PC 88-211~ ~ . . . .,5.'.
~ .
' RESOLUTTON NO~P 88-;;11
A RESOLUTION OF ?:;;~; :~NAH~IM CTTX PLANNING COMMISSION
TFIAT PETITION FOR VARIAN~E I30. 3824 BE DENIED
I~VHGREAS, the Anaheim Cit,y Plamiing Commission did receive a
veriEied Petition for Vari~ncE fram JAhiES R. NEEDFiAM anc~ SIiIRLEY A. NLEpHAhf,
1028 ~• North $tr.eot, Anaheim~ CA 9.~.8Q1, SArIxOS BECEP.RA and I20SA B~CERRA, 1014
E. North Straet, An~Yceim, CA 92a05, DONALD K. SMAGI~EY and. JERI M.
, HOLLINGSWORTH, 107.0 E. North Stre~~t, Anaheim, ~,~ y2D01, owner, and MASSOUD
,~ MONSHTZADSEH, 1524 Victorxa ~•Vay, Placent.ia, CA 9Z6~~~, agent, for certain real
praperty situated in i:h~ Ci*yo uE Anaheim, Couni:y af Ora;tgE, State of
Cali;°ornia described as:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN TH}'s NORTH LINE OF LOT A-1 AS
SHOWN QN a DSAP RECOFDED IN B00IC ~#, PAG.ES 6'l9 A,17D 630
' OF AEEll$, RECORllS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNTA,
SAID ~POINT BEING 239 FEET iVESTERLY aF TH~ NORTHEAST
~ CORNGR THEREOF; RLTNPlING THENCE SOUTF3ERLY PARAI~LEL TO
TFI~ EASTERLY LIrIE OF SAID LOT, C~~ , 5 FEET; TkIENCC
PiORTHEI2LY' PARALLEL TO SAID EAST~RLY LINS 'l25 FEET TU
A P07.NT TN ~AID NORTF~ERLX LINE; T.HENCE EASTEi~LY.
. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LING 67.5 FEk;T Tp THE PpIN'P OF
BEuINNING,
; B~GIN~TING A'C A PO:INT IN THG NQRTH LINE 0~' VINE`tAFll
LOT A-1, AS SHOWP7 ON A MAP R~rORD~~ IN BOOR 4, Pi~GES
' fi29 AND fi30 OI' DE~DS, fiECORDS Or LOS ANC+ELES COUI~TTY,
CALIFGRNTA, SAID PUINT BEIN'G 306.5 F'~ET WES~'ERLY Or
THE IJOI~TFIEAST CORNEk THEREOF; RUNPlING THENCE
SUiTTHERLY PARALLEL TO iHE EA51'ERLY LINE OF SAID LOT,
225 P'EET; THE:QCE WE~TERLY PARALLFL TO THF NORxHSRLY
LINF AF SAID L'0'P, 67.5 FEET; THETiCE NORTHERLY
FARALLEL TO SAIB EASTERLY LINE, 225 FE~T TO ]~ POINT
IN THE SAID PIORTFI~R.LY Z,INE; TFiENCE L`'ASTERLX ALONG
SAID NORZ'HCRLY LINE, 67.5 FEET 'r0 THE POINT OF
BEGINrII.NG.
IiEGINNING AT A P07NT I2v THE p70RTH ~,INE OF V;tNrS~ARD
LOT A-Z, AS SH()WN ON A MAP BFCORDED IN BUOK 4, PAGES
y G29 AND b30 OF DEEDS, R~CORDS OI' LUS .1~NGELES COUNTY,
~ CALIFOR2dTA, SAID p0I2TT BEJNG 164 k'EET WESTERLY OF
THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEi2E0F; fiUNNING THH;NCF.
; SOUTHERLY PARALLEL TO THE EAST~RLY LINE OF SAIA LOT,
~ 225 FEET; TH~NCE WESTEFLY PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LQT 75 FE~T; ~H.ENC~ NORTH~RLy r•ARALLEL
~ TO SAID FAS7.'FRLY LINE, ~1.5 FEET ~0 A POa?1T ?N THE
, SAID NO~2TFIERLY i,TNE; TH:c~. ' EASTERLY AI.ONG SAIU ~
NORTHERLY LYTTE 75 FEE',~ TO THE L ~~ ri~' OF BEGINNING.
O~i25r
,~'. ; .
- ; .~;;1
ii..~w~
PC88-211
. ~!+ (~
. WHEREI~S, tk~e City Planning Commisszon ~3.d hold a public hearing
at the Civic Center ir~ th2 City of An~heim on August 1, 1988, a~ 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said puba9.c k.earing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with th~ ~~rov.isions of the Axiaheim Municipal Gode, Chapter 18.03,
to hea.r and coiisz~lar evidenc~ for and. against said proposed wari.ance and ~a
investigate and make findinr~s and recortunendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, saicl Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation
and study made by itself anil in its behalf, and after due considera~ion of a17.
