PC 88-2~ _.. ..... , . . ,..:_,.. ., , . . _
,:, . .,. . . . „ __. _..
, ~ ~„ .,,v,;;~~~:.~ ~:
.y
r '! `~inUy ,,'~"~tMK ` ,~`
r ci
L~~
RESOLi1TI0N NO,, PC88-02
A RESOLU'PION OF ~FI~ ANAFiEIM CITY' PL'ANNING COMMISSTON
THAT PETI'TIOI~ FOR 'i7ARTANCE N0. 3718 BE G~ANTFD =+
~" WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Corrunis,ion did receive a
^>. ver..Eied Petit.ion ¢or Variaiice from P~FALTA LTD., 3150 ~;. Birch, Brea, CA
92621, owr.er, and SOGAR CONSTRUCTICN INC., 1650 N. Glassell, # H, Orange, CA `s
9266', agent, of ~~ cain real pro~erty situateci in t;ie City ~f Anaheim, County
of Orange, ~tate oi alifornia described as:
LQT 29 T~2ACT 12576, IN TFIE CIT1 OE ANAHEIM, GOiTNTY QF
"~ ORAIdGE, STATE pC CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN OIv' MAp RFCURD~U
'? LN Fi00K 573 PAGES '10 TO 16 TTICI~USTVE, MTSGELLANEOUS
'~ MAPS, OFF'ICE OF 'rHE COUNTY RECORD:~R~ OF SAID COUNTY.
..i;
'WFiEREAS, the City F~anning Commi;,sion did hold a publ.ic hear.ing
";~ ar_ the Civic Center in ~he City of An3he.im on November 9, 1987, at 1:30 p.m.,
ti~; notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by lzw and in
;~ accordar.ce with the provisions of the ~nahcim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, l
'~ to liear and consider cviaence for and against said proposed variance and Y.o
F
investigate an~ make {indings and recnm;nendations in connectiun therevrith; and
t~ subjecz hearing havinc~ been continued to the meeting af January 4, 1988; and
Y WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investi~ation.
and atudy made by its~lf and in its behalf, ~nd af:ter due cansideration of all
;;
.,;. evidc~nee and reports offereci at said hearing, does firxcl and Qetermine the
" fol.lowing facts:
G?
>f 1. xk~at the petitioner proposes waivers of the followir~g to s
~i cons~ruct a 30-foet hic~h, 2-story, s~ngle-family residencea
~ ~ECTrON 1$. ~},q~2,OZ1 ~
~ -.~___ - Maxim,}un si:ructurll height
~ (25 £eet oermitted; 30 feet proposed) ,
2. That the above-mentior.ed waiver is hereby qrantecl on thc: basis that
ttier~ are sp~:cial c;ircumstances appla,rable t~ L•he propertY~ such as size, shape,
topography, location or. surroundin.gs, wliich do not apply t;o other identically
2oned properties in the vicinity; arid ~hat strict apglication of ~he Zoni.ng Code
deprivQS the property ot ~irivilege~ enjoyed by other. proporties in identi.cal
zoning classification iii the vicinity.
3. Thai: tliere are excep~ional. or extraordinary cirr:umstances or
conditions sp~licable to the property involved or to ~he intEnded u~e oE the ;
property that do not apply genQrally to the properta or class of use in t1~e sam~
vzcinity ~nd zon~;.
4. That the ,.~^.quested varianco is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same `
vicinit.y and zone, an~ clenied to the property in guestion. - ~-`;
;c;;
'oi5xr
~ri ~ ~
r ~ - ~ ~ .
.,
i
},,. ~ .
,
~ . . . , ~ ~
^
. . ~ ~;
~„~ ,
~ys, '
,
`
,i: ~ . ' ~ ~ ri~
, ,~
5. 'Phat tl~e rec~uested variance will not be materiallx detrimental to
~he public w~lfare or injurious to the property or improvernents in such t~icinity
and zone i.n which the property is locatea.
n. That 9 persons indicated th~ir pres~nce ai. rhe November 9, 1987
:+~. public hearinc~ and 3 persons at tY:e Januarp 4, 1980 pub].ic hearing indicatad
;~;;; their presence at said public hearing in o~p~s.i~ion; and that no corresrondence
' was received in opposicion to aubjecl n~tition.
