PC 88-189;~H.e.qnv4.Yl~zwlCt ~. . ~} .. , , . , . .....,. .. .., .. . . ~ . ~ . .
`r r ~~~
RE~^OL~TTQN NO,L '~'C~$~1~.
, ;C c w;< Pi ~
~ ; ~~:;i
~
A R~SULUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CI~'X PLANNTNG COMMISSIOI'f
THA'T PE:I'ITIDN FUR VARIANCE N0. 3818 BE GRANTED
WHEREA^a~ the Anaheim Citl Planning Comm3ssi.oii aid receive a
veriEie3 Petition for Vari~ncA Lx•om MYUNG SIitK YUi7 OK YUN, ek. ~1, 727 S. Beac2+
Fioulevard, Anaheim, CA 92a04, ovmers, of certiain real pro~~rty s3tuatQd in th~
C~.ty aF Anaheim, County oE brange, State of Calif.ornia described as:
PARCEL A:
YarcE:1 1 in the c:ity of Anc~heim, as pex map recorded
xn Book 225, P~gas 20 thru 22 ot P~rcel tdaps, in tho
office oi" the Caunr~y r~ccrder oi Oranqe County~,
Californ.ia.
WHFREAS, the City Planning Commission di.d hold a pv.blic hearing
~~ the Civic Center in tixQ City of Anaheim on July 18, 19E8, at 1:3U p.m.,
notice of said public hoa~ing having been duly g.iven as required by law and in
accoxdance witYi the provisions of the l~naheim Municipal Code, Chaptier 18.03,
to hear a•nd consider eviclence :[or anQ against said proposed variance and to
investigate anci make findiiigs and re~comrnendations in cunnec~ion therewith; and
hHERLAS, said Genunission, aEter duo inspection, investig~tio~.t
and study made by itisel[ and in its behal~, ancl atter due consideratian of 311
evidence and reports oEPernd at said hearir.g, ddes i•ind and determine th~
following Facts:
1. That I:Y.e poCiCioner proposea waivors uf the following to
~ermit two (2) wal~ siqns for a moL•e7.:
( A ) ~.~~9N 5 _~~s25_.4~ 1._.4_?4. -
~.~4,QGZ.
a:-cz ~,Q~ ~~? _0`~4
(B) $ECT~N~~a~.`~s~~.0`~? -
], $ . 4 ~-_~4?
and 1~._._fs4,~ (~.~_?.~QaQ
Maximum n~_bQr_~_.w~l~q~~~
(1 perneitted; ~ propose~l)
~rm~ rr_e li~hs,ina ~f si n.
(Signs n2~ parmitrod ta be
ligh~ea botwaen hlidnight and
6:30 a.m.; ~~rn~~ liqhting
niopo3Pd~
2. That the abave-mQntioned wa•iver~ arQ hpreby ~ranted on the
bas.is that rhere are special circumstances applicable to tho property such as
size, sliape, topography, loc:ation 3nc3 surroundings which do not apply tio othe~
i.dentically foned prop~rty in thA same vicinity: and that str~r.t application
o£ the Zoning Code doprives the propert! of privi].eges enjo~ed by other
propertiQS in the idQnl:ic~l zone and clas;ific~-tion in the vicinity.
~C8S-1t39
0393r
.~~1
r ,,
r; i
'~'~4~
i:~'
.. .. . ~ ~ ~ ~f
~~t a .~.~' ~~
~~ .:..~, ~ ~,;,. ~ _......... _ . .... ^i~
~lGu~.W:...rn ,-.,.. .. . . . . . . . .... . .....~... ,..~...1~ ~.t<'~......! iS~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ., . , _. ~ ~ ~~~~
~~.'i /~' ~t.l?~t l
•'"~~
~
, ~ }~:..I,.A ~ $ y~~~ +~N'~
. i ; 1~ ":' ~+.~..i
3. That there arQ exceptional or extraordinary circwnstanres
or conditions app'lic~ble to the ~roperty involvecl or to the inten~led use of
tk~e pro~erty that do nor apply generally to the property or class of use in
the same vicinity ana zc~ne.
4. 'Ph~t th~ requesL-od variance is necessary for the
preservation ana enjoymenL• ot a ~ubst~ntial property right possessed by other
property in ~he same vicinity and zone, and denied to the propert,y in question.
5. That the requc~sted variance w5.11 not be materially
detrimenCal to the public wel~aro or injurious to tlle proporty or imprqvRm~nts
in such vicinity arid zone iii which L•he proper~,y is locaCed.
6. That no one indicate~ tYleix~ ~~rc~sence at sai~ publir. hearix~g
in opposition; and that no corresponclence was raceivad in opp~sition to
subject pe}ition.
(:ALIP'ORNIA ENVTR NMENTAL QUALITY ACT_ EIDTDIN : That L•he Planning
Director or his authorzzed rQpresentati.ve has d~termined that the pronosed
projeat Ealls withi.n th~ definiCion of Categorical Ex«~mptions, Class 11, as
defined 3.n the ~tate Environmental Impact Report Gui.delines and is,
theref.are, cateqorically Qxempt From the rQquiremen~ L-o ~repaze an ~IR.
