PC 88-255~
RE~SQLUTION N0. P~8 -255
~
A RFSOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLAN27TNG COMMJCSSION
TFIAT PETITtON FOR VARIAN~E N0. 3836 BE GE2ANTED
WFiFREAS, the Anaheim City~ Planning Commission did rece.ive a
verified PeCition for Variance from VERNON L. F'REDFRICK I~ND JEHNNR E.
FREDER.ICK, G272 Trailcr~~t Lane, Yorba L,inda., CA 926$6, and DONALD G. NIKOLS
AND ~ARRTE W, NIROLS, 2532 Circle Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92fi3g, ownar^,, and
TERRY .~ND NTKOLS COMPA,*Ty, 4 Upp~r Newpart Plaz~ Drive, ~103, Newport Beach,
CA 92660, agent, nf certain real propQrty situated in the City of Ana~ieim,
County of Urange, State of California described as:
; ,LOTS TFiREE AND FOUR AND SE~IEN ANA E:[GHT IN Br.,OCK
; TkiREE OF ~~ERI~?:E~D AND OPPEI~THF'IMER'S SUBDIVISION OF
THE SPOERL TRACT, IN THE CTTY OF ANAHF'IM, ~OUNTY UI'
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORt7IA, i4S SEIpWN ON A Ml,,p
~ RECORDED IN BOOK 19 PAGE 94 OF MTSCELLANEOiJS kECORDS
' OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, C.\LIN~ORNIA.
LOTS 5 ADTD 6 IN BLOCK 3 QF THE SUMMERFI~LD AND
O.PPENFIEIMERS SUBDIVISION OF THE SPOERL TRACT, IN THE
CI=~Y OF )+NAHEIM, CO[JNTY OF ORANGE, STA7.'E Oi
C'AL.LFORNTA, .AS PEK MAP. KECO&'DED .IN BOOK 19 PAGE 4h
M'IS(".ELLANEOUS MAFS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
R,ECORD~R QF SATD COUNTX.
LGTS 1 AND 2 IN' HLTCK 3 OF SUM1dERFIELD AND
OPPENFIFIMER'S SUBDIy1SI0N QF TfIE S~OFRL TRAC'r, T2~t' TH~
CTTY OF ANAH~IM, COUNTY OF OI2ANC,E, STATE OF
~'ALIFOFNIA, A5 PER MAF THEI:CCIF RECORDED IN k?OOK 19,
~~T PAGE 44, OF MISCEL'LANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGEL~S
(:OUNTY, CALIFORNTA.
Ai
0 ,. ;,
FiT~EREAS, the Cit,y Plannina Commissian did ho'ld a Qublic: hearing ~~
the Civxc (;enter in the City ~f Anaheim on Septem~er I2, I988, a;-, 1:3q p,m„
notice af s,aid public hearing having been du?y given as required by law and in
acco~dance wi~h t:he provzsions o£ the .A.naheim Municipal Cocle~ Ch~ptor 18.03,
to .hear ~nc~ consider evidez~ce for a:id against saic~ proposed variance and to
.investigaCs and make Eindings and rec;orrunendatians in coniiection therewith; and
WFiE~2EJ1S, said Co;nmission, after due inspection, investigation and
stu3y made k~y atsE~lf and in its behalf, ar.d after due consider.ation of all
evider~ce and repozts offerQd at said hearing, does Eind and determine th2
following faal:s:
0481r
-:1-
PC88-255
;~~
:=~
~ ~;;,
:r' ~~
;:;;
; f,
•r; Y
' ~:
.~~
I
r?
i'~I~t''
r...
L.%.~
~ ~
l. That the p~tiCioner propos~s waivers of tho folJ.okinq to
const:uct a 3-story, 22-unit apartment complex:
~A) ~~'r TI 18,34e,Q4?~~1 - ~t!Il1x~a~r~.S~~: ~~~•
(2 g4;ori°~ permiCted, ~,~Q.~~ ~roposc~d)
~ B) ~ rT I SL'~.~8.=~..q.~A~ ?~Qx~. - ~~m~~ i Gg~4~Q~~9Q •
(,F~ permitted, C~.$^~ prop4sed)
2. That thP abova-mentinnod waivezs are hQreby granted on the basis
that tbere are spocial cizr.umstances apnlicable to the property yuc;h as size,
shape, topCgraphy, location and surroundings which do not apply to oi:her
identi~ally ~dn~ad pr~perty in the same vicinit}; and that strict ~pplicatfon
of• t~.~ Zonlz~g Code deprives thc ~,ropQrty of. privileges enj~yod by ot~:ar
rropQrtias in the ident.ical zone and classification in the ~.icinitp.
