PC 88-256; .e ,.,. , ,. ,
::u??~`:~: r.i ~"..~, .:r • i+' + ' •, . , ~ ~, .. „ , _ . ,. .. , ~
,. . ~. ;• ... , , . . ... , „ ,
i~
'0~' ~' ~~'`~
RB I, TION N0. PG8$V25¢
A RESOLUTtON OI' THF ANAHIEIM CTTY PLANNTNG COMMISSION
1'HAT PETITION FOR VARIANC~ N0. 3L~40 BE GRANTED
FI~IEREAS, rhe Anaheim Citx Planning Commissinn did receive a
verifisd Petition for Variance from FUJITA CORF~URATION USA, P.O. 8ose 1607,
Santa Monica, CA 9040fi, o~~ner, and SEABOARD ENGINEERING GO., 1100 South
Beverly Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90035, agenL•, oE certain real property
situated in ttie Cit.y of Anaheim, County o.f Ozange, Sta~e of Califor.nia
descr:bed a~:
> PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAE' 79-257, IN THE GITY OF
~ AN1~fiFIM, AS FIL~n IN liO~K 146, PAG~S 1 and 2 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN TH~ OFFICE OI' THE COUrTTY RECORDER ~F
SAID CUUNTY.
%; WHF.REAS, the City Plan.n:ng Cummis~ion did hold s public hearing
'+ at t:~e Civ~c Conter in L•he City of Au~heim on Septembar 12, 1988, at 1:30
"' p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law
a~id in accorr~ance with the provisions of. the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
1f3.03, to hear ~nd consicler. evidence for and agaziist said proposed variancp
and to investigate and make findings ar.d recommendations in connection
, th~~-ewith; and
WHERC~.~, sazd Commi-sion, after due inspection, investxgation
and si.udy made Uy itself and in it5 behalf, and after due consideration of a11
evidr:nce and r~ports off:ered at said heasing, does Eix~d and detQrmine s:he
foll~~wing fac:ts:
1. That th~ pet~tioner proposes waiver of the following ~o
establish a 22-lui: (~lus 1 common lot) industrial subdivision;
~wETION 18 • pl . J.?Q _. I?oauired L~C ~r4nr~c~g •
(A'll lc~~~ roquired to abut ~~p~~l. i~~str~at or alley;
Lot Nos. 2~hrgurh 13 and_ 1~ ~rouah,22 prc~posod to s~but
~.~x i.~_~~~t r~~~ )
'a 2. Tha~ thQ ab~ve-menL-ionod waiver .is heraby grantQ3 on the
~~.sis that a suitablQ privato ~t;reet rri11 provide on-sike r,irculatiion, and
~~; that there ar.e specia] circumstances applicable to tho property such as siz~,
~ sl~ape, toporraphy, locatian and surroixndings whic:~ do r~ot apply k~ other
::dentically zoned property .in thR same v~cinit,y; an.l that strict appli.cation
of t:he Zoniny Coc]Q c7e~riv~s the property of privileges enj~yed by other
properties in the identical zone and clas~ifica.tion in thc~ vir.inity.
0482r
-1-
P~08-?.5f,
y
,~~ !.
;:°;
.. . . . , 's'.~;~
:,~
,:~
3. ThaC ~here axe ~xceptional or oxtraordinary circumstanees or
canditions appl;cable to ~k:a prqperty invnlvQd or to ~he intended use of the
p.roperty that do not apply gen~rally to the ~roperty or c]ass of use in ths
sama vi.ainity snd zane.
a
~' ,
9. xhat the reques~ed vari.ance is necassary for the
nreservation and enjoymQnL of ~ substantial property right possessed by other
nroperty in tYie same vicinity and zone, and deni9d to tha property in guastion.
5. That the requested variance wi?;i not he mater.ially
~etri.ment~l to rhe public welfare or injuxious t~ the property or improvements
.i~i such vicinity and zonQ in wtiich the property is loc~ted.
6. Tha* no onp indirated ~heir presEnce at ~aid public he~ring
in opposition; anc~ Y.hat no correspondence was received in oppositior 1:a
subjecL perit~on.
~A~QRNIA EDN~:R0I3blENT ._~1hLTTY A~T FINDIN : ~hat the Anaheim
City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to waive the roquired lot
irontage to establish a 22-lot (plus 1 common la~) i~idustrial subdi~vis3on on
a rectangularly-shaped parcal consisting of agproxim~tely 10.9 acres having
an approximatt Erontaye of 600 feet an L•he south side oE Miraloma Avenue~
having a maximum depth of ~pproximately 523 feet and being located
approximately 319 feet east c•f the centerline o£ Fee Ana Street; and does
hereby t~pprove tho Negative Declaration upon findin~3 that it t~a~ considered
the Neqative Declaration togECkier wiY,h an~ comments r~cai.ved r~i~ring the
public raview process and further fincling on the basis ~f the initial study
a.nd Tny c~mments raceivod 'tY~at tY:ere i.s no substantial evidence that the
project wil~ have a s.ignificant effect on ttie environment.
