PC 88-192t~ , ~ .:. ,. .; ~. .
~
~
. . . . . . . 1 1 .
~
~~~~~N N ..~._P~$.$ •_~ 2?
A RESOLUTION QF T(iG ANAFIErM CITX PLATTNING COMMISSION
THAT PETI'.~ION P'OR CONDITIONAL i,JSE pERMIT N0. 3036 }3E GRANTED
WHER~AS,. the Anahaim City Planning Gommissa.on did receive a verifiad
Petition .for C~nditional Use Permi~ ~rom 'JCC.Ib~NTAL BUSINESS CENTEF. TT, 30390
Pullman Street, Costa M~asa, CA 92626, owner a.nd KRIaTINA ROBERTS, ;02 E. ~iall
Road, Suite 100, Anaheim, CA 92~05, ag~iit far certain real property situated
in the fity of Anaheim, County of Orange, StatQ of Ca:Liforni.a, described as:
PARCEL 2, AS SIiOWN ON A MAP F7L~D IN BOC1K 20$, PAGES
26 AND 27 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN TFi~ OFE'IC~ TFIE COUNTX
RECORDER CE OR,A,PIGE COUNTY, CALrFORNIA.
~F.; ~, ~- . ...
~+:~i.:._- '~.~,.. .., ~
i ~ ':.. ~ , ~ ' _
.~. r
WHEREA~, the Ciry Planning Commission did ho~d a public 'hearing at
the Ci~vic Center in tlie City of Anahaim on Ju1y 16, 1~88 at 1:30 p,m., notice
of saia publi.c hearing haviny heen duly gi.ven as required by luw and iu
a~cordance with the provisions of the Anaheim yiunicipal Code, ~h;~pter 18.03,
~o hear and considQr eviden.ce for and against saicl proposed condit_'.onal use
permit ;i:~d *o inve; tigate and make f.indings and rer,ommend~t.ions in connection
thereaith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, af•ter due inspection, invesLigation and
study matle by itsolF and in its L~ehalf, and after due con.sideration of all
eviclence anci report~ o£~er.ed ac sa.id heariixr, d~e, finci arid determine Ehe
following far.ts:
1. That thQ propost~d use is properly one tor which a conditional
uso permit is authorized b~~ Anaheim Municipa7. Code 5ection 18.61.050.39~ to
wit: permit a restaurar,t in an existing industrial park.
2. That thc~ propnsed use ~~rill not adversely aEf~ct the adjoining
land uses and the growth and ~eve~.opm~:nt oE the area. in which it is proposed
ta be lccated.
3. '.~l~at the siz~ and stia~e oE the si.te proposed for ~lie use is
adeq~:ate to a11ow the Eull development ot the proposQCl Ll3@ in a manx~er not
detrimen~al to the parCicular area nox t~ the peace, heal.th, ~aFatl and
general welfare nf the Citizens of the City oi Anaheim.
4. Th~L- kne granting oF thA Conditional tJse Permit under thA
conditi~ns i.mposed, if any, will not b~ detrimentai to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Gitizens c~f tho ;ity of AnahQim.
5. That th~ traffic qc.noraCad by the proposed use wi11 not impase
an ur..~lue burden upon tho sL•reeCs and higtiways desiyned an3 improveu ~o carry
the kraffic in the arQti.
0396r Pr88~•192
lr-
. . . :'1~:;~t
.~i
;~
~
`: ;
„~
;;
r
~ +~:
`'',j
I•;
~ ir
i
,';;
,:<
;r
~~
,~; ~~
6. Ttiat no one inclicated tYieir preaence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no cerrespondoncQ was r~ceived in oppositian Co the
subject p~tition.
cr,z,I~~2NIA ENVI _ NhiENTAL .,~iJALITY ~~,T FI~~DIN~C,: That the Anaheim
City Pl~nning Commissi~n has reviewed tiha proposal, t~ permit a restaurant in
an existing i:~dusL-ria.l park ozi an irregularly-sh~pec~ parcel af land
consistiny o~ t~pproximatel1 6.~~ acres, having a£routago of appruximately
335 f~et on the north side o~: Ball Road, being located approsi~natcly 700 feet
we~t of the centerl.in~ of Lewis Street ancl L"urther ddscribed as 721 Eas~ Ball
itoad; and does herc~by approve the Negative Declaration upon findix~g that i~
has considerod thc~ Negativ~ Declaratian together with any cammonLs rec~ive~
during the public re:~iew process and further finding on the basi.s of the
initial study an9 an.y cammonts rPCeived that Ch~ro is no substantial eviCt~nce
that the project w:~l]. have a:,ignificant eiL-ect on L-he envzronment.
