PC 88-19N . ... ... ...
1~l' . . . _ .... :. . ..~,,.~ .... : ......:. ,..,..,., „~..;;~ a+~s+N~
w~ . . . '~ ~ . . ... _. .. . .. . ~ .. . ~~~
~i . . ~ rll~~~f{!i
,i~ e ' '~,"n"h; .'.,~,'
`, i,
:I
i , ; `~
;A?
i
.i:;
IjF,S T.,UTI~N NO PC8E3-1~
A RFSOLUTIUN OF TH~ ANAHEIM CIT'Y PLALdNIidG COb4•lISSION
THAT PI;TI'.CION FOR CONDITIONAL i1SF PEftD1IT N0. 2975 BE DENIED
WHE~2EA~, the Anaheim CS.ty Planning Commission did receive a
:ii verifiea Petztion for Conditional Use Permit from PHILIPE DELG.ADO, ET. A*,.,
., '12 E. Ball Road, AY~aheim, CA 92806, c/o ROBERT S. SKY,AR, owner and FIsRANO
AND KIEVIET, 100 S. Anaheim, Blvd., Suite 7.40, ,Analaeim, CA 92805, Attn: '
KARIN L. WATT6, ac~ent for certazn real. prt~perty situate~ in the City of
Rnaheim, County of Or~nge, State of' California, descrxbo~l as:
' CQ~IIrIE*1CING AT A POINT IN THE NG'RTH LTNB :1C` TH'r',
~ NORTHWES:. QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUART.ER OF T.HE
' NORTHWEST QiJAFTER OF' SECTTON 23, T~WNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
' RANGE J.0 WEST, S.S.B.&M., WHICH POINT IS 359.40 FEET
EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER 0~' THE NORTHWEST QU~1R'"ER
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THF NORxfiWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION ~3, RU,INING T..EiENCE EASTERLY ALOZTG THE
` NORTH LINF UF SAID SECTION TQ THE POINT WHERR SAID
~ NORTH LTNE :IS INTEfiSECT&n 3Y THE WESTERLY gOG'NDARY
LINE UF THE RT.GHT OF WAY OF THE CALIFORh'TA CENTRAL
RAILWAY C0. , AS SHOWN D'1 A MAP OF SA7D RIGHT OF WAY
; RECURDED I'r7 BO~K 34, PAGE 34, ET SEQ., p~
MISCELLANEOUS R~CORDS OF :,OS ANGELr5 COUtITY,
CALTFORNIA; RTJNNING THENCF SOUT~iERLY ALONG SAIB
' WESTERLY BOUNPAkY LINE OF SAIQ RIGHT. OF WAY TO TEIE
' POINT WHERE THE S,AM~ INTEKSCCTS THE SOUTH L]:N~ OF TFIE
NURTIi I3ALI' OF TY.~ NORTFIEAST QUAR:CER OF THE LlORTHWF.ST
~ QTJA~TER OF S7~ID SECTIQH 23; TH~23CE WESTERLY. ALONG
SAZD SO'UTH LINE TO A POiNT '+HEREIN, WFiICH I5 359.40
I'EBT EAST OF THE SOUTFIWEST ~,ORNBR OL' THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF' TEIE NORTHCAST QUAR'xER OF THE IVORTiiWEST
QIIART~;R AF SAID SECT.:CON 23; THES7CF, NORTHERI,Y PARALL~L
WITH ~HE WEST LINE OF THE *IORTHEAST QUAR"lER UF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTi;R OE' SAID SECTIqt1 23 TO THE POT11Z' OF
BEGINNI~IG .
~~! WH~KEAS, the C,it,}• Fl~xnning Commission did hold a gublic hearing
at th,e Civic Center iz~ tlie Gzty of Analieim on January 4, 19t38 a.t 1: 30 p.m. ,
natice of. s~id publzc hoariny having been duly given as required by law ancl in
accor.dance with t.he provisions of tlie Anaheim Municipal Code, Cha~tex 18.03,
f to hear and consider 1.vidence for and against said propqsed condil•.iona~ use
, permit anci to invest ~ i~-~~~ and make Eindings ancl recommen6at?.ons in connecri~n
the:ewith; ~nd
~ Wf~~REf'~3, said Commission, after dv.e ins~ection, investigatfun
r! an3 study made by itself and in i~s baYialf, ancl after due consideration of• all
evic~enee and rsports aFfereci at said hearing, does find anci dsterm.ine the
follawing facts:
0168r PC88'~9
,.....,
;;
~
_ ;•y
~
. r~,7.i
V~~ , . .. .... . . . . . .. . ... -- - ~ , 'T±":i''1'1+.
fM.
, . ~ ` ~~ l~, . .
1' -., ~
1. ThaL the proposed use is properly one for. whic.h a
conditional use permit; is authorized by Anaheim Munici~al Code Sections
18.03.030.010 or 18.6J..050.14~ l;o wit; ro retain a l.iquidation sales ~utlet
with waiver of ~he following:
~~ ,? SECTIONS 7.8 06 0 0212
, , -~2__~ - ~tinimum nixmber of ark'na snaces~
18.06.050,0'L2, t34~ required; 127 existing).
r~~ AND 18.06 050.p31
2. That the proposed waiver is r~rEuy danied on the basis that
thera are no special circumstances applicable to ~he property such as size,
shape, topography, location ana surroiindings which d~ not appl~ to other
,~
' identically~ zoned property in ~he same vicinity; and that s~rict applicatiion
; of the Zoning Code does not: deprivQ the property of privil~tges enjoye~ by
;.y other propertie~, in khe idenL-ical zone ar~d classifacation ixi the vicinity and
subje~t to Tnteriiepartmental ~ommittee recommendations.
;~ 3. That. the proposed u,a wi11 adversely affect the a~ljoi.ning land
4.
uses and the growth and dev~lopment ot rhe ~r~ia in which iC is propc~sed ta be
4~ locatecl.
`;:
,r 4. That k:he
adequate to a11ow the size and ~hape o£ tlie site proposed for the use is
fu12 devel~
rr
ent
f
h not
},
ueL-rimeni:~1 to t,h~ p p
,
o
t
e proposed use iri a manner
articular a not
rea nor ~Q the peace, hea1L•h, safot~r
general welf.are of the Citizens of
th
Ci and
.
e
ty of Anahe3.m.
t~:
'~ 5• ?'hat ~he qranting o£ tlae Corid.itional Use Permit under
con~itions imposecl
3
E tYie
' ,
.
and general wc~lfare o.f any, wi].1 b~ det~imental t;o the peace, health, safety
the Citizen
f
,:,~ s o
the City of Anaheim.
i;l
, 6. ThaC ttie
undue burden upan thQ traffzc gen~rated by th~ proposed use will impose
streets and highwa
s d
i an
traffic in the ac•Q~.. y
es
gned an~ improved to c~rry ~hQ
~.
~: 7. That no one indica~ed their presencP at saia public hearing
opposiCion; and tha~ xr~
1 r,
subject pQtition. no .;orrespondence was recei.ved in opposition to the
ALIF Rl7I~ ENVZRONMEIvTAL QUALITv A~~' HINDIt~: ThAt tho Anaheim
City Planni.n.g Conunission has reviawed the progosal to retain a lzquidation
- sales outlet wiCh waiver of minimum number of parking spaces on a
~ rectangularl~•-•shape3 parcel of Yan.~ consisting nf z~proximately 5.06 zcros
'; having a fronta7e of approximately 270 feet on the south side of Ball Road
~; having a maximum dephh of appra:~imatoly G00 Eeet and baing located
~~ approxinately 680 feet west of the centerline oP Lewis Stre~t and further
~.i dsscribed as 712 E. Ball Road; and does horQby ~pprove the Negat:tve
~i Daclaration upon Pinding that it has considered the Negative B~claratioa
;~ togeLher with any comments recei.ved durin the ~
g public revie~r proness and
4! further £inding on the basis of the initial studv c~nd any comments received
'~ that ther~ is no substantial evidence that th~ project will have a
~ signif.icant effect on the environment.
~ 0168r ^2^
x PCS$-Z9
~`?~
~1~J.~
r ~~:
~:~
` `:; ~~r
'; tii
' . ;'.i
,,~
~, ;;,;
,,Y
y'
~ kj,
~ti
`;~
.,,~
'~`~
~:
;:;i
,;
~
;<r,;
,,.;~
,
',
~~
blutir
:',:
i~:~-
T
~,r r
~
3r~,~
~,~,
~r
~/, ` `:~'. ? ~ ,
`~ ~`'---~--..-.L~~'~-~:t.,
SECItETARY, ANAH~IM CITY P.L,'~,N~ING COt~STS5I0N
" "~'?~.1
. ,. ,
.~~,
, ,~
;~ ,~~
;,,,
k'`'~(t
1
(
' M
; r`za
~ j~yd
NOW, THEREI'pRE, a~ IT RESOLVED that ~tie Anahoim City Planniny ,~~
Commission r3oes her~by deny su.bject Petition £or Conditiox~al ilse Pexmit, on 1
the basis nf the aforementianed f.indings. ,
~.;~f
;:~ ~,
THE FOkEGOIN(; RESOLUTION 9.s ~igned and approvUd by me this 4~h ~
day of January, 19Rg, s
/ ~ >~
e.~ ~~ ~.~
~-~ ,a~
CHAIRMAN, ,~NI~HETM CT;'Y LAItNING CODIIrSISSION
i~
.~TtES1': '~;i
~~ _ ;' i~
^ ',, , .~s
STATE OF CAL.L!'ORN'IA )
C4UNTX' OF OR?~.NGE ) ss.
CITt OE' A,NAHEIM )
..,
.=~
:; i
~
~
IN WITNESS WHERF.OF, I have hereunto ser my hand this ~~h day of .•,,~
January, 1y88.
...~ _~ ~ ~ `~
_~~ ~
~~CRETARY, ANAF~EIM C Ty p.[,ANNING COMMISSIpt7
:i
~Y~S% COMMISSIQNERS: CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, I3ER$ST, MC BU.HNEY, t~fE~gE
NQES: COMMISSJONE22g; BOUAS, BOYDSTIJN
AF3SENT; COhII~tISSZONE22S: P70NG
I. Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Cit:
.y Planning
Cnmmissi~n, do herQL~y certify that the :Coregoing resolution was asser.l
adopted at a;npetixig of the ~,naheim City Plaran.in Commi~• p ~n~
'~~ 198a• by L•he following vota of the memb~rs the ~ot; asion held on ,7anuary
: ;w
; ,,',
:~j'
,i
~ '~~I ~,,
':>
~~ ,
~
~
~~
~~'~5
. ~',i~.{,.
i! i
~~ %~
-3 - 1?Ca8-19 ~,~~
,~,,
,~,~,
_ . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~~~. 6.Yi
- ~ • , . . . . .. . . ... .. .: i..r, r;..~,t-i$i~