NUW, TY3EHEF'OP.E, IIE iT RESOLVED tkiat the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereLy grant: subject Petition L-or Vari.ance, upon the
following :.o:nditions which are harebl L•ound to be ~ necessary pxerequisite to
the proposed use oE the subject pr~pQrty in orCier to ~reserve the safety and
general wei£are of the Cih,izens of the rity of Anaheim:
1. :l'hat prior to zssuance of a bui.].d5.ng permit:, the appropriate major
thorotigh~are and bridge fee shall be gaid to the City of Anaheim in
an nmount as ~pectfied in the M~jor Thorouglizar•o and Bridge ~'ee
l~rogram Eor the Foothill/EastQrn Transportiation Curridor, as
approved by City Council Rcsolu~ic,n N~. a5R-423.
2. That prior to is:,uance o£ ~ builcling permit, Che appropriate
traffic signal assessment Pee sha1l be paid to the Cit;r o~ Anaheim
iu an amount as determirled by City Council r~.~olutio~.
3. That the vohicular access righY.~ to Miraloma Avenue sxcept at
street and/or alley opQnings, shall be dodic:ated to the City ~f
Anaheim.
?.
PC80-256
~: ~
~~ ~`I
~ ..,-;zi:_
r
~
;
V.4 ytir,! ~ F..>'~ fl~_h~;t ~ ~r.4"y ti .,jti ~ ~ :7`;~ 1 ti71 ..,,:y. ~ . „ .... ~ .~,.,~,; r.•..1: i ~~~ .. ~ ~..~ .. i ~r.'~tKN'SI~4`i~~~f~~
. .. ~ ~.1~~;i'~
~~v
/
~~,,~ ~9~~1'S~1~ ~ .~,1
l . ~:
~• That all priv~te stre~ts shall be ~eveloped in accordance with ~he
Engine+~ring Divisiun's Standard Detail No. 12Z ior private sti•eek~
,
includiY~g installatii~n of stree~ name signs. Plans f~r tho privato
~rreot lighting, a~ required by the standard detai~
ahall be
,
submi.tted to the Buildang Aivasion for approval ~nd .included with
the building plans I~rior to the issuance of build.ing per
mits
.
.
(Private streets a.re those which pro~ia~ p~:imary access an~/or
circ.ulstion within the project).
~• That a parcel map to rQCOrd the divisi.on of subj~ct property shall
be submi.~ted to and lpproved by the City of Anaheim and then be
recorcied in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
~• That a parking plan indicat~ng comnliance with Czty park.ing 'Lot
design standards shall be ~ubmikted to arid approved by the City
Traffic Engir..eer.
~• That gates shalJ. nor b2 installed acrnss any driveway or privake
street in a manner w}iich may ~dversel.y afEect vetiicular traEEic in
t2ie 3djacerit publzc str~eet. InsLal.l.ation ot any gat~s sha11
conf_urm to the Enginecring Division's Standard Plo,n No. 402 and
sliall be subject ta the review and approval of the City Tza£fic
Engiiieer .
8• 'Th3t each driveway location Gha11 ba subject to thg review and
approval of ths Gity Traffic Enyineer t~ guaran~ee that no drivaway
shall be located on any port3on of a streot curb radiixs.
9• That prior to commencemerit uf structur~l iraminq, fira h~drants '
shall be instal_l~d and charged as required and approved by the City
Fire ~iepartment.
10. That al2 lots within subject ~ubdivision s~call be served by
underground utilit:ies.
lI. That thP developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim El~ctrical ~
Engineering Aivision a plan or a writ~on accep~anae indicatinq that ~
thR lighting roquirernents of t~~e City o£ Placenti~ have been ~
3atisfied for the south side of rfiraloma Av~nue adjacent to subject
property, f
i
.~
12• That a recigrocal access and parY.ing ~qree*.;;zit, in a for~n
satisfac~ory to Che Cit Akt~rne f
Of~ice af ~he Orange ('ounty ReeordeLShu1A op~';'e~c~r t~ re oraAa r
agr~.~mant shall th~n be submitted to the Zaning Divzsion. !
~•~• That. dxainage oP subject proporty shal: be disposed oE in a manner
satisfactorX to thP CiGy Engineer. ,
3 FC88-256
~
~'~.
~
~ , .~e,C ..~~ Xit~,Yt'~"i;
~
C, i
l:~C
.}
:ii
~ ''1
14. That if r~3quired by the Fire and/or ~olice Dopartment, ail Iockable
pedestrian and vehicular access gates sha'l1 be equipped wi.t2i a
"knox box" dovice '~c~ the satisfaction of the City ri.re Dopartr~ent,
and the City Palice Derartmsnt.
i5. That trash storage ar~as shal]. be provided and maintained in n
location ~ccept:able to the SCreet Maintoxianca and Sani~cition
Division and in accnrdance with approved plans on File with said
DiviSion.