N~W, THERF.rORr, IIE IT RESOLV~D that i:he Ai~aheim City Planning
Commission does hereb~ granL• subject Petition for Variance, upan the
f:ollowing conditioris which are hereby found to be a n~cessary prarequisite to
the propossd u~e af the subjecL• proPerty in order to preserve the safsty anc~
qer~eral wslfare af the Citizens o~ the City of• Anaheim:
i. That suLjacr ~roperty sha1.I be developed substantially in accocdance
with plans ~r.d specifications on til~ with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit N~s. 1 through 4.
2. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition No. l,
above-mentionod, shall bQ complie~l wiL-h.
3. That appxoval of thie application constitutes ~pp~ov~l of the proposod
requesti on].y to th~ extenL- that it com.plies wit2- ~he Anaheim Municzpal
?onir,g Codo and any other applicable City regu~ations. Approval does
nol: include any action or findings as to compliance or appraval of tho
request regardinc~ any ottior app'licabla or.dinance, regulation or
requirement.
BE 1"i FURTHGR RESULVEU that the Anaheim City Planning C~mmission
does hereby f.ind an3 detern~ine that ac]opCi~n of this Resoluti~n is expros~ly
predicatea upon applicarit's compliance with each and all o~ the conditions
hereinabeve sot forkh. Shauld any sucIi conditions, or any part thereof, be
. . _ .._..,-,I
'1
_2_ PC88-189
~
; ~,
~J '
, G: ,
_ , _ , ,._ _ .. , . ,, .. . , . _. ,..,. . _ , , .. .. . . ... ., x. ~..,..~~
• ,iYPMY.,a ;:n.'.'Nt/9ti~iv.r'.r:~;'q~j`udAR,A.,'m~w~,: ~, ,,..y,.r~i:,~.t~1r'~~~'~°;~S~~~H'.~~Wit~~{:H~~~+1p~:+;t"r, Slryt~E~.~V~.. !~:~=.t'.P?4 .~~,.J.,~!i'~r 'aµ"rr, n t.i~;.;rrrie ~i ~
. _ ... , . . . . . . r., . . it•.t~ti.'JxAr:Wwk•y~WD~IVLqli,tlG+~r4YrPY~!M4 ~ ~
. . . ' ~ . . .. . . ! a~.l ~- ~~ .~
. . . . . ~ . . :~ f ,~, il
. . f}.r.,~^ . . .. . , { :! i
r~}
.. . . . ~ ~ . .~ . -. . .~,',
declarecl invalid or unenforco~ble by the Einal ju3gment uf any court of ,II
cnmpetent jurisdictian, then thS.s R~soluCion, and r~ny apprc~va].s herQin
cuntained, shall be deemed nu1:L and voi.d.. ;~ ~~
,~ ~
THE FOREGQING RE50LUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th day ~,I
o~ July. 19a8. ,t.
----~- '-~--~=~~ C~ ~.,~_.r_.Q.,,.- ~
~ < ~:'_)
CFIAIRtQAN, AI~AiiETM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON ';;?
~ ~~r.
ATTEST: ~ ~ .~ ~ ~;~
J~ ,.-~ ~~--J - U
`f~ i~,~~(...~`.~ ~ ----- :~~,
~--- _ •a~, ~:. .~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM ~ITY P ANNIt1G COMMISSION '~.;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNT`~l OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AfIAHE7M )
I, Edith L. Fiarris, SecreL•arl ot the Anahcim City P~.snning Commissinn,
clo hereby certify that the ~oregoing resolut•ion. was passed and adoptPd at a
meeting of the Anaheim Czty Planning Comrnission held on July 18, 1988, by the
foll~wing vote of the members thereof:
AXES: COM2/.ISSIONERS: BOliAS, IIOYDSTU~I, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, H~RBST,
MC BUKNEY, MESSF
NOF.S: COMMIaSIONERS: NONE
ABS~NT: COMMISSIONEI2G: NONE
TN WITNESS WHEkGOF, I have hereuntn set my hancl tYiis 18th day of.
3'uly, 1988.
. ' ' ~J .~ /
_ ~~., ci• c ..~{~, L~(~., ~
SECRETARY, ANA:dEIM CITY PLANNING CC1h41ISSI0N
;
;.
~Yi,,'' . . .
~ `/~~ ' . , ~ - _ .
~~~
Y •..r
~;..,, ,
~'"'~~ '
~ ~ ~~} ~~ r r'~i~""~4~~ ~.e~~~} ~
. . !da'.V tl , ./7~~1K. / \... ~ r +_
-3•
iS
PC8s3-1$9 ,~n~~
r;'t
' r~J
' ~ . ! 1.~~'~V
il 1(S ~~
~ , . . .. ., . ... .?..i1rMr