PC 88-210~
~~~;
~~
RESQLLiTION NO~.PC~$_____214
!~'''~
A RESOLUTION OF THF. A2dAHGIM CYTY PLANNING COIyA~SISSIqN
THA'.' PETI1'YON FOR IlECLASSIFICATION N0. 88-89-05 BE UENtED
WHLREAS, Lhe Anaheim C.ity Planning Corruniusion did recoive a
verified pet~tion for R~classi~ication from JAMF5 R~ NEEDHAM and SFIIRLEY A.
NEEDHAM, 102£3 ~. North Street, Axiaheim, CA 928Q1, SI~NTOS HECERRA and ROSA
BECEFRA, 1014 1:. North St.reet, Anaheim, CA 92805, DODiALD K. SMALLE'Y and JERI
M. HOLLINGSWOR7'H, 102U E. I~orth Street, Anaheim, CA 9280?, own~r ar.d MASSOUD
MONSHIZADSEFi, :~521 Victoria Way, Ylacentia, CA 92670, agent, for certa~in real
propertl• s.itua~ed in the City of Anaheirn, Count~y of. Orange, State ~f
California, described as L•ollows:
BEGINNING AT ti PUIN:1 ZN THE NORTH LTNE 0~ LOT A--1 AS
SHOWN ON A biAF RECURDEU TN BOOK 4, F'AGES 62y AND 630
OC D~~DS, RECOR~S OF LOS ANGELES CGUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
SAID ?OINT HETNG 239 FEET WEST~kLY OF THE NORTHEAST
CORNF:I2 THEREOF; Ri1N21ING THENCE SOTJTHERLY PARALLFL TO
THE EASTEk2LY LINE OF SAT.D LOT, 67.5 FEET; THEN~R
NORTHEP.LY PARALL.Er., TO SAID EASTERLY LINE 225 F~ET TO
A FOINT IN SAID N012'rHERL'~C LINF.; THENCE EASTERLY
ALONG SAID NORTiiERLY LIPTF 67 , b FEET TO THE POINT OF
EiEGINNINC.
EEGIPiNING Al' A'POTN'P IN THE NORTH LINF. OF VINEYARD
LOT A--1, AS SEiUWN CN A MAP ~ZECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGES
629 AND 630 OF' DEEDS, RECORDS OF GOS ANGELES COUNTX,
CALIFORNIA, SAID POIN'~' BEING 306.5 FSET WGSTEk2LY OE'
T[IE NORTHEI~ST CORNER TH~,REOF; RU~INII~G 'rHENCE
SOUTHERT.,Y PAF.ALLBL TO TH~; EASTSRi,Y LINE UF SATD LOT,
225 rEET; TI{ENC~ WESTERLY PAFtALLEL TO THE NORTFIERLY
L'!NE QF SAID LOT, 67.5 FE~;T; TFIENC~ NORTF~IERLY
PARALLCL TO SAID EASTERLY LINF., 225 FEET TO 1~ POINT
IN TH~ SATD NORTHER[,Y I~INE; THENCE EASTERGY ALONG
SAID NORTFIERLY L,ING, 67.5 FEET TO THE P~INT QF
BEGINNING.
BEGIIJi3zNG AT A POINT TN THF 1.10RTH LINE OF VINEXARD
LOT A-1, AS SHC~47N ON A MAF fiECORDED IN BOQK 4, PAG~~
629 AND 630 0!~' DEEDS, RECOF2DS OF LOS I~NGELES COUrII'~f,
CALIFORtlIA, SAID P4INT. BExNG 164 FFET Y`ESTFRLY OF
'rIIL NORTHEAST CORTIE~ THGREOF; RUN27YNG THENCE
SOUTHE;RLX PARALLGL TO T~iE EASTERLY GINE OF SAID LOT,
225 FGET; THENCE WFSTrRLY PARALLGL TO THE NOI2THERLY
LINE O1~ SAiD LOT 75 FEET; '.CHENCI: NORTHERLY PARALLFL
'.0 SAID EASTERLY Y,INE, 2x5 FE,ET TO A PO~NT IN THS
SATD NOA.T;•IERLY LII3E; T.HEtvCE EASTERLY ALOttG SAID
NORTHERLY .'~IN~ 75 F.~E:T TG THE POINT OF BEGI'NNING.
0424r
PC88-210
_ ,. ~,'~,
;;:; :~ ; ` ,~* ~~,
y~
WHBREAS, the Cit,y Plannin
at the Civic Center in tiie City of Ana eirr~ ons.A.ugus~.ll ho1 Cg at 1.Z0 ~.m.
noticai oE said Pub~x° h~~;ring
public hearing hZVing been dul ~
accardance with the prnvisions of the Anaheim Mune i aa1 rCodeied by law and in
to heax ~nd consider evidence for and against said pr.oposed reclassxficatipn
ancl to investi~ate ancl make F.indin 5 ~ ' Cha~ter 18.03,
tYi~rewi.th; and 9 and recomm~ndations in
connection
~' WHEREAS, said Commission, after due ins oction
. iiAVestigation
«~. and study made by itself and in i~s behalf, and nf~er due consicleratio
~ folaowzng fa ts~p~~ts ~ffex•ed ~t said hea~ing, does find and ~et n°~ all
ermira~ the
1• Tl~at the petiti~ner r P
Pr~P~rty from the RS-72pp P o ~s~~ reclassification of subjec~
~ (Residential Mu1ti le~Fami7 ~Residential, Sing1.~-Farr~ily) ?Qrie ~o ~r~e RM-3000
+,, , ' P Y) zone.
~.