•.~ NOW, TFiEREFOFtt', BE IT R~SOiVED that the Anaheim City Planning
~'~ Commission does hAreby granf •~ubject Pet;.ition far Conditior~al Use Permit,
+x upon the followa.r_g conditio::.. which ara heret~y f~und to be a nece5sary
'; grerequisite to the proposed use of the subject prpperty in ordPr to preserve
~ the safety and g~neral w~lPare ~F thc Citizens oE the C,iL-y of Anaheim:
,~
} Y. T2iat prior to issuanco uf a builcling pern~it, a traffic signal
~~ ~ssessment fee oqualing the difference between tkie industri.al anid
commercial ass~ssment fees sha11 be paid to the Cii:y af Anaheim in an
amouni: as detQrmined by ~ity Cnuncil r~soluL•ion.
2. 'rhat trash storage areas s!,311 be provided and mai.ntaine~ in n locatian
acceptable to tho SCreet MaintenancQ and Sanil-a~i~n Division and in
~. ~ accord3nce with approved p].ans on t'ile with sa3.d Division. In addikion
; to the exi.sting ~n-site trash sL•or•age are;i, a separata new ~rash
~ storage sroa s:iai~ bc constructed fox• the proposecl restaurant.
; ,,
3. That all air condi~ioning £acilities ancl other roo~ and grc,und mount~ed
equipcnent shall ue properly shielded ~rom view.
4. 'ihat the proposal stial7 comply with alJ. signing r~qui.rements ~F the ML
(Inclustrial, Lin!i~ed) Zor.Q, unl~ss a vaz•ianc;e allowing sigri waivers is
~pproved by the City Council, Planning Commissiuii or 2oning
Aclministrator.
5. Tndt nu beez and wine or alcol~olic beverages af any kind shall be solii
~r consumed on the pr.emises v.nlesr a condi~ional use ~ermit is spproved
by the City Counc.il, Ylanning Com.mi; sion or Zoninc~ l,~iministrator.
o. That CY~c~ on-si.Le landscaping shall be nai~tained i.n compliance with
City st2~ndnrds .
7. Thar subject p.r.operty sha).:1 1~Q develope8 substant.ial'ly in accorc3~nce
with plans and ,~p~ciiications an file with the City of AnahQin~ marked
Exhib~.t Nos. 1 thraugh 3. -
-2- PC~38-1y2
i~;:. . . .
`"` r°'~~''+'h~dldt3Y14
s ~~~.,
_ r:,l'.°M
~ ~,~,~~:
.,;~y
,,
,:
:
i~
s~~,Y,..l:,;^,.!nc'tftyttfr.r7~rlir~r~~.~~ r i -~ r t~ :/~~r
. ~ . r ~ ... ~..~F?A.~,.;! ~'~t~~j!f+al i ~\~~~~t.t5{N~'lJfr~.<~t ~w ":~t^ ~ H ::.y,w~k~ ~l l ;P~i~ 2a i
.'~, _ .,1 , . . . . ~yi.; F ~\rPP•.i a ~r - _~tr~rz+'~.~~' ;k`~C y}~~r •
y}~
. , ` ;~1 Y ~i~a'!.f. ~`
~Sr,4 ~
M~~, f~
I~~~~' ~ . ~ -"''
, ~~~ ;i i
,: ~ ~~
;~'a
';i
i;j
S. Thai: prior ~o commoncsment o£ the activity authorizeci by this ,y
resolution, o~ prior to issuar.ce o£ a bui].ding permi~, or within rx
period o~F one year i'rom the date of th.is r~solution, whichever ocaurs
first;, C~nda.~ion No. 1, ~bove-menrionad, shall bo cdm~liod with.
rx~ensa.ons Por f~irtlier time to complote said r.ondi.tions may be granted
in accordance with Seccion 18.03.090 nf the Anaheim Mun~ci~al Code. ~~
, "i,
9. That praor i;o the commencement of the activity authorized by this '''~
rasolution, or Einal building an3 zonzng inspec~ions whichever occurs ~''~`i
fxrst, Condition N~s. 2, 3, and ?, above-men~ionpcl, shall be comp'lied ~?~~
with,
10. That approval af: ttiis applir.ation constitutes approval of the propor~ed
rc~guest only to the extent Chat it camplies with the Anahei.m Municipal
Zoning Cude and any ctk~er ap~licable City regulations. Approval does
not include any action or Lindings as ~a compliance o,r approval of the
reques~ regardiz~g any ~ther app].icab],e ox•d3.nance, regulation or
requirement.