3. That trere are excep~ional. or extraordinary c3.rcumstance^ oi
conditions a~plicabl~ to lhe property involved or td the intended uso of thc~
~roperty that do not apply yanerally to khs property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zc-r.e.
4. That ~he re~uested variance is necossary for. the prps~rvat•ic:n
and en juymenL• of a~ubstantial propc~rty ri.grt possessed by other property ir-
L•he same vicinity anci zane, a:zd denis~ to thQ property in q~testion.
5. 'Thal the rc~quo~tQd variance will n~t be materially detr.imental
to the public we).Lare or injurious to the propPrty or impr~vements in such
vic.inity ancl zone in which the pr~perty is located.
6. That one pex~son indi~aled their prea~enca at said public he~ring
in opposition; and tnat no corr.QSpundence was received in opposition to the
subjcat geti~ior..
~p,~.~ORNIj~ ENVIRQNM~NT~L Q~Ai,~X ~T FINDINC~: That tho Anaheim
City P? al:niiig Commission has revie~aQd tbe proposal to r.onstrur.t a 3-~tor;
22-rinit apartmPnt compler. with waiv~rs oE maximum structural height t+nd
maximum site coveraqe on a O.G aaro parcel having an approximatc+ fr~ntago of
200 fee~ on tho sov.th side oE DiamonQ Street, havin3 a maximum dopth of
approximately 135 faQt, beinq loc~ted approximtst~ly 28~J fe~t west of the
centr~rline of Car2oton AvQnue and further d~scribed as 1220-32 Diamond
Street; and doe~s herQby ap~rcve t:e N~gative Ueclarakion upon finding that it
has consic]erad th~ NRqaCivQ Ueclnration tugeL•her with any comments received
d.uring the public review process and f.urther finding on kh~ Lasi.s of the
initial study ~.nd r~ny comments receiva~ that tharr ib no substantial evidence
tnat the projoct wi.Il have a siyniElcanL• etfect ~n tfie environnKnt.
PC88-255
; ~~
~
,.~
„r:
NOW, THL~REFURE~, 13E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commissioix dues hgreby rra::t aubject Pet3.tioxi for ~~t~r.iance, upon tho
following conditions which aro hereby four.a to be a neces3ary prer.equisite to
the proposed urzo uf the suhject property i.n arder to ~reservo tho st+Eoty and
gAnQral welfare oF the Citizens of khe Ctty ot Ana~elm:
1. That prior to issuance oE ~ building permit, Che appropriate
traff.ic signal assessment fea shall be paid to t2ia Clty of Anahoim
in an amount as determi.nod by City Council rESOlutxon.
2. That the lega~ owner of subject gropr~r~y sha'l1 irrev~cabZy affer to
dedicate a strip of land ton (10) foPt from thg centerline of. ti:e
al].ay Eor alley widening pur.poses.
3. That alJ. enginoering improvements ~long tha alley sha~l be
constru.cted in accordancp with spocirications oz~ xile in the oEfice
of Lhe Clty RnginoQr.
4. That sidewalks, curbs aiid gu~ters shall be removod and/or
:•~constructed along Diamond Street as required by the City ~ngineer
and in accordance with standard plans and speciPicati~ns on Eile fn
the Office ~f ~he City Engineor.
5. That the existing driveways on Diamond Stroet shall be remove~i and
replaced with standard curb znd gutter, Sidewalk ;,nd landscaping.
6. That in the ovent a parcel map is not recorded combining the eiqht
(8) existinq lots, the laqal proporty owner shal~ furniah the
2oning Division with a copy of a recorded covanant and aoreemdnt in ,~
a form approved by the City Attorney aqroeing to nold subject
property as one par.cel.
7. Th~t gate~s shall not b~ installed ncross any drivPway in a manner
wt~ich may adversely affQCL• vehicular traffic in the adjacent public
strQOt(s). Instal.l~tion uf a~y gates shall conform to the
Engineering Division':s Stand.ard Plbn No. 402 ancl shall be subject
to the revlew and approval of th3 City Traffic Engineer.
8. That a fee shall Le paid to the Cit•y of Anaheim for streo~ lfyhti.ng
alonq Diamond Streer. in ari amount as deter~ninorl by City Council
rc~solution.
9. T_hat ~s fee shall be gaici to rho City of A7ahoim for tree glantiny
t~long Diamond Streer in ~.n amount as detormined by City Counci2
rQSOlution.
10. That subj~ct propcr•.y shail be sorved by underground utiliti.os.
-~-
1,
F~C88-255
f
_ ;-.is
7 @~
y~ ,.:«a.~ ~ ' ti c
,~ .
11. That a five (5) Foot wida public utility oasemenL shall be
dedicared and rocorded across the north s~de of. hhe south property
line, as requ.ired by the Electrica2 Engineara,ng Divis.ion.
12• Ths~t tho owner/dcveloper shall porf•orm a water flow te~t and
clemonstrato to t,he sati.sfactiun oE th~ City Wator Engineerinq
Divisi~r. that an ample water supply can be del3vered to the pLOjoct
. ;~ite. If the tc~st indir.atos inacleq~atQ water sup~ly, tho
owner/developer ~?ia11 cor~struct off-site watPr system improvements
in nr~]or to deliver an t~cloquat~ wr~t;er supply to subject sxte to the
satiafaction oE the Ci~y Water Engineering Division.
13. ThaL• prio: to commencomenr o£ stre;ctural framing, a fire fl~w of
2000 G.P.M. shall be providr.ci (1000 G.P.M, from ea~ch of 2 hydrvnts
` on Dzamon3 ^atreQt) or tho ontire comFlAx sha11 be sprinklerod and
: provid~ci w:ith a 1000 G.P.M. flow with an actuul 20 P.S.I. minimum,
a as required by the Ciry Fire L~partment.
~ 14. That pr5.ur to issuax~ce af a buildtnq ~Qrmit, appropriata parlc and
recreation ir:-7.ieu fees shall be paid to the City oE T~naheim in an
`~ amount as deteXR,ined by the Citx Cuuncil.
t
y~ 15. That drai.na e of sub'ect •
? 9 ~ propert~ shail be d.isposed of in a manner
satistactory to the City F.ngineer,
1
16. That if requir~d by the Fire and/or Pulice Depart,nent, all. ~ockable
pQd~stripn and vehicular accesa gates q!~dll be eqi~ippefl with a
~ "knox box" devicQ to the satisfa~ti~r~ of the City .F'ire Depa~tment
~ $nd 1:ha CiCy Police DepartrnQnt.
` 7-7 • 1hTt a double-bin tra3Yi storagQ area sl~a'll be providod an~,~
+. mai.nl~ained in r~ locaCion acceptable to the S~reet MainL•~na,nce and
3 SnniCa'tinn Divasion and. in accordance with approved planr~ on i'i1R
with saic] Divfsion.
18. Thal• a11 air aonditioning L•acilities 3:sd other ro~f and gro~xnd
mounted equipment shall be propHrly shielded fcom view, and t:tie
sound buffored Erom adjacent residenti.~t pioperties.
~ 1~• That prior to .issuance uf u buildiiig ~ermit, evfdonc~ shall lie
' pres~ntac~ cncisfactory to the Buil~ii.ng Division thak the praposecl
Prp]Q~~ is in con£•ormanr_e witb. Council Po.licy Num-+~r 542 "Sound
?-rtenuation in Residential Projects" and wit:h N61•4p Insulatian
` SCandards specifi~d in the Califoznia Administr~~ive Code, Title 25.
~o• T'liat a six (6)-footi high masonry binr_k wali shull b~ construct~d
and maintained along the west ~ror:,rty lino,
-4-
PC88-~55
~J
~'~:4
~
. . ~ . . . . ' . Y
~ r amta~a
h.~j
~ ~ 74
,~
21• That ~ho on-slte landscaping shall be rnaint;ained in compliar~ce wi.th
City standards.
2~• That prior. to Isguance of a building permi.t, the legal pr~oport~
owner shall prep~ro and recerd an unsubordinatRd covonant limitinq
occupar~cy of c~ach apartment tiznit to no more than two (2) persons
(otkier tlian children und~r the aga of two ( 2) yoars ) per badroom.
