PC 88-201~~
~ r Fr41,.'v~J~r~~~~
~ '~~ r
~ =y r
? .4~
~ ;tb
~f
. ... ..,'. ; `T
:a:f
~~ ~ +. ~~~~~ ~'~,~~
A. RESOLUT.IOt~ OF TEiE ANANGIM ^,ITY PI~ANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARTANCB N0. 3814 BE GRANTEI)
WHEREAS, L•iie Anaheim City Planning C~mm3.ssion ~id recc~:vc~ ~
veri~ied Yetitian for Variance from TJi~ AALDWIN COMPANY, A GEN~RAL
NARTr1ERSHIP, :16$11 Hale Avenue, Ir.vine, CA 90630, owner, 8TlC~ DIANA HOARD,
VtCE-PRESIDENT, THR BALUWIN COMYANY, 16d11 Kale Avenuo, Irvino, CA 90630,
agent, of ce_tain real property situated in the City ~f Anaheim, County of
drange, State of Califoxnia described as:
PARCEL 1:
TR.3~CT N0. 2 GP' :CFIE LAND AL~LOTTED TO '~EODpCIO YORAA,
AS .DESCRIBED IN THE FINAG DFCREE OF PARTITION pF TFiE
RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, WHICH WA5 ENTFR~D
SE',~TGMBRR 12, 1936, IN BOOK "8", PAGB 410 OF
~UDI:MEN'TS OF THE AISTRICT COURT OF THE I7TH JUDICIAL
DtSTRICT IN AND F'OR LOS :NG£L~S COUNTY, CALIL'ORNIA,
DESCR23ED 1-5 FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT Tf?F. SOiJTHWEST CORr1Ek CF THG 't'RACT qF
~'ELI~E YORBA, P~R SAID AECREE; 7HCNCE SCiJTfi 27
DEGREES 08' EAST 1.154.00 FFET; T3E~CE NORTH 62
DEGREGS 52' EAST 5874.O~J FEET TO TF.E LINE QF FLl'NT
AN'D SIXBX' S ALI.OTMENT PER SA2D DECRL•'~; ; THENCE NORTH
34 DEGREFS 45' EAST 1270.50 FECT TO TIiE NORTiIEAST
1'.,.INE OI' PfiRALTA YORBA TRACT, AS ~?E;R SAID D~CREE;
TBENCE N~RTH 27 DEGREES Of~' WEST 6G0.00 FEE'P TO THG
SOUTHEA5T C4RNER OF TfIE SAID TRACT QF FELIPE YOR$A:
THENCE SOUTH 6Z DEGRESS 5T.' Vl~ST 6955.74 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BGGINNI:JG.
PAF.CEL, 2:
TRACT N0. 2 OF' THE L1,ND ALLOTTED TO FELIPE YURBA, AS
DESCRIBED IN THF k'INAL DECRbE OF PllRTITION OF 'PEIE
RI~NC~iO SA~TTIAGU D~' SANTA A2~lA, WHICIi WAS ENTERF.D
SEPTEMBER 17, 18G8 IN BOOK "B", PAGE 410 OI'
JUDGEMEN?'S AF T~IE AISTRICT CGURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL
DISTRICT, IN AND FUR LOS ADTGELES COUR~TY, CALYFORNIA,
DF.SCRIBt:D Au FOLLOWS s
0419r PC88•-x01
r
.,5'A • ~~ ~
~,t
~~.~
. ;r"~~1,
r'~
~ ~ a~~~
,,
_ :~~
II~:GINNING AT. THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF '.fH~ TRACT OF
TOMAS YU12k3A AS 1~Eli SAiD D~CREF;: TI~ENC~ SOUTFi 27
DEGREES OS' EAST 1'L54.OQ FEET: TIiENCE NORTH 62
DRf;REES 52' EAST 6955.74 FEFT TO THE NOR'rHEAST
BOUNDARY. LINE OF' THE PERALTA YORBA TRACT, AS PER SAl'b
DECR~E: THENC~ NOEtTH 27 DEGREES 08' WEST. 1254.OQ
I'EET; xFiEhCB SOUTEi 62 DEGREES 52' WEST 6955.74 F~ET
'TO THE POINT Qk' BEG2NNIrIG.
