PC 88-208,
~,
I2E$OLUTI~PI ~0, PCHB_208
~,~f '3'
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAI~EIM CITX PLANNING COMMISuION
THAT PETITION FOR VAP.IAIIC~ Dip. 3F322 BE GRAtITED, IN PART
WHER~AS, the Anaheim Ci~cy Planning Commission did receive a
veriEied Qetition £or Varianc~ from 5PIROS GIANN'OUTSOS and CATHERIN'E
GIANNOUTSbS, 1469 7~7.abama Lano, Piti~.sburgh, P~ ~521.6, own~rs and MASSOUD
MANSHIZAL`EH, 1~2~ Victory Way, Flacentia, CA 92670, agen~, of certain real
prup~rty situated in the City of Analieim, Caunty of Orange, State of
Califor.nia dascribsd as:
BE~INNING AT A POINT 80 FEE;T SOUTTiERLY FROt4 THS
NQRTHEbST COFN~R OF' ~INFYARD LOT A-r, GITY (1F
ANAHBIM, COUNTY. OF OR1aNGE, ~TATE OF CALIFORNTA, AS
PER MAP RECORDFA IN BOOK 4, PAGE 629, LOS ANG~LES
COUNTY, RUNNING TH'ENCE WESTERLY PARI#LL~L WITH THE
I30RTHERLY LTNE OF SAIA LO`.~ 164 FEET, THENCE ,
SOUTHERL,'S[ P~RALL~L WITH THE ~ASTERL:i LINE OF SAID
LOT 75 FEET, THENGE k;A5TERLY PARALLF?~ WI^'.i THE
NORTcI~RLY L:[NE OF SAID LOT 1~4 F$E'P, THENCE
NORTHERLY TO TH~: POINT OF II~GIZ]NING.
WHEREAS, the CiL•y Planning Ca:nmission did hold a public henring
at the Civic Cdr.ter in the City of Anaheim ~n August 1, 1988, at 1:30 p.m. ,
no'~ice oP said public hearinq havirig been duly qiven as rp~uire~ by i.aw and in
accordaxice wiY.h Che p~rovisions of thQ Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter ~8.03,
ta hear and consider. evidence for anu against said propoged va.riance and to
inves~igate and make findinqs and recommendations in connection thexewith; and
WFiEREA6, said Commissian, after due inspection, investigation
anc~ study made by itself and in i~s behalf, and ~fter due consideration o~ all
evidence and reports otfeied at said hes.ring, doss fiad aiid determine the
following facrs:
1. Tk~at tha peL•itioner proposes waivers of the followi.iig to
construct a 2-story, 14-unit apartmont comp~ex:
ti (A) E TI N 1g~~T..0~1,,,Q1.0_ - Minimum buil~i_ng_,~i~e~r_~ ner dwellins
~nit.
a; (2400 s,qpare foQt reguired; 1$}1 svuarQ
- fgg~ proposed)
~; (g) ,~C~T Ott 1.~i,~2.OG...Q1? - M~rimum struc*ural heaqt~~.
(1-~turv permitted within. 150 feet oE
~ single-fami:ly resic~c~n~izl zoning;
2-s~ories proposed 25 Co 52 feet trom
r. RS-7200 zonix-g)
0423r
R.' '
r:<~ ~
PC88-208
:i
r
,, ~
'
;,~,':
.~:; ;~
15.1 ~
~r, r.~ ;i
rT?';.y. ~ _ ,.'{„~~
.. . . .. ~,. _., ..,~. .~~
)~ F r1+.~!d'+,?':~ v1 1 ie~~~~~~~ .iit~.~~r!~.. . ~ ~~'~~'•~ . . , ~~.lh `. . ,..
~iaA.~ ~
(C) SECTIv.J 18 32 063,Q11 - in3,~tt,~rQ froz~t setba~,
{~.a_foot minimum wit 2~_Poq~
avert~ge permitteci al.ong East St. ;
'~,5_f..4ot minimtun wiL•h l~foot
averaa~ proposed)
2. T.hat the abave-mentxoned waiver (A) is hereby Clenied on tne
'-~ basis thaC thero are no specia~ circumstances applicahle to tlzc~ pr.operty such
r'' as size, snape, topograp2iy, locaL•ion and surroundings which do not apply to
~~w„
otk~ar identically zoned nroperty in the same vicinity; t2~at stri.ct applicat~.on
of the Zoning Gode doos not deprive the property oE privileges enjoyed .oy
other properties in the identlcal a.one ~r.~ alassi.fication in the vicinity; ari8
that the requestEd waiver is not nscessary for the prssarvation and enjoyment
oE a~ubs~antial prarerty righr, possessed by ot`~r property zn the samA
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in questi~n.
