Loading...
PC 88-295w•,; ~~~~~'~~ t REyS~Li1TI0td Np. PC8H_'19~. !. ~ A RESOL,T1'.CIUN OF THE ANAiIFIM CITY PLANNING f'OMMISSION THAT PETITION F~R ItECLASSIFICATION N0. 88-89-13 HE; GRANT~D WHEREAS, tlxu Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion did receiv~ a verified petiti~n ior ReclassiEication from MAHDI NAZARI, 1032 N. Acacia St., Anaheim, CA 92a05, ~~wner, and SADEGH GHASHGHAIE, 7982 E. 3auer Road, An2heim, CA 92807, agent, ot certain real property situatQd in th~ City of Anaheim, County of. Orange, ~'ta~e of Cali£orr~ia, clescribed as follows: THE NORTH 55 FCET GF THL WEST 198 FEET OF THE WEST QNE HALF OF TFiE SOi~TIiWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST Ql1ART.ER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 `AEBT, SAN B~RNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. EXC.EPTING TIiERE~'ROM TEIAT PORTION LXING WITFiIN ACACIA STREET. ~ ~ '~ WH~REAS, the City Planninc~ Commission did hold ~. p!tblic hea.ring at the Civi.c Cent2r in t:he City of Anaheim on t~ctobQr 24, 196g, at 1:30 g.m. , n4tice of saiii public heari.ng having b~e~a duly given as 'r@quirad by lgw and ir acr.ordance wi~h the provisions of tho Ax.aheim Municipal (;ode. Chapter 1$.03, t~ hear and consider avidencP L•flr and against sai.d proposed rerlassification and r~ i.nvestigatQ and make findings and recommendatians in connection therewith; and WIiEREAS, said Commission, after du~ insp~ctian, invastigr~tion and study made by itsslf and in it~ behalf, and after due consideration of ail evidence and reporis offered at said hearing, do~s fin~i and determine the follcwinq facts: l. That ~hQ petitioner pr.~poses roclassification ot su~jec~ property f:om the RS-A-43~000 (Res•icientiallAgriculturo) 'Lone to tne RM-2900 (Fesidential, MultipZe-k'amily) or a].ess int~nse zone. 2. That the Anaheim General Plan dQSign~tes subject property for Law-•Madium Density residontia'1 land uses. ~. That the proposed ~eclas~i~Eication oF subjec~ pr~ipr~rt~~ is necessary and/or desirable for tY~e orde~r3y and propor 3evelopmen'c of thQ communit,y. 4. That the proposed reclassificaL•ion oE subject proporty does property re~lat~ ~u the zoiies and thQir permi~ted uses locally established in close proximity Lo subjecr proport.y and to Lhe zones and their permi.tted uses generally Qstablished throughout tho community. 5. Tt~at L-ho proposed reclas3iffcation of subj+act proparty r~~uiras the d~dication aiid improvement ~E abutting streets irl accordanae with tlio f:irculation £lemenr, of tne General P1an, duo to the anticzpsted increase in traf£ic which will be genQratiod by the intensification u~ 1anc1 usc~. 0524r •-1- PC 88-295 `;,~;I,1 r "I ' .~~ , ;r 'r: ...~.~:e`J ~F ~ ~ ,. , ~ l ~ , ',' ' . ~: / {,il 43~..F~ ,yrL ~ . dFIYWI~ ~'~•~RlF ; t: ~ 6. Ttlat no on~ indicatod their presence at said publ:ic hearing I in opposition; an,d tkaat no correspondence was received in op.position subject pQ~ition. to ~AS~LIFQRtTIA ENVIRONMEN'~~L City Plannin ----•---~-U~LITY .~~T FTNDI~T~C; Ttiat the Anaheim P P t~ reclassify sub;ect property from ths ~SSAiqn~U00s(Ros dential/Agr cultu a1 Z (ResidenL•ial, Multiple Fam:ily) or a less intense zone an8e ~o n~ns kM-2400 2-stor ~ y, 3•-unit (~~wnhouse style) apartment complex on a roctangularl t sY~a a , parcel of land consistiny of approximatel• p,z 1 acrc~ having a Exo taqe ~oF approximate1y 55 ~eet an the east sida af A~acia Street, beiziy loc:~tad approximatelx 600 feet north of the centerline of t,Q p~lma A.venue and fur~her described as 1032 North Acacia Street; and does hereby appr~vA the Nega~xve Declarat;ion ur,on finc;ing that it tias ~' together wi~h aay commer.ts received aur~n ~lder~d the Ney~tive Aeclr~ratior i FurLhec finding on the basis of the initial s ud P~abd1 an~~ ~view process and khat tihere is no subsrantial evidencP tha~ r t ~ommRnts rec~ived ^I significant eE'£ect on tY:e environment, he projQCt wi11 h~,y~ a ' N~~', rHLk~;~ORE. BE IT RESOLVED thas: *_h~;. ~~heim City Planr~9.ng ' ~ammiasion aoe~ hereb ~ti' doing, that Title 18 Zonin-3~ ofethe