PARCEL 3:
TFiE SECOND TRACr OF LAND ALLOTTED TO RAYMUN'[)0 SCARF3A,
AS DESCRIB~D IN THE FIN.AL DECREE pI' FARTIT:[QN vF THE
RANC130 SANTIACO A~ SANTA ANA, WI;ICH WA.'; ENTERED
SGPTE:rIBER 1'1., 1868 IN' BOOK "B", ~AGE 410 OF JUDGMEN'Pu
OI' THE DISTP,ICT COURT OF THE 17th .Ji1DICIAL DISTRTCT
Iit AND FOR LOS I~NGELES COUMTY, CAI.IFORNIA, DESCRIBEA
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT TH~ MOST SOUTHERLY OR ~(1UTHWESTERLY
CARNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND ALLOTTED TO TEODOCTO
'lORE3A, AS PER SAIU DECRF.E: THENCE SOUTH ?.7 DEGREES
08' EAST 3128.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 D~GREES 45'
EAST b5%6.00 FF.ET TO TiiE SUUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
TRAC'.C ALT.OTTED TO T~ODOCTO YORHA; ~HENCE SOUTIi 62
DEGREES WES1 ALONG TTiE; SQUTHEl2LY LINE aF SAID TRACT
5874.U0 k'EET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNSNG.
WHEREAS, thQ City Planninq Commission did hold a publ.ic hearing
at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 1, 1908, at 1:30 p.m.,
natice of said public 2iearir,g h~svinq been duly given ss required by law and in
accordanca with tihe pxovisi~ns of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chaptor 18.03, .~l
to hear and consider. evidenco '.or and aaainst 3A7.C1. pro~,osed variance and l:o
invPStigace and make f3ndings anr] recommendations in connecti~n therew3th; -.nd
WHEREAS, said Commission, after dae inspecti~n, investigation
and ~tudy madQ by itself and in its b+~half, ~nd after clue consideration of all
evidence and re~orts ofEer~d at said hearing, doe~ Fi.nd And dotorinine tho
following fac;t;s; ~-;
1. That the petitfonor proposes wa3.vers of the followinq to
aonstruct two entry menument signs adjacent to Serrano Avemao and to constrt:ct
view and solid wa11s/fences adjacent to ro~idential tot lines ancl buildiny
pads, as part of Ein11 spec.il-ic plan of development review for
previously-approved Tentative Tract Nos. 13266, and 13512-135'18:
;;
;i
i`~
`~.
;!'!'
"Z' PC88-20.1
:'~
~;,i
:~~1
, `, '
. , ,~~.~~:
~
,,
. , .
di,: ,"'~~,
r,.d. l !
, -,r
~
~A) SecCion 18.0~ p$0,03p _
; ~~.?~$ `Z4 . 067
~.
• ~ P ) ~e '~t ~n 1$s.~:~.~~1.Q? -
~>~,
;,w:; ~~? ~1 ~~.
?~~~.~~ z i
18 • 24.=Q6$.~22~
~n_,~ 18 . 2 4l~( 6$. Q 2 fj_2
^
R.""~
ar°:
.: ~~,~;
~;-~.
.~
~ ~ ~ ~~'~:!
~ ,.
.. ~ ;.;5~1.
, .~.r
~~rmi~ted aic~ ; s~e in re4~ den ~ a~ zones ~ ,,`~
~~~.~~~.sians nQk nermi P`
~---._.~ ~'~~ in
single-•fami].y regidentfal zones; Two e
~L-r~-1~-~.~5_iqn r ~~y '~.