A+
CALTFORriIA BNVIROI3I~IENTAL OUALITY ACT FINDING: That the ~naheim
City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to construct. a 30-L•aot
kiigh, 2-story, single-family residence with waiver of m~xii.um structural
,; lzeight on an irreqularly-shaped parce7. of land consisting of approximately
~ 0.5 zcre, having a Prontage of approximately 7.36 feet on the :lorth side of
~~ ',
, Copa D~ Oro Drive, having a maximum depth ox' approximately 250 Eeet and being
~~~~•. locatied approximately 2~0 feet north of the centerline of Nohl Ranch Road an3
;~~~:
turther described as 5091 Copa De Oro Drive (lot 29 of 'Pract No. 12576) ; and
does hereby approvP the t~egative Declaration upon fiiicing that it has
t: considered ~k~e Negative DeclaraL•.;.nn together with any comments received
+:, during the pubZic review process and further Pindinq on t,he basis oE the
~' initial study anc~ any comrnents received that~ there is no substan~ial evirl~nce
th.at ~he project wil:i have a significant effect on the environ.men~.
NOW, THEREI'012E, BE IT RES~LVED that the Anaheim C.ity Planxiing
Commission ctoes hereby grant subject Fe*.iLion for Variaxice, upon the
Eollowing conditions whicY. are hereAy found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proposed use ~f the subject property in or•der to greserve the saP~t~ and
general welfar.o o~ the CiGizans of the City of Anaheim:
1. Tha+ prio.r to :issuance o£ a building permit, the approprzate
major thorougli~are and bridge fee shd11 be paid to the City of
Anaheim in an amount as specafied in the Major Thoxoughfare and
9ridge I'ee Prc~grain for the Foothill/Eastern Transportat;ioil
Corrid~r, as approved b,y City Coizncil Resolution No. 85P.,-423.
2. That priur Lo issuar.ce of a building ~ermit, appropriat~ park
and recreat-ion in-la.eu fees shall be paid to the CiLy of
Anz.heim in an amount as determir.er3 by the City Cuuncil.
3. That prior t~ issuancc~ of a~uilding permzt, the approprxate
traffic sigrzat ~ssesc,ment i:eP shall be paid ta the City of
Anaheim zn an amount r~s determined by the City Couzicil.
~. That drainage oi- subject propcrty sha11. be dzsposed of in a
manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. That subjeet pruperty shall be secvQd by ux,clerground utiliries.
6. Thzt praor to commencemen~ af strv.ctural fr.aminq, ~_i.re hydr~nts
shall bs insta'lled and charge~ a~ r~quired and determined to be
nec.essary by the Cb.ie£ of• tlie Fire Department.
~151r -2- F'C~8-02
~
~
,, -
~ f
y~`
, 7. That plans shall be submitted to the Building Division showing
compliance with ~he minimum standards of the City ~c Anaheim,
including the Unifox•m Building, P].umbing, Electric~,1, Housing,
biechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the Citv of Anaheim.
Tk~e appropriate permits stzall be obtained for any :lecessary
work.
8. '.that any specimen tree rer~oval shall 3~e subjeat ~~~ the tree
preservation rEgulations in Chapter 18.84 ot the Anaheim
Municipal Code, the "SC" Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone.
9. That, as specifiPd in Anaheim Municipal CodQ Section No.
18. 84. U41.0:12, no roo~`-mourited •:quipmen.t, whatsoever, sha11 he
permitted.
10. ~iha:. subject proper~y sha11 be developed subs~antially in
accc~rdance with plans and specifi~~ tions on fil~ with the City
~f Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. ~ tnro;iqh 7.
11. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or with3n a peri.o3
of one year from ~he daL-e u~ ~this resalurion, whichever occurs
£irs~, Condition tdos. 1, 2, 3, ana 7, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with. Extensions for furi:Yaez time to complete said
condi~ions may bc ~rar.ted in zcco.r~iance with Section 18.03.Oy0
of the Anahezm Municipal Cade.