Y';
3. That tha above-mentionPd waivers (Fi) and {C1 ar~ here"s~y ;;
grante3 on the ~asis that L-here are special czrcumstances applicable to thrs
property such as size, shape, topography, lcca~ioxi and surrcundings :vhich ao
not r~pply to other ident.ically zoned pz~operty in the same vici;iity; tYiat
s~rict ap~l5.cation ~f the Zoning C~de deprives L-hQ propart~ o;: privi:teges ':~`i
enjoyed by other properties izi 1;he identzcal zane and classification in the
vicinity.
4. That t~here are excepL-ional or extraordinary circumst3nces
or conditions app:licable to Chc pro~erty involved or to the intand~d use o£
the property i:hat do not apply gen.erally to the property or clas~ of use in
the s1m~: vicinity and ~one. -
5. T.hat the r.equest;~sd waivors (B) and (C} are necassary for
the preservation and ~njoyment of a substancial property right; possessed by
othor property in the same v~cinih.y and zone, and denied ~o the pr.operty in
question.
6. Tha4 th~ re~Ruested variance, as granted, will not be
materia].ly detrimental to Lhe pt,blic welfare or injurious to the propwrty or
im~roverrents in stich vicir.ity and z~ne in which the property is located.
7. That or~e (1) persoti i~xdi.cater] his presence at said public
hearing in opposit~ion; that no correspandex~ce was received i~a oppositiion to
su;~j~:et petition; and that two (2j per~ons indicated their presencN in support
of subj~ct petitia.n.
~ALIFORNI~. EPIL':IROr7MFNTT,L UALITY A~T ~'IN~SN~': That t~e A~aheim ,:;
Ciry Planuing Commission has reviev~ed L•he propusal ta reclassif~ s•xbjact '~
property from L•he ~t5-72p0 (Resideritial, Sinqln_~~iYy) to the RM-2400 ~ I~!!~
(Residential, Multiple-Family) zona to coiistruct a 2-stor~~, ld--unit epartment ~
com~l~x with waivers of minimum }~uild3.ng site area per d~a~li.ing ~.~n.it, maximum
structura]. hezght and minimum front setback on an irregularly-shaped parcel
of land consisting oE app~oximately 0.76 ncre, h~s~ing a frontage of '
approximately 235 .leet on the ~est side of East Street, b~ing loaated
~pproximately 100 L'Qet south of Y.ho cent~sxline o.E North Street anQ further
described as %41-'/47 ii. East Street; aua doe~ h.ereby approve the tlegative ~
~~
-2- P~38•-208
• .'
'~'~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~>t
-- _ _ _ . ' . ~ . . . ., . . ~ . . ~ . . ,. I ~~i~L±'+
jtN,~y
,i Y
r
~~ I
l.'~7.11ti:h't ~~:t;'~frlNt~i:- Y~{~1,m,l~v ip. ~~w~, t r.°._i~;.,~ .~0,•.5 X ti.Yq .
.. rri , - .At7''"~ E~. ~. _ t ~+,w,. .c_t i , y~ti~n;. r~,,,rt~:;,.., c :_,~~ it~ ;<, ~ ..1 :~ r ',q~:~
~ . .. . ~ .. . , . . '.' _ . _ r~ :j; ~li 7e -d~ti~r r~~i~ jpry~~ ~~'fiir`~C~J
P
~ ~~
. . }~~:
V . . . ~ .~i.~~
,
Declara~ion upon finding that it has considered the Neqative Declaration h,
S;
~~~
to~ather with an~ commor~ts roceived c~uring Lhe public review ~roce:;s and
~urtlier findin
on th
b
i
g
e
as
s of the initi~l study and any c~mm~nts received
t1~at there i J
s no substantial evid3nce ~hat the pro~ect wzll have a
significant ~f£
t
oc
on the ez~vironment.
NOW, TFIL•'RE.FORE, B~ IT ~tESOLVSD tha't the An;~heim City Planning
Commission does hereb
rant
b
y g
su
ject Petition for Var.°.anc~3, in part, for a
maxzmum of 10 aparY.mont- units u
o
th
~~
p
n
e following conc3it.ions which axe ht~rQby
~oun~ to be a ~'
necessary prPrequisite ta the propost~d t~se of the subjecC
property in order ta preserve the safety and general w~~lFarp of the Citizens
of the Cit
of A
h
i ~
~
y
na
e
m:
1• That prior ~a issuance of a bui.lding parmit, the appropri.ate
` `~
tra:E.