~--~-4£Q~ (132 sq. Ft. and ,+;
4B Sq. rt.) in Tentative Tract No. 13266) ~
. . !:f.:'~i
M--~--Y..im~m..he~~..h.~~4~~~9~_and t~.pe af
~3_:1.~. •
~~t~.xim _um 6-PoQ~ hiah blo~lc wa~lg
requS.red adjacenC tn tract boundaries
abutting the k~osterly Fiighlands
multiple-~amily dovelopments and thQ
northerly Serrano Avenue boundary, max!mum
p~rmitted wa11 or fence hoight: 6 feet; .
View axid solid wal.l/iencQ heights varying
f•rom 6 foet to b feeh, 6 inches proposed
adjace~nt to rQSidor.tial lot lines and
building pads)
2. That tnQ above--nentiuned waxvQrs are hereby granted on t2ie bzsis
that ~hore are special circumetances applic~ble Co tho propQrry such as size,
shape, topography, location and ~urroundings which do not apply to other
icienticall~ zoned property in the same vicinity; and tk~at strzct apolication
of the Zoning Code dPprivQS the proper~y of privileges enjoyed by o~her
pro~erties i.n the idenL•ical zone and ctassification ir~ *.t~e vicinity.
3. That there are excoptional or extraordinar,y circumstanco3 or
~onc~itions applieable to the property inv~l~ed or to ths intenc~ed use of tt~e
property that do not apply generally to the property or cl~ass of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
~ 4. That the requested vari.ance is necessary Por tlie preservation
{ and onjoyment of a substantial prop~rty right pos~essed by other propezty in
the same vicii~ity and zone, and denied t~ the pronerty in qu~stion.
5. That the requesteci variance will not be matexially dQtrimenLal
Co the public welfare or injurxous to the pruperty or improvements in such
~ vicfnity ar.d zone in whicti the property ic located.
,
6• xhnt no ono indicaCed theii p.rosence at su.id public heazing in
opposition; and that no corcespondence was recPived in apposit~on to subject
petition.
-3- PC38-~O1
~ ~.o-r
.I'
~ .. ~ ~f .
^,
^ ~e
. . .. . . . .. . .. .,.. .~. . ,;. . .~:. :: ':.r , ,.,; ~~ 't ~~~Y~r{pl
, , . . . . . . ' '7 , f ~ 1 4 ~ L
, . ~ ~ ~ t ~ tt~yt .. t,
' ~~_ S~ti
~ ~ 't
. ' ' ~'~-'n'i
~~,I OR IA~,I~V7~NMENTAr., Qi~AY~I~;L..~~T FI,~DING: That rhe Anaheim City
Planning Commission has re~riewnd ttse ~ro~aosal to co:~struct two entry monument ~'~~
~igns adjacent L•o Serrano Aveuu~ xnd to construct view and solid walls/fences
adjacent to r.esiden~ial lok lines and building p~ds, as part of final ~~ocif3.c
plan of devalapmont rev.iew for proviuusly-approved Tentative 'rract Nos. 13266,
and 13512-13518; and does herPby approvQ the Negative Decl~ration uF~On find'zng
that it has considered the Negative beclaration together w3th any comments
receivad during the public review process and ~urther finding on the basis of
the initial study and any comments received tY~at t:Yiore is no substantial
evider_ce that the pr~ject w3.J.l have a ~ic~nificant aPf.ect on the environmsnt.
NOW, TH~REEQRE, B8 IT RESJLVEQ that the Analieim Cit~ Yl~nning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
conditions which are hereby £ounc~ to be a necessary pr~requi.site to the
proposed usa of the subject propexty in order to preserve the safety ~nd
general welfare of ttse Citi.zens of tihQ CiCy o~ Anaheim:
1. 'rhat Traat Map Nos. 1.326u, and 13512-1351t3 to rocord the division of
subjec,t proporty sh311 be submitted to and appr.oved by the City of
Anahoim and *_hen be rocorded in the Offiae of the Orange County
F2ecorder and th~t developmenL- sha11 be aubject to and in
c~nformance with a17. ap~,licablo conditions adopter~ in conjunction
with Reclassi~icaticn No. 86-87-19, AmoncL~~ant On~ (City Council
Resalution No. 88R-259).