12. That prior to tinal building an~3 zox~ing inspections, Condi~ion
Nos. _4, 5, and 10, above-mentioned, shal.l be com~lic~d with.
13. That ~pprovaJ. oi this applica*_ion const.itutes approva]. of rhe
proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the
Anaheim Municipa.~ Zoning Cude and an~• other applicable City
regul~tions, Approval does not includ~~ any action ~r findiiigs
as to compliance or approval o:f the reguest regardiny any other
applic~ble ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT Fi1RTfI.~R RESOLVED that the l~naheam Ci~y Planning Commission
does ;~ereby find and determin.~ ~hat adoption uf this Resolution i:; expressly
predicatecl u~on appl:icant's compliance witt~ each and a11 of the cor.di~ions
h~rQinabove se~ ferth. Shou~d any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared inva'lid ~r unenf~~rceable by the final juagmenk of any cour~ of
compet~nt jurisdict.ion, ~hen this Resolutioxi, and any approvals herein
c~ntained, shall be deemed nu11 and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and aprroved by me this
oP January, 1988.
~~v~`~"' -,
CHAIRM~.N, ANAHEIM „ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTE~T:
~ ,.
__ -~~~-"~, ~ '
SECRE'~IARYr ANAHETM CITY PLANNING CQtiII~SISSION
Q 1.51 r
_ ~ _ ,,.. ~ ,
'~4"~1'R~~ r~ ~.~r, . ,. .. . ...
-3-
~~h day
PC8$-02
~_
~ r
~,: . , ~~; r .~:~:~d,~l.it•tt,.~?s~tr,.,llr:i,d
. . . . ~ ' . . , . .
.
. . . . . . t
~~4 1r~,3.
.. i
yr
. ,
~ ~
~ ,; r I~a4
~1 ~ .. ~ ~1,s
~i~t
,:;~t
~.!, .'r'
STATE OI' ~AL.LFQItNIA ) iis?
~'.
° "~`,,
C6UNTY 0~ ORANC~ ) ss.
C7:TY OF A.fiAHE2M )
Edith L. Harris, Secre~ary of L-he Anak~eim
I City Planning °
;
,
Cor:.mi;~sion, da hereby certiiy tnat the foregoing resol.uti~n
was passed and ~;
:.:+„
adopte:d at a meeting o£ the Ana2ieam City Plan~ling Commission held on January ~~
4, 19f18, by the fnlluwing vote of ths members tY~ereof: ,
:;~
AYES: COMMISSTONERS: BOliAS, $OYDSTUI~, 'i ELDHAUS, H~RBST, MC BTJRNE'Y ''
NOES: CQMMISSIONEfiS: NONF. `;':'~
ABS~N'.C: C~2~nISSIONERS: MrSSE '"~'
AB•.^:TM:iN: COMMISSIQNERS: ~AR.'JSILLO ; ;~r'
IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntu set my hand this ~th day of.
Janua~ry, 1988.
~ ~ ~
4~j G~.~L.~~ _~ r„n~.
_ ~i
~ ~
SECRETARX, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNItTC COMMIS5~OICI
;2jr:
:1:~
':';
:":~
;,,~;
'.';;~;
,.'.;'`
;,,':
;i~
. ~ i lt
~ ~ '~~~`t
.r`
`ri~i
+~
. .. ~.,~i,;::~
,i
~ ; (
~ ~ r~
~ ~ ~'~'~'~
-q_
PC88~02 ~ . r;
~;;i~
_ I.,~
`~`-;:
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ;,,
~ -i
'~a
,
r
~ ~ ~ ... ~~,R W
~
~
4....,, , ~ .::..~ .. , .,.. , ., .....
4.~.. 1,. . ~~ .. . . .. . ~. . ,... ~ . .
~~
x~~k~
.: ~ .~'i ~i{ ~ ' r r ~ vn ~{+~
~
.. '.1:~~4 .. V..1t~~i'~A.Jr+?~1.a:'I~~C.lli~y. ;~~