.ic signal asse::sment fee ;,hall be paid t-~ ~hQ City of .~nah~im
i ~
n an 3mount as determined by Ci~~y Council resolution, ''
1
2• That subject proposal authorized bl, L-his resolutioaz she311 be served ~
by undergr.ound !~tilities. i
3. That a cash naym~nt sY~a1]. be made ~•o the City of Ana:aeim £o
r the ~
.
cost of. the removal of existinq streQt a.mprovement~ a1~r:g East ~
Street and roconstr.uction/cc~nstruction of fu]1 si:reet in~p•r.ovemen~~
at ihe ultimate loca~~ion. ~aid payme:lt shall be made pric~r to
i ~
ssuance of a bui.ldina permit. g
'~. That the existing drivev:ays on East Street sha11 be removed and -~
replaced wit;a stand~ard curb and guttez-, side:,valk anc3 landscapizi~, ~
5• That t11~~ dri.vc~way sh.ll ~i~ cor.structed with *~n (10) ;:uot radius ~
curb retuxns aa requirc~d hy the Ci~y En~3neer, -;~
~• That ga±~Q:.~ s~iall not be installed across the driveway in a man ~
ner
which may ~adversoly afE~ct vehicular traffic in t;ze adjacent publi~ `~
str.aet(~). Insts~i.lation of an~• gates shall couform ta the
Cngineerinr~ T.~ivision's 5tandard P1an No. 402 and shall be sul~jecL ~
to t:he revaew anii approval of t'r:e City Traf~ic Exiyineer. ~
~• That a parking 1~].an zt~clicati~ng compliance with City parkiric~ desiqn ~
s:andarc~s shall ;~e submii;ted ~o and ap~~roved by th~ City Tr~f£ic ~~
Engine~r.
8• Thati prior *_o issuancg of a building perm..t, appropriate park and
recreation in-lieu L•eQS shall be paid ta th~ City of Anaheim in an
amour~t as determined by *he City Council.
9• That d:aiuage of subject property shall be disposed of in a mannc~r
satisfactory ta the City ~ngineer.
?.0. That in ~he event a parcet mc~p is noC zecorded cornbining tY~e thre6
(3) exi.stinq 1ots, the legal prope=ty owner sha~l furnish the
;..
,;1: ~
~~~,?~:
~
-'- PC88-208
~:!~!
, ~~~.
. . . . ~ . . ~?,rK
;'i
~
Zan.:ng Division with a copy of a recorded cavenant and agreemen~ in
a form approved by the City Attorney agreein~ tin hola subject
propar~y as one parcel.
Z~•• Thai: pri~r to commencem~nt of structural framing, fire hydrants
shall be installed and charged as r~quirad and approvod by the City
Fire Department.
12. That if required by the ~'ire and Police Depnrtment, all lockable
pecle~stz•ian ~nd vehicular access gates ~hall be equipped with a
"knox box" dEVice t.o the satisfaction of the City Fire Department
and the City Police Dapartment.
1~. That trash storage areas she.lt be provided ar,d maintained in a
locakion accepta}~le L•o th~ Stxeet Maincenance and Sanitat,i.on
Division and in accordance with approved plans un fite with said
IIivi.sio;z ox• as is.
1~• That aX1 air conditioning Paci].iti~s and other roof and ground
mounted equipment sha11 be properl~ shielded :[rom v:i.ew, and the
sound bufferod from adjacent residential properties.
.15. That prior to issuance oE a buiiding permit, ecidence shall be
presentecl satzsfac~ory to the Building Div~.sion that the proposed
project is in conformance ~vith Council Polic,y Number 542 "Sound
Attenuation in Residontial Pxojects'' and with Noise Insulation
Standards specified in the CaJ.ifornia Administrativs Code, Titl.e 25.
].6. That a six (G)-foc•r h;gh masonry block wall sha11 be constructed
and maintained aloMg the sou~h anfl wesC property li.nES excepting
the f:ont setbac.k ~rher~ th~ wall h~ight sha~l be three (3) foet and
turther except:ing tkaaC portion of ~.he west rronertx lin,e adjacent
to the prope.rty b~ing considered under Rec~;~si£ica~ion No.
88-$9-~J5, ,in the eve•nt said Reclassificat3on is approved and
becomes effective.
~7
~7• That the ou-site ~andscap.iny ~hall be maintained in compliancP with
City ctandards.
18• That tkiis Variance is granted sub~ect ~o the adoption of the 'Loning
Ordixiar.ce in connection with Reclassification lYo. R8-g9_p7, now
~~ending.
