PC 88-269~J~:J
:,~
~a''.
; RESOI,UTI N N p~_ 8a-$ _26
,1
; A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHETM CITX pL~~INC COI~ISSInN
' THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL
U5~ P~I~M~T N0. 3067 BE GRA2dq'ED, TN pp~T
WI3EREAS, the Anaheim CitY planning Commission did r~ceive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit ~rom
'' 1515 E. Broadwa ENRIQ~E RASURTO AND I~NTONIA BASLTRTO,
'`°' y, Anaheim, CA 92805, owner
property situated i~ the City of :'+naheim, County a of t Orange,~r St tereo~'
Cali,.ornia, described as:
THE SOUTH 170 I`EET OF THk; WEST
OF TE~I~ NORTET HALF OF LOT HALF OF THE EAST HALF
SHpWN ON A g~F ~NAHEIM EXTEIISION, AS
MAP RECOI~DED ZN BOOK 3, PAGES 16?. TO 16~
TNCLUSIvg UF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGFLES
• COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
~ii
WI~EREAS, the City Plannin (;o
the Civic Center- in the g ~ission did hold a public hearing at
noL-ice City of Anaheim on SeptQ~ber 2f, lggg a~ 7,;30
of. said public hearirig havinq been du~, ' P•m..
accordance with the pr~vis.ions of the Anaheim given as required by law and in
to hear and consider evidence ~or Munici~al Code, Chapter 18.03,
~erm:it and ~~ investiga.te and make and against said proposeci condition~l use
therewith; and £indings ~nd r.PCOmmendations in connection
WFi~R~AC, ~aid Commission, after. due inspncc.ion
study made by itse.lf and .in zt, . investig~tian an~
evidence ax~d reports offered a~ said f hea in a£ter clue cansideration of a~,l.
following f acts: ~. does find and aetermine ~p~e
l. Trat tihe '`I
use permit ~.S ~rOp~sPd use is pxop~rly onQ gor which a conditional
authoriz~c~ uy CaliPornia Government Code
wit: to permit a 536-square fo~t ~~ „ a^ection 65852.1 ~o
granny-unit wxtPi waivers of the fpllowing;
(A) S~TTpN---18 21, 05- 3 4?4 _ Miiiimum ad
-~~_y~rd set~ack,
(10 feet requ3red; 3 ~eet existinc~)
~~~ S~..T_ION 1P,21 069~, 30 - Minim m r ~
..31 4 r a~ s~_tback. ;
(25 Pget required; 3 f `l
eet existing) ,~
~C) SE~TIONS~• .05 ~g11 _ i
N'_~.in _imum n r.;ber Q~~rkincx s ~ y,t
18 . 0 0. r'i 50 . 013 2 ~-.-__p c c, s
;c,
and . 0 21 p Q6 ~. ````~
~,
Z• That the proposea use is hereby granted nursuant to Californi
Govez•nment Code Sect~zon h5852,1.
a
3• That the requested waivers (A} and (B
basiy that there are spacial air~~stances applicable to~the
y granted on the
size, shape, tupogx•aphp, loc~tion anc~ surround~ ,propert,y Such as
identical~y zoned property in the same vicinit~s which do not apply to other
of t:~e Zoning Code deprives th~ r y' ~n~ th~t strict a~•
ro erti,e~- P opertY of privileges en'o ed p~+lcatx~n
P P ~ in the idPntical zone a.ncl c~assification in the vicinit~, y other
0499r
PC88-2f~g
I ~ `;
.4~• ~ 7'~//'~~K'.F.~.~S+' ,:~J ~"~' ~{~iNr~.f.vt t:l,,..t.~i..i .~ .L~.t: ~ , ' . . ~1~~
~ . ~~
~ . ,. . . . . . .. . . ,..~: ~~,~
. ~ ~ r" P ~j~y ~
~ ~.Y
+'?~
''i
,?;
;;~
«
~t
},
~~ f~
,;;,~
-:~
,`~~
~G~
',
;;
i
,'^'~,
i:ct Cx~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~%'~~y
~~'~A
'i
4. That Che rr~quested waivor (C) is hareby denied on tha ba~is that: 3t
wa~ deletod ~n revi.s~d plans ~ubmitt~~d subsaquent to advertising.