2. That subject properky shall be devel~pe~ substantially in ~ccordance
with plan3 and speciEications on file with f~he City of. Anaheim
maY•ked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
3. That the monument signs shall not be located within the stree~
right-of-wny and shall have ndequate sight dista~zcc~s a3 approved by
the ~ity Traf.~Eic Etigineer.
h. Thak prior r_o iss~aaace of a building pErmit, or within a period of
one year £rom th~ date of this resolution, whichever occurs ~irst,
Cnnciition NQS. 1 and 3, abovg-mentioned, shail be complied with.
Extonsions for ~Eurther time to complete said c:onditions may be
granCed i~z acc;orclance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim
Muiiicipal Code.
5. That prior to ~irial build~ng and zoniiic~ inspections, Condition No.
2, above-mentfone3, shall be complied with.
r~ ,;
~?.
•j ', f
-q.. PCOB-201
i,~
F'i!
t p ~
~'~~~- :~..iCti, ~ 1 ~s:~t~..'~iU17~
r~
^ ~
~ ;M
~
;.~
6. That appraval of this ap~lication constituties approval oi the
progosod request only to ~he extent that it compli.ey •~rith the
Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other ap~~licable City
regulations. Approval does not includo as~y action oc findings as
to compliance or approval of th~ request regardi,ng any oth~r
applicablo ordinance, regulation or requ9.rement.
~~ ~ ~>~~
>~ ~~
~
'~
Y
~
': i.
'' `~
BE IT FURTHER R~SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby fin@ and determine tliat adoption of this Resolu~ion is expressly
p:•edicar.ed upon applicant's compli.ance with each asd all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Shauld any such conditiona, or any part thereof, b~
declared inv~lid or unenPorcoable by the final judgmenY. oE any at~urt o~
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolutio~, and any approvals herein
c~nCained, sha11 bo @eomed null and void.
~/~,',t-.:,!-~J J ,/ ~'JLr~L-~:~r.ti/
CF€F.IRMAN, A~iAFiFIM CITY PI~ANNING C.OhIIrSIS5I0N
ATTEST: r 1 /
~. " ~ ~ / ~ .
,
.J , _ ~~~. __ _~ .u~~ _~
THE FOREGOING RESOLU~ION is signed an3 approved b,y me this lst day
of August, 1988.
SECRETARY, ANIIHEIM CITX PLANNING COMM'LSStON
STATE UF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGG ) s3.
CITX 0~' ANAHEIM )
I, Bdith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahoim City Planning
Commission, do herPby cer•tify that the foregoing resolution. was passed anii
adoptacl ar a meeting o£ the Anaheim City Planning Comr~ission held on August 1,
198~, by the following vote r~E ~hQ members thereoE:
AYES: COMMTSSInNERS: BOUAS, BOYDSiUN, CARUSILLO, FE;LnHAU5, H~RAST,
MC BURNEY, MLSSE
tvOES: COMMTSSIONERS: NONE
AHSENT; COMMISSSUNGRS: NONE
T!T WTTNESS W?iEREOF', I have hereunto seL• my hanii thi.s 1sh day oE
Augixst, 1988 . ; '~ ~
~ ; ~~ ,
,t~~LL%' / ~f /! '~ .
_ L~G _. ~.~.1'`'-!s "-'~-:~
SECRF.TARY, AKAF~FIM CfTY PLANNING COMMISSION
-5-
PCS$-201
~
.C
~.
'~
!~
,!l
; :~
;~
,~ ;,~
,
;~ ,
~ r: : : _ , i t-~i ~ ,~:"~'