2• T2iat the Anaheim General Plan designatps subjoct proper~
~' f.or Low Density Rew~idential land ;iseg and that Gsnerul Pl~n
submitted zn connection with subject rec1assification ~e21~erit No. 246x
u.se to Low N,edi~,ur~ p~n~ity Re52.dentia1 was ' Lc~ i~~~sigr.ate the land
den.ied by said Comrnission.
}~` 3' Tha~ t~l° proposecl recla~sificatic~n
not necessart~ nor desirable for tg~ ord~~r1 ~f aub~e~~, xo ezt
comrr,unity, y and proper cievelopmentP o~ y~he
4
'~• That t;hQ proposed ra~:~assification of subj~~~ ru
not• pro~~rly relate to the zones and thei.r
in c1osF perm.itted uses locallp ,pe~ry does
proximity to subjec~ proper.ty and tu t-he zones and their S~ablished
, uses generalty eS~abiished throixghQU~ th~, ~o~nuni~
y, permitted
5• That the proposed r~eC~,a,,,ificaraon is
khat Gerieral P1an Arr,~n~mEanL• No. 246 to zedesignate thp landnuse to Law Medi
Density ResS.ctentia.l was dnnied, on the basis
um
6• 7'liat nina (g) p~rsons indicated their
publ3.c heaz•ing in oy,position; and ~hat a
G9 S'ISn~tures was rec~~ pr~sence at saiQ
ivAd in o Petitiun containing ~ppxoximately
~position to subject petition.
City E~lanni.~n -F~~A _ENVIRQ I~h~EN~AL ~~ALITY
-----~ ~ Tha f the Anahe im
g Commission ha view~d the ~ pr~poS3zN~o reclassif
proper~y from Che RS-•72Qp (Resident3.a1, Single-famfl
(Residential, Dtultipl~~_Iamil ) Y subject
Y. ~o construct a 2_, y~ Znne ~o the RM-3000
y 15-unit condominium
complex with waivers of maximurn structural heigt,r„ inimum ~andscaped setback
abutting sing.le-f~rnzl
recreat.ional/leisure area on arrectangular3 d~vslopments, anci
oF appraximately 1. C8 t~cres, having ~ fxo tac~e n;~ a minimum
P parcel of land consisting
pproximat;oly ~1A fest on
rhe souCh sidQ og North Srree~, boing located approximatelp Zgp geQ~ wsst
the centerline of. East SCreet and furthQr dec~cribecl as Z014, 1020 and ~OZ
~asC NorLh ~~
Straet; ~nd doe~ hereby ap~~rove the Negati.va DeclaL~ation uPQ~
Eind.ing that it has contiiaerRd tihQ Npgative Declaration togethar with
comments rece~ved during tho public review
basis ot' the initfal fitud Px~cesa and L•urther findin ~ny
y comment;s raceived that trare is no
sub3tanCial evidence that the p o ocL• will have a s,ignificant eEfeC ~ on t:ie
environment.
t on the
•2-
+~'%~,, . PC88-210
~... ;-. ,
~~.s~~f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --,,:;~i
~1 ~:.4~ . ~ ~ ,~~~y
~ ,
,
N~i~l, rHEREFORE, BG IT RE~OLVED tPxat the Anaheim City Planning
. Commission does hc~reby deny Petition for Re~;.lassi£i~atian an the basi.s of the '
aforemQnciuned findings.
TFIF FOREGOING FtESOLUT:IaN i~ signed and approvecl by me thi, 1st
da~ of: August, 1988. .
; • ",. .
' ~~~~:~I .~~ 5, /..-r ,~ i
._1_,,L~ ~ %~ ~Ci~f ~:..~...-
CH,~IkMADT, ~~AI3~HEIM CT'rX PLANNING COt~ITSSION
%" -~ 1 ;i
ATTFST; ( , ~ ~~
1 ~ ,~'
, ~ ~~/ j ..
, ~-=-T:~- ., C~::_ . ~i~~.-~ _
SLCRETARY,. ANAHEIDf I'fY P~.AP7N3:Nu C~NII~(ISSION
STATE QF' CALIT'ORNIA )
COUNxY OF ORANG'r'. ) SS,
CtTY 4F AN~EIM }
7.. EdiL•h L, Ha~°ris„ S~ecretai~y of th~ Anaheim City Planning
Conunis ,ion, do hereby cQrt:i~y thati the faregoinq rc~solution was gas~ed and
adop~ed a•L• ~ meeting of the Ar_aheim City P~~inning Commission held on August
1, 1988 by ~he following vc~te c~f the tnembers thereo~':
AYES: CO2~A'lISSIONERS: EiUUA;i, FEC~llHf-U.~'
NOES: (;0(~TSSIONERS: BOYnSTUN, CAFtIISZLLL~C), HERBST_,
MF~S;i~, MC $UF:N~Y
ABSENT: CdMMISSIONLRS:
~ 22~ W1TN-,•SS WHERE01', I.have hereunka set; my ha:nd t~ris 1si: day ot
~ Aagust. 1988.
•, /
I ,. - f'~'J .. /~ ~j~~l' ,i
_..~ (~~~.:..t...~L.~S,~w.~ ~f~ ~~~Cf;~~Lr'
:iECRE;FA.R~.'. 1.I~T,t~HEIM CITY~P ANIrING CpNaMISSIQN}
~
C
,:'; ;:r
`'; 's
;, ;'~
,
~;
~ ,:`'
~
~
~,
,,
i
~
~.
~
'3' PC$t3-210
`.,~ i
I..
.~
: . ~
~~+~r_~k.~ ' "'' ~ ~
' ,
' .~