PC 88-297~
~ ~
~i
~~~~.~_.~8 _~
A RESOLUxION OF THE ANAfIEIM CITY pLI~NNING COMMISuION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3079 BE DENIED
WEIEREAS, th.e Anaheim C3~:y Planniiig Comm.ission did rocaive a
verified PetiCion for Conditior.al U5e Fermit from JAMES ALLEN CANNADAY and
RETTX HETE CANNADAY, 512 L2.s Riendas Drzve~ Fullerton, CA 92635, ownsrs of
certain rNaZ property situated in t?~e City uf Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described ag:
THS SOUTHERLY 70 FEGT OF TFiN; NORTHERLX 120 F'EET OF
THE EASTERLY ~56.50 FfiET OF THAT F~ORTION OF VIN~;YARA
LOT H5, AS SHOWN ON A MAP TI3EREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4,
A'r PAGL•'S 629 AP~D 63C OF DE~DS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELE5
COUNTY, CALIF'ORP'IIA, Ll'ING SOUTHERLX OI' THF. SOUTHERLY
SOUNDARY, l~NU THE EASTFE:LY EXTENS.LON THEREOF, OB'
TRAC'r NU. 4Q6, AS ~HOP~N ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN
IIOOK 1h, AT PA~n 7 4F MISC~LLI~NEAUS MAPS, RlECOF2DS 0~'
SATD ~:~At7GE COUNTY.
WIiERF.AS, tYie City P1anr.ing Commission did hold a public hearing
at tFie Civic C~antA.r in the Ci.ty of. Anaheim on October 24, 1988 At 1:30 p.m.,
noticQ of saiQ publzc hearing having beQn duly givan a~ required by law and in
accordance wi~h l:he provisio:is of ttle Anzheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consi-1er Qvidgnce for and against said pro~oaed conditional use
pormit and L•o in~~t~stigate and make findi.ngs a:~d recommei~datxon~ in connection
therewithr an~i
'AFIEREAS, said Commission, aftor aue inspection, inve~tiqation
and study m;acle b,y i.ksalf and in iL•s beha.2f, ~nd aftsr duo consideral:ion of a12
eviaence ar.d rQporis offered at said }~earinq, does find and determine ths
following far::s:
l. That the proposed use is proper]y one for whic'a a
conditi~nal use permit is aut}iorireci by Californfa Government Code Sec:tion
65852.1 to wit: to construct a 634-squ~re foot "modula:" granny unit wfth
waiver oE ~'he follnwing:
;iF._~I 4~?~~2~ ,9~.19 ~Q - M.i n.,2 ~u1! ~~~Ys~~~~.t~s~~
(~.~~~ roquired; 1Q
£ee~ proposod).
2. T}:at tha requested waiver iss hereby dc~nfed on tho basis
Cht~t t2ie:;o are no sper_ial circumst~nces appl~~ahle to the property such as
sizQ, Rhape, =~pography, .~ocation 4r surroundings, which do not apply to otlt~r
i~antically aonod pro~erties in tho vlc:inity; and that strict application af
the Zo~ing ~oda doen not depriva khe property of privi].~ges enjoyed by other
Nroparties undar i@entical aoning classificution :n tlia vicinity.
0530r -1- PC Ba-297
F
i;;j
~ ~ ~r r:~~lJ
~
~
2. That L•he pr.oposed us9 is hereby den3od on tho basis that
~he original intenC of the gr~nny unit Fruueduro was to pr.ovide housing for an
elderly family membor and tho in~ended use of this p~rticular granny unit is
not Xor a family mamb~ar and is to be uso as a rantal unit and tnat i~lannfng
Commission cansi~7ers thQ proposal a commerciHl venture in the single-family
rosident3al area, ~rhich wnuZd adv~rsely AEfect tho adjoining land uses and the
grow~~h and development oL• tha tarea in which it is proposed to bQ locaCed.
4. That th~ si.ze ~ind shape of tho site proposed for. the uag as
nat adequate Co allow tho full devel•~pment of the proposed uso in z~ manneri not
detr.mental t.o the par~icular area nar lo the poace, ht~alth, gaiety and
generol wol~are of the Citizens of the CiCy of Anahaim.
5. Thaf the granting of: l:he Canditional Uye Permi~ will be
datrimental to the peac~, haalth, safoty and general welfare o~ the Citizena
aF thR City of A,naheim.
6. That th~ traf.fic gAnerated by tho proposoc~ use will fmposa
an un~uo burc3en upon the streats and high~+~ays designed and improvec: t4 car, y
the traffic in the ~.rea.
7. That four (4) persons indicate~! theix presence at said
public hQaring ixi o~position; anci that no c4rz~espondence w;.a received in
opposition t~~ the sulaject petition.
CAL~FORNIA ~Ny~R~NMENTAL _QUA~,TTY ACT ~I'I~pING: Tho Planning
DixerCOr or his authorSzed reprosentative has determined Chat the proposed
project falls within tha definition of Catogorical Exempti~ns, C].as~ 3 and 5,
as defined in tho State EIR Guidolinos and is, therefore, caCegorically
exempt irom the r~guiremenG i:o prepare an ~IR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED th^: th~ Anahexrn Citv Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject P?t1CS~GA for CondiL•ional Use Permit, om
the hasis of the aforomentiotied finflings.
TFIE FOREGOING RESOLIITIUN is signgd and approv~d by m~ ttiis 24th
day of Uct.ober, 7.98~.
,
~:
---- ~/~~ ~'.:%.f.;~_ ~F ,i" ~~...:C~'..~._
CH~,IRWOi4Ar7,. A,NAHGIFS CITY PLANNING C01~4~lISSLQN
,i'
ATTES'P: ~ ~ ,~ ~
------- v ~ / L' ~ -- , ._..~
S~GR£TAR , ANAIIEIM CITY PLIW:IING COr4/.ISSIUN
-2-
PC 88-297
;` :
~r r,~,'~
''!,~ ~r
,75C "~''~vi?l1 r.~ i:,';, . . .. . ~. , ~ ~ . . . ~..
~
STA'PE OF CA[~SFORNII~ )
COUNTY Oi ORANGE ) ~~. ~~~
CITX UF ANAI3~IM ) ~,.,r
I, ~dith I~. H~rris, Secretary of ~he J~naheim City Planning '~;;
Commission, do hereby certiify thrat thR foregoiug resc+lution was passed and ,''S,~
adopted at a meeting of the AnaheSm Ci+:y Planning Cammission held on Or.tober '~i~
29, 1988, by the f.ollowinq vate of Lhe memb~xs tnoreof': '~f
AYwSi COMMISSIONER~: ROUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSIILT.O, IiERBST,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES: COhIIdISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CQMMYSSIONGRS: FELDFIAUS
:; ,7
;;:
}, ` IN Wi7'NESS WHET.2EOF, ~ have her~unto set my hand this 29.Ch day
~? of October, 1988.
~~ .
~' ~ -- / ~ `
'~ SFCRETARY, ANAIiETM CITY PLANNIIJG ~02~STSSION
,
,,, ,,f , ,~,~~L,{
5 y~
r~ Jr
. ' ~ ;;,. ~:y:~{~1~.
, ~ ~~
~ +~
. .. f~~~'.~~f~
R~
~ ~rl~~
,li
;,;
~~
';~
'~1
~
J'.:
'*/
;~'~
~ \
,'q~
i
,1
r''~
~a'
r~ti
PC 88-297
i, i
; __
~ :1
1
~ ,.,
~IJ
!i•'r~..,.~>r~y: