occupancy of ~ach apartment unit to no moxe than two
(2) per.sons ~other than children under th~ age of two (2) years) per
bedroom. ~ai3 J.imiL-ation shall be inclu~ed i.n sach lease/rental
agreement. A copy of the covenant sha11 be submittec? to and approved
by the Ci.t~ Attorney prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded
covenant shall be f.urnist~ea to L•he Zoni:zg Divi;,ion.
!1. ThaY. a covanant shall be recorded agreeing to provide the renter o£
each dwe'! ling unit with wri.t;ten ini:ormation obtainec3 from the School
bistrict(s) pertaining to possible overcrowcied c:ondit?ons and bixsing
statu~ of the schooi(s) serviug the dorel~ing unit.
5. That the owner of subject prupertx sri~11 sub-nit a letter requesting
ter~m~.nation of Vari.ance No. 1729, 3720 and 3'12.1 ~snd CondiY,zonal U'se
Permit No. 289, 326 and 862 to thu 7oning Division.
6. That prior tu the introduction o~ an ordinance rezoriing subject
property, Condition Nus. 1, 2, 3, h and 5, above -mentioned, shall be
cor~pleted. ThQ provisi~ns or rights granted by this resolution shall
became n~,zl1 axid void by action of the Planning C:ommission unless saS.d
conditions are com~lied ~rit:h wittzin one year frorti the date of this
r~solutian, or such lurthF~r time as the Planriing Commission may gr~nt.
7. That appr.oval ot this applicatian constitutes apprnval ol the proposed
requ~sti onl~~ to the exl:ent that it com~lies with the Anah~~im Munica~,a1
Zoriing~ Code and ar~y o~her applicable City regulations. Appruval doe~
not inclu3e any actiori or findings as to compliance or approval oi the
request regarding any other ~pplicablc: ordinance, regulation ur
requirem~nt.
aF. I~ FURTFiER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City PZanning Commission
cloes heroby find and determino t.hat adoption uf this Resclution is ea~pressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and al1 of the c~nditions
hereinabove set forth. Shou.ld any sueh c~~ncii.tic>ns, or any part thereoL•, be
cleclarod invalid or unonforceab.le by tlie firia.l judgment oi• any cuurt of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, anci any approvaJ.s hercin
contained, sha7.1 .be deemed nul.l and void.
-3 --
PCSE-1$7
~a:
~!~!
°~,
~
~ l~~i`~r+'v~1~~j . ;' d 4k1
, ; a, xa,
1 ~ ,~
,r, ~.{~,
~r , ,,
~
~~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOtv' is signed and a~proveu by me this 1$th day ~c,.
of July. 1988. : ''"~
•~ I ~ ,
~' ~~..,C-~.~~
,-~~~~ ~ ~t
CHAIRMAN, ANA~I•IEIM CITX PLANNI:NG COMMISSION ,R:
~. _,
ATTEST: ~ ,
~
..~'~1,, .~ .!.C~,,~_!1_~"'r~c -
SECRETARY, A,4'AHEIM CITY PL,A NING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, ~dzth L. Ha•rris, Secretarv of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certiiy that l•he fure~oing resalu~ion was passed and
ado~ted at a meetinq of ~he Anaheim City Planning Commission held on
Ju].y 1.8, 1988, 1~y the tollowing vote of the mernbers thereoi:
AY~S: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, 130YDST.UN, CARUSILLO, E'ELDHAUS, HERBST,
MC BiJRNEY, MESSE
NO~S: COMhIISSION~RSs NONE
ABSENT: COM?~4zS5I01`T~RS: NOIJF
IN WITNESS WHEREO~', T have hereunta set my hand ~his 18th day of :;;~
].985. !
July,
~-- G~ ~ ~v~ ~/ - ,
,.~ u~~, ~^( '" v _
SECRETAR~, ANAFiETM CITY. PLANNIN CG ON4dISSION `
r;,:
'.:.~•F :
`~fa
i ,.~
„tj
~~i
PC88-187 } '~~sY
'4~ ~rr4.''
,t ^'
r~~.
; ''.
~. . •~, . ~.~..~.... ..:.,...~.- ~~~...: ~ ' _. __ '-____~_'_ ..,. .~.,. ,..:.~.,.;.~..n,.~...l..r~l. r,.r....»•S~n.~~..R.r.;rY~r.s,.1.v..r~~nJ4iC~.et;.~~,~.}n~~~~