~9• That subjoct rroperty sha11 be developetl subsrar.tially ia
acco.rdance with nlans and specirr.ica~ions nn fxle wi.th the City of
Anaheim maz~keu Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 provided, hcwever, that m~aximum
apartment units shall not excee~ +:en (1G1 and that the traeh
encl.osure shall bE• relocated t~ ~he satisfact.ion of. the Stroet
Mai.ntenanc~ ~nd Sa~.itation Division.
20. That prior to issuance of .~ bu.i.lding permit, or wittiin a peri.ocl of
one ~rear from th~ d~te ~f th.is resolr.~tion, whichever occurs first,
"4' PC88-?,OS
,~;";
;';~:
`~.;
,'
";;
'''j;
`s
,~~
; ,:
;;: ~
~#
;
' :4~~ r ^,i ~i . . , . . . . . . . .
I~i"`~~ ., . . . . . . .
, . ~~r:t~
. Condi~ion NoQ 1, 3, 6. 7. 4~ 1~. 15~ 16 and 18, above-m~i1~idlAto
shall be comQlied with•rantojE~in bacccrd~ncerwith So t~ono 14Q0 •090
said cond~tions may be ~
of the Anahc3.m tdunicipal Cod~.
2~,, TY-at prior t.o fin:-1 building 2~nd zoning inspections, ~oncliCi~n Nos.
2~ ~~ ,~ g, 12 thr~ugh 19, and 19~ above-mQntioned, shall be
c:omplioci with.
~roval of r_his app.lica~ion con~tir~ates a~proval of the
? 2 , That a~~~,
proposad requc~st only to the oxtent thaz it comp~ilic~bleh CitY
Anahei.m Manicipal Zoning Code and any othar a}~p
regul~tions. Approval does not inc:lude any uCtion or Lindings as
ti~ compliance or appr~val of the request regarding any other
apoli~at~le ordinance, regulation or requirement..
n~ I'C FURTIiF.R RESOT.VED t'.'lat the Anaheim City Plar~ning
Commis~ion does hereby fiiid and der_~xmine t~at aduption of this Resoluti~n is
expressly ni•edicated upo~. applicant's compliance with eacti and all of tihe
co~~c~iti.ons h~rc~.inabove seL Lorth. SY,~~uld any suc~~ep fd~2i° ~u~~Q~~nofpany
tliereuf, he declared invalid or unenf''~rceable by
C~url; oE competent j~.~risdict.i~n, then Chis Fesol~tL'ioti, and any approvals
Yierein c;antainocl, :~Yiall be cloemrd 'iull and void.
TF?E r'OREC~OING RESOLUTTON is s:igned and appravsd by me this lst
day of Auqust, 198'~.
` ,, ~ ! ,•)r, .. ,,,
._~._,~___. ~_-------"__
CIiAI12MAN,. NAHEIM CI~Y PGANtlING COMMt5SLON
. ,
j~ ~ ~
ATTEST: ~. ~, ~ .
~ ~~~~,,,~ ~~ ~~ ,f~~),~1 1 ~--~:';~tI5SI0N
.: _w ~C.C----
~ 5~GRETARY, 1.NAHEIM CIT'f PC.ANNl'NG CO
STATE OF CALJFORNIA )
COLINTY OF ORI~NGE ) 5~ •
CITY OF ~~;~IM 1
I, t;ditli L. H~rris, Socretary of tho Anah~im City Pl.anning
Commis°ion, do herPby certir.y that the for~goin9 resolu~ion was passed and
aa~prQd ~r a mQetinq of th~ Anaheim Ctty Pl~nning C~mmission held on
August i, 7.98a, by the foll.owing v~tP of: tha mombQrs ~horeof:
AYES: COMMZS5tONET:S: DnUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, FEL~DHAUS, EiFR35T,
Mr BURt3EY. MESSE
NOES: COFIIytIS5I0NERS: 2IUi1~:
ABSENT: ~'OMMISSIOt1~RS: NONE i
tN WITNCSS WH~K~~QF~ 1 h~Ve her~unto set my h• ri/thi3 lst day of
~ ~ ; ~
1988. , /,, % f, ~ _
Au3ust. ~ ~ ..f ~ ~~ ,/~ ,
~% ..y' ' ; I', ... /, ~~ : • C~~ra.._._..
SECRETARY, ANAHEiM CITY~PLANNING C()MMISSION
!'
-5-
PC83-2A6
.;~~;~~
~;;
~
,t.:
~..~~: