PC 88-216~~~ ,
.~~
,, ~, . ,.
~~*,.
RESOL~L3 N N _-~@_$.~1.~L
A RESOLUTION OP' '!'fiE At1AHETtQ CITX PLANNING CO.yIMISS:iO.N
THAT PETITIpN FOR RECLASSIFICAT70N NU. 88_gg_pg g~ GRANTFp
petition for~ Re ~assif cat on rom ,~l~D ing ~°~~ss3on did receive a verif3.ed
Anaheim, CA 92805, owner, and RONALll CROW EYJAAAD~I~NI~a~ntrea• R ad ~~Fullerton,
CA 92635, agent, of certain real prn per~ y s i t u a t e d i n t h~ City of Ariah~im~
C o u n t y o f Or3nge. Stata of Californi,a, described as ~ollows:
PARCEL A. THAT PORTION OF TI•I~ ~AST HAC,F OF LOT 9 OF HE:,EN
AND LYNCFY' S A.DDITION TO ANAHFTM, TN THE CIxY OF ANI~,F;EIM, AS
GHaWN ON A MAp RECORDED I27 Fi00K 442, PAGF 7.58 OF nE~D5,
RFCORDS OF LOS ANGELES COU2dTX, CAI;IFORNIA, ~ESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
AEGINNIN'G AT TTiE NOR'rHEASx CORNER OF SAIU LOT 9; TH~.NCE
SUUTH if8 DEGRE~S 54'42" WEST 239.06 FEET AI.ONC THE NORTH
LINE OF SATU LOT 9 TO THE TRUC POINT QF BEGZNNING; THENCE
SQiJ.T.H Q 7EGREES 10'08" EAST 142,41 FEET A.LONG A LINE
PAF~ALLEI', TQ THE ~AST LINE OF SAID LQT 9; THENCF I30R:t'H
88 D~GREES 54'42" EAST 73.63 FEFT; THFNCE S~JT1H 0 DEGR~;ES
10' 08" EAST 91. 61 k'EET TO A POIPJT ON A CURVE CO2JCA'VE
SOU'TFIEASTERLY HAVING A Ri1DI[JS OF 45.00 EEE~; THENCE
SOUTHEASTFRLX ALONG SAIb CU12VE FROM A TANGCPJ~ ~EARI~IG SOUTH
70 DEC:lEES 10' 11" EAST, A27 AR~ pIgT1~2dC~ ~~ g~., 33 FEET TO A
REVER°~' CURVE, IiAVING A R]1nIUS OF 45.00 FEET, A, RADIAL, FIiOM
THIS POINT HAVIt7G A BEARlNG OF ~70RTii 56 D~GREES 36'42"
F1EST; THEN(;E 50UTH~RLY AN ARC DIST~INCE OF 10.27 ~'EET J~I,pN'~
SAID CURVE THROTJ~j3 ~ CENTRAL ANGLE pE 13 DEGRE~S 04'12";
TH.[:NC~ NORTH 89 7EGRE~;; pZ ~ 1+1~~ EAST ].18. 24 FEET TO THE WEST
T,IN~; OF THE EAST 31.00 FEE1' OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE ALONG
SATD WEST LINE NORTH 0 DEGREES 1d'Q8" WEST 310.84 FEET ~'p
THE NORTH LZNE OF SATD LOT 9; THGNCE I~,ONG SAID N4RTH LINE,
SOUTIi 1!8 DEGREES 54'42" WEST 209.06 k'EET TO THE TRU~ POINT
OF BEGINN.tNG.
PARCEL H: LOT A OF TRACT 9201, ZN THE CITY OF A~7AH~TA,f, AS
SHOWN ON A Ml~p ngCORDEI? Irr BOOK 380, PAGE5 23, 24, 25 and
'l6 OF M7SCELLANEOU.~', MApS, RECORDS OF SAIn ORANGE COUNTY,
CALII'ORNIA,
093Sr
~~ ;:;°
_~Yf~: r.ai 1r~9"YJ. b ~ ~ '
.,,,' ~
WFiEREAS, the Ca~y Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
~he Civic CenCer in the City oE Anaheim on August 15, 1958 e~ 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing hr~vinq been duly givan as requa.red by law and iu
accordanco with ~,he provisions of Ghe Anaheim Municipal CodB. ~Che~pter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence Eor and against said proposed ro~lassification
and to investigate and makQ Exndings and rec~mmenclations in connertion
therewi.th; atxd
WHEREAS, saicl Conunission, aftor due xnspection, investigation an3
study ma~le by iCse~f and in its be~alf, and afi:sr duo cansideration oF al1
avidence and reports affered at said hearing, cloe~ fi.nd and 8etermine the
foll~wing facts:
1, That the petitioner prop~ses reclassific3tion o~ subject
property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residenkial, Agricultural) (Porti.on A) and
RS-A-~13,000 (Residential, Multiple ~'amily) Zone
k 2. That the Anaheim GeneraJ~ Plan designates subject property Eor
~ Medium DPnsit~ Residential land uses permitting up to 36 dwelli.nq units per
~ gross acr~.
~
r 3. That the prop~sed reclassifica} of: zubject property xs
~,: necess~~:y andlar desirab).e for the orderly . ~roper developmen~ aE the
'` c ommuni L• y .
;:
`' 4. That the propased reclassiL•ication of subjer,t property dees
~ properly relats to tihe zones and thezr permitted uses locally established in
';~ close prpximity to subj~ct propezty and to the zosies and their nermitted uses
~'` generally es~ablishgd throughout the cnmmunity.
!,
~,~
5, That thQ proposec3 reclnssification of sukrject propezty requi.res
the improvzment of abutting streets in accordancs wiL•h the Circulation Element
of the Ggnaral ~lar., due to the anticipat~d increass in traffic whic2i will be
generated by the i.ntensificaL•ion of land use.
~ 6. That seven (7) persons indicated their presenr.e at said public
~-' hearing in opposikion; and that no correspond~nce ans received in opposi~ion
, to subject potitiori.
li;,° ~
. + ~',~`~~ 1{~t 1
. ~''; j7~'~
_ "t~
i
,~
e
f
-2- PCB8-2].6
_ ; `~
~,
~
'if~
~ .......ir..~. s.N,~~
:
; ,.., , . , ~:
, . . ..
.
, ~..,
~~
i
;
LIF NIA ENV~RQNMEN'PAL 0 J~ALIx3'~+cx ~IN..PIN : Tha~ the Anaheim City ~:;,
;`
~
Planning C~mm3.ssi.on has reviewQd tho proposal to reclassify subjeat property a
'
000 (Residential, Single-Family) zone to RM-3,000 (~tesidantial,
from the I2S-5 ,:~
,
Multiplo-Famil.y) (F~rtion A) and RS-A-43,~OQ (Residential, Agracultural) '~',;
(Portion B) zone to the RM-3,000 (Residential MultiplQ Zone) and to construct ~;;
a 7-story, 15-unit residenCial condaminium comp:lex with waivers of minimum ~;
structural seL•back, minimum landscaped setback and maximwn fence height, on an ~;.
irregalarly-shaped parr.el of lancl cozzsisting of approximately 1.7, ncres having ~;
a f•rontage of ~ppraximately 210 fee~ on Lhe south side o£ Hroadway having a
~
ma~imum depth of appraximately 2G6 £eet, beinc~ locatecl approximately 250 feet ;,
east of the conterline of Gilmar ~Creet and further described as 1500 West a,~:
Broadway; and does horeby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that 4~.
it has consid~red the Negative ~eclarat.xon together with any comments received ,~~
during the public raview process and further findiny oYi ~he basis of the ~
initial study and any camments received that there i.s no substantial evidence f.
~
that the pr.oject will have a signif.ic~nt sffect on Che environment. ~
TH~R~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cxty Planninq
NOW 1
1,'
,
Commissi.on dues hereby graxit subject Pet~tion for 12ec1HSSification and, b,y 60 :
doing, that TiL•le 18-Zoning of ttie Ar_dheim Munzcipal Code be amended to ~.
exclude €rom tl~e above-described propertyr from the RS-5,000 (P.esidential,
ricultural?
A
l
ti
id ;
g
a
,
en
Sinqla-Family) (Portion A) anr~ RS-A-43,000 (Res
'
amily) zone and
(PArt;ion B) zone to the RM-3,0~0 (&esidential. Mu.ltiple k ,
+
incorpora'tP said describad property upon thP iollawing condit~ions which are ,
hereby feund to be a n~cessary ~rorequisite to thQ proposed use o£ subjer*_ ;:
r
propArty in ordsr to preserve the saf.ety and general walfare uf the ~it:izenf;
oE tho ~Ci.ty aL Anaheim: ~
~
ThaL a fea shall be paid to ~:he Gity of Anaheim fox street lighting
1
i
,
along Broadway in an amount as determined by City Cauncil resolufiion.
Tha~ a fee shall h~ paid to the CiL•y aE Ana'heim for tree planting
2
,
aloz~g Broadwa;= in t~n a~nount as detern~ined by City Council resolution.
3, xhat vQhiculaz and pedestrian acces~ rights t;o Gilbruck Urive sha~t
be dedicated to the City cf Anaheim.
That the owner of subject property shall sub~nit ~x le~ter req~iesting
4
.
termination of Conditional Use Permi~ No. 1872 to thP Zoning
Divisinn.
5. Tl~a~ prior to thg introducti.on o:E an ordinanc~ rezoniny sub~ect
property, Condition Nos. ]., 2, 3 and 4, ~+bove-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions ar rights granted by this resolution
s1ia11 becom~ null and void by e:~ion of the Planning Ccmmission
uuless said conditions are complied with within one ~~ear from the
date of this resulution~ or such further time as the Planninq
Commissfon maN ~rant.
-3- PC:88-216
~<
~a
,.
~
~ y'
'~,S
~; y'
" ~. i H tY~'~~
~~~ r' b~" ;~
A j j
~'~`` ~'~ ,
~ ;~;,~
"..r
~
'` ~'.
~.
6. That approval of this applicati.on cons~itu~e3 approval of the
proposed reguest on:ly to the extent that it compl3es w3.th the
AnahQim Munic.i.pa1 2oning Code and any athsr applicablo City
reguiations. Appraval cloas not include any actio~i or findings as to
compliance or approyal of the requast rmgarding ~ny other ap~licable
ordinance, regulaL•ion or r.Eqixirement.
BE: IT FURTHER i2ESOLVED that ths Anaheim City Planning Commissi.on
doe~ hereby find and determine that adoptiozi c~f this Rgsalution is expressly
predica~ed upon apnlicant's cemplxance with Pach and all ~f the conditions
hereix,r.tibove :~et ~orth. ahould any such c~nditions, or any part thereof, bs
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judc~n'~oz~t of any court of
compeL-e:nL• jurisdiction, then this Resolutian, and any appravals herein
aontaineci, sha.ll be deemed null and void.
THE FORc~G0I2JG RESQLUTION is signed and appr~ved by me this 15th day
of August, 1988.
i~ ~ j~:~~ y ~ .i ~!'L'l~-~ r'
_ ~/~.
CHATRMAN, AFiEI~I CT'rY PLANNZNG COMMISSION
v'
o ~ y .,.
ATTEST: J `
- .~.~~~-- _
EXECUTI'VE SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CQUNTY OF ORANGN ) ss.
CZTY OF ANA.HEIt•1 )
I, Yamela Ti. Starnes, Fxecutive Secretary of ~he Anaheim Planaing
DeparYanent, dn hereby certify that the foreqoing reso2utian was passod and
adc~pted at a meetinq of the Anaheim City Planning Commission he~d on
August 15, 1988, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CC2~A~IISSION~;RS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUTT, CARU5ILL~, rEl'.DTiAUS, HERSST,
M~ B(,'RNEX, AtEuSE ~;
NOES: COA4SI^aSIONERS: FIERHST '~':'~
~„
A~3SENTc CQMMTSSTONERa: NONE ~%
~
IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntv set my nand this 15l•h da,y oF ;~,Q
August, 1988. .;;
f ,~~~., ~ ~ `'~~
. Starr~es , ,~
E7C~CUTIVE SECRETARY, ANAFiEIM PL,ANNING DEPARTMENT ,,,