~ ~~•idence and zeports offered at said hearing, does find ar.cl c3etermine Lhe
followinq facts;
1. That ~he petitioner pro~oses waivers of the followin•~ to
construct a 2-sto.rx, :L5-unit condominiurn camplex:
?~ (A) SECTTUNS 10.31~62•C~1? - Maximuin struatural height.
,~ axtd 18._i1~,2 013. il sto_ry permit~ed vrithxn 150 feet of
single-family residential zoning;
'' 2 storigs. proposed 3.0 Co 95 feet Erom
~.
RS-7200 zuni.nc~)
,:
'' (B) SECTION 18.31_,6;i.024 -• Minimum land~ca~~d ~P.. back abutti»a
`; sin~le-faro.il~_residEntial developmentt,~.
a~ fee~ required; 4 to ~2 fge~ proposod)
~C) ~E("_ 10N ].~~1~UG3.0~1 -• Minimtun re ~r ational/. leisurs area.
(Daleted)
2. rhat th.e above~-mentioned waivers are hereby denied on 'the
basis that ~eneral Plan Amenc3ment No. 246 and Reclassifica.tian Na. 88-89-05
ccnsidered in connectzon with aubjec~ variance were denisd.
,i; 3. Tha~ there are na exczptional or extr~ozclinary
`' circumstar.ces or condiL-ions applicable tn the property involved nr to the
' intc~ndeci ~.so of the property tYlz.r do not apply generally to L-he ~roperty or
class of use in ~he same vicinity and zon~.
' 4. Tl~at th~ requestod variance is nut necessary for the
:., preservation and enjoy-nent of a sub~tan~i~1 property right possessed by other
property in the same vicini.ty and zon~, a~:d denied to the pxoperty in gues~ion.
5. That tne requested variance will be materially dP~rimental
tn the ~ublic welfare ar injurious to the property r~r irnprovements in such
~ vicinity and zo~~e in vrhiuh ~:he propexL•y is locat~d.
6. That nine (9) persons indicated their presence at said
pablic hearing in opposii:i.on; and i;hat a petition contai.ning approximately
69 signatures was received in uppositi~n to siibjec~ petition.
i: i -2- F'C88-2.11
;
:~
a
~~Y~1 ~
~
. ~ . . . . ~ ~;{y.
~ ~ALIFORNI~T~RONMENTAL QTJALTTY ACT FINDIN T
~: hat the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has revi~wed the proposal to reclassify subject property
from the RS-7200 (Residential, 5ingle-I'amily) zcne tp the RM-3U00
(Residential, Multiple-Fami:ly) zone to construc~ a 2-story, 15-•unit
condominium complex with waivers o£ maximum structural hsight, m.inimum
landscaped. setback abuttinq single-f.aanily residential develogmen~s ~and minimum
recreational/leisure area o.n a rectangularly-shaped parcel ot land consisting
o£ approximatel,y 1.08 acres, havi.ng a£rantage of app.raximate].y 210 feet on
the snuth side of North Street, being located approximately 190 £eet west ~f
the c~nterline of Eas~ 8tireet and f.urthex de5cribed as lUl4, 1020 ar.d 1028
East NorL-h St~est; and does Yiereby approve the Negative Declaration upon
finding that it has ^onsidared the Negative Aeclara~tion together wi~h any
cornn~ s received dt~ring the public review procegs and further finding on the
basi: of the iniL-ia1 study azid any comments r.eceived tha~ there is no
substantial evidence tlzat tl:e project will have a significant eff~ct o:. Che
er,vironment.
N0~4, THEF2EFOR~, BE IT RESQLVEA Y.hat~ the Anaheim City Pianning
Commission does hereby deny subject Petition foz• Variance on thP basis of the
a£orementioned findings.
THE FOhFGOSNG R~SOLTJTION is signed and ap~,ravec3 bv rn~ t~is lst
of August, 1988.
~l ~~l/,.' ,~ / .•;. ,
.-~ ~. ' ! ~ •~%
CEiAIRMAN,/'AN,AHEIM C.T.TY PLANNING COMMISSION
%
ATIEST: ~
S~:CR~TARY,y ANAHSIM CTTY pLAN:1ING COh~Il+dTSSION
STATE OF CAL7FOP.NIA ?
COUNTY nF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY ~1F A:lAHETM )
I. Eclith L. Harris, ~ecretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Corrunission, do hereby certify that the for~goir,g r.esolutaon was pass~d an~
`~ adoptea at a meeting of the Anak~e,im City Planning Commission held on August 1,
'<, 1588~ by thc follo~~ing vote uf the members t.hereof:
1.
`! AYES: COMMIS~IONERB: BOUAS, FFLDHAUS
`:1 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUN, CARUSILI,O, HERBST,
~ MRSSE, MC BURNFY
~~? ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHFREOx, I have hereunto sQt my hand thi~ ].~t day of
Auyust, 19$8.
~i SECRH:TAR`l, ANAF;EIM PLANNZNG COMMISSIOrf
;u ,
:, ,. .
l
'
i~
~
+3- PCBA-211
~
. , • ~n,;~{ r~uv.~tiM,~:. '