BE IT FirRTHER RESOLVED that thc± Anaheim Ci~y Planning Commission
c'oes hereby fznd antl determine t2:~1 adoption of this Resolution is expressly
pre~.icatQd ur•on applicant's complaancc~ with each and a11 of tho conditions
hereinahove set forth. Should any su.c:i conditions, or ~ny part thereo~, be
doclarad invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment nf any court ut•
competen~ jurisdiction, tlien this Reso].ution, and any approvals herei~x
cnntained, shall bc~ deem~d nuli and voxd.
THE FOREGOING RES~?LUTION is signed and approved by me 1_h :s 18th day
of July, 19gg.
.~ •. ,•~ ,~
~':''. : :
__ ~/:: ,~/'-'~~7 ,:''!/;ij' ~~-cz_~
CHAIRMAN, A~ ~IM C1TX PLANNING COPIMISSION
,
.,
AT'J.'i:S'P: ~' -. '
i yG-~~ , .
..._ _ • ,~,~ . f /
! ~ ~ . :~•~~~
SECRETA X, ANAF3EIM CTfi PL.;~Y ING CqNA~tISSICIN
-3-
~
PC88-192
.i `;;~;
, , .. ' r.;:. ~"it~i
~~
t~f
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
crTy or ArrAxEi~ ~
l'.'_ t
~~f .. "~: C ~~l Y 1 ~ll< } ,~ J
_ . . , .. ~ '' N.1~r ~ `~ ti/,}~=1~,~,~~~t`~'1 1.jyA
. ~ ~L ~i {tkf~~
ri
~ ~~~tTl;
~ L,~., ~ 7 , . . ..
i ~~~
,~,e,'~
(t~4}i'~
'~5'
~~
. . ~^a.~+',
y~,f
~ :,
. . . ,,~~~~~
~ ~'~^'r'~
<1 •:.
f
j~
~~
I, EdiY,h L. Harris, Secratary of Lhe Anaheim City Planninq a
Commission, c3o hereby cortify that the forogoing resoluCiun was passed F;nd
adopted at a mee~ing cE khe Anaheim City Planning Cc~mmission !ie].Q on Ju1y ;~.8, : `!~
1988, by the following voto of the members therr:of: • ~i,~
AYES: COMMISSIONER4: ~QUAS, BOXDSTUD7, ~A.RIISII,LO, ~'~LDIiAUS, IiERB5T, '`~
MC DU1tNGY, MESSE ,'- ;:;;~
NOES: C01~I78SIONERS: NONL ',;:~~
ABSRN~: C02~41ISSIqNERS: NOt7E ^''3;
•,~
IN WIT.NE,SS WI3~REpF, I ha.Je hereun~o set my hand th3,s 1R!:h day of _G
July. 198 F3 . ;-f
~ ~~,
,_~~ ' /~ / ~ ~t
C"~`-{~ "~-- /~ . ~
---~ ~T X ~L-~-~ ,, i~;
SECR~;TARY, ANAHrIM CT.TY PLANNING COMMISSION ;,~
, ~, ,~
_ . , :,r:,
;~~
~'h
' '_~~
;tK
~ ~ . ~~1 ~~~~~
,~` } ~
~ . . .".~'.)1
' :,~~..,"~1~1
. - ' 'l ~±i'~~~
i'~~
.;i
. , '~-:'.f'
~ ,'- ' .
~~ ~
s' ~
~
~~~, '
o ~ _ . _
,'~/
~~
`'
:i~
{~
~'
~~~
7
. .. . . .. . . _. ~~
~~+
~;
'4 " PC88-7.92 '~~
J; ~ 'y
rt
~~
_ ___. .. '~~ ~:,~ 1,tjH'•:i~:~~l/~d~:~r..i~.c~..L.'~~i+_'d.:rrlila._~t....,.r. ..,...>~ ......... ... .. . ~ 5 . ~ly~