QAnaY:eimEMunRcipalS1Codetb~ arnd, by ~o exclude the ab~ve-de~Gribea pr~Per~y from the RS-A-43, Qilded to Agriculture) ~one and ~C incorporate said described Q1opert000n~o (Residentiul, Mu1tipZe--F~;nil ~Residential/ horeby found to be a necessar ZonQ upon t`~e followin y the RM-24pp property in arder to ~reserve ho~saf~ uis.ite to L•he p.roposedt se ogh SuhjQ~t of the City of Anaheim: Y~n~ genera'1 welf~re of ths Citizens 1. That a.fe~ sha11 b~ ~aid to the City og An~heim ~~r s~rc~Qt li ht.ir~ A~acia Street in an amount as determ.ined by City Councal resolution~g along 2. Thah a fee shal.t be paid to tt~e City of A:~aneim for tree planring alon Acac.ia Strget in an amount as determiri~,d by City Council rAsolution. ~J 3. That prior to issuan~P of a buildin o signal assessm~nt fee ;.hall be g P-rmit, tha appropriate traf,fic determined by Cit•y Council rQ,. paid to tho City of Ar.ahe~m in an amounh, as olution. 4. That the leyai qwnPr Q~ 5u~~g~~ pru~erty shal]. irrevocabl dedicat:o to tk~o City of. Anahei-n a strip af land f~ort five y offer ~o width irom L•lie cenL•erliye af the street Ulong Acac a~treet~ for~street ~idening purpps~s. - 5. 'rhat prior to issuance cL• a buildin to the City ar Ar.aheim for tha cost~o,tl the moval~ of~ex.istin ~e made improvemRnts along Acacia Street and reconstri~ction/~ S street st.reet, improvem~nts aL khe ultimate locatfon. °risrruction of full ~ 6. That rior ~~ F to issuauce of a building p~r~it~ a i recreation in-lieu fQes shall be PPropriate ' as detQrminod b Paxd to l:he City of Anaheim i.n dn ramaunt ~ y the ~fty Council. .~ -2- ~ °~ 30-295 ~ ~ . ~ ~. ~ ~ i'' ~ ~~[ , ~ ~ , . ~ ~ -- ~ ~ . ~ r , y L '',I ~::`~ l~ 4 7• x2~at the driveway shall re reconstructed to accommodate ten (3.0) ioot radius curb return.s. Existing broken or aracked driveways shall be remove~. and replaced as requized by the City EngineQr. 8. ?'hat subject propHrty sha11 be served by underground utilities. 9. That a p~rpetual easemen~ agreemenE; f.or a strip of land fzve (5} feet wida ~long the north property line for public utility purposes shall be su:;mitted to the Cit~r Attorney's OLfice for review ~nd approval. xhe a~proved agreement shn]1 then bo filed and recorded an the Office af the Orange County Recorder. Froof o£ sa9.d recordz~tion shall be submitted to the Zonin~ Division. "10. Tihat gates ~hall no~ be installe~. across the clriveway or in a manner whir.l~. may ~dver~~l~- affect vohicu].ar traffic in the adjacenL• public strect. InstallaL•ior~ of any gates shall contorm to th~ Engineering Division's Starxdard Plaxi No. 402 and sha.ll be subjdct to ~he r$viow ar~d apnroval of Lhe City Tz•af.fic Engineer. 13.. That a site plan, indicating satis£acto:~•y building orientation rela~ive to on-~~.te power].;r.~s, shall be submitCed to the Electrical Ut;ilities D,ivision for review and t,pproval. 12. That drainzg~ Q~ subject property shall be disposed oF. in a maraner satisfactory t~ the Cihy Engineer. 13. That trash storage areas shall bo provided and maintained in a location aece~,Cable to tk~e Stre&t Maintenance and Sanitation Division and in accQrdance with z-ppro~~eQ pians on filc~ with said Divisi.on. Y4. That all air conditxoziinc7 Facili~iQS ancl other roof and ground-mounted equzpment shall be prop~rly shielded from viow, and the sound buffert~d ~rom adjacent residential Iaropertias. ~5. That the propasa~l shall comnly witb all signing requirements of thc~ RM-240U "Rosidential, Mul~iple Fam~.~y'~ Zone, ianle$s a variance allowing sign waivers is app~uvc~ci by the City Couricil, Planning Commis~ion or Zoning Administratar. ~; lb, Thnt the on-site landscaping shall be maintained in ~ompliance with CiL•y stAndards. ~.~ 17. That pri.or l:o issu~nne of a bui.lding per.mit-, thA legal property owner shall prQ~arF and recorci an unsubordinatecl covc~nan~ limitirlg accupancy of each anar.i:ment unit to ~io moro than two 2 ( ) p~rsons (other than t;hildren undor the a3e of. two (2) yedrs) pet bedroom. Said limitation sha11 be ittcluc~ed in each lea.se/renC~al agr~ement. A copy of the covenan~ shall be submitted to and ap~roved by the City Attorney pri~r to r.ecordation. A copy ot the recor.ded covenan~ shall be £•urnished tu the Zcning Division. ~~- PC 88-295 i 1~ ~ ~\ ~a""'W ~` . 