PC 88-292~
. . . ' ~l?'` `~H(rL,~`}~~
R~or,v2`ION NO ~ _2 2
:
~ A RESOLUTIQN OF THE ANAHE~M CTTY PLi~A(NING COMMTSSION
THAT E~ETJTION FOR COPIAITIONAL LJSE PERMTT N0. 3074 BE GRANTED
,; WIiERE.A5, the Anah~im City PJ.annin~x Commission dfd receive a veri#ied
~: Perition for Conditional Use Pernit from ANAHETM H7LI,S PROMTNADE PAT~TNERSHIP,
y ATTN; DAVID E. SIGMONA, Z2 Starligtit, Irvine, CA 92715, owner and JTTDY p~
REXNOLAS, 6511 E. Serrano Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92807, agent for certaan real
property situatad in the City of Anaheim, County oL l1range, Si:ate ~g
Cal.ifornia, describod as:
THAT ~p1~TIpN OF S~~TIONS 7 AND 18, TOWNSHIP 4 SAUTFI~
RANGE 8 WEST I2v THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, Iti
T~IE C'!Tt OI' ANAHEtM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CAL.IFORNIF~, BEING ALSO A POk2T:I0N OF TFiE T,AND AI,LOTTED
TO PAUI,A PERAL'TA DE DOMINGUEZ, AS DESCRIHED IN THE
F7NAL nECREE OF PARTiTiON OF SAin RANCFin, WHiCH WAS
ENTERED SEPTE:dfiFR 12, 1868 iN BOOK "B" Ax PAGE 4~0 OF
JUDGMENTS C~'e' THE UISTRICT CGURT OF THE 17TH ~NATCIAI,
DISTRICT IN AND FOR LOS ANGELE~ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
LESCRIHED AS FOLLOWS:
BECiTNNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORN~R OF' TF1~ LAND
LIESCRI.BED IN THE DEED TO HALLCRAFT HUMES, RECURDEJ
OCTOBER 31, 1972 IN BOpK 1a403 PA~h' 909, OFF.ICI.~,L
RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTIiERLX LINES OF THE L.1ND
OF EiAT.LCRAFT, NORTH 58~ 44' 00" EAST 157.7I FBET TO
A TANGENT CURVE CONCAV~; SUUTFiEASTEBL'1 I~ND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1000.00 FEET; TFIENCF NORTHEASTERLY ALON'G
SAi~7 CUkVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17~ 39' 40",
I~N ARC DISTANCE OF 308, 25 FEET; THENCE TANGE2~T NORTH
~bb 23' ~0" EAST 49.04 FEET TQ AN ,ANGLE P~INT IrI
TFIE LANU DESCRI$ED TN THE llEED TO 'nT00D8INE
CORPORATION, RGC012D~D OCT.OBER 27, 1g72 IN ROOK ].039?
PAGE 868, OFFICIAL RECORDS; TH~NCE .ALONG TFIE LIATE QF
TH~ LI~Nn Og WOODBII~F NORTIi 13~ 36' 'lU" WEST 280.00
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76~ 23' 40" WEST 297.9p FF.GT;
THENCE SOCJTH 58~ A4' 00" WEST 277.92 ~EE1' ~0 A.N
A~TGLE pOIHT IN SAID L:~NI~ JF w00DIIINE; THE2ICE
CONTINiJIIJG SAUTH 58~ 44' 00" W~ST 31.00 F'EET TO A
LINE WHICH BEARS NORTIi 31° 16' Q~" WSST FROM THk.
PnINT OF BEGINi7IpTG; TfiENCE SOUTH ~1~ 16° 00" EAST
295.17 FE~T TO THE PO~I~TT OF IIEGIIvNING
G5U5r
-1-
PCaB-292
, ., .'r:'~~1
,,v,
~
^
'~.'~~
~~ 1 1
~r.\J
,. , ~l
~;
~'x:
;,`I
WHEIdLAS, ~h~ Cit~ Planning Cummiss3on r~id hold a public hearinq at
the Civic Gentar in the City of Anaheim un OctobPr 10, 1988 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having been du]y given as required by 1aw and in
accordance wxth the provisaons oE the Anaheim Municipal Codo, Chapter 18.a3,
to hc~ar and concidor evidence fQr and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigato and makQ finc?ings and recommAndations in connection
thorewith; and
WH~REAS, said Commissipn, after due inspection, investigaL~on and
study made by itself and in its beh~lf~ and aftor c~uE co~xgideration of all
evidence ~ntl r~norts otfered at said hearing, does find and determine the
followiiig facts;
? 1. That the propased use is pro~,erlg ane for which a conditiona7.
t'' use pern~it is au"tharized, bg Anaheim Municipal Cnde 5eai:ion ~8. a9.030 to wit:
r Co permih. physi.cal theranx(massage) in an existing aor.o:~ics stuclia.
,
(A) ~CTI,QN 1f3.89~0~0.,02~A¢13
and 18 Q2 0. 30•~2C~~ B
-~Qrmittipo l~~~ion of an_ "_A~u~r
Ex~~r~i.nment Business,,,_
CJse pruhibitecl within 4QG f~ of.
residential zone ancl 1~000 feet
of church or educational
f.acility; us~ ~r~posad ~ £eeti
from residential lots to thc~
north, 145 feet from uesidential
lats to the east, 214 f~et from
residenY.ia1 lots to the south
acr.oss S~rzana, and use proposzd
on ,~,~me lot as church and
educaticnal fa~ility,
Z. xhat the requestc~d wai.ver is he~reby g.rantsd on the basis that
there are spacial circumstances app7.icable tr~ Ci~e prop9rty sunh as si:~e,
shapc~, topography, location and surrounc~in~s which do nat app'ly to othez
i~enti4ally zr~ned property in the same vicinity; and that stric~:. ap,pl3catlon
of the 'Loninv Coae dsprives the proporty of privileges enj~yed by of~her
propertias in thQ iclentical zone and classificaL-ion in the vicir,ity.
3. 7~2iat *.lie proposed use is subject to tiie prr,•visions of Chapter
4.29 uf. the Anahezm Municinal Code.
~. That ~here sha11 be na interior or exter~or s~.ructural char.ges.
5. That ane licensed massaqo tecY-nician shall be amployed to
provide roassage theiapy ~o clients with spo.rts-related injuries and general
t;ierapy (i.Q, back strain, m3.grair.e, and stress).
5. That the praposQd use will not adversely affect the acijoining
x~nd usQS and the gruwth and developmenk ot the area in which it is proposec~
to be located.
-2- PC88-292
;;;;,};,~
..~
Sb,+l:. _.,i.N~3^' .a~.. _.y.
ti . .. . . . .. ~ . `;:r a!'~i~.,4 I..~~st , ~ ~ •
~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~';, ~ i l;%,~11 tv4 k ~ °
)'3 r (,r~ q~j~~i {,.r,~
~i ~ ~ ,~
,~~
;,. .
,.
, ,
4. Tha~ the size and shap~ of the site pruposect for ~he use is
adequatQ tu allow ~he fu11 doveloPment of the proposecl use irz a manner not
detrimenta:l to the particular ar~a nor to the peace, hea~~h, safety and
general welfare of. t~ie Citizens of the City ot Anaheim.
~ 5. Tha~ th~ granting of the Conuitiona]. Use Permit under ~h~
'" aonditioris imposQd, if any, wi11 not be detximental ko the peace, health,
safety and general welfarQ of ~he Citzzens of the City of Anak~eim. ~
,,
6. That ~he traffic generated by ttie praposad use will not impose
I an undue burden upon ~he streets ~3nd hiqhways designed and impruved +o carry
khe traffic in tY-e area.
7. That no one indicated their prQSence at said
f oppositiori; and that no correspondence was received ~n o ublic hearing 3n :,,
, subject petition. pposition to the
~; CALIFORNIA EPIVIR~NMENTAL OUALITY A T rTDTDIN~: That thc~ Anaheim City
~ Planninq Commxssion has revierred the propoaal ~o
(massage) in an existing aexobi~s studio on a irreguJ.arly-shaSedal therap~,
land r.ansisting ~f approximately 3~acres 1~caterl at the northeas~ parcel o~
Serrano Avenue and Nohl P.Anch :2oad, and further described as 6511 E.~ Serrana
(Aqua Duks Swim School and Physical Fitness Center
the Negative Declaration upon finding that it has~ consideredh the YNegativQ
lleclaratiun t~gether with any~ comments rer.eived during the public r.oview
~ process and fur~hez~ findi.ny or. the ~zsin o.£ i;hQ initial study and any ramroents
; received that there i~ no substantial evidonce that the p.roject will have a
; signif•icar.t effect on the anvironma»t,
NOh', THEREFORC, BE TT RESOLVLD that the Anaheim City ?laz~n3ng
Comn~ission doo~ horeby grar~t subject Petition £or Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following condz~tions which are hereby foi~nd to be a riecossary prerequisite
to the proposed us~ uf rha subject property in nrder to presorve ~he safety
and general welEare of the Citize~is of the City of Anahaim:
1. 'rhat th.e use appruved by this res5lution shall be subject to the
provisinns of Chapter 4.29 of the AnaY.eim Municipal Code pertaining t~
ma~sage ~acilit:ies.
2. Thal the proporal shal]. conply witY~ all signixig requ5.rements of. the CL-HS
(Commercial, I,imitecl - Hillsi~~) zone, unless a variance all~~wi.ng sigu
waivc~rs is approved by th~ Ci ~y Council, Planning Cnrruni~sian or Zoninq
Administra~or.
3. That subject prnperty shall be developed substantially in ~ccordance with
Plaus aud speci~icati.ons on Eile with tne City o£ Anaheim marked E:chibit
23os. 1 and 2.
4. mhat thS.s use is apprc~ed specific.~lly in conjunction with the ~ui.stir.g
aerobic3 stuc:io and that only one masseuse sha12 be employed at these
premises unless a written request for more than one massouse is made to
and ap~roveix by tY:e City Planning Com~iission.
~3 E'C88-292
~~5x~
5.
~
That approval of this a~plicatian constitutes apprnval oE ~he proposod
requast only tn the extent that it complies with the AnPil:eim Municipal
Zoning Coae and ~ny other applicahle City regulatipns. Approva~ does not
includP any ac~ion or findings a~ to compliaiice or approval of ~he
xequest regardi,~~~ any other applicable ordinance, reyulation or
::equirement.
BE IT FC':THER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City P~anning Commis~ion
does herQby E'ind and 3etermine that adoption oE this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon ap~licant's con~p2iance with eack~ and a11 af ihe condit3ons
hereinabove set f.ort:h. Sk~oulci any such condition~, or a•~y part thereof, be
declared invatid or unonforceak~le by tx~e final judgcnent oF ariy caurt ~f
competent juri;~di:ti~n, then this Resolution, and a:~y approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and vo:id.
THE FnREGOING R~SOLUTYON is signed and app.roved by me this lOth day
o£ October, 19Ei8.
. , , •~
' ~= !~' '` ~ ':~:.%":c' -C;; ~
CHAI?MAN, ~NAHEIM C~TY PLANP?.iNG CGMMISSTON
~
ATTEST.: ~ G
` ^ ~. _ / ..,~~~E~-~-
SECRETARY, ANAHEIhf Cr'~Y i~L.ANNING COMMISSION
STATE OI' t^.ALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANt;~ ) sy.
~iTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Tiarris, Secretary of th~ AnahPim City Planning Commission, do
hereby ceitify that the foregoing r.•esoluE.ion was passed and adopted at a
meetinq cf the anahaim City Planning Commission helc3 on Qc~ober 1Q, 1B8g, by
the fo].lawiz~g vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CUMMIBSIONEFtS: BOI7A~, BOYllSTUN, CARUSILL.O, FELUHAiJS, HERBS'T,
MC BURNEY, bfES5~
NO~S: COt~41ISSI0NGRS: NONE
AJ3Sk:NP: COMhfISSION~RS: NUNE
IPT WITNLSS WHEREOF, I Y~ave hereuntio set my hand thi.s Uctober dax o~
lOth, 1988.
~-~ ~ ~_- ~
.~~~._.__~~~~~____
SECRk:TARY, ~,NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMidIS5YON
_q_
PC88-292
fi