5. That the prnposed use will not aclve~:~ely ~-ff.er.t the adjoining Znnd
u~es and tha yrowlh and deve].opsnant of L•he area in which it 3.s propasafl to be
located.
6. That the size an~ shage of tho situ proposed for the usc~ is adequaCo
to ~llow the fu11 development of the pruposed use in a man»er not detriment:al
to the particular area nor L•o LhQ peace, hoaltki, safeky and genezal we1£are of
the Cit'izens of ~l~e City of Anaheim.
7. Ttiat the granCir.g of the Conditiotial ilse Permit under. the cnnditicns
imposed, if any, will not be dQtrimantal ta the p~ace, lnealth, salety and
general welfare of tt~e Ci~izens of the Citiy of Anaheim.
8. Th~t th~ traffic qenerated by tho pro~used use wi11 not imposo an
undue burden upon the streQts an3 highways designad and improved to c:arry tl-e
CraEfic in the area.
9. That no one in~iicate~i their presence at said public heaT•ing in
opposition; and tliat. no correspondence was recei.ved iT oppc~silion ~o the
siibject petition.
~~I IFQRNIA E~iVI~P~IE:ITA~C_~~AL?TY ACT FI~IDIN : the Planning
Director ux his auchorized represent•.ative has dotermine~ that the proposed
projoct ~alls within the definitaon o' Categori.cal ExQmptions, Classes 3 and
5, as definod in ~he StaLe EIR Guid~lines a:~d is, thereEore, categor.icall,y
exempt from rhe requirement to preparn an EIh.
NUW, TFIEREF~RE, BE IT RES~LVEn that the Anahei-n City Planning
Cornmission does hereby gra:it, in p~rt, subject Peti.ti.on for Condition~I Use
PRrmit, t~pon the following conditions whic.h cire hereby found to be a
necassary preroqiiisite to che Ftopo:s~d use of thc~ suhject nroper~y in c+rcl~r
tG Zireserve the safety aiid gc~necc-1 we ~.fare of the Ci.tiz~ns of Che ~ity of
Anatxe im :
1. That prior tc i,,sunnc~ of d bu5lding por.miL, the appropri~to tr~ffi~c
signal ~s~a~smen} fee yhall b~ paid to the Ciry of Anzheim in an amount
as d~tr,rrr~ined tiy L'ily Counci.l resolution.
7.. xha~ the 1ega1 owner of subject pro~+erty shall irrevocably oEfer to
dodicace t.u tho City ot Anahe.im a strip of land forty five (45) :o~t in
widtl~ frocn the cent_orline o~ the 3trpet along Broadway Yor street
wicinning purpose~.
., That sid~walks shall be removed and/or cec~»;~:uetecl alonq Bro~dway as
roquirad by tha City t:nqineer ancl in a~c~rc:ance witts sL•andarc~ plans and
spec:flc~:::.ons on file in Lhs Off.ico of the City EnginQOr.
4. xhat a fivo (5) to~t wide p~~blic ur.ility easem~~nt shnll be clc~dicgted
al~s~g tho nor _;~ ~iro, err,y 1 inu r,~ the ~aCi3faction of the F.2ectrical
Enqi.nNe::.nq Divition. .'n .lddition, an ercroachment permit shnll be
obr.A~ined permitting thF: c~:.isting building to oncroacl~ into sai~d easement.
-2- PCSff•-2G9
~. _ _ ~~;~
. :`: ;i
~~~ ~
`I
5. T2iat as r~squirod b1 the City Tra£fic Engineer, the unpaved ares betwoen
tha driveway and patio slab to tre ~ost oE the drivoway sh:~ll be paved
wi~h asphalt or con.;retQ.
G. Th~t a f~e ~hall bo paid to the Cit;y of Anaheim for trae planting nlong
6roa~way in an amount. as dQterminea by City ~ouncil rQSOlution.
7. Tha~ Fri~i tr~ issuanc~ of a bui.lcling permit, dppropriato park and
renr~atio~ in-liou fees sliall be paid to the City of An~-hein in an
amount as cietermined by tl:o City Council,
8. That thc~ new construction aathorized by tliis resolution sha11 be servQd
by underg:ound utilitios.
9. That a11 air conditioni.ng fac:ili~ie:, and other roof and ground mount.ec~
c~quipmerit sha;.l be pr.operly shieldod from viaw, and t1iQ sound buEfered
from adjacant i•~ ;ic~eni:i.al ~,roperties.
10. That the lcagal oorner of subjecL• property shall restrict the occupancy of
the qranny un=~ Co one or twa adults, both af whom are sixty (60) years
aC age or oldex, anci furthe:more, shall record a covenant ag~iinst the
Ara~orty so restrictiny t;he occupancy of s4.id unit. Said covenanG shal~
be ~ubmit~c~d to tlrie Zoning Divisiun for ~ransmi.ttal to the City
A.ttorney's Office for reviow and approv~l prior L•o rocordation. Pioof
of roc:ordation sha11 then be submitted to the Zoning Divisian.
11. That subject properL-y shall be de~eloped substantially .in accordance
with plans dnd specifications on filo with tha City of A,naheim marked
~xtiibit No. 1.
12. 'That prior to is~uance ef a bu~.l8ing permit, or within a pc~riod of one
year fi•om the clate af this rosoluY.ion, whichover occurs f.irst, Condition
Nos. 1, 7., 4, 6, 7 and 10, above-mantioned, shall he cornplied with.
l;xtanszon;~ for further timo Co complPCe said can~iti.ons may be grdnCed
in accordance with Suct.ion 18.q3,q90 ~f Che Anah~im Municipal Cocle.
13. That prior ~o fina~ bullding and zoning inspections, Condition No3. 3,
5. 8, 9 and 11, abovo-rnQntioned, ahall be compliod wfth.
14. That approvzl of this application constitu~es approval of ~h~ proposod
req~~e;t only ~~ t2ie oxtent that. it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
2oning Code and any other applacable CiL•y reg-ilations. A~proval dot~s
not include any action or findings ~s to compliance or approval of the
raquest rpg1rdinq any other applicable or.dinance, requlation or
requi:ement.
BE I1' ~URTHER RF:SULVED hh~t th~ Anaheim City Planning Comm.isssfon
d~es herob} find and dEtermfne that ado~tion oE this Rasol+ation is expresssly
predic7tesi upan applicant'~ complfanGa wSth a~ch and all o~ the conditians
her8ix~above saL• forth. Should any sach conditians, or. any part tl:ereof, be
doclar~d xnvalid ar unenforce~ble by the fi.na~ judgment o£ a:iy caurt of
competcnt jurisdfction, thon this Rnsolut:ion, an3 any t~pprovals herein
containQd, shall bo deemed null an3 v~fci.
-3- FC86-26'1
. . . , . . . . . . .. .... . ... • .,. ,T 4 ~{~11t
~-~
~: ~1;
!~' ~ ~ . . . ~n
,s
~~:~
.~; ~
TFIE F'UREGOING RESOLUTIO~i is signed and a~prov~~d by me this 26th dKy
o.E Sep~embc~r, 1988.
~
^ _,_._ i1 ~ i' ~L ~r' ~;i' ~~ .,f (~.W: C r.~' ~_..
CEiAIRW~~MAN, ,~~NN;~IM C '.CY FLAI3NING COMMISSION
,: ~
ATTGST: ~
---..~.-~~ _~°~~~.a ~~ __ _
SECRETARY, AN~WEIM CITY PLANNT.NC COhtt~fISSIOiI
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTX OF ORANGr ) ~s.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edit:~ L. Harrzs, Sa~^etary ot the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby r_erti Py thaL• the foreqo.ing r~ssolution was passed az~d
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City P2atining Commission held on
SPptember 26, 19A8, by ~h~ Pollowing vote of the memberc thereof:
AYTS: COMMISSIQNERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CAF'JSILLQ, FFLDHAUS, IIERDST,
MC AURNEY, MESSG
NOES: COMMISSIONEkS: NONE
ABSENT: COhA~tISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNP:SS WHEktEOF, I have t~ereunto set my hana this 2Fth day of
September, 19821.
/ r ~ ` / ~ ~ •
T~ ~
SECkETARY, ANAHEIM CYTY ~'GANNING COMMISSIt~N
-9•• PCBS-269 ~
-.:'~
f:l
': R.I