S,sid :limitation shall be included in each loase/rental agreement.
A copy cf tho c~venant shall be submitLed ro and approved by thQ
Ci~j Attorney pr.i.or to recorciation. A. copy ~f tha recordad
covenant sh311 ba t'urnished to the Zonitig DSvision,
~3• That a cav~nant shall be recorded agr~Ping to pr~vide the renter of
ear.h dwelli.ng unit w.ith written in~ormation obtaiiied from the
~chool District(s) pertuir,inq to possible overcxowded concliLions
and busing status of thQ sr.~,ool(s) serv.ing the clwel:ing unit.
24• Tra~ subject 1~,operty, shal]. he dovelopecl substantially in
accordance Fr~th plans anc~ specifications on fi1Q with the City oE
A.naheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3.
75• That prior to issuarace of a rui]ding permit, or wi.thin a p~riod of
one year frorn thz da~e cc this rosolution, whicIiever occurs Eirst,
C~ndition Nos. 1.. Z, 6, 8. 9. 11. 12. 14. 19. 22 ~nd ~3,
above-ment.ior~ed, shall be compliod with, Extensions fur further.
time tu completP said conditions may b~ grant~d in accordance with
Section 1FI.C3.090 oE the Anaheim MunicipaA Code.
26• That prior to fiizal building and zoninq Inspections, Condition Nos.
3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 16, 17, ?A, 20 and 24, above-mentioued, t;hall be
complied with.
27• ThaL• ~,p,.nva1 of this appl~ca~ion ronsiitutes approvzl oE the
rt'~pased request ~nly to thP axtent that it complies wzth the
Anaheim Municipal 'Ln:.yng Code and any other appliaablo C.ity
regulatior.s. A~i~roval 3oes not include any action or find3ngs as
to comp~:~nce or appruval of the re~uost rogarding any other
aj~~a..icablo ordinance, re~ulation or requirement.
BE TT FURTEfER RESULVEA t'riar_ the Anahe3m City PZanning Cammission
doQS horeby f.tnd and doterml~e thdt adopici~n of this Resolutiun is expressly
predicated upon appltuanL's compliance with each anct all of tho conditions
hereinabove sel•. forth. Should any sucti con~litions, oz any part tr.oreof, be
declaroci invalicl or unQnforc~ablo by the final ju~lgment of any court o~
competent jurisdiction, khen this Resolution, and any t~pprovals herein.
containad, shaZl be deemQd null and voi3.
-5-
pC88-255
Y ~~:
i;
r -------- ~ .. . • .. . .. `li't~;r:.lj~
~
„
, '
;;, .
~
THE FOREGnING RESOLUTION is signod and ~pproved by mR "chis 12th dZy
of September, 1980.
.~~~j~~~.-.:;~~f~Jr-4-~.~._ .~.
CHAIRWOMAN,~~NAHEIM CITY' PLA~INTA'G COM2~tISSION~
;, i
ATTEST: . ~
_ ' ~,~
' , . ~J _-.____
SECRETAR~, ANAHEIDi CITY PLANNING f:ODfMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
C~JNTX OF ORANGE ) ss.
,.
~~ CITY nF ANAHEIM )
-,.
i;
I, Eclith L. Fiarx•i~, Secret~ry oF the Anak:eim ~~ity P1an~zing
!
"~~ C~mmission, do hereby certi.Ey that the Eoregaing resolu~ion was passQd and
adopted at a meering of the Anaheim C.ity Planning Commissxon h~ld on
September 12, 19$8, by the follo•wing vote o~ the members L-her.eo~':
h,'. AYES: COMMISSIpNERS: BOUAS, ROYDSTUN, CARIJSxL~I,Q, FF:LDHAUS, MC BURNEY
'',; NOF.S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEN:[': COMMIS~InN~RS: fiERBST, MF,~SE
~,
:~ tN WITNESS WHEREQF, I have hereun~o set my hand L•his 3,2th day oE
r` September, 1988.
,, i
''~~ • r D ~ /
'4;, SECR~TAF~`!, A.ZJAFIE~Ty pLANNTN~ iSSTON
„~;
; ~~
`6- PCSB-255
y' ~
.. .:~~fi~