16. Thak all aix• conditioniny faciiities and other roof and ground
mour~te3 equipment shall be propRrly shielded from view. ,,
17. That the propos~l sha].1 c~mply with all signing requirament•s of the
ML "Industrial, Limited" 'L~ne, unless a variance allowing sigM
waivers is apgr~~ved by the City Council, Planning Commission or
.7,oninq Administrator.
. ~,
''~ 18. That tihe on-site landscaping shall k~e mair.:ainQd in compliance wztti
~~~ City standards.
19. ~hat subjECt pro~erty sha11 be developed sub~tan~iaY:ty in
accordance with plans and s~ecifications on f,ile with ~he City of
Anaheim marked Exnibit No. 1; provided, howevQr., that the proposed
• int:eri~r parcel lines ma~ be relocated to progerly align tihe
proposed private street, suhject to the apnroval aE tFie City
Traffic Engineer and the l~lanning Department.
2A. Tha: prior ~o cumr.iencement o£ the activi.ty herei~ approved, or
witYiin a period o£ one year from ~he daL-e of, this reyulution,
whichever occurs first, Canditaon Nos. 3, 5, 12, ond 19,
abov~-mentioned, shali be compliod wi~h. Extens?ons for further
time to complete said conditions may be grankECi in accurdan~:e with
Section 18.03.090 of the Ar~aheim Muiiicipal Code.
21. Tha~ prior tc issuance of a bui'lding psrmit, Condi.tics~i Nos. 1, 2,
4, 6, 7, 8 and 11, t~bove-mentioned, sh~11 be compla~d with.
2:. That pri.ar to final buiZdiny and zoning inspections, ~on8iti.on Nps.
10, 13, 15 and 16 abcve-mentioned, sh~Zl be complaed with.
23. That approvsl o~ thi~ application constitutes ap~roval of the
pro..,sed r~quest ~n].y to the ~xtent ~hat it complies with the
Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code an~1 nny other applicable City
regulations. Approval does not include dny action or ~indings as
to compJ.iance or approval of the requos~ regarding ~ny otkier
applicable ordinance, regulation or requiren~ent.
4 PCE19-2S6
t:
~!~
,r..
~,
~:
doclared s,nvalid or unenforceable by the tinal judcYmentyoE an~• cour~~ of.
comp~~en~ jurisdiction, then th~.s Reaolutinn, anr.1 any approvals herein
contained~ aha11 be ~eemed nall and void.
. F~ Fjr
~ ~~}
`;
BE I9' FURTHI;R RESOLV~D that the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission /~~}
does hereby find and de~erm.ir~e that adoption of this Resolution is e~:•prc~ssly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with, each and all of ~he ~oiiditions ~.I1
: j,,
hereinabove set f~rth. Should anx such conditians, or an art th
~:
THE FOR~GOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thi: 12th day
of September, 1988.
. - .-,
A/ . I .
'~~,.:'~ :..' ~~~. y
~
~ /~ ~i~e ~l , . '~ ~~1'. L.r.: t~', .r _
~"7-~-.G.~ ~ r^
CHAIRWUMAN, ANAFiFTM CITY PLAN~T'ING CO1~f2SSI0N
ATT~ST: `
_~~c2- ! ~
-- ~,~.~'~.'.~. l./,~(-_,
SECRETARY, ANAI;EIM CITX kLANZTING ~OhfMISSION
'' STaTE OF CALZFOFNIJI )
ws
COUNZ'Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
,~T C7TX OF ANAHEIM )
:~
',' I. Edith L. HarrSs, Secretary of the t.naheim City rlanning ~~
~: Comrnission, do hereby certify that the ~are.oin ~e~ +-•
~: 7 ~ - ~olu~~.on was passed and
,. adoptQd ;~t a meeting o[ the Anaheim City Pla:ini.ng Commission held on
'~~f September 12, 1988, k~y the fo].lowing vote of the members thereoL•; ~
i;,l ;;i
r',~
~~;; AYFS: COt~fI~SIONCRS: AOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSTLLfi, Fc^,~DHA~6
t;
NOE~: CGMMISSIONERS: NONE . MC BURNEY
~" A13SRNT: COMMISSYONERS: Ii~;;~'B cc
,~n ST, MEu~E
,,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have taereunto se1: my hanrl ~his 12th day of
' Septemb~r. 1988.
,s, ,~
~ ,
;t ;
^ ~ ~:~.~E'it~ ' :
i ~~ ;
+j SECRETARY, ANAIiE.IM CITX PL~NNING CObtMISSION ;~
'~
'i
~r
i
w ., ~'
l
~
,
:~
,,
;;
~
,;
,
,,
r
1
)
` 5 PC88-256
i
~,~
„ ~ .,. . ~;~~
.,~~ ~'x~~~'.~rflr.~H ,,-:: ~ yr;.: .,,.:,.. , : . , . _ . .. _ . . .~
~ d.i
`~ ., :... ...~...~,~, .,. . •,~~ . . . . . ~ . . . . . ~_ .