18. That a cover,ant shall be recorded agreeing to providz L•he renter of each dwelling uniL with writi:en i~zforma~ion obtained from the Schopl DistricL(s) per~aining to possible avercrowdod conditions and busing s~atus of ~~ie SCt1Qp~(,) sorvzng rhe dwel:ling unit. 19. That subject property shall be developed subsL•antially in accoraance with plans and spoczficati~ns on iile with the City of Anaiieim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2e 20. That pri~r to .intr~duct.i.on of an or.dinance razoning subject proper~y, or withi.n a period of one year Erom the date of this resoluti~u whiche3vor occu*:s f:irst, Coziditi~ii Nos. 4 and 9, above-ment.i.oned, shall 1~~ cdmplied Wxth• Extensions Por fur~her time to cumplete said conclitions may be grantQd in accordanca wit;~ Section 18.03.Q9fl af the Anaheim Municipal Cocle. t 21. That prior to xssuance oF a buildin 6, 10, 11, 17 and 18 g parmit, Conc?ition~ Nas. J., 2, 3, 5, . above-mentionad, shall be complied with. Exter~sions for further time to complete said condiCians may be gr~n'ced in ', accordanca with Section 18.03.090 of the Anatieim Municipal Coc1e. ti 22. Tk~at prior to final building and zoning inspections, Gondition N~s. 7, A, 12, ~3, 1~t, and 19, above-menti~ned, shall bQ complied with. ' 73. TYlat appxoval of this applicaF.ion r,onsritutQS approval of the proposed request onlg to the extent that it ~:omglies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable C'.ity r.egulatzons. Approval doss not inr~lude am ,~ acti~n or tindings as t~~ comp],iazxce or approval oE tha roque~t regarding any otY~er applicable ora'.inance, regula~ion or requirement. BE IT F'URTFiER EtESOLVEll that ~he Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion doe~ hereby find and determine L•hat adop~3on of this :te~soluti.on is ~xpressly nredicated ugcn applicant'~ compliance wiCh each and all of th~, conditions hereinah~y~ ~e~, for4h. Should any such conditi~~ns, ~i• any ~art thareof, be ileclared invalid or t~nenforceable by the final judyrne~nt o£ ang court o~ competen~ jurisdictipn, then this Resolution, anrl a.ny approvals herein containc~d, shall k~e deemod null ar~d void. TFIE F'OREGOTNG RESOLUTION is signed anc~ approved by me this 24th day of Octnb~r, 1988. , .. ., , , .._._~„_, '-~~.. ___. CHAIRWCMI~.N, 7~NAFiEI~_ M^ITy pL:,rr~arNG CO SS IID4f p~ ~, : : ATT~ST: . ~ _ ~ SECRETAR , ANA,HLIM f;3TY PLANN'ING (.0' MMISSION _,~ _ pC a8-295 ~~,;„ ~s u..w.~. V,~.~ . ~ .. . . . .. 1 . {"~ ~4 t' . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ p }'~+S ~Y' M,' _ ~ , '~.~ ~~ 'k `,ri y! , . ,....~.;F. '~ } STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORA,.vGE ) ss . ', ',~;t C'TT.Y 0~' ANAIiEIM ) I, Edith L. Harris, Ser,ret.ary of the Anaheim City Planninc~ ~ Commission, do heraby certi.fy that the foregoing resolutian waa passed an~ -:+ µ'w %:~~ adopted at a-neeting ot i:he Anahe.i.m City Planning Commission helcY i~n October '~;F 24, 1988, hy the followinc~ -~ate af the membErs thereof: ;:~'. I~YES: COMMIISSIONERS: BOUA~, BOYDSTUN, CARUSTLLG, H~RBST, MC ~3URNEY, MESSE NOES: COb4v1TSSI0NERS: NONE ~'' s° s; AaSENT: COMt~SISSIOPIEk~: FELDHAU5 ~~ er ~, ~ ~~ ~ ; ,~ IN F1ITDIESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my ha:nd this 24th d~,y of ,~; Octobei•, 192F3. ~,, ~ ~ '' S ~ ~ { t ,r i il ~,.; -~ ~ ~ _ `.;: '= SECRETARY, ANAIiEINi CIT~' PLAI~FIiII1G COMMISSION y%i , ° `i ;;a i;'~: .~ ~ ~ . ~,'~'.ri ~: ~~ ,1 U~ ?~ , i ~, ~ . . ,~,.'y6 ~`: ; {: i? 3 }.~ 1 '' i', '~, ~ ~ ' a i ~~~ . ' • ~r ~ ~;~ , `;.! ~ ,I.~i ~:~-. ~ . ~~ 'l, . . ~';i,j + i,' I i'~~ i " ~J~ ~ ~. I`,j l ~ iN ~ ~S .'t i.~ .. . . `t~: ~ ~ ' f' i . . . . ...t._.~..~ A h•.~ ~ ;~I;S ~ ' _~ ' PC 88-295 ;r~ ,;~ ~ ~ ; f~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ,,~~ , _ ~ ~~ ' , ;~ ~ • .~ a ;,.~ --__ ~ . . . . ~ . . . . . .. . . . . _